--
-- Host: intrvuzproddb.mysql.database.azure.com    Database: intrvuz
-- ------------------------------------------------------


--
-- Table structure for table `admin_companies`
--

CREATE TABLE `admin_companies` (
  `id` int NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT,
  `adminId` int NOT NULL,
  `companyName` varchar(150) COLLATE utf8mb4_general_ci NOT NULL,
  `isAdminCompany` tinyint NOT NULL DEFAULT '0',
  `createdBy` int NOT NULL,
  `updatedBy` int NOT NULL,
  `created` datetime NOT NULL DEFAULT CURRENT_TIMESTAMP,
  `modified` datetime NOT NULL DEFAULT CURRENT_TIMESTAMP ON UPDATE CURRENT_TIMESTAMP,
  PRIMARY KEY (`id`),
  KEY `idx_admincompany_adminid` (`adminId`)
) ENGINE=InnoDB AUTO_INCREMENT=118 DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8mb4 COLLATE=utf8mb4_general_ci;

--
-- Dumping data for table `admin_companies`
--

INSERT INTO `admin_companies` VALUES (1,1,'Adzip Technologies',1,1,0,'2023-08-14 03:53:24','2024-12-29 11:26:21'),(3,2,'Adzip',1,2,0,'2023-08-14 08:14:58','2023-08-14 08:14:58'),(7,3,'Vision Beyond',1,3,0,'2023-08-15 08:11:07','2023-08-15 08:11:07'),(10,4,'VBeyond Corporation',1,4,0,'2023-08-16 05:41:05','2023-08-16 05:41:05'),(13,5,'Artech Infosystems',1,5,0,'2023-08-22 07:25:35','2023-08-22 07:25:35'),(14,12,'HCL Technologies',1,12,0,'2023-08-23 02:05:32','2023-08-23 02:05:32'),(19,13,'First Call HR',1,13,0,'2023-08-23 06:58:09','2023-08-23 06:58:09'),(21,14,'Fialetechnology',1,14,0,'2023-08-24 12:10:10','2023-08-24 12:10:10'),(23,15,'Adzip',1,15,0,'2023-09-26 03:31:18','2023-09-26 03:31:18'),(24,1,'Genpact',0,0,0,'2023-10-25 23:46:53','2023-10-25 23:46:53'),(25,1,'Oracle',0,0,0,'2023-10-27 04:54:37','2023-10-27 04:54:37'),(26,1,'Accenture',0,0,0,'2023-11-08 02:16:07','2023-11-08 02:16:07'),(27,1,'GoKloud',0,0,0,'2023-11-08 06:28:00','2023-11-08 06:28:00'),(28,1,'Yes it labs',0,0,0,'2023-11-09 07:16:06','2023-11-09 07:16:06'),(29,1,'test',0,0,0,'2023-11-09 11:21:38','2023-11-09 11:21:38'),(30,16,'GoKloud',1,16,0,'2023-11-09 11:41:14','2023-11-09 11:41:14'),(31,1,'Google',0,0,0,'2023-11-23 05:50:42','2023-11-23 05:50:42'),(32,17,'ECS India',1,17,0,'2023-11-23 06:54:40','2023-11-23 06:54:40'),(33,17,'PHARMACOVIGILANCE',0,0,0,'2023-11-23 16:30:20','2023-11-23 16:30:20'),(34,18,'Gradient M',1,18,0,'2023-11-24 03:49:46','2023-11-24 03:49:46'),(35,19,'Gradient M',1,19,0,'2023-11-24 04:05:10','2023-11-24 04:05:10'),(36,20,'VBeyond Corporation',1,20,0,'2023-11-24 23:59:52','2023-11-24 23:59:52'),(37,21,'Co-Workers Technologies',1,21,0,'2023-11-25 01:10:23','2023-11-25 01:10:23'),(38,22,'Gradient M',1,22,0,'2023-12-12 23:04:55','2023-12-12 23:04:55'),(39,33,'test',1,33,0,'2023-12-13 06:14:18','2023-12-13 06:14:18'),(40,34,'Milesweb',1,34,0,'2023-12-13 07:02:43','2023-12-13 07:02:43'),(41,18,'GradientM',0,0,0,'2023-12-14 04:12:23','2023-12-14 04:12:23'),(42,18,'Merkle',0,0,0,'2024-01-17 10:25:17','2024-01-17 10:25:17'),(43,35,'Meraqui',1,35,0,'2024-02-09 05:39:32','2024-02-09 05:39:32'),(44,36,'First Mile',1,36,0,'2024-02-09 06:23:18','2024-02-09 06:23:18'),(45,1,'Wipro',0,0,0,'2024-02-09 06:37:57','2024-02-09 06:37:57'),(46,37,'IBS Gurgaon',1,37,0,'2024-02-16 15:11:49','2024-02-16 15:11:49'),(47,38,'IBS Gurgaon',1,38,0,'2024-02-17 04:33:26','2024-02-17 04:33:26'),(48,39,'boho baubles',1,39,0,'2024-02-18 10:04:02','2024-02-18 10:04:02'),(49,40,'IBS Gurgaon',1,40,0,'2024-02-19 12:58:06','2024-02-19 12:58:06'),(50,40,'Apple',0,0,0,'2024-02-19 13:09:27','2024-02-19 13:09:27'),(51,41,'UpGrad',1,41,0,'2024-02-22 06:49:18','2024-02-22 06:49:18'),(52,42,'Shevalues',1,42,0,'2024-02-28 12:27:33','2024-02-28 12:27:33'),(53,43,'Vega',1,43,0,'2024-03-05 08:58:52','2024-03-05 08:58:52'),(54,44,'Inmentus Solution',1,44,0,'2024-03-09 06:36:22','2024-03-09 06:36:22'),(55,45,'Logic Overdrive',1,45,0,'2024-03-18 11:38:57','2024-03-18 11:38:57'),(56,45,'Logic Overdrive INC',0,0,0,'2024-03-18 13:34:41','2024-03-18 13:34:41'),(57,46,'ABCDE',1,46,0,'2024-03-19 10:13:42','2024-03-19 10:13:42'),(58,47,'xyz',1,47,0,'2024-03-20 06:26:25','2024-03-20 06:26:25'),(59,48,'ABCDE',1,48,0,'2024-03-22 08:35:08','2024-03-22 08:35:08'),(60,49,'Sunlife',1,49,0,'2024-03-28 02:50:44','2024-03-28 02:50:44'),(61,50,'Sunlife',1,50,0,'2024-03-28 03:02:14','2024-03-28 03:02:14'),(62,51,'Noah Healthcare',1,51,0,'2024-03-28 11:53:25','2024-03-28 11:53:25'),(63,52,'Hyperleap AI',1,52,0,'2024-04-01 11:00:04','2024-04-01 11:00:04'),(64,53,'Intrvuz',1,53,0,'2024-04-01 15:30:48','2024-04-01 15:30:48'),(65,54,'Intellinez',1,54,0,'2024-04-03 05:07:15','2024-04-03 05:07:15'),(66,57,'Cosmospumps',1,57,0,'2024-04-09 10:54:20','2024-04-09 10:54:20'),(67,60,'Hire Pedia',1,60,0,'2024-04-10 05:24:49','2024-04-10 05:24:49'),(68,62,'Private',1,62,0,'2024-04-20 04:35:45','2024-04-20 04:35:45'),(69,63,'Element Technologies',1,63,0,'2024-04-23 06:59:37','2024-04-23 06:59:37'),(70,67,'Kynthr',1,67,0,'2024-05-06 15:53:01','2024-05-06 15:53:01'),(71,68,'testing',1,68,0,'2024-05-15 13:38:06','2024-05-15 13:38:06'),(72,69,'Kingson Tech',1,69,0,'2024-05-23 12:32:32','2024-05-23 12:32:32'),(73,70,'shree mahadev photoshop',1,70,0,'2024-05-24 20:22:11','2024-05-24 20:22:11'),(74,71,'TechDilation',1,71,0,'2024-05-25 04:59:36','2024-05-25 04:59:36'),(75,73,'Royal Enfield',1,73,0,'2024-06-03 10:26:38','2024-06-03 10:26:38'),(76,74,'Adzip',1,74,0,'2024-07-18 17:32:53','2024-07-18 17:32:53'),(77,75,'Talent Schools',1,75,0,'2024-07-20 17:21:17','2024-11-20 16:48:06'),(78,76,'Adzip Technologies',1,76,0,'2024-07-21 02:57:07','2024-07-21 02:57:07'),(79,76,'LTI Mindtree',0,0,0,'2024-07-21 03:16:45','2024-07-21 03:16:45'),(80,1,'Lingaya\'s University',0,0,0,'2024-07-22 06:53:10','2024-07-22 06:53:10'),(81,77,'Sharda University',1,77,0,'2024-07-28 10:45:15','2024-07-28 10:45:15'),(82,77,'Wipro',0,0,0,'2024-07-28 10:52:38','2024-07-28 10:52:38'),(83,77,'Tech Mahindra',0,0,0,'2024-07-28 11:13:13','2024-07-28 11:13:13'),(84,77,'HCL',0,0,0,'2024-07-28 11:15:20','2024-07-28 11:15:20'),(85,77,'Infosys',0,0,0,'2024-07-28 11:17:23','2024-07-28 11:17:23'),(86,78,'Levo',1,78,0,'2024-08-05 12:13:18','2024-08-05 12:13:18'),(87,79,'Tech Jar',1,79,0,'2024-08-23 09:58:13','2024-08-23 09:58:13'),(88,81,'Magic EdTech',1,81,0,'2024-09-09 05:55:48','2024-09-09 05:55:48'),(89,83,'Naxnova',1,83,0,'2024-09-12 11:03:46','2024-09-12 11:03:46'),(90,75,'SS&C Technologies Holdings Inc',0,0,0,'2024-09-18 11:10:59','2024-09-18 11:10:59'),(91,1,'SS&C Technologies Holdings Inc',0,0,0,'2024-09-20 11:40:55','2024-09-20 11:40:55'),(92,85,'Adzip Technologies',1,85,0,'2024-10-14 17:05:48','2024-10-14 17:05:48'),(93,86,'MindSprint',1,86,0,'2024-10-19 03:18:08','2024-10-19 03:18:08'),(94,87,'MindSprint',1,87,0,'2024-10-21 03:30:10','2024-10-21 03:30:10'),(95,88,'Tech Jar',1,88,0,'2024-11-07 04:21:24','2024-11-07 04:21:24'),(96,75,'EY',0,0,0,'2024-11-20 16:34:03','2024-11-20 16:34:03'),(97,75,'Institute of Product Leadership',0,0,0,'2024-11-20 16:42:44','2024-11-20 16:42:44'),(98,90,'Adzip Technologies',1,90,0,'2024-12-20 11:18:05','2024-12-20 11:18:05'),(99,91,'Adzip Technologies',1,91,0,'2024-12-29 11:18:28','2024-12-29 11:18:28'),(100,93,'TECHJAR TECHNOLOGIES PRIVATE LIMITED',1,93,0,'2025-01-09 05:33:30','2025-01-09 05:33:30'),(101,94,'Bandiz Technoz',1,94,0,'2025-02-09 11:58:42','2025-02-09 11:58:42'),(102,94,'Tech Mahindra',0,0,0,'2025-02-09 12:08:44','2025-02-09 12:08:44'),(103,95,'Gradient M',1,95,0,'2025-03-09 06:13:29','2025-03-09 06:13:29'),(104,96,'Verticurl(a WPP Company)',1,96,0,'2025-03-24 14:59:49','2025-03-24 14:59:49'),(105,97,'Star Health Insurance',1,97,0,'2025-04-02 07:06:02','2025-04-02 07:06:02'),(106,98,'UnsaidTalks',1,98,0,'2025-04-08 07:46:00','2025-04-08 07:46:00'),(107,99,'Btrack India Private Limited',1,99,0,'2025-04-09 09:01:48','2025-04-09 09:01:48'),(108,100,'Innovatiview',1,100,0,'2025-04-23 12:44:24','2025-04-23 12:44:24'),(109,101,'Macgence',1,101,0,'2025-04-24 16:33:55','2025-04-24 16:33:55'),(110,102,'Autowiz',1,102,0,'2025-04-28 10:07:32','2025-04-28 10:07:32'),(111,103,'Sarvodaya',1,103,0,'2025-05-08 05:24:17','2025-05-08 05:24:17'),(112,104,'8 Directions security services',1,104,0,'2025-05-25 07:43:56','2025-05-25 07:43:56'),(113,105,'Vividhta',1,105,0,'2025-06-21 06:25:38','2025-06-21 06:25:38'),(114,105,'Imprint Information Technology Pvt. Ltd',0,0,0,'2025-06-21 07:05:17','2025-06-21 07:05:17'),(115,106,'Nive',1,106,0,'2025-07-04 06:59:23','2025-07-04 06:59:23'),(116,111,'Nive',1,111,0,'2025-07-04 07:01:15','2025-07-04 07:01:15'),(117,113,'Innovatiview',1,113,0,'2025-07-15 17:37:28','2025-07-15 17:37:28');

--
-- Table structure for table `admin_resume_weightage_r`
--

CREATE TABLE `admin_resume_weightage_r` (
  `id` int NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT,
  `adminId` int NOT NULL,
  `title` varchar(100) CHARACTER SET utf8mb4 COLLATE utf8mb4_general_ci NOT NULL,
  `weightage` int NOT NULL COMMENT 'This weightage for, if JD is available',
  PRIMARY KEY (`id`)
) ENGINE=InnoDB AUTO_INCREMENT=1121 DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8mb4 COLLATE=utf8mb4_general_ci;

