Tanmay's response demonstrates a basic understanding of the 5S methodology but lacks depth and clarity compared to the benchmark response. He mentions the steps of sorting and setting in order but does not clearly articulate the full process or the importance of each step. His explanation is somewhat disorganized and misses the emphasis on creating a culture of discipline and continuous improvement, which is crucial for sustaining the 5S methodology. A more structured and detailed response, similar to the benchmark, would have been more effective.