--
-- Dumping data for table `admin_resume_weightage_r`
--

INSERT INTO `admin_resume_weightage_r` VALUES (1,1,'hard_skills_wt',80),(2,1,'skills_knowledge_wt',20),(3,1,'secondary_skills_wt',30),(4,1,'primary_skills_wt',70),(5,1,'Certifications',5),(6,1,'Key Competencies',5),(7,1,'Domain/Industry',10),(8,1,'Skills/Knowledge',60),(9,1,'Education Qualification',5),(10,1,'Years of Experience',5),(11,1,'Roles & Responsibilities',10),(12,3,'hard_skills_wt',80),(13,3,'skills_knowledge_wt',20),(14,3,'secondary_skills_wt',30),(15,3,'primary_skills_wt',70),(16,3,'Certifications',5),(17,3,'Key Competencies',5),(18,3,'Domain/Industry',10),(19,3,'Skills/Knowledge',60),(20,3,'Education Qualification',5),(21,3,'Years of Experience',5),(22,3,'Roles & Responsibilities',10),(23,4,'hard_skills_wt',80),(24,4,'skills_knowledge_wt',20),(25,4,'secondary_skills_wt',30),(26,4,'primary_skills_wt',70),(27,4,'Certifications',5),(28,4,'Key Competencies',5),(29,4,'Domain/Industry',10),(30,4,'Skills/Knowledge',60),(31,4,'Education Qualification',5),(32,4,'Years of Experience',5),(33,4,'Roles & Responsibilities',10),(34,5,'hard_skills_wt',80),(35,5,'skills_knowledge_wt',20),(36,5,'secondary_skills_wt',30),(37,5,'primary_skills_wt',70),(38,5,'Certifications',5),(39,5,'Key Competencies',5),(40,5,'Domain/Industry',10),(41,5,'Skills/Knowledge',60),(42,5,'Education Qualification',5),(43,5,'Years of Experience',5),(44,5,'Roles & Responsibilities',10),(45,12,'hard_skills_wt',80),(46,12,'skills_knowledge_wt',20),(47,12,'secondary_skills_wt',30),(48,12,'primary_skills_wt',70),(49,12,'Certifications',5),(50,12,'Key Competencies',5),(51,12,'Domain/Industry',10),(52,12,'Skills/Knowledge',60),(53,12,'Education Qualification',5),(54,12,'Years of Experience',5),(55,12,'Roles & Responsibilities',10),(56,13,'hard_skills_wt',80),(57,13,'skills_knowledge_wt',20),(58,13,'secondary_skills_wt',30),(59,13,'primary_skills_wt',70),(60,13,'Certifications',5),(61,13,'Key Competencies',5),(62,13,'Domain/Industry',10),(63,13,'Skills/Knowledge',60),(64,13,'Education Qualification',5),(65,13,'Years of Experience',5),(66,13,'Roles & Responsibilities',10),(67,14,'hard_skills_wt',80),(68,14,'skills_knowledge_wt',20),(69,14,'secondary_skills_wt',30),(70,14,'primary_skills_wt',70),(71,14,'Certifications',5),(72,14,'Key Competencies',5),(73,14,'Domain/Industry',10),(74,14,'Skills/Knowledge',60),(75,14,'Education Qualification',5),(76,14,'Years of Experience',5),(77,14,'Roles & Responsibilities',10),(78,15,'hard_skills_wt',80),(79,15,'skills_knowledge_wt',20),(80,15,'secondary_skills_wt',30),(81,15,'primary_skills_wt',70),(82,15,'Certifications',5),(83,15,'Key Competencies',5),(84,15,'Domain/Industry',10),(85,15,'Skills/Knowledge',60),(86,15,'Education Qualification',5),(87,15,'Years of Experience',5),(88,15,'Roles & Responsibilities',10),(89,16,'hard_skills_wt',80),(90,16,'skills_knowledge_wt',20),(91,16,'secondary_skills_wt',30),(92,16,'primary_skills_wt',70),(93,16,'Certifications',5),(94,16,'Key Competencies',5),(95,16,'Domain/Industry',10),(96,16,'Skills/Knowledge',60),(97,16,'Education Qualification',5),(98,16,'Years of Experience',5),(99,16,'Roles & Responsibilities',10),(100,17,'hard_skills_wt',80),(101,17,'skills_knowledge_wt',20),(102,17,'secondary_skills_wt',30),(103,17,'primary_skills_wt',70),(104,17,'Certifications',5),(105,17,'Key Competencies',5),(106,17,'Domain/Industry',10),(107,17,'Skills/Knowledge',60),(108,17,'Education Qualification',5),(109,17,'Years of Experience',5),(110,17,'Roles & Responsibilities',10),(111,18,'hard_skills_wt',80),(112,18,'skills_knowledge_wt',20),(113,18,'secondary_skills_wt',30),(114,18,'primary_skills_wt',70),(115,18,'Certifications',5),(116,18,'Key Competencies',5),(117,18,'Domain/Industry',10),(118,18,'Skills/Knowledge',60),(119,18,'Education Qualification',5),(120,18,'Years of Experience',5),(121,18,'Roles & Responsibilities',10),(122,19,'hard_skills_wt',80),(123,19,'skills_knowledge_wt',20),(124,19,'secondary_skills_wt',30),(125,19,'primary_skills_wt',70),(126,19,'Certifications',5),(127,19,'Key Competencies',5),(128,19,'Domain/Industry',10),(129,19,'Skills/Knowledge',60),(130,19,'Education Qualification',5),(131,19,'Years of Experience',5),(132,19,'Roles & Responsibilities',10),(133,20,'hard_skills_wt',80),(134,20,'skills_knowledge_wt',20),(135,20,'secondary_skills_wt',30),(136,20,'primary_skills_wt',70),(137,20,'Certifications',5),(138,20,'Key Competencies',5),(139,20,'Domain/Industry',10),(140,20,'Skills/Knowledge',60),(141,20,'Education Qualification',5),(142,20,'Years of Experience',5),(143,20,'Roles & Responsibilities',10),(144,21,'hard_skills_wt',80),(145,21,'skills_knowledge_wt',20),(146,21,'secondary_skills_wt',30),(147,21,'primary_skills_wt',70),(148,21,'Certifications',5),(149,21,'Key Competencies',5),(150,21,'Domain/Industry',10),(151,21,'Skills/Knowledge',60),(152,21,'Education Qualification',5),(153,21,'Years of Experience',5),(154,21,'Roles & Responsibilities',10),(155,22,'hard_skills_wt',80),(156,22,'skills_knowledge_wt',20),(157,22,'secondary_skills_wt',30),(158,22,'primary_skills_wt',70),(159,22,'Certifications',5),(160,22,'Key Competencies',5),(161,22,'Domain/Industry',10),(162,22,'Skills/Knowledge',60),(163,22,'Education Qualification',5),(164,22,'Years of Experience',5),(165,22,'Roles & Responsibilities',10),(166,33,'hard_skills_wt',80),(167,33,'skills_knowledge_wt',20),(168,33,'secondary_skills_wt',30),(169,33,'primary_skills_wt',70),(170,33,'Certifications',5),(171,33,'Key Competencies',5),(172,33,'Domain/Industry',10),(173,33,'Skills/Knowledge',60),(174,33,'Education Qualification',5),(175,33,'Years of Experience',5),(176,33,'Roles & Responsibilities',10),(177,34,'hard_skills_wt',80),(178,34,'skills_knowledge_wt',20),(179,34,'secondary_skills_wt',30),(180,34,'primary_skills_wt',70),(181,34,'Certifications',5),(182,34,'Key Competencies',5),(183,34,'Domain/Industry',10),(184,34,'Skills/Knowledge',60),(185,34,'Education Qualification',5),(186,34,'Years of Experience',5),(187,34,'Roles & Responsibilities',10),(188,35,'hard_skills_wt',80),(189,35,'skills_knowledge_wt',20),(190,35,'secondary_skills_wt',30),(191,35,'primary_skills_wt',70),(192,35,'Certifications',5),(193,35,'Key Competencies',5),(194,35,'Domain/Industry',10),(195,35,'Skills/Knowledge',60),(196,35,'Education Qualification',5),(197,35,'Years of Experience',5),(198,35,'Roles & Responsibilities',10),(199,36,'hard_skills_wt',80),(200,36,'skills_knowledge_wt',20),(201,36,'secondary_skills_wt',30),(202,36,'primary_skills_wt',70),(203,36,'Certifications',5),(204,36,'Key Competencies',5),(205,36,'Domain/Industry',10),(206,36,'Skills/Knowledge',60),(207,36,'Education Qualification',5),(208,36,'Years of Experience',5),(209,36,'Roles & Responsibilities',10),(210,37,'hard_skills_wt',80),(211,37,'skills_knowledge_wt',20),(212,37,'secondary_skills_wt',30),(213,37,'primary_skills_wt',70),(214,37,'Certifications',5),(215,37,'Key Competencies',5),(216,37,'Domain/Industry',10),(217,37,'Skills/Knowledge',60),(218,37,'Education Qualification',5),(219,37,'Years of Experience',5),(220,37,'Roles & Responsibilities',10),(221,38,'hard_skills_wt',80),(222,38,'skills_knowledge_wt',20),(223,38,'secondary_skills_wt',30),(224,38,'primary_skills_wt',70),(225,38,'Certifications',5),(226,38,'Key Competencies',5),(227,38,'Domain/Industry',10),(228,38,'Skills/Knowledge',60),(229,38,'Education Qualification',5),(230,38,'Years of Experience',5),(231,38,'Roles & Responsibilities',10),(232,39,'hard_skills_wt',80),(233,39,'skills_knowledge_wt',20),(234,39,'secondary_skills_wt',30),(235,39,'primary_skills_wt',70),(236,39,'Certifications',5),(237,39,'Key Competencies',5),(238,39,'Domain/Industry',10),(239,39,'Skills/Knowledge',60),(240,39,'Education Qualification',5),(241,39,'Years of Experience',5),(242,39,'Roles & Responsibilities',10),(243,40,'hard_skills_wt',80),(244,40,'skills_knowledge_wt',20),(245,40,'secondary_skills_wt',30),(246,40,'primary_skills_wt',70),(247,40,'Certifications',5),(248,40,'Key Competencies',5),(249,40,'Domain/Industry',10),(250,40,'Skills/Knowledge',60),(251,40,'Education Qualification',5),(252,40,'Years of Experience',5),(253,40,'Roles & Responsibilities',10),(254,41,'hard_skills_wt',80),(255,41,'skills_knowledge_wt',20),(256,41,'secondary_skills_wt',30),(257,41,'primary_skills_wt',70),(258,41,'Certifications',5),(259,41,'Key Competencies',5),(260,41,'Domain/Industry',10),(261,41,'Skills/Knowledge',60),(262,41,'Education Qualification',5),(263,41,'Years of Experience',5),(264,41,'Roles & Responsibilities',10),(265,42,'hard_skills_wt',80),(266,42,'skills_knowledge_wt',20),(267,42,'secondary_skills_wt',30),(268,42,'primary_skills_wt',70),(269,42,'Certifications',5),(270,42,'Key Competencies',5),(271,42,'Domain/Industry',10),(272,42,'Skills/Knowledge',60),(273,42,'Education Qualification',5),(274,42,'Years of Experience',5),(275,42,'Roles & Responsibilities',10),(276,43,'hard_skills_wt',80),(277,43,'skills_knowledge_wt',20),(278,43,'secondary_skills_wt',30),(279,43,'primary_skills_wt',70),(280,43,'Certifications',5),(281,43,'Key Competencies',5),(282,43,'Domain/Industry',10),(283,43,'Skills/Knowledge',60),(284,43,'Education Qualification',5),(285,43,'Years of Experience',5),(286,43,'Roles & Responsibilities',10),(287,44,'hard_skills_wt',80),(288,44,'skills_knowledge_wt',20),(289,44,'secondary_skills_wt',30),(290,44,'primary_skills_wt',70),(291,44,'Certifications',5),(292,44,'Key Competencies',5),(293,44,'Domain/Industry',10),(294,44,'Skills/Knowledge',60),(295,44,'Education Qualification',5),(296,44,'Years of Experience',5),(297,44,'Roles & Responsibilities',10),(298,45,'hard_skills_wt',80),(299,45,'skills_knowledge_wt',20),(300,45,'secondary_skills_wt',30),(301,45,'primary_skills_wt',70),(302,45,'Certifications',5),(303,45,'Key Competencies',5),(304,45,'Domain/Industry',10),(305,45,'Skills/Knowledge',60),(306,45,'Education Qualification',5),(307,45,'Years of Experience',5),(308,45,'Roles & Responsibilities',10),(309,46,'hard_skills_wt',80),(310,46,'skills_knowledge_wt',20),(311,46,'secondary_skills_wt',30),(312,46,'primary_skills_wt',70),(313,46,'Certifications',5),(314,46,'Key Competencies',5),(315,46,'Domain/Industry',10),(316,46,'Skills/Knowledge',60),(317,46,'Education Qualification',5),(318,46,'Years of Experience',5),(319,46,'Roles & Responsibilities',10),(320,47,'hard_skills_wt',80),(321,47,'skills_knowledge_wt',20),(322,47,'secondary_skills_wt',30),(323,47,'primary_skills_wt',70),(324,47,'Certifications',5),(325,47,'Key Competencies',5),(326,47,'Domain/Industry',10),(327,47,'Skills/Knowledge',60),(328,47,'Education Qualification',5),(329,47,'Years of Experience',5),(330,47,'Roles & Responsibilities',10),(331,48,'hard_skills_wt',80),(332,48,'skills_knowledge_wt',20),(333,48,'secondary_skills_wt',30),(334,48,'primary_skills_wt',70),(335,48,'Certifications',5),(336,48,'Key Competencies',5),(337,48,'Domain/Industry',10),(338,48,'Skills/Knowledge',60),(339,48,'Education Qualification',5),(340,48,'Years of Experience',5),(341,48,'Roles & Responsibilities',10),(342,49,'hard_skills_wt',80),(343,49,'skills_knowledge_wt',20),(344,49,'secondary_skills_wt',30),(345,49,'primary_skills_wt',70),(346,49,'Certifications',5),(347,49,'Key Competencies',5),(348,49,'Domain/Industry',10),(349,49,'Skills/Knowledge',60),(350,49,'Education Qualification',5),(351,49,'Years of Experience',5),(352,49,'Roles & Responsibilities',10),(353,50,'hard_skills_wt',80),(354,50,'skills_knowledge_wt',20),(355,50,'secondary_skills_wt',30),(356,50,'primary_skills_wt',70),(357,50,'Certifications',5),(358,50,'Key Competencies',5),(359,50,'Domain/Industry',10),(360,50,'Skills/Knowledge',60),(361,50,'Education Qualification',5),(362,50,'Years of Experience',5),(363,50,'Roles & Responsibilities',10),(364,51,'hard_skills_wt',80),(365,51,'skills_knowledge_wt',20),(366,51,'secondary_skills_wt',30),(367,51,'primary_skills_wt',70),(368,51,'Certifications',5),(369,51,'Key Competencies',5),(370,51,'Domain/Industry',10),(371,51,'Skills/Knowledge',60),(372,51,'Education Qualification',5),(373,51,'Years of Experience',5),(374,51,'Roles & Responsibilities',10),(375,52,'hard_skills_wt',80),(376,52,'skills_knowledge_wt',20),(377,52,'secondary_skills_wt',30),(378,52,'primary_skills_wt',70),(379,52,'Certifications',5),(380,52,'Key Competencies',5),(381,52,'Domain/Industry',10),(382,52,'Skills/Knowledge',60),(383,52,'Education Qualification',5),(384,52,'Years of Experience',5),(385,52,'Roles & Responsibilities',10),(386,53,'hard_skills_wt',80),(387,53,'skills_knowledge_wt',20),(388,53,'secondary_skills_wt',30),(389,53,'primary_skills_wt',70),(390,53,'Certifications',5),(391,53,'Key Competencies',5),(392,53,'Domain/Industry',10),(393,53,'Skills/Knowledge',60),(394,53,'Education Qualification',5),(395,53,'Years of Experience',5),(396,53,'Roles & Responsibilities',10),(397,54,'hard_skills_wt',80),(398,54,'skills_knowledge_wt',20),(399,54,'secondary_skills_wt',30),(400,54,'primary_skills_wt',70),(401,54,'Certifications',5),(402,54,'Key Competencies',5),(403,54,'Domain/Industry',10),(404,54,'Skills/Knowledge',60),(405,54,'Education Qualification',5),(406,54,'Years of Experience',5),(407,54,'Roles & Responsibilities',10),(408,57,'hard_skills_wt',80),(409,57,'skills_knowledge_wt',20),(410,57,'secondary_skills_wt',30),(411,57,'primary_skills_wt',70),(412,57,'Certifications',5),(413,57,'Key Competencies',5),(414,57,'Domain/Industry',10),(415,57,'Skills/Knowledge',60),(416,57,'Education Qualification',5),(417,57,'Years of Experience',5),(418,57,'Roles & Responsibilities',10),(419,60,'hard_skills_wt',80),(420,60,'skills_knowledge_wt',20),(421,60,'secondary_skills_wt',30),(422,60,'primary_skills_wt',70),(423,60,'Certifications',5),(424,60,'Key Competencies',5),(425,60,'Domain/Industry',10),(426,60,'Skills/Knowledge',60),(427,60,'Education Qualification',5),(428,60,'Years of Experience',5),(429,60,'Roles & Responsibilities',10),(430,62,'hard_skills_wt',80),(431,62,'skills_knowledge_wt',20),(432,62,'secondary_skills_wt',30),(433,62,'primary_skills_wt',70),(434,62,'Certifications',5),(435,62,'Key Competencies',5),(436,62,'Domain/Industry',10),(437,62,'Skills/Knowledge',60),(438,62,'Education Qualification',5),(439,62,'Years of Experience',5),(440,62,'Roles & Responsibilities',10),(441,63,'hard_skills_wt',80),(442,63,'skills_knowledge_wt',20),(443,63,'secondary_skills_wt',30),(444,63,'primary_skills_wt',70),(445,63,'Certifications',5),(446,63,'Key Competencies',5),(447,63,'Domain/Industry',10),(448,63,'Skills/Knowledge',60),(449,63,'Education Qualification',5),(450,63,'Years of Experience',5),(451,63,'Roles & Responsibilities',10),(452,67,'hard_skills_wt',80),(453,67,'skills_knowledge_wt',20),(454,67,'secondary_skills_wt',30),(455,67,'primary_skills_wt',70),(456,67,'Certifications',5),(457,67,'Key Competencies',5),(458,67,'Domain/Industry',10),(459,67,'Skills/Knowledge',60),(460,67,'Education Qualification',5),(461,67,'Years of Experience',5),(462,67,'Roles & Responsibilities',10),(463,68,'hard_skills_wt',80),(464,68,'skills_knowledge_wt',20),(465,68,'secondary_skills_wt',30),(466,68,'primary_skills_wt',70),(467,68,'Certifications',5),(468,68,'Key Competencies',5),(469,68,'Domain/Industry',10),(470,68,'Skills/Knowledge',60),(471,68,'Education Qualification',5),(472,68,'Years of Experience',5),(473,68,'Roles & Responsibilities',10),(474,69,'hard_skills_wt',80),(475,69,'skills_knowledge_wt',20),(476,69,'secondary_skills_wt',30),(477,69,'primary_skills_wt',70),(478,69,'Certifications',5),(479,69,'Key Competencies',5),(480,69,'Domain/Industry',10),(481,69,'Skills/Knowledge',60),(482,69,'Education Qualification',5),(483,69,'Years of Experience',5),(484,69,'Roles & Responsibilities',10),(485,70,'hard_skills_wt',80),(486,70,'skills_knowledge_wt',20),(487,70,'secondary_skills_wt',30),(488,70,'primary_skills_wt',70),(489,70,'Certifications',5),(490,70,'Key Competencies',5),(491,70,'Domain/Industry',10),(492,70,'Skills/Knowledge',60),(493,70,'Education Qualification',5),(494,70,'Years of Experience',5),(495,70,'Roles & Responsibilities',10),(496,71,'hard_skills_wt',80),(497,71,'skills_knowledge_wt',20),(498,71,'secondary_skills_wt',30),(499,71,'primary_skills_wt',70),(500,71,'Certifications',5),(501,71,'Key Competencies',5),(502,71,'Domain/Industry',10),(503,71,'Skills/Knowledge',60),(504,71,'Education Qualification',5),(505,71,'Years of Experience',5),(506,71,'Roles & Responsibilities',10),(507,73,'hard_skills_wt',80),(508,73,'skills_knowledge_wt',20),(509,73,'secondary_skills_wt',30),(510,73,'primary_skills_wt',70),(511,73,'Certifications',5),(512,73,'Key Competencies',5),(513,73,'Domain/Industry',10),(514,73,'Skills/Knowledge',60),(515,73,'Education Qualification',5),(516,73,'Years of Experience',5),(517,73,'Roles & Responsibilities',10),(518,74,'hard_skills_wt',80),(519,74,'skills_knowledge_wt',20),(520,74,'secondary_skills_wt',30),(521,74,'primary_skills_wt',70),(522,74,'Certifications',5),(523,74,'Key Competencies',5),(524,74,'Domain/Industry',10),(525,74,'Skills/Knowledge',60),(526,74,'Education Qualification',5),(527,74,'Years of Experience',5),(528,74,'Roles & Responsibilities',10),(529,75,'hard_skills_wt',80),(530,75,'skills_knowledge_wt',20),(531,75,'secondary_skills_wt',30),(532,75,'primary_skills_wt',70),(533,75,'Certifications',5),(534,75,'Key Competencies',5),(535,75,'Domain/Industry',10),(536,75,'Skills/Knowledge',60),(537,75,'Education Qualification',5),(538,75,'Years of Experience',5),(539,75,'Roles & Responsibilities',10),(540,76,'hard_skills_wt',80),(541,76,'skills_knowledge_wt',20),(542,76,'secondary_skills_wt',30),(543,76,'primary_skills_wt',70),(544,76,'Certifications',5),(545,76,'Key Competencies',5),(546,76,'Domain/Industry',10),(547,76,'Skills/Knowledge',60),(548,76,'Education Qualification',5),(549,76,'Years of Experience',5),(550,76,'Roles & Responsibilities',10),(551,77,'hard_skills_wt',80),(552,77,'skills_knowledge_wt',20),(553,77,'secondary_skills_wt',30),(554,77,'primary_skills_wt',70),(555,77,'Certifications',5),(556,77,'Key Competencies',5),(557,77,'Domain/Industry',10),(558,77,'Skills/Knowledge',60),(559,77,'Education Qualification',5),(560,77,'Years of Experience',5),(561,77,'Roles & Responsibilities',10),(562,78,'hard_skills_wt',80),(563,78,'skills_knowledge_wt',20),(564,78,'secondary_skills_wt',30),(565,78,'primary_skills_wt',70),(566,78,'Certifications',5),(567,78,'Key Competencies',5),(568,78,'Domain/Industry',10),(569,78,'Skills/Knowledge',60),(570,78,'Education Qualification',5),(571,78,'Years of Experience',5),(572,78,'Roles & Responsibilities',10),(573,79,'hard_skills_wt',80),(574,79,'skills_knowledge_wt',20),(575,79,'secondary_skills_wt',30),(576,79,'primary_skills_wt',70),(577,79,'Certifications',5),(578,79,'Key Competencies',5),(579,79,'Domain/Industry',10),(580,79,'Skills/Knowledge',60),(581,79,'Education Qualification',5),(582,79,'Years of Experience',5),(583,79,'Roles & Responsibilities',10),(584,81,'hard_skills_wt',80),(585,81,'skills_knowledge_wt',20),(586,81,'secondary_skills_wt',30),(587,81,'primary_skills_wt',70),(588,81,'Certifications',5),(589,81,'Key Competencies',5),(590,81,'Domain/Industry',10),(591,81,'Skills/Knowledge',60),(592,81,'Education Qualification',5),(593,81,'Years of Experience',5),(594,81,'Roles & Responsibilities',10),(595,83,'hard_skills_wt',80),(596,83,'skills_knowledge_wt',20),(597,83,'secondary_skills_wt',30),(598,83,'primary_skills_wt',70),(599,83,'Certifications',5),(600,83,'Key Competencies',5),(601,83,'Domain/Industry',10),(602,83,'Skills/Knowledge',60),(603,83,'Education Qualification',5),(604,83,'Years of Experience',5),(605,83,'Roles & Responsibilities',10),(606,85,'hard_skills_wt',80),(607,85,'skills_knowledge_wt',20),(608,85,'secondary_skills_wt',30),(609,85,'primary_skills_wt',70),(610,85,'Certifications',5),(611,85,'Key Competencies',5),(612,85,'Domain/Industry',10),(613,85,'Skills/Knowledge',60),(614,85,'Education Qualification',5),(615,85,'Years of Experience',5),(616,85,'Roles & Responsibilities',10),(617,87,'hard_skills_wt',80),(618,87,'skills_knowledge_wt',20),(619,87,'secondary_skills_wt',30),(620,87,'primary_skills_wt',70),(621,87,'Certifications',5),(622,87,'Key Competencies',5),(623,87,'Domain/Industry',10),(624,87,'Skills/Knowledge',60),(625,87,'Education Qualification',5),(626,87,'Years of Experience',5),(627,87,'Roles & Responsibilities',10),(628,88,'hard_skills_wt',80),(629,88,'skills_knowledge_wt',20),(630,88,'secondary_skills_wt',30),(631,88,'primary_skills_wt',70),(632,88,'Certifications',5),(633,88,'Key Competencies',5),(634,88,'Domain/Industry',10),(635,88,'Skills/Knowledge',60),(636,88,'Education Qualification',5),(637,88,'Years of Experience',5),(638,88,'Roles & Responsibilities',10),(639,90,'hard_skills_wt',80),(640,90,'skills_knowledge_wt',20),(641,90,'secondary_skills_wt',30),(642,90,'primary_skills_wt',70),(643,90,'Certifications',5),(644,90,'Key Competencies',5),(645,90,'Domain/Industry',10),(646,90,'Skills/Knowledge',60),(647,90,'Education Qualification',5),(648,90,'Years of Experience',5),(649,90,'Roles & Responsibilities',10),(650,91,'hard_skills_wt',80),(651,91,'skills_knowledge_wt',20),(652,91,'secondary_skills_wt',30),(653,91,'primary_skills_wt',70),(654,91,'Certifications',5),(655,91,'Key Competencies',5),(656,91,'Domain/Industry',10),(657,91,'Skills/Knowledge',60),(658,91,'Education Qualification',5),(659,91,'Years of Experience',5),(660,91,'Roles & Responsibilities',10),(661,93,'hard_skills_wt',80),(662,93,'skills_knowledge_wt',20),(663,93,'secondary_skills_wt',30),(664,93,'primary_skills_wt',70),(665,93,'Certifications',5),(666,93,'Key Competencies',5),(667,93,'Domain/Industry',10),(668,93,'Skills/Knowledge',60),(669,93,'Education Qualification',5),(670,93,'Years of Experience',5),(671,93,'Roles & Responsibilities',10),(672,94,'hard_skills_wt',80),(673,94,'skills_knowledge_wt',20),(674,94,'secondary_skills_wt',30),(675,94,'primary_skills_wt',70),(676,94,'Certifications',5),(677,94,'Key Competencies',5),(678,94,'Domain/Industry',10),(679,94,'Skills/Knowledge',60),(680,94,'Education Qualification',5),(681,94,'Years of Experience',5),(682,94,'Roles & Responsibilities',10),(683,95,'hard_skills_wt',100),(684,95,'skills_knowledge_wt',0),(685,95,'secondary_skills_wt',0),(686,95,'primary_skills_wt',100),(687,95,'Certifications',0),(688,95,'Key Competencies',0),(689,95,'Domain/Industry',0),(690,95,'Skills/Knowledge',80),(691,95,'Education Qualification',5),(692,95,'Years of Experience',5),(693,95,'Roles & Responsibilities',10),(694,96,'hard_skills_wt',80),(695,96,'skills_knowledge_wt',20),(696,96,'secondary_skills_wt',30),(697,96,'primary_skills_wt',70),(698,96,'Certifications',5),(699,96,'Key Competencies',5),(700,96,'Domain/Industry',10),(701,96,'Skills/Knowledge',60),(702,96,'Education Qualification',5),(703,96,'Years of Experience',5),(704,96,'Roles & Responsibilities',10),(705,97,'hard_skills_wt',80),(706,97,'skills_knowledge_wt',20),(707,97,'secondary_skills_wt',30),(708,97,'primary_skills_wt',70),(709,97,'Certifications',5),(710,97,'Key Competencies',5),(711,97,'Domain/Industry',10),(712,97,'Skills/Knowledge',60),(713,97,'Education Qualification',5),(714,97,'Years of Experience',5),(715,97,'Roles & Responsibilities',10),(716,98,'hard_skills_wt',80),(717,98,'skills_knowledge_wt',20),(718,98,'secondary_skills_wt',30),(719,98,'primary_skills_wt',70),(720,98,'Certifications',5),(721,98,'Key Competencies',5),(722,98,'Domain/Industry',10),(723,98,'Skills/Knowledge',60),(724,98,'Education Qualification',5),(725,98,'Years of Experience',5),(726,98,'Roles & Responsibilities',10),(727,99,'hard_skills_wt',80),(728,99,'skills_knowledge_wt',20),(729,99,'secondary_skills_wt',30),(730,99,'primary_skills_wt',70),(731,99,'Certifications',5),(732,99,'Key Competencies',5),(733,99,'Domain/Industry',10),(734,99,'Skills/Knowledge',60),(735,99,'Education Qualification',5),(736,99,'Years of Experience',5),(737,99,'Roles & Responsibilities',10),(738,100,'hard_skills_wt',100),(739,100,'skills_knowledge_wt',0),(740,100,'secondary_skills_wt',10),(741,100,'primary_skills_wt',90),(742,100,'Certifications',0),(743,100,'Key Competencies',0),(744,100,'Domain/Industry',0),(745,100,'Skills/Knowledge',80),(746,100,'Education Qualification',5),(747,100,'Years of Experience',5),(748,100,'Roles & Responsibilities',10),(749,101,'hard_skills_wt',80),(750,101,'skills_knowledge_wt',20),(751,101,'secondary_skills_wt',30),(752,101,'primary_skills_wt',70),(753,101,'Certifications',5),(754,101,'Key Competencies',5),(755,101,'Domain/Industry',10),(756,101,'Skills/Knowledge',60),(757,101,'Education Qualification',5),(758,101,'Years of Experience',5),(759,101,'Roles & Responsibilities',10),(1024,102,'Roles & Responsibilities',10),(1025,102,'Years of Experience',5),(1026,102,'Education Qualification',5),(1027,102,'Skills/Knowledge',60),(1028,102,'Domain/Industry',10),(1029,102,'Key Competencies',5),(1030,102,'Certifications',5),(1031,102,'primary_skills_wt',70),(1032,102,'secondary_skills_wt',30),(1033,102,'skills_knowledge_wt',20),(1034,102,'hard_skills_wt',80),(1039,103,'Roles & Responsibilities',0),(1040,103,'Years of Experience',5),(1041,103,'Education Qualification',10),(1042,103,'Skills/Knowledge',70),(1043,103,'Domain/Industry',10),(1044,103,'Key Competencies',5),(1045,103,'Certifications',0),(1046,103,'primary_skills_wt',70),(1047,103,'secondary_skills_wt',30),(1048,103,'skills_knowledge_wt',40),(1049,103,'hard_skills_wt',60),(1054,104,'Roles & Responsibilities',10),(1055,104,'Years of Experience',5),(1056,104,'Education Qualification',5),(1057,104,'Skills/Knowledge',60),(1058,104,'Domain/Industry',10),(1059,104,'Key Competencies',5),(1060,104,'Certifications',5),(1061,104,'primary_skills_wt',70),(1062,104,'secondary_skills_wt',30),(1063,104,'skills_knowledge_wt',20),(1064,104,'hard_skills_wt',80),(1065,105,'Roles & Responsibilities',10),(1066,105,'Years of Experience',5),(1067,105,'Education Qualification',5),(1068,105,'Skills/Knowledge',60),(1069,105,'Domain/Industry',10),(1070,105,'Key Competencies',5),(1071,105,'Certifications',5),(1072,105,'primary_skills_wt',70),(1073,105,'secondary_skills_wt',30),(1074,105,'skills_knowledge_wt',20),(1075,105,'hard_skills_wt',80),(1080,106,'Roles & Responsibilities',10),(1081,106,'Years of Experience',5),(1082,106,'Education Qualification',5),(1083,106,'Skills/Knowledge',60),(1084,106,'Domain/Industry',10),(1085,106,'Key Competencies',5),(1086,106,'Certifications',5),(1087,106,'primary_skills_wt',70),(1088,106,'secondary_skills_wt',30),(1089,106,'skills_knowledge_wt',20),(1090,106,'hard_skills_wt',80),(1095,111,'Roles & Responsibilities',10),(1096,111,'Years of Experience',5),(1097,111,'Education Qualification',5),(1098,111,'Skills/Knowledge',60),(1099,111,'Domain/Industry',10),(1100,111,'Key Competencies',5),(1101,111,'Certifications',5),(1102,111,'primary_skills_wt',70),(1103,111,'secondary_skills_wt',30),(1104,111,'skills_knowledge_wt',20),(1105,111,'hard_skills_wt',80),(1110,113,'Roles & Responsibilities',10),(1111,113,'Years of Experience',5),(1112,113,'Education Qualification',5),(1113,113,'Skills/Knowledge',60),(1114,113,'Domain/Industry',10),(1115,113,'Key Competencies',5),(1116,113,'Certifications',5),(1117,113,'primary_skills_wt',70),(1118,113,'secondary_skills_wt',30),(1119,113,'skills_knowledge_wt',20),(1120,113,'hard_skills_wt',80);

--
-- Table structure for table `basta_psycho`
--

CREATE TABLE `basta_psycho` (
  `id` int NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT,
  `name` varchar(100) COLLATE utf8mb4_general_ci NOT NULL,
  `screeningId` int NOT NULL,
  `resumeId` int NOT NULL,
  `candidateId` int NOT NULL,
  `isCompleted` tinyint(1) NOT NULL DEFAULT '0' COMMENT 'if ful assesments completed ',
  `isVal` tinyint(1) NOT NULL DEFAULT '0' COMMENT 'if 1 means can not use other attempt',
  `languageApt` tinyint(1) NOT NULL DEFAULT '0' COMMENT 'if 1 means language aptitude completed',
  `abstractApt` tinyint(1) NOT NULL DEFAULT '0' COMMENT 'if 1 means abstract reasoning completed',
  `verbalApt` tinyint(1) NOT NULL DEFAULT '0' COMMENT 'if 1 means verbal reasoning completed',
  `mechanicalApt` tinyint(1) NOT NULL DEFAULT '0' COMMENT 'if 1 means mechanical reasoning completed',
  `numericalApt` tinyint(1) NOT NULL DEFAULT '0' COMMENT 'if 1 means numerical Aptitude completed	',
  `spatialApt` tinyint(1) NOT NULL DEFAULT '0' COMMENT 'if 1 means spatial completed	',
  `perceptualApt` tinyint(1) NOT NULL DEFAULT '0' COMMENT 'if 1 means Perceptual Aptitude completed	',
  `created` datetime DEFAULT NULL,
  PRIMARY KEY (`id`)
) ENGINE=InnoDB AUTO_INCREMENT=6 DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8mb4 COLLATE=utf8mb4_general_ci;

--
-- Dumping data for table `basta_psycho`
--

INSERT INTO `basta_psycho` VALUES (1,'Swami_134_564_144_2051061017',144,564,134,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,NULL),(2,'Varun_4_577_151_1792058206',151,577,4,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,NULL),(3,'Nirmesh_157_652_195_1116612447',195,652,157,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,NULL),(4,'Gagan_4_658_198_1754286536',198,658,4,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,NULL),(5,'Sankalp_167_679_215_515648090',215,679,167,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,NULL);

--
-- Table structure for table `bot_interview`
--

CREATE TABLE `bot_interview` (
  `id` int NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT,
  `screeningId` int DEFAULT NULL,
  `candidateId` int NOT NULL,
  `resumeId` int DEFAULT NULL,
  `ref` varchar(100) COLLATE utf8mb4_general_ci DEFAULT NULL,
  `status` enum('START','IN_PROGRESS','END') COLLATE utf8mb4_general_ci DEFAULT 'START',
  `isCron` tinyint(1) DEFAULT NULL,
  `isVal` tinyint(1) NOT NULL DEFAULT '1',
  `isConsent` tinyint(1) NOT NULL DEFAULT '0',
  `created` datetime NOT NULL,
  `modified` datetime DEFAULT NULL,
  `isReportShow` tinyint(1) NOT NULL DEFAULT '0',
  PRIMARY KEY (`id`)
) ENGINE=InnoDB AUTO_INCREMENT=355 DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8mb4 COLLATE=utf8mb4_general_ci;

--
-- Dumping data for table `bot_interview`
--

INSERT INTO `bot_interview` VALUES (1,48,6,227,'SID_6_48_20240209_151919',NULL,1,1,0,'2024-02-09 15:19:28',NULL,1),(2,48,6,227,'VID_6_48_20240209_151919',NULL,1,1,0,'2024-02-09 15:19:28',NULL,1),(3,48,6,227,'VIDEO_6_48_20240209_151919',NULL,1,1,0,'2024-02-09 15:19:28',NULL,1),(4,48,6,227,'REPORT_6_48_20240209_151919',NULL,1,1,0,'2024-02-09 15:19:28',NULL,1),(6,57,11,256,'SID_11_57_20240319_121311',NULL,1,1,0,'2024-03-19 12:23:16',NULL,1),(8,59,7,265,'SID_7_59_20240328_034311',NULL,1,1,0,'2024-03-28 03:46:43',NULL,1),(9,60,4,259,'SID_4_60_20240328_034731',NULL,1,1,0,'2024-03-28 03:52:09',NULL,1),(10,61,15,266,'SID_15_61_20240403_120344',NULL,1,1,0,'2024-04-03 12:10:58',NULL,1),(11,61,15,266,'SID_15_61_20240404_075458',NULL,1,1,0,'2024-04-04 07:57:13',NULL,1),(12,61,15,266,'SID_15_61_20240404_075458',NULL,1,1,0,'2024-04-04 07:58:38',NULL,1),(13,61,15,266,'SID_15_61_20240404_075458',NULL,1,1,0,'2024-04-04 07:58:45',NULL,1),(18,71,12,304,'SID_12_71_20240410_071510','IN_PROGRESS',1,1,0,'2024-04-10 07:25:55',NULL,1),(19,60,4,258,'SID_4_60_20240410_102043','IN_PROGRESS',1,1,0,'2024-04-10 10:21:00',NULL,1),(22,71,12,304,'SID_12_71_20240412_055527','IN_PROGRESS',1,1,0,'2024-04-12 06:01:14',NULL,1),(23,60,4,258,'SID_4_60_20240412_072303','IN_PROGRESS',1,1,0,'2024-04-12 07:36:05',NULL,1),(24,60,4,258,'SID_4_60_20240412_081316','IN_PROGRESS',1,1,0,'2024-04-12 08:21:35',NULL,1),(25,60,4,258,'SID_4_60_20240412_081316','IN_PROGRESS',1,1,0,'2024-04-12 08:37:39',NULL,1),(26,71,12,304,'SID_12_71_20240412_113211','IN_PROGRESS',1,1,0,'2024-04-12 11:34:27',NULL,1),(27,65,26,285,'SID_26_65_20240414_073142','IN_PROGRESS',1,1,0,'2024-04-14 07:55:36',NULL,1),(28,77,31,339,'SID_31_77_20240426_070709','IN_PROGRESS',1,1,0,'2024-04-26 07:42:16',NULL,1),(29,79,4,341,'SID_4_79_20240508_040842','IN_PROGRESS',1,1,0,'2024-05-08 04:26:04',NULL,1),(31,81,4,357,'SID_4_81_20240526_062354','START',1,1,0,'2024-05-26 06:32:22',NULL,1),(32,80,4,344,'SID_4_80_20240526_083102','START',1,0,0,'2024-05-26 08:35:16',NULL,1),(33,80,4,342,'SID_4_80_20240606_163951','START',1,0,0,'2024-06-06 16:40:33',NULL,1),(34,87,4,371,'SID_4_371_87_20240717_031712','END',1,1,0,'2024-07-17 03:17:12','2024-07-17 03:25:15',1),(35,88,4,372,'SID_4_372_88_20240717_054229','END',1,1,0,'2024-07-17 05:42:29','2024-07-17 05:55:24',1),(36,80,4,342,'SID_4_342_80_20240717_111340','END',1,0,0,'2024-07-17 11:13:40','2024-07-17 11:23:09',1),(40,80,4,344,'SID_4_344_80_20240718_041640','START',NULL,0,0,'2024-07-18 04:16:40',NULL,1),(42,80,4,342,'SID_4_342_80_20240718_073911','START',NULL,0,0,'2024-07-18 07:39:11',NULL,1),(43,80,4,344,'SID_4_344_80_20240718_113835','IN_PROGRESS',NULL,0,0,'2024-07-18 11:38:35','2024-07-18 11:44:43',1),(44,51,4,228,'SID_4_228_51_20240718_133759','START',NULL,0,0,'2024-07-18 13:37:59',NULL,1),(45,91,40,377,'SID_40_377_91_20240718_141115','END',1,1,0,'2024-07-18 14:11:15','2024-07-18 14:26:45',1),(46,91,33,378,'SID_33_378_91_20240718_142632','END',1,1,0,'2024-07-18 14:26:32','2024-07-18 15:07:13',1),(47,90,35,374,'SID_35_374_90_20240718_160642','END',1,0,0,'2024-07-18 16:06:42','2024-07-18 16:37:57',1),(48,93,4,398,'SID_4_398_93_20240718_173102','END',1,1,0,'2024-07-18 17:31:02','2024-07-18 17:42:49',1),(49,94,4,401,'SID_4_401_94_20240718_174531','END',1,1,0,'2024-07-18 17:45:31','2024-07-18 18:05:35',1),(50,94,4,405,'SID_4_405_94_20240718_181220','IN_PROGRESS',NULL,1,0,'2024-07-18 18:12:20','2024-07-18 18:12:40',1),(51,94,4,404,'SID_4_404_94_20240718_181736','END',1,1,0,'2024-07-18 18:17:36','2024-07-18 18:31:39',1),(52,92,33,388,'SID_33_388_92_20240719_035404','END',1,1,0,'2024-07-19 03:54:04','2024-07-19 04:26:56',1),(53,97,35,410,'SID_35_410_97_20240719_045504','END',1,1,0,'2024-07-19 04:55:04','2024-07-19 05:21:21',1),(55,89,34,373,'SID_34_373_89_20240719_053514','END',1,1,0,'2024-07-19 05:35:14','2024-07-19 06:13:22',1),(56,98,4,411,'SID_4_411_98_20240719_054149','END',1,0,0,'2024-07-19 05:41:49','2024-07-19 06:00:30',1),(57,98,4,411,'SID_4_411_98_20240719_064136','END',1,1,0,'2024-07-19 06:41:36','2024-07-19 07:23:20',1),(58,80,4,342,'SID_4_342_80_20240719_065101','END',1,0,0,'2024-07-19 06:51:01','2024-07-19 06:56:44',1),(59,80,4,342,'SID_4_342_80_20240719_070106','END',1,0,0,'2024-07-19 07:01:06','2024-07-19 07:02:19',1),(60,51,4,228,'SID_4_228_51_20240719_085215','IN_PROGRESS',NULL,0,0,'2024-07-19 08:52:15','2024-07-19 08:53:55',1),(61,92,40,387,'SID_40_387_92_20240719_091012','END',1,1,0,'2024-07-19 09:10:12','2024-07-19 09:38:48',1),(63,99,45,412,'SID_45_412_99_20240719_105451','END',1,1,0,'2024-07-19 10:54:51','2024-07-19 11:48:04',1),(64,51,4,228,'SID_4_228_51_20240719_130518','START',NULL,1,0,'2024-07-19 13:05:18',NULL,1),(65,96,44,409,'SID_44_409_96_20240719_153137','END',1,1,0,'2024-07-19 15:31:37','2024-07-19 16:49:22',1),(66,91,46,383,'SID_46_383_91_20240719_170627','END',1,0,0,'2024-07-19 17:06:27','2024-07-19 17:36:28',1),(67,91,42,375,'SID_42_375_91_20240719_235726','START',NULL,0,0,'2024-07-19 23:57:26',NULL,1),(68,91,42,375,'SID_42_375_91_20240720_013142','END',1,1,0,'2024-07-20 01:31:42','2024-07-20 03:04:08',1),(69,100,35,413,'SID_35_413_100_20240720_061739','END',1,1,0,'2024-07-20 06:17:39','2024-07-20 07:18:27',1),(70,91,38,379,'SID_38_379_91_20240720_100325','END',1,1,0,'2024-07-20 10:03:25','2024-07-20 10:34:21',1),(71,101,38,414,'SID_38_414_101_20240720_105009','END',1,1,0,'2024-07-20 10:50:09','2024-07-20 11:48:47',1),(72,91,37,380,'SID_37_380_91_20240720_171546','END',1,1,0,'2024-07-20 17:15:46','2024-07-20 17:40:01',1),(73,106,4,449,'SID_4_449_106_20240722_071234','END',1,0,0,'2024-07-22 07:12:34','2024-07-22 07:21:50',1),(74,106,4,449,'SID_4_449_106_20240722_072514','IN_PROGRESS',NULL,1,0,'2024-07-22 07:25:14','2024-07-22 07:25:41',1),(75,91,46,383,'SID_46_383_91_20240722_174928','END',1,1,0,'2024-07-22 17:49:28','2024-07-22 18:22:44',1),(76,80,4,342,'SID_4_342_80_20240728_033652','IN_PROGRESS',NULL,1,0,'2024-07-28 03:36:52','2024-07-28 03:37:41',1),(78,113,54,462,'SID_54_462_113_20240729_053612','END',1,1,0,'2024-07-29 05:36:12','2024-07-29 06:03:35',1),(79,113,53,465,'SID_53_465_113_20240729_054034','END',1,1,0,'2024-07-29 05:40:34','2024-07-29 06:14:42',1),(80,113,52,463,'SID_52_463_113_20240729_054225','END',1,1,0,'2024-07-29 05:42:25','2024-07-29 05:45:40',1),(81,113,55,466,'SID_55_466_113_20240729_055310','END',1,1,0,'2024-07-29 05:53:10','2024-07-29 05:53:50',1),(82,112,56,460,'SID_56_460_112_20240729_062829','START',NULL,0,0,'2024-07-29 06:28:29',NULL,1),(83,111,57,458,'SID_57_458_111_20240729_062921','IN_PROGRESS',NULL,0,0,'2024-07-29 06:29:21','2024-07-29 06:31:01',1),(84,112,56,460,'SID_56_460_112_20240729_063530','END',1,1,0,'2024-07-29 06:35:30','2024-07-29 07:10:16',1),(85,111,58,459,'SID_58_459_111_20240729_063628','START',NULL,1,0,'2024-07-29 06:36:28',NULL,1),(86,111,58,459,'SID_58_459_111_20240729_063801','END',1,1,0,'2024-07-29 06:38:01','2024-07-29 07:03:17',1),(87,115,59,469,'SID_59_469_115_20240729_063914','END',1,1,0,'2024-07-29 06:39:14','2024-07-29 07:02:26',1),(88,111,57,458,'SID_57_458_111_20240729_064750','IN_PROGRESS',NULL,0,0,'2024-07-29 06:47:50','2024-07-29 06:48:27',1),(89,111,57,458,'SID_57_458_111_20240729_064957','END',1,1,0,'2024-07-29 06:49:57','2024-07-29 06:50:26',1),(90,91,39,382,'SID_39_382_91_20240729_132232','END',1,1,0,'2024-07-29 13:22:32','2024-07-29 13:51:43',1),(91,109,46,456,'SID_46_456_109_20240730_181734','END',1,1,0,'2024-07-30 18:17:34','2024-07-30 19:24:44',1),(102,116,41,470,'SID_41_470_116_20240804_022957','START',NULL,0,0,'2024-08-04 02:29:57',NULL,1),(105,116,41,470,'SID_41_470_116_20240804_042649','END',1,1,0,'2024-08-04 04:26:49','2024-08-04 05:33:43',1),(117,91,60,381,'SID_60_381_91_20240809_131029','END',1,1,0,'2024-08-09 13:10:29','2024-08-09 14:08:04',1),(118,119,4,509,'SID_4_509_119_20240904_101235','START',NULL,1,0,'2024-09-04 10:12:35',NULL,1),(119,119,4,509,'SID_4_509_119_20240904_101235','START',NULL,1,0,'2024-09-04 10:12:35',NULL,1),(120,119,4,509,'SID_4_509_119_20240904_101235','START',NULL,1,0,'2024-09-04 10:12:35',NULL,1),(121,119,4,509,'SID_4_509_119_20240904_101235','START',NULL,1,0,'2024-09-04 10:12:35',NULL,1),(122,119,4,510,'SID_4_510_119_20240904_101313','IN_PROGRESS',NULL,1,0,'2024-09-04 10:13:13','2024-09-04 10:13:29',1),(123,122,4,517,'SID_4_517_122_20240907_101826','END',1,1,0,'2024-09-07 10:18:26','2024-09-07 10:37:51',1),(124,121,4,516,'SID_4_516_121_20240907_104032','END',1,1,0,'2024-09-07 10:40:32','2024-09-07 10:42:00',1),(125,123,4,519,'SID_4_519_123_20240909_112754','START',NULL,1,0,'2024-09-09 11:27:54',NULL,1),(127,129,4,523,'SID_4_523_129_20240911_120422','END',1,1,0,'2024-09-11 12:04:22','2024-09-11 12:27:34',1),(129,120,4,512,'SID_4_512_120_20240911_123818','END',1,1,0,'2024-09-11 12:38:18','2024-09-11 12:41:36',1),(130,130,4,526,'SID_4_526_130_20240916_122720','END',1,1,0,'2024-09-16 12:27:20','2024-09-16 12:32:40',1),(131,132,4,529,'SID_4_529_132_20240918_114921','START',NULL,1,0,'2024-09-18 11:49:21',NULL,1),(132,122,4,518,'SID_4_518_122_20240918_162257','IN_PROGRESS',NULL,1,0,'2024-09-18 16:22:57','2024-09-18 16:23:16',1),(133,131,74,528,'SID_74_528_131_20240918_200020','END',1,0,0,'2024-09-18 20:00:20','2024-09-18 20:18:13',1),(134,135,4,540,'SID_4_540_135_20240920_124152','START',NULL,0,0,'2024-09-20 12:41:52',NULL,1),(135,135,4,540,'SID_4_540_135_20240920_125636','START',NULL,0,0,'2024-09-20 12:56:36',NULL,1),(136,135,4,540,'SID_4_540_135_20240920_131521','START',NULL,0,0,'2024-09-20 13:15:21',NULL,1),(140,119,4,511,'SID_4_511_119_20241107_105223','END',1,1,0,'2024-11-07 10:52:23','2024-11-07 11:01:30',1),(152,135,4,540,'SID_4_540_135_20241112_055107','START',NULL,0,0,'2024-11-12 05:51:07',NULL,1),(153,143,131,562,'SID_131_562_143_20241112_055349','START',NULL,1,0,'2024-11-12 05:53:49',NULL,1),(154,143,131,562,'SID_131_562_143_20241112_062711','START',NULL,1,0,'2024-11-12 06:27:11',NULL,1),(155,143,131,562,'SID_131_562_143_20241112_072800','START',NULL,1,0,'2024-11-12 07:28:00',NULL,1),(156,80,4,344,'SID_4_344_80_20241112_121829','START',NULL,1,0,'2024-11-12 12:18:29',NULL,1),(157,135,4,540,'SID_4_540_135_20241120_090355','END',1,1,0,'2024-11-20 09:03:55','2024-11-20 09:10:22',1),(158,144,134,564,'SID_134_564_144_20241120_171034','END',1,1,0,'2024-11-20 17:10:34','2024-11-20 17:41:50',1),(159,144,134,566,'SID_134_566_144_20241122_063117','END',1,1,0,'2024-11-22 06:31:17','2024-11-22 06:45:25',1),(160,136,4,541,'SID_4_541_136_20241202_193049','END',1,1,0,'2024-12-02 19:30:49','2024-12-02 19:36:45',1),(162,151,4,577,'SID_4_577_151_20241230_105624','END',1,0,0,'2024-12-30 10:56:25','2024-12-30 11:01:32',1),(163,151,4,577,'SID_4_577_151_20241230_110833','END',1,1,0,'2024-12-30 11:08:33','2024-12-30 11:11:30',1),(164,154,4,581,'SID_4_581_154_20241231_051635','IN_PROGRESS',NULL,0,0,'2024-12-31 05:16:36','2024-12-31 05:17:04',1),(165,154,4,581,'SID_4_581_154_20241231_051904','END',1,0,0,'2024-12-31 05:19:05','2024-12-31 05:19:13',1),(170,154,4,581,'SID_4_581_154_20250104_040629','IN_PROGRESS',NULL,1,0,'2025-01-04 04:06:30','2025-01-04 04:07:22',1),(178,164,138,594,'SID_138_594_164_20250105_075057','END',1,1,0,'2025-01-05 07:50:58','2025-01-05 07:52:43',1),(179,151,138,580,'SID_138_580_151_20250105_075714','END',1,1,0,'2025-01-05 07:57:14','2025-01-05 07:59:33',1),(205,163,4,585,'SID_4_585_163_20250109_080734','IN_PROGRESS',NULL,1,0,'2025-01-09 08:07:35','2025-01-09 08:07:58',1),(208,170,144,599,'SID_144_599_170_20250109_084147','IN_PROGRESS',NULL,1,0,'2025-01-09 08:41:48','2025-01-09 08:42:14',1),(209,169,144,598,'SID_144_598_169_20250109_093758','IN_PROGRESS',NULL,1,0,'2025-01-09 09:37:59','2025-01-09 09:39:03',1),(210,169,144,598,'SID_144_598_169_20250109_094338','IN_PROGRESS',NULL,1,0,'2025-01-09 09:43:38','2025-01-09 09:44:10',1),(211,172,144,602,'SID_144_602_172_20250109_100338','IN_PROGRESS',NULL,1,0,'2025-01-09 10:03:39','2025-01-09 10:04:08',1),(212,172,144,601,'SID_144_601_172_20250109_101355','END',1,1,0,'2025-01-09 10:13:55','2025-01-09 10:17:12',1),(213,173,144,604,'SID_144_604_173_20250109_102553','END',1,0,0,'2025-01-09 10:25:53','2025-01-09 10:31:43',1),(218,173,144,603,'SID_144_603_173_20250109_110107','IN_PROGRESS',NULL,1,0,'2025-01-09 11:01:08','2025-01-09 11:27:54',1),(219,174,144,606,'SID_144_606_174_20250109_113454','END',1,1,0,'2025-01-09 11:34:55','2025-01-09 11:42:08',1),(220,174,144,605,'SID_144_605_174_20250109_113459','END',1,1,0,'2025-01-09 11:35:00','2025-01-09 11:38:32',1),(221,175,144,608,'SID_144_608_175_20250109_114821','END',1,1,0,'2025-01-09 11:48:21','2025-01-09 11:52:47',1),(222,176,144,610,'SID_144_610_176_20250109_115025','END',1,1,0,'2025-01-09 11:50:25','2025-01-09 11:53:51',1),(223,176,144,609,'SID_144_609_176_20250109_115112','END',1,1,0,'2025-01-09 11:51:12','2025-01-09 11:54:23',1),(224,175,144,607,'SID_144_607_175_20250109_141930','END',1,1,0,'2025-01-09 14:19:31','2025-01-09 14:26:52',1),(226,179,144,615,'SID_144_615_179_20250110_070521','IN_PROGRESS',NULL,1,0,'2025-01-10 07:05:21','2025-01-10 07:05:55',1),(228,179,144,616,'SID_144_616_179_20250110_071055','END',1,1,0,'2025-01-10 07:10:55','2025-01-10 07:16:05',1),(230,171,4,600,'SID_4_600_171_20250110_072200','END',1,1,0,'2025-01-10 07:22:00','2025-01-10 07:26:46',1),(232,179,144,617,'SID_144_617_179_20250110_072805','END',1,1,0,'2025-01-10 07:28:06','2025-01-10 07:31:17',1),(233,181,4,630,'SID_4_630_181_20250110_072943','END',1,0,0,'2025-01-10 07:29:43','2025-01-10 07:41:53',1),(234,179,144,614,'SID_144_614_179_20250110_073209','END',1,1,0,'2025-01-10 07:32:09','2025-01-10 07:36:26',1),(236,180,144,618,'SID_144_618_180_20250110_074306','END',1,1,0,'2025-01-10 07:43:07','2025-01-10 07:45:44',1),(237,181,4,628,'SID_4_628_181_20250110_074529','END',1,0,0,'2025-01-10 07:45:29','2025-01-10 07:52:58',1),(238,166,144,596,'SID_144_596_166_20250110_083705','END',1,1,0,'2025-01-10 08:37:06','2025-01-10 08:49:30',1),(239,177,144,611,'SID_144_611_177_20250110_084952','END',1,1,0,'2025-01-10 08:49:53','2025-01-10 08:53:02',1),(240,177,144,612,'SID_144_612_177_20250110_085322','IN_PROGRESS',NULL,1,0,'2025-01-10 08:53:22','2025-01-10 08:53:51',1),(241,181,4,627,'SID_4_627_181_20250110_090914','IN_PROGRESS',NULL,0,0,'2025-01-10 09:09:14','2025-01-10 09:09:39',1),(242,181,4,629,'SID_4_629_181_20250110_103436','IN_PROGRESS',NULL,0,0,'2025-01-10 10:34:36','2025-01-10 10:35:07',1),(243,180,144,619,'SID_144_619_180_20250110_141311','END',1,1,0,'2025-01-10 14:13:12','2025-01-10 14:19:21',1),(244,181,4,626,'SID_4_626_181_20250110_141701','END',1,0,0,'2025-01-10 14:17:02','2025-01-10 14:18:20',1),(245,181,4,625,'SID_4_625_181_20250121_093744','START',NULL,0,0,'2025-01-21 09:37:45',NULL,1),(246,162,4,584,'SID_4_584_162_20250122_080456','START',NULL,1,0,'2025-01-22 08:04:57',NULL,1),(247,151,4,570,'SID_4_570_151_20250122_080602','IN_PROGRESS',NULL,1,0,'2025-01-22 08:06:03','2025-01-22 08:06:34',1),(248,160,4,583,'SID_4_583_160_20250122_084512','START',NULL,1,0,'2025-01-22 08:45:12',NULL,1),(249,182,144,631,'SID_144_631_182_20250122_084559','END',1,1,0,'2025-01-22 08:45:59','2025-01-22 11:55:34',1),(250,181,4,630,'SID_4_630_181_20250122_095041','END',1,1,0,'2025-01-22 09:50:41','2025-01-22 11:52:53',1),(251,181,4,629,'SID_4_629_181_20250122_111302','IN_PROGRESS',NULL,1,1,'2025-01-22 11:13:08','2025-01-22 11:13:28',1),(252,183,4,632,'SID_4_632_183_20250122_114332','END',1,1,1,'2025-01-22 11:43:37','2025-01-22 11:49:02',1),(253,184,4,633,'SID_4_633_184_20250122_114925','END',1,1,1,'2025-01-22 11:49:42','2025-01-22 11:53:05',1),(254,185,4,634,'SID_4_634_185_20250122_115319','END',1,1,1,'2025-01-22 11:53:22','2025-01-22 11:55:28',1),(255,180,144,621,'SID_144_621_180_20250122_115821','END',1,1,1,'2025-01-22 11:58:27','2025-01-22 12:05:53',1),(256,180,144,620,'SID_144_620_180_20250122_123531','END',1,1,1,'2025-01-22 12:35:37','2025-01-22 12:49:20',1),(257,168,144,597,'SID_144_597_168_20250123_114511','IN_PROGRESS',NULL,1,1,'2025-01-23 11:45:41','2025-01-23 11:46:21',1),(258,181,4,628,'SID_4_628_181_20250124_033711','IN_PROGRESS',NULL,1,1,'2025-01-24 03:37:18','2025-01-24 03:37:32',1),(259,181,4,626,'SID_4_626_181_20250206_100451','IN_PROGRESS',NULL,1,1,'2025-02-06 10:04:56','2025-02-06 10:05:08',1),(260,194,144,651,'SID_144_651_194_20250207_124616','END',1,1,1,'2025-02-07 12:46:22','2025-02-07 12:47:04',1),(261,195,157,652,'SID_157_652_195_20250209_122255','END',1,0,1,'2025-02-09 12:23:04','2025-02-09 12:28:01',1),(263,199,144,661,'SID_144_661_199_20250305_063223','IN_PROGRESS',NULL,1,1,'2025-03-05 06:32:29','2025-03-05 06:32:44',1),(264,208,164,671,'SID_164_671_208_20250402_073333','END',1,1,1,'2025-04-02 07:33:45','2025-04-02 07:41:36',1),(265,208,164,672,'SID_164_672_208_20250402_074806','END',1,1,1,'2025-04-02 07:48:10','2025-04-02 07:52:45',1),(269,181,4,622,'SID_4_622_181_20250414_094401','IN_PROGRESS',NULL,1,1,'2025-04-14 09:44:12','2025-04-14 09:44:30',1),(270,181,4,623,'SID_4_623_181_20250415_075303','END',1,1,1,'2025-04-15 07:53:37','2025-04-15 07:58:43',1),(276,223,144,696,'SID_144_696_223_20250416_150656','END',1,1,1,'2025-04-16 15:07:04','2025-04-16 15:22:37',1),(278,210,144,674,'SID_144_674_210_20250417_083132','END',1,1,1,'2025-04-17 08:31:39','2025-04-17 08:32:42',1),(279,224,144,697,'SID_144_697_224_20250417_083815','END',1,1,1,'2025-04-17 08:40:34','2025-04-17 08:56:11',1),(280,224,144,697,'SID_144_697_224_20250417_083815','END',1,1,1,'2025-04-17 08:41:13','2025-04-17 08:56:11',1),(282,214,144,678,'SID_144_678_214_20250417_102337','END',1,1,1,'2025-04-17 10:23:42','2025-04-17 10:28:33',1),(283,227,4,700,'SID_4_700_227_20250424_103528','END',1,1,1,'2025-04-24 10:35:31','2025-04-24 10:39:36',1),(284,229,4,708,'SID_4_708_229_20250424_105236','END',1,1,1,'2025-04-24 10:52:39','2025-04-24 10:56:30',1),(285,230,4,709,'SID_4_709_230_20250424_105323','END',1,1,1,'2025-04-24 10:53:29','2025-04-24 10:54:41',1),(286,231,4,710,'SID_4_710_231_20250424_105755','IN_PROGRESS',NULL,0,0,'2025-04-24 10:57:59','2025-04-24 10:58:11',1),(287,231,4,710,'SID_4_710_231_20250424_110221','END',1,1,1,'2025-04-24 11:03:10','2025-04-24 11:08:20',1),(288,234,4,720,'SID_4_720_234_20250425_042313','END',1,1,1,'2025-04-25 04:23:16','2025-04-25 04:34:24',1),(289,234,4,721,'SID_4_721_234_20250425_052118','END',1,1,1,'2025-04-25 05:21:22','2025-04-25 05:37:54',1),(294,228,4,707,'SID_4_707_228_20250425_062240','END',1,1,1,'2025-04-25 06:23:01','2025-04-25 06:27:28',1),(300,236,210,738,'SID_210_738_236_20250426_072049','END',1,1,1,'2025-04-26 07:21:10','2025-04-26 08:31:04',1),(301,236,209,743,'SID_209_743_236_20250426_080911','END',1,1,1,'2025-04-26 08:11:03','2025-04-26 08:32:47',1),(303,236,201,735,'SID_201_735_236_20250427_042301','IN_PROGRESS',NULL,1,1,'2025-04-27 04:23:08','2025-04-27 04:25:40',1),(304,236,201,735,'SID_201_735_236_20250427_043801','END',1,1,1,'2025-04-27 04:38:08','2025-04-27 04:48:48',1),(305,236,196,730,'SID_196_730_236_20250427_094352','START',NULL,0,1,'2025-04-27 09:44:09',NULL,1),(306,236,211,731,'SID_211_731_236_20250427_103547','END',1,0,1,'2025-04-27 10:35:58','2025-04-27 10:38:14',1),(307,236,200,734,'SID_200_734_236_20250427_105908','END',1,0,1,'2025-04-27 10:59:31','2025-04-27 11:04:58',1),(308,236,211,731,'SID_211_731_236_20250427_110748','END',1,1,1,'2025-04-27 11:08:10','2025-04-27 11:27:34',1),(309,236,200,734,'SID_200_734_236_20250427_105908','END',1,0,1,'2025-04-27 10:59:31','2025-04-27 11:04:58',1),(310,236,198,732,'SID_198_732_236_20250428_075958','IN_PROGRESS',NULL,0,1,'2025-04-28 08:00:09','2025-04-28 08:00:44',1),(311,236,212,746,'SID_212_746_236_20250428_102832','END',1,1,1,'2025-04-28 10:28:56','2025-04-28 10:42:24',1),(312,236,212,746,'SID_212_746_236_20250428_104315','END',1,1,1,'2025-04-28 10:43:19','2025-04-28 10:58:17',1),(313,236,195,729,'SID_195_729_236_20250428_105706','IN_PROGRESS',NULL,0,1,'2025-04-28 10:57:41','2025-04-28 10:58:24',1),(314,236,195,729,'SID_195_729_236_20250428_110411','END',1,0,1,'2025-04-28 11:04:58','2025-04-28 11:17:14',1),(315,236,195,729,'SID_195_729_236_20250428_111826','IN_PROGRESS',NULL,0,1,'2025-04-28 11:18:41','2025-04-28 11:27:00',1),(316,236,196,730,'SID_196_730_236_20250428_185905','END',1,0,1,'2025-04-28 18:59:12','2025-04-28 19:19:38',1),(317,236,4,745,'SID_4_745_236_20250429_042150','END',1,1,1,'2025-04-29 04:21:56','2025-04-29 04:26:51',1),(318,237,4,748,'SID_4_748_237_20250429_052911','IN_PROGRESS',NULL,0,1,'2025-04-29 05:29:14','2025-04-29 05:29:25',1),(319,237,196,747,'SID_196_747_237_20250429_132401','IN_PROGRESS',NULL,1,1,'2025-04-29 13:24:20','2025-04-29 13:25:26',1),(320,237,196,747,'SID_196_747_237_20250429_132542','END',1,1,1,'2025-04-29 13:25:47','2025-04-29 14:00:08',1),(321,236,195,729,'SID_195_729_236_20250429_133032','END',1,1,1,'2025-04-29 13:30:37','2025-04-29 13:40:37',1),(322,236,206,740,'SID_206_740_236_20250430_170149','END',1,0,1,'2025-04-30 17:02:36','2025-04-30 17:08:04',1),(323,237,206,750,'SID_206_750_237_20250430_172153','END',1,1,1,'2025-04-30 17:21:59','2025-04-30 17:30:38',1),(325,246,225,767,'SID_225_767_246_20250508_065921','END',1,1,1,'2025-05-08 06:56:21','2025-05-08 06:57:54',1),(326,246,225,767,'SID_225_767_246_20250508_065921','END',1,1,1,'2025-05-08 06:59:28','2025-05-08 07:06:59',1),(327,226,144,699,'SID_144_699_226_20250520_055219','IN_PROGRESS',NULL,1,1,'2025-05-20 05:52:58','2025-05-20 05:53:18',0),(329,251,4,782,'SID_4_782_251_20250522_110422','END',1,1,1,'2025-05-22 11:04:28','2025-05-22 11:12:24',0),(330,251,229,776,'SID_229_776_251_20250522_140504','END',1,0,1,'2025-05-22 14:05:11','2025-05-22 14:11:44',0),(331,251,228,775,'SID_228_775_251_20250523_083107','IN_PROGRESS',NULL,0,1,'2025-05-23 08:32:08','2025-05-23 08:33:43',0),(332,251,226,773,'SID_226_773_251_20250523_115855','END',1,1,1,'2025-05-23 11:59:09','2025-05-23 12:22:56',1),(333,251,230,777,'SID_230_777_251_20250527_052356','END',1,0,1,'2025-05-27 05:24:27','2025-05-27 05:26:05',0),(334,251,233,780,'SID_233_780_251_20250527_120018','IN_PROGRESS',NULL,1,1,'2025-05-27 12:00:57','2025-05-27 12:01:38',0),(335,251,233,780,'SID_233_780_251_20250527_121630','END',1,1,1,'2025-05-27 12:16:43','2025-05-27 12:31:56',1),(336,251,228,775,'SID_228_775_251_20250527_150125','END',1,1,1,'2025-05-27 15:01:34','2025-05-27 15:14:00',1),(337,181,4,624,'SID_4_624_181_20250527_160148','IN_PROGRESS',NULL,1,1,'2025-05-27 16:01:52','2025-05-27 16:02:04',0),(338,181,4,627,'SID_4_627_181_20250527_174706','END',1,1,1,'2025-05-27 17:47:10','2025-05-27 17:59:18',0),(339,254,238,786,'SID_238_786_254_20250622_172737','END',1,1,1,'2025-06-22 17:28:07','2025-06-22 17:58:25',1),(340,198,4,658,'SID_4_658_198_20250708_055439','IN_PROGRESS',NULL,1,1,'2025-07-08 05:54:45','2025-07-08 05:54:49',0),(341,256,4,788,'SID_4_788_256_20250708_070343','END',1,1,1,'2025-07-08 07:03:49','2025-07-08 07:08:38',1),(348,256,4,789,'SID_4_789_256_20250708_100650','IN_PROGRESS',NULL,1,1,'2025-07-08 10:06:56','2025-07-08 10:07:03',0),(349,256,4,789,'SID_4_789_256_20250708_122313','IN_PROGRESS',NULL,1,1,'2025-07-08 12:23:17','2025-07-08 12:23:27',0),(350,256,4,789,'SID_4_789_256_20250708_123159','END',1,1,1,'2025-07-08 12:32:03','2025-07-08 12:40:32',0),(352,198,4,659,'SID_4_659_198_20250713_170221','IN_PROGRESS',NULL,1,1,'2025-07-13 17:02:30','2025-07-13 17:02:33',0),(353,257,4,790,'SID_4_790_257_20250715_012448','IN_PROGRESS',NULL,1,1,'2025-07-15 01:24:58','2025-07-15 01:25:26',0),(354,258,4,791,'SID_4_791_258_20250715_101150','END',1,1,1,'2025-07-15 10:11:55','2025-07-15 10:14:31',0);
DELIMITER ;;
/*!50003 CREATE*/ /*!50017 DEFINER=`azureprod`@`%`*/ /*!50003 TRIGGER `after_update_bot_interview` AFTER UPDATE ON `bot_interview` FOR EACH ROW BEGIN
    
    /*IF NEW.status = 'END' THEN
        INSERT INTO mailbox (
            adminId, screeningId, resumeId, botInterviewId, candidateId, candidateName, 
            mailType, title, email, whitelabelId, comments, created
        )
        SELECT 
            sc.adminId, 
            NEW.screeningId, 
            NEW.resumeId, 
            NEW.id, 
            NEW.candidateId, 
            rc.name,
            'Techjar_Students', 
            rb.title, 
            rc.email,
            r.whitelabelId,
            'Sends an email to students or candidates associated with the Techjar company after completing an interview conducted by Techjar',
            NOW()
        FROM screening AS sc
        INNER JOIN register AS r
            ON r.id = sc.adminId 
        INNER JOIN register_whitelabel AS rb 
            ON rb.id = r.whitelabelId 
            AND rb.title = 'Techjar'
        INNER JOIN register_candidate AS rc 
            ON rc.id = NEW.candidateId
        WHERE sc.id = NEW.screeningId;
    END IF;*/
END */;;
DELIMITER ;

--
-- Table structure for table `bot_logs`
--

CREATE TABLE `bot_logs` (
  `id` int NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT,
  `botInterviewId` int NOT NULL,
  `ref` varchar(100) COLLATE utf8mb4_general_ci NOT NULL,
  `questionId` int NOT NULL,
  `interviewType` enum('ONLY_AI','AI_PRE_DEFINED','ONLY_CUSTOM') COLLATE utf8mb4_general_ci NOT NULL,
  `stage` int NOT NULL,
  `datetime` datetime NOT NULL DEFAULT CURRENT_TIMESTAMP,
  PRIMARY KEY (`id`)
) ENGINE=InnoDB AUTO_INCREMENT=515 DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8mb4 COLLATE=utf8mb4_general_ci;

--
-- Dumping data for table `bot_logs`
--

INSERT INTO `bot_logs` VALUES (2,218,'SID_144_603_173_20250109_110107',2050,'ONLY_CUSTOM',2,'2025-01-09 11:20:28'),(3,218,'SID_144_603_173_20250109_110107',2051,'ONLY_CUSTOM',3,'2025-01-09 11:20:31'),(4,218,'SID_144_603_173_20250109_110107',2052,'ONLY_CUSTOM',2,'2025-01-09 11:23:45'),(5,218,'SID_144_603_173_20250109_110107',2053,'ONLY_CUSTOM',3,'2025-01-09 11:23:52'),(6,218,'SID_144_603_173_20250109_110107',2054,'ONLY_CUSTOM',2,'2025-01-09 11:25:27'),(7,218,'SID_144_603_173_20250109_110107',2055,'ONLY_CUSTOM',2,'2025-01-09 11:27:58'),(8,218,'SID_144_603_173_20250109_110107',2056,'ONLY_CUSTOM',3,'2025-01-09 11:28:17'),(9,219,'SID_144_606_174_20250109_113454',2064,'ONLY_CUSTOM',2,'2025-01-09 11:35:36'),(10,220,'SID_144_605_174_20250109_113459',2064,'ONLY_CUSTOM',2,'2025-01-09 11:35:52'),(11,219,'SID_144_606_174_20250109_113454',2065,'ONLY_CUSTOM',3,'2025-01-09 11:36:17'),(12,220,'SID_144_605_174_20250109_113459',2065,'ONLY_CUSTOM',3,'2025-01-09 11:36:28'),(13,219,'SID_144_606_174_20250109_113454',2066,'ONLY_CUSTOM',4,'2025-01-09 11:36:31'),(14,220,'SID_144_605_174_20250109_113459',2066,'ONLY_CUSTOM',4,'2025-01-09 11:36:39'),(15,219,'SID_144_606_174_20250109_113454',2067,'ONLY_CUSTOM',5,'2025-01-09 11:36:47'),(16,220,'SID_144_605_174_20250109_113459',2067,'ONLY_CUSTOM',5,'2025-01-09 11:36:56'),(17,220,'SID_144_605_174_20250109_113459',2068,'ONLY_CUSTOM',6,'2025-01-09 11:37:14'),(18,219,'SID_144_606_174_20250109_113454',2068,'ONLY_CUSTOM',6,'2025-01-09 11:37:26'),(19,220,'SID_144_605_174_20250109_113459',2069,'ONLY_CUSTOM',7,'2025-01-09 11:37:36'),(20,219,'SID_144_606_174_20250109_113454',2069,'ONLY_CUSTOM',7,'2025-01-09 11:37:45'),(21,220,'SID_144_605_174_20250109_113459',2070,'ONLY_CUSTOM',8,'2025-01-09 11:37:56'),(22,219,'SID_144_606_174_20250109_113454',2070,'ONLY_CUSTOM',8,'2025-01-09 11:38:37'),(23,221,'SID_144_608_175_20250109_114821',2085,'ONLY_CUSTOM',2,'2025-01-09 11:49:59'),(24,221,'SID_144_608_175_20250109_114821',2086,'ONLY_CUSTOM',3,'2025-01-09 11:50:25'),(25,221,'SID_144_608_175_20250109_114821',2087,'ONLY_CUSTOM',4,'2025-01-09 11:50:34'),(26,221,'SID_144_608_175_20250109_114821',2088,'ONLY_CUSTOM',5,'2025-01-09 11:50:49'),(27,222,'SID_144_610_176_20250109_115025',2071,'ONLY_CUSTOM',2,'2025-01-09 11:51:04'),(28,221,'SID_144_608_175_20250109_114821',2089,'ONLY_CUSTOM',6,'2025-01-09 11:51:06'),(29,223,'SID_144_609_176_20250109_115112',2071,'ONLY_CUSTOM',2,'2025-01-09 11:51:32'),(30,221,'SID_144_608_175_20250109_114821',2090,'ONLY_CUSTOM',7,'2025-01-09 11:51:39'),(31,222,'SID_144_610_176_20250109_115025',2072,'ONLY_CUSTOM',3,'2025-01-09 11:51:39'),(32,222,'SID_144_610_176_20250109_115025',2073,'ONLY_CUSTOM',4,'2025-01-09 11:51:49'),(33,223,'SID_144_609_176_20250109_115112',2072,'ONLY_CUSTOM',3,'2025-01-09 11:52:00'),(34,222,'SID_144_610_176_20250109_115025',2074,'ONLY_CUSTOM',5,'2025-01-09 11:52:08'),(35,223,'SID_144_609_176_20250109_115112',2073,'ONLY_CUSTOM',4,'2025-01-09 11:52:11'),(36,221,'SID_144_608_175_20250109_114821',2091,'ONLY_CUSTOM',8,'2025-01-09 11:52:11'),(37,223,'SID_144_609_176_20250109_115112',2074,'ONLY_CUSTOM',5,'2025-01-09 11:52:30'),(38,222,'SID_144_610_176_20250109_115025',2075,'ONLY_CUSTOM',6,'2025-01-09 11:52:31'),(39,222,'SID_144_610_176_20250109_115025',2076,'ONLY_CUSTOM',7,'2025-01-09 11:52:49'),(40,223,'SID_144_609_176_20250109_115112',2075,'ONLY_CUSTOM',6,'2025-01-09 11:52:50'),(41,223,'SID_144_609_176_20250109_115112',2076,'ONLY_CUSTOM',7,'2025-01-09 11:53:06'),(42,222,'SID_144_610_176_20250109_115025',2077,'ONLY_CUSTOM',8,'2025-01-09 11:53:10'),(43,223,'SID_144_609_176_20250109_115112',2077,'ONLY_CUSTOM',8,'2025-01-09 11:53:29'),(44,224,'SID_144_607_175_20250109_141930',2085,'ONLY_CUSTOM',2,'2025-01-09 14:21:11'),(45,224,'SID_144_607_175_20250109_141930',2086,'ONLY_CUSTOM',3,'2025-01-09 14:21:41'),(46,224,'SID_144_607_175_20250109_141930',2087,'ONLY_CUSTOM',4,'2025-01-09 14:21:58'),(47,224,'SID_144_607_175_20250109_141930',2088,'ONLY_CUSTOM',5,'2025-01-09 14:22:42'),(48,224,'SID_144_607_175_20250109_141930',2089,'ONLY_CUSTOM',6,'2025-01-09 14:23:45'),(49,224,'SID_144_607_175_20250109_141930',2090,'ONLY_CUSTOM',7,'2025-01-09 14:24:35'),(50,224,'SID_144_607_175_20250109_141930',2091,'ONLY_CUSTOM',8,'2025-01-09 14:25:25'),(51,226,'SID_144_615_179_20250110_070521',2092,'ONLY_CUSTOM',2,'2025-01-10 07:07:12'),(52,226,'SID_144_615_179_20250110_070521',2093,'ONLY_CUSTOM',3,'2025-01-10 07:07:18'),(53,226,'SID_144_615_179_20250110_070521',2094,'ONLY_CUSTOM',4,'2025-01-10 07:07:31'),(54,228,'SID_144_616_179_20250110_071055',2092,'ONLY_CUSTOM',2,'2025-01-10 07:11:32'),(55,228,'SID_144_616_179_20250110_071055',2093,'ONLY_CUSTOM',3,'2025-01-10 07:11:53'),(56,228,'SID_144_616_179_20250110_071055',2094,'ONLY_CUSTOM',4,'2025-01-10 07:12:40'),(57,228,'SID_144_616_179_20250110_071055',2095,'ONLY_CUSTOM',5,'2025-01-10 07:13:22'),(58,229,'SID_4_600_171_20250110_071315',2029,'ONLY_CUSTOM',2,'2025-01-10 07:14:08'),(59,228,'SID_144_616_179_20250110_071055',2096,'ONLY_CUSTOM',6,'2025-01-10 07:14:09'),(60,228,'SID_144_616_179_20250110_071055',2097,'ONLY_CUSTOM',7,'2025-01-10 07:14:26'),(61,228,'SID_144_616_179_20250110_071055',2098,'ONLY_CUSTOM',8,'2025-01-10 07:15:32'),(62,231,'SID_144_614_179_20250110_072201',2092,'ONLY_CUSTOM',2,'2025-01-10 07:23:18'),(63,231,'SID_144_614_179_20250110_072201',2093,'ONLY_CUSTOM',3,'2025-01-10 07:23:47'),(64,230,'SID_4_600_171_20250110_072200',2029,'ONLY_CUSTOM',2,'2025-01-10 07:23:50'),(65,230,'SID_4_600_171_20250110_072200',2030,'ONLY_CUSTOM',3,'2025-01-10 07:24:23'),(66,231,'SID_144_614_179_20250110_072201',2094,'ONLY_CUSTOM',4,'2025-01-10 07:24:24'),(67,230,'SID_4_600_171_20250110_072200',2031,'ONLY_CUSTOM',4,'2025-01-10 07:24:35'),(68,230,'SID_4_600_171_20250110_072200',2032,'ONLY_CUSTOM',5,'2025-01-10 07:24:53'),(69,231,'SID_144_614_179_20250110_072201',2095,'ONLY_CUSTOM',5,'2025-01-10 07:25:17'),(70,230,'SID_4_600_171_20250110_072200',2033,'ONLY_CUSTOM',6,'2025-01-10 07:25:20'),(71,230,'SID_4_600_171_20250110_072200',2034,'ONLY_CUSTOM',7,'2025-01-10 07:25:39'),(72,230,'SID_4_600_171_20250110_072200',2035,'ONLY_CUSTOM',8,'2025-01-10 07:25:56'),(73,231,'SID_144_614_179_20250110_072201',2096,'ONLY_CUSTOM',6,'2025-01-10 07:26:04'),(74,231,'SID_144_614_179_20250110_072201',2097,'ONLY_CUSTOM',7,'2025-01-10 07:26:18'),(75,231,'SID_144_614_179_20250110_072201',2098,'ONLY_CUSTOM',8,'2025-01-10 07:27:14'),(76,232,'SID_144_617_179_20250110_072805',2092,'ONLY_CUSTOM',2,'2025-01-10 07:28:35'),(77,232,'SID_144_617_179_20250110_072805',2093,'ONLY_CUSTOM',3,'2025-01-10 07:29:02'),(78,232,'SID_144_617_179_20250110_072805',2094,'ONLY_CUSTOM',4,'2025-01-10 07:29:24'),(79,232,'SID_144_617_179_20250110_072805',2095,'ONLY_CUSTOM',5,'2025-01-10 07:29:44'),(80,232,'SID_144_617_179_20250110_072805',2096,'ONLY_CUSTOM',6,'2025-01-10 07:30:07'),(81,232,'SID_144_617_179_20250110_072805',2097,'ONLY_CUSTOM',7,'2025-01-10 07:30:22'),(82,232,'SID_144_617_179_20250110_072805',2098,'ONLY_CUSTOM',8,'2025-01-10 07:30:51'),(83,233,'SID_4_630_181_20250110_072943',2106,'ONLY_CUSTOM',2,'2025-01-10 07:31:29'),(84,233,'SID_4_630_181_20250110_072943',2107,'ONLY_CUSTOM',3,'2025-01-10 07:32:15'),(85,234,'SID_144_614_179_20250110_073209',2092,'ONLY_CUSTOM',2,'2025-01-10 07:32:39'),(86,234,'SID_144_614_179_20250110_073209',2093,'ONLY_CUSTOM',3,'2025-01-10 07:32:56'),(87,234,'SID_144_614_179_20250110_073209',2094,'ONLY_CUSTOM',4,'2025-01-10 07:33:25'),(88,234,'SID_144_614_179_20250110_073209',2095,'ONLY_CUSTOM',5,'2025-01-10 07:33:47'),(89,234,'SID_144_614_179_20250110_073209',2096,'ONLY_CUSTOM',6,'2025-01-10 07:34:24'),(90,234,'SID_144_614_179_20250110_073209',2097,'ONLY_CUSTOM',7,'2025-01-10 07:34:43'),(91,233,'SID_4_630_181_20250110_072943',2108,'ONLY_CUSTOM',4,'2025-01-10 07:35:22'),(92,234,'SID_144_614_179_20250110_073209',2098,'ONLY_CUSTOM',8,'2025-01-10 07:35:26'),(93,233,'SID_4_630_181_20250110_072943',2109,'ONLY_CUSTOM',5,'2025-01-10 07:35:38'),(94,233,'SID_4_630_181_20250110_072943',2110,'ONLY_CUSTOM',6,'2025-01-10 07:35:54'),(95,233,'SID_4_630_181_20250110_072943',2111,'ONLY_CUSTOM',7,'2025-01-10 07:36:10'),(96,233,'SID_4_630_181_20250110_072943',2112,'ONLY_CUSTOM',8,'2025-01-10 07:41:03'),(97,235,'SID_4_629_181_20250110_074209',2106,'ONLY_CUSTOM',2,'2025-01-10 07:42:42'),(98,235,'SID_4_629_181_20250110_074209',2107,'ONLY_CUSTOM',3,'2025-01-10 07:43:09'),(99,235,'SID_4_629_181_20250110_074209',2108,'ONLY_CUSTOM',4,'2025-01-10 07:43:18'),(100,236,'SID_144_618_180_20250110_074306',2099,'ONLY_CUSTOM',2,'2025-01-10 07:43:30'),(101,235,'SID_4_629_181_20250110_074209',2109,'ONLY_CUSTOM',5,'2025-01-10 07:43:34'),(102,236,'SID_144_618_180_20250110_074306',2100,'ONLY_CUSTOM',3,'2025-01-10 07:43:37'),(103,235,'SID_4_629_181_20250110_074209',2110,'ONLY_CUSTOM',6,'2025-01-10 07:43:49'),(104,236,'SID_144_618_180_20250110_074306',2101,'ONLY_CUSTOM',4,'2025-01-10 07:43:51'),(105,236,'SID_144_618_180_20250110_074306',2102,'ONLY_CUSTOM',5,'2025-01-10 07:44:11'),(106,236,'SID_144_618_180_20250110_074306',2103,'ONLY_CUSTOM',6,'2025-01-10 07:44:27'),(107,235,'SID_4_629_181_20250110_074209',2111,'ONLY_CUSTOM',7,'2025-01-10 07:44:29'),(108,236,'SID_144_618_180_20250110_074306',2104,'ONLY_CUSTOM',7,'2025-01-10 07:44:41'),(109,235,'SID_4_629_181_20250110_074209',2112,'ONLY_CUSTOM',8,'2025-01-10 07:44:44'),(110,236,'SID_144_618_180_20250110_074306',2105,'ONLY_CUSTOM',8,'2025-01-10 07:44:55'),(111,237,'SID_4_628_181_20250110_074529',2106,'ONLY_CUSTOM',2,'2025-01-10 07:46:03'),(112,237,'SID_4_628_181_20250110_074529',2107,'ONLY_CUSTOM',3,'2025-01-10 07:46:30'),(113,237,'SID_4_628_181_20250110_074529',2108,'ONLY_CUSTOM',4,'2025-01-10 07:46:48'),(114,237,'SID_4_628_181_20250110_074529',2109,'ONLY_CUSTOM',5,'2025-01-10 07:47:16'),(115,237,'SID_4_628_181_20250110_074529',2110,'ONLY_CUSTOM',6,'2025-01-10 07:47:32'),(116,237,'SID_4_628_181_20250110_074529',2111,'ONLY_CUSTOM',7,'2025-01-10 07:48:01'),(117,237,'SID_4_628_181_20250110_074529',2112,'ONLY_CUSTOM',8,'2025-01-10 07:48:17'),(118,238,'SID_144_596_166_20250110_083705',1991,'ONLY_CUSTOM',2,'2025-01-10 08:38:20'),(119,238,'SID_144_596_166_20250110_083705',1992,'ONLY_CUSTOM',3,'2025-01-10 08:38:39'),(120,238,'SID_144_596_166_20250110_083705',1993,'ONLY_CUSTOM',4,'2025-01-10 08:40:07'),(121,238,'SID_144_596_166_20250110_083705',1994,'ONLY_CUSTOM',5,'2025-01-10 08:44:50'),(122,239,'SID_144_611_177_20250110_084952',2078,'ONLY_CUSTOM',2,'2025-01-10 08:50:29'),(123,239,'SID_144_611_177_20250110_084952',2079,'ONLY_CUSTOM',3,'2025-01-10 08:51:23'),(124,239,'SID_144_611_177_20250110_084952',2080,'ONLY_CUSTOM',4,'2025-01-10 08:51:33'),(125,240,'SID_144_612_177_20250110_085322',2078,'ONLY_CUSTOM',2,'2025-01-10 08:53:56'),(126,241,'SID_4_627_181_20250110_090914',2106,'ONLY_CUSTOM',2,'2025-01-10 09:09:45'),(127,241,'SID_4_627_181_20250110_090914',2107,'ONLY_CUSTOM',3,'2025-01-10 09:10:18'),(128,241,'SID_4_627_181_20250110_090914',2108,'ONLY_CUSTOM',4,'2025-01-10 09:10:26'),(129,241,'SID_4_627_181_20250110_090914',2109,'ONLY_CUSTOM',5,'2025-01-10 09:11:21'),(130,242,'SID_4_629_181_20250110_103436',2106,'ONLY_CUSTOM',2,'2025-01-10 10:35:13'),(131,242,'SID_4_629_181_20250110_103436',2107,'ONLY_CUSTOM',3,'2025-01-10 10:35:48'),(132,242,'SID_4_629_181_20250110_103436',2108,'ONLY_CUSTOM',4,'2025-01-10 10:36:09'),(133,242,'SID_4_629_181_20250110_103436',2109,'ONLY_CUSTOM',5,'2025-01-10 10:36:31'),(134,242,'SID_4_629_181_20250110_103436',2110,'ONLY_CUSTOM',6,'2025-01-10 10:36:48'),(135,242,'SID_4_629_181_20250110_103436',2111,'ONLY_CUSTOM',7,'2025-01-10 10:37:08'),(136,242,'SID_4_629_181_20250110_103436',2112,'ONLY_CUSTOM',8,'2025-01-10 10:37:23'),(137,243,'SID_144_619_180_20250110_141311',2099,'ONLY_CUSTOM',2,'2025-01-10 14:13:52'),(138,243,'SID_144_619_180_20250110_141311',2100,'ONLY_CUSTOM',3,'2025-01-10 14:14:10'),(139,243,'SID_144_619_180_20250110_141311',2101,'ONLY_CUSTOM',4,'2025-01-10 14:16:33'),(140,243,'SID_144_619_180_20250110_141311',2102,'ONLY_CUSTOM',5,'2025-01-10 14:17:09'),(141,244,'SID_4_626_181_20250110_141701',2106,'ONLY_CUSTOM',2,'2025-01-10 14:17:37'),(142,243,'SID_144_619_180_20250110_141311',2103,'ONLY_CUSTOM',6,'2025-01-10 14:17:43'),(143,243,'SID_144_619_180_20250110_141311',2104,'ONLY_CUSTOM',7,'2025-01-10 14:17:58'),(144,244,'SID_4_626_181_20250110_141701',2107,'ONLY_CUSTOM',3,'2025-01-10 14:18:06'),(145,243,'SID_144_619_180_20250110_141311',2105,'ONLY_CUSTOM',8,'2025-01-10 14:18:53'),(146,251,'SID_4_629_181_20250122_111302',2106,'ONLY_CUSTOM',2,'2025-01-22 11:13:41'),(147,251,'SID_4_629_181_20250122_111302',2107,'ONLY_CUSTOM',3,'2025-01-22 11:14:10'),(148,251,'SID_4_629_181_20250122_111302',2108,'ONLY_CUSTOM',4,'2025-01-22 11:14:21'),(149,252,'SID_4_632_183_20250122_114332',2174,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',2,'2025-01-22 11:44:02'),(150,252,'SID_4_632_183_20250122_114332',2175,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',3,'2025-01-22 11:44:13'),(151,252,'SID_4_632_183_20250122_114332',2176,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',4,'2025-01-22 11:44:24'),(152,252,'SID_4_632_183_20250122_114332',2177,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',5,'2025-01-22 11:44:38'),(153,252,'SID_4_632_183_20250122_114332',2178,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',6,'2025-01-22 11:44:49'),(154,252,'SID_4_632_183_20250122_114332',2179,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',7,'2025-01-22 11:45:02'),(155,252,'SID_4_632_183_20250122_114332',2180,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',8,'2025-01-22 11:45:13'),(156,252,'SID_4_632_183_20250122_114332',2181,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',9,'2025-01-22 11:45:24'),(157,252,'SID_4_632_183_20250122_114332',2182,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',10,'2025-01-22 11:45:39'),(158,252,'SID_4_632_183_20250122_114332',2183,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',11,'2025-01-22 11:48:15'),(159,254,'SID_4_634_185_20250122_115319',2167,'ONLY_CUSTOM',2,'2025-01-22 11:54:07'),(160,254,'SID_4_634_185_20250122_115319',2168,'ONLY_CUSTOM',3,'2025-01-22 11:54:34'),(161,254,'SID_4_634_185_20250122_115319',2169,'ONLY_CUSTOM',4,'2025-01-22 11:54:42'),(162,254,'SID_4_634_185_20250122_115319',2170,'ONLY_CUSTOM',5,'2025-01-22 11:54:56'),(163,254,'SID_4_634_185_20250122_115319',2171,'ONLY_CUSTOM',6,'2025-01-22 11:55:12'),(164,255,'SID_144_621_180_20250122_115821',2099,'ONLY_CUSTOM',2,'2025-01-22 11:58:48'),(165,255,'SID_144_621_180_20250122_115821',2100,'ONLY_CUSTOM',3,'2025-01-22 11:59:25'),(166,255,'SID_144_621_180_20250122_115821',2101,'ONLY_CUSTOM',4,'2025-01-22 12:00:14'),(167,255,'SID_144_621_180_20250122_115821',2102,'ONLY_CUSTOM',5,'2025-01-22 12:00:42'),(168,255,'SID_144_621_180_20250122_115821',2103,'ONLY_CUSTOM',6,'2025-01-22 12:03:08'),(169,255,'SID_144_621_180_20250122_115821',2104,'ONLY_CUSTOM',7,'2025-01-22 12:03:45'),(170,255,'SID_144_621_180_20250122_115821',2105,'ONLY_CUSTOM',8,'2025-01-22 12:04:43'),(171,256,'SID_144_620_180_20250122_123531',2099,'ONLY_CUSTOM',2,'2025-01-22 12:37:08'),(172,256,'SID_144_620_180_20250122_123531',2100,'ONLY_CUSTOM',3,'2025-01-22 12:37:19'),(173,256,'SID_144_620_180_20250122_123531',2101,'ONLY_CUSTOM',4,'2025-01-22 12:38:22'),(174,256,'SID_144_620_180_20250122_123531',2102,'ONLY_CUSTOM',5,'2025-01-22 12:38:36'),(175,256,'SID_144_620_180_20250122_123531',2103,'ONLY_CUSTOM',6,'2025-01-22 12:39:03'),(176,256,'SID_144_620_180_20250122_123531',2104,'ONLY_CUSTOM',7,'2025-01-22 12:47:27'),(177,256,'SID_144_620_180_20250122_123531',2105,'ONLY_CUSTOM',8,'2025-01-22 12:48:31'),(178,259,'SID_4_626_181_20250206_100451',2106,'ONLY_CUSTOM',2,'2025-02-06 10:05:16'),(179,260,'SID_144_651_194_20250207_124616',2208,'ONLY_CUSTOM',2,'2025-02-07 12:46:42'),(180,260,'SID_144_651_194_20250207_124616',2209,'ONLY_CUSTOM',3,'2025-02-07 12:46:47'),(181,263,'SID_144_661_199_20250305_063223',2225,'ONLY_CUSTOM',2,'2025-03-05 06:32:51'),(182,263,'SID_144_661_199_20250305_063223',2226,'ONLY_CUSTOM',2,'2025-03-05 06:32:52'),(183,264,'SID_164_671_208_20250402_073333',2242,'ONLY_CUSTOM',2,'2025-04-02 07:37:26'),(184,264,'SID_164_671_208_20250402_073333',2243,'ONLY_CUSTOM',3,'2025-04-02 07:38:16'),(185,264,'SID_164_671_208_20250402_073333',2244,'ONLY_CUSTOM',4,'2025-04-02 07:38:40'),(186,264,'SID_164_671_208_20250402_073333',2245,'ONLY_CUSTOM',5,'2025-04-02 07:39:15'),(187,264,'SID_164_671_208_20250402_073333',2246,'ONLY_CUSTOM',6,'2025-04-02 07:40:12'),(188,264,'SID_164_671_208_20250402_073333',2247,'ONLY_CUSTOM',7,'2025-04-02 07:40:59'),(189,265,'SID_164_672_208_20250402_074806',2242,'ONLY_CUSTOM',2,'2025-04-02 07:48:33'),(190,265,'SID_164_672_208_20250402_074806',2243,'ONLY_CUSTOM',3,'2025-04-02 07:49:41'),(191,265,'SID_164_672_208_20250402_074806',2244,'ONLY_CUSTOM',4,'2025-04-02 07:49:51'),(192,265,'SID_164_672_208_20250402_074806',2245,'ONLY_CUSTOM',5,'2025-04-02 07:50:18'),(193,265,'SID_164_672_208_20250402_074806',2246,'ONLY_CUSTOM',6,'2025-04-02 07:51:22'),(194,265,'SID_164_672_208_20250402_074806',2247,'ONLY_CUSTOM',7,'2025-04-02 07:51:39'),(195,270,'SID_4_623_181_20250415_075303',2106,'ONLY_CUSTOM',2,'2025-04-15 07:55:50'),(196,270,'SID_4_623_181_20250415_075303',2107,'ONLY_CUSTOM',3,'2025-04-15 07:56:18'),(197,270,'SID_4_623_181_20250415_075303',2108,'ONLY_CUSTOM',4,'2025-04-15 07:56:28'),(198,270,'SID_4_623_181_20250415_075303',2109,'ONLY_CUSTOM',5,'2025-04-15 07:56:44'),(199,270,'SID_4_623_181_20250415_075303',2110,'ONLY_CUSTOM',6,'2025-04-15 07:57:00'),(200,270,'SID_4_623_181_20250415_075303',2111,'ONLY_CUSTOM',7,'2025-04-15 07:57:17'),(201,270,'SID_4_623_181_20250415_075303',2112,'ONLY_CUSTOM',8,'2025-04-15 07:57:33'),(202,272,'SID_4_627_181_20250416_135638',2106,'ONLY_CUSTOM',2,'2025-04-16 13:57:23'),(203,272,'SID_4_627_181_20250416_135638',2107,'ONLY_CUSTOM',3,'2025-04-16 13:57:52'),(204,272,'SID_4_627_181_20250416_135638',2108,'ONLY_CUSTOM',4,'2025-04-16 13:58:02'),(205,278,'SID_144_674_210_20250417_083132',2283,'ONLY_CUSTOM',2,'2025-04-17 08:32:02'),(206,282,'SID_144_678_214_20250417_102337',2308,'ONLY_CUSTOM',2,'2025-04-17 10:24:03'),(207,282,'SID_144_678_214_20250417_102337',2309,'ONLY_CUSTOM',3,'2025-04-17 10:25:13'),(208,282,'SID_144_678_214_20250417_102337',2310,'ONLY_CUSTOM',4,'2025-04-17 10:26:08'),(209,282,'SID_144_678_214_20250417_102337',2311,'ONLY_CUSTOM',5,'2025-04-17 10:26:40'),(210,282,'SID_144_678_214_20250417_102337',2312,'ONLY_CUSTOM',6,'2025-04-17 10:28:01'),(211,283,'SID_4_700_227_20250424_103528',2393,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',2,'2025-04-24 10:35:53'),(212,283,'SID_4_700_227_20250424_103528',2394,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',3,'2025-04-24 10:36:22'),(213,283,'SID_4_700_227_20250424_103528',2395,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',4,'2025-04-24 10:36:37'),(214,283,'SID_4_700_227_20250424_103528',2396,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',5,'2025-04-24 10:36:51'),(215,283,'SID_4_700_227_20250424_103528',2397,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',6,'2025-04-24 10:37:14'),(216,283,'SID_4_700_227_20250424_103528',2398,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',7,'2025-04-24 10:37:37'),(217,283,'SID_4_700_227_20250424_103528',2399,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',8,'2025-04-24 10:38:01'),(218,283,'SID_4_700_227_20250424_103528',2400,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',9,'2025-04-24 10:38:22'),(219,283,'SID_4_700_227_20250424_103528',2401,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',10,'2025-04-24 10:38:38'),(220,283,'SID_4_700_227_20250424_103528',2402,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',11,'2025-04-24 10:38:58'),(221,284,'SID_4_708_229_20250424_105236',2403,'ONLY_CUSTOM',2,'2025-04-24 10:52:58'),(222,284,'SID_4_708_229_20250424_105236',2404,'ONLY_CUSTOM',2,'2025-04-24 10:53:19'),(223,284,'SID_4_708_229_20250424_105236',2405,'ONLY_CUSTOM',3,'2025-04-24 10:53:48'),(224,285,'SID_4_709_230_20250424_105323',2411,'ONLY_CUSTOM',2,'2025-04-24 10:53:49'),(225,284,'SID_4_708_229_20250424_105236',2406,'ONLY_CUSTOM',4,'2025-04-24 10:54:11'),(226,284,'SID_4_708_229_20250424_105236',2407,'ONLY_CUSTOM',5,'2025-04-24 10:54:27'),(227,284,'SID_4_708_229_20250424_105236',2408,'ONLY_CUSTOM',6,'2025-04-24 10:54:44'),(228,284,'SID_4_708_229_20250424_105236',2409,'ONLY_CUSTOM',7,'2025-04-24 10:55:06'),(229,284,'SID_4_708_229_20250424_105236',2410,'ONLY_CUSTOM',8,'2025-04-24 10:55:32'),(230,286,'SID_4_710_231_20250424_105755',2423,'ONLY_CUSTOM',2,'2025-04-24 10:58:19'),(231,287,'SID_4_710_231_20250424_110221',2423,'ONLY_CUSTOM',2,'2025-04-24 11:03:54'),(232,287,'SID_4_710_231_20250424_110221',2424,'ONLY_CUSTOM',3,'2025-04-24 11:04:57'),(233,287,'SID_4_710_231_20250424_110221',2425,'ONLY_CUSTOM',4,'2025-04-24 11:05:42'),(234,287,'SID_4_710_231_20250424_110221',2426,'ONLY_CUSTOM',5,'2025-04-24 11:06:51'),(235,288,'SID_4_720_234_20250425_042313',2439,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',2,'2025-04-25 04:24:44'),(236,288,'SID_4_720_234_20250425_042313',2440,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',2,'2025-04-25 04:25:00'),(237,288,'SID_4_720_234_20250425_042313',2441,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',3,'2025-04-25 04:25:17'),(238,288,'SID_4_720_234_20250425_042313',2442,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',4,'2025-04-25 04:25:31'),(239,288,'SID_4_720_234_20250425_042313',2443,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',5,'2025-04-25 04:26:35'),(240,288,'SID_4_720_234_20250425_042313',2444,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',6,'2025-04-25 04:27:42'),(241,288,'SID_4_720_234_20250425_042313',2445,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',7,'2025-04-25 04:29:19'),(242,288,'SID_4_720_234_20250425_042313',2446,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',8,'2025-04-25 04:29:34'),(246,289,'SID_4_721_234_20250425_052118',2449,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',2,'2025-04-25 05:27:26'),(247,289,'SID_4_721_234_20250425_052118',2450,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',3,'2025-04-25 05:27:57'),(248,289,'SID_4_721_234_20250425_052118',2451,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',4,'2025-04-25 05:29:30'),(249,289,'SID_4_721_234_20250425_052118',2452,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',2,'2025-04-25 05:31:36'),(250,289,'SID_4_721_234_20250425_052118',2453,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',3,'2025-04-25 05:31:50'),(251,289,'SID_4_721_234_20250425_052118',2454,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',4,'2025-04-25 05:32:07'),(252,290,'SID_4_722_235_20250425_054006',2459,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',2,'2025-04-25 05:40:38'),(253,290,'SID_4_722_235_20250425_054006',2460,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',3,'2025-04-25 05:40:57'),(254,290,'SID_4_722_235_20250425_054006',2461,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',4,'2025-04-25 05:41:14'),(255,290,'SID_4_722_235_20250425_054006',2462,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',5,'2025-04-25 05:46:09'),(263,293,'SID_4_723_235_20250425_060742',2469,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',2,'2025-04-25 06:08:08'),(264,293,'SID_4_723_235_20250425_060742',2470,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',3,'2025-04-25 06:08:23'),(265,293,'SID_4_723_235_20250425_060742',2471,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',4,'2025-04-25 06:08:59'),(266,295,'SID_4_724_235_20250425_062325',2489,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',2,'2025-04-25 06:23:42'),(267,295,'SID_4_724_235_20250425_062325',2490,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',3,'2025-04-25 06:23:57'),(268,295,'SID_4_724_235_20250425_062325',2491,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',4,'2025-04-25 06:24:14'),(269,295,'SID_4_724_235_20250425_062325',2492,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',5,'2025-04-25 06:24:30'),(270,295,'SID_4_724_235_20250425_062325',2493,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',6,'2025-04-25 06:24:50'),(271,296,'SID_4_725_235_20250425_063434',2499,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',2,'2025-04-25 06:35:02'),(272,296,'SID_4_725_235_20250425_063434',2500,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',3,'2025-04-25 06:35:19'),(273,296,'SID_4_725_235_20250425_063434',2501,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',4,'2025-04-25 06:35:36'),(274,296,'SID_4_725_235_20250425_063434',2502,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',2,'2025-04-25 06:42:55'),(275,296,'SID_4_725_235_20250425_063434',2503,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',3,'2025-04-25 06:43:35'),(276,296,'SID_4_725_235_20250425_063434',2504,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',4,'2025-04-25 06:45:37'),(277,296,'SID_4_725_235_20250425_063434',2505,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',5,'2025-04-25 06:46:24'),(278,296,'SID_4_725_235_20250425_063434',2506,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',6,'2025-04-25 06:46:46'),(279,296,'SID_4_725_235_20250425_063434',2507,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',2,'2025-04-25 06:48:59'),(280,297,'SID_4_726_235_20250425_065640',2509,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',2,'2025-04-25 06:56:56'),(281,297,'SID_4_726_235_20250425_065640',2510,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',3,'2025-04-25 06:57:13'),(282,297,'SID_4_726_235_20250425_065640',2511,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',4,'2025-04-25 06:57:38'),(283,297,'SID_4_726_235_20250425_065640',2512,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',5,'2025-04-25 06:57:59'),(284,297,'SID_4_726_235_20250425_065640',2513,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',6,'2025-04-25 06:58:20'),(285,297,'SID_4_726_235_20250425_065640',2514,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',7,'2025-04-25 06:58:43'),(286,297,'SID_4_726_235_20250425_065640',2515,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',8,'2025-04-25 06:59:13'),(287,297,'SID_4_726_235_20250425_065640',2516,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',9,'2025-04-25 06:59:35'),(288,297,'SID_4_726_235_20250425_065640',2517,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',10,'2025-04-25 06:59:52'),(289,297,'SID_4_726_235_20250425_065640',2518,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',11,'2025-04-25 07:00:10'),(290,299,'SID_4_728_235_20250425_101637',2529,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',2,'2025-04-25 10:17:02'),(291,299,'SID_4_728_235_20250425_101637',2530,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',3,'2025-04-25 10:17:22'),(292,299,'SID_4_728_235_20250425_101637',2531,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',4,'2025-04-25 10:17:37'),(293,299,'SID_4_728_235_20250425_101637',2532,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',5,'2025-04-25 10:18:00'),(294,299,'SID_4_728_235_20250425_101637',2533,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',6,'2025-04-25 10:18:43'),(295,303,'SID_201_735_236_20250427_042301',2779,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',2,'2025-04-27 04:25:50'),(296,303,'SID_201_735_236_20250427_042301',2780,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',3,'2025-04-27 04:26:18'),(297,303,'SID_201_735_236_20250427_042301',2781,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',4,'2025-04-27 04:29:23'),(298,304,'SID_201_735_236_20250427_043801',2789,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',2,'2025-04-27 04:38:54'),(299,304,'SID_201_735_236_20250427_043801',2790,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',3,'2025-04-27 04:39:51'),(300,304,'SID_201_735_236_20250427_043801',2791,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',4,'2025-04-27 04:40:11'),(301,304,'SID_201_735_236_20250427_043801',2792,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',5,'2025-04-27 04:40:54'),(302,304,'SID_201_735_236_20250427_043801',2793,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',6,'2025-04-27 04:42:13'),(303,304,'SID_201_735_236_20250427_043801',2794,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',7,'2025-04-27 04:43:35'),(304,304,'SID_201_735_236_20250427_043801',2795,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',8,'2025-04-27 04:44:23'),(305,304,'SID_201_735_236_20250427_043801',2796,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',9,'2025-04-27 04:45:04'),(306,304,'SID_201_735_236_20250427_043801',2797,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',10,'2025-04-27 04:45:32'),(307,304,'SID_201_735_236_20250427_043801',2798,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',11,'2025-04-27 04:46:54'),(308,306,'SID_211_731_236_20250427_103547',2949,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',2,'2025-04-27 10:37:19'),(309,307,'SID_200_734_236_20250427_105908',2979,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',2,'2025-04-27 11:00:22'),(310,308,'SID_211_731_236_20250427_110748',2989,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',2,'2025-04-27 11:10:00'),(311,308,'SID_211_731_236_20250427_110748',2990,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',3,'2025-04-27 11:12:11'),(312,308,'SID_211_731_236_20250427_110748',2991,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',4,'2025-04-27 11:13:26'),(313,308,'SID_211_731_236_20250427_110748',2992,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',5,'2025-04-27 11:14:36'),(314,308,'SID_211_731_236_20250427_110748',2993,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',6,'2025-04-27 11:16:09'),(315,308,'SID_211_731_236_20250427_110748',2994,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',7,'2025-04-27 11:17:30'),(316,308,'SID_211_731_236_20250427_110748',2995,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',8,'2025-04-27 11:19:14'),(317,308,'SID_211_731_236_20250427_110748',2996,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',9,'2025-04-27 11:20:49'),(318,308,'SID_211_731_236_20250427_110748',2997,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',10,'2025-04-27 11:22:57'),(319,308,'SID_211_731_236_20250427_110748',2998,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',11,'2025-04-27 11:25:02'),(320,310,'SID_198_732_236_20250428_075958',3009,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',2,'2025-04-28 08:00:57'),(321,310,'SID_198_732_236_20250428_075958',3010,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',3,'2025-04-28 08:02:02'),(322,310,'SID_198_732_236_20250428_075958',3011,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',4,'2025-04-28 08:03:05'),(323,310,'SID_198_732_236_20250428_075958',3012,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',5,'2025-04-28 08:03:58'),(324,310,'SID_198_732_236_20250428_075958',3013,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',6,'2025-04-28 08:04:56'),(325,310,'SID_198_732_236_20250428_075958',3014,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',7,'2025-04-28 08:06:06'),(326,310,'SID_198_732_236_20250428_075958',3015,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',8,'2025-04-28 08:07:13'),(327,310,'SID_198_732_236_20250428_075958',3016,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',9,'2025-04-28 08:07:43'),(328,310,'SID_198_732_236_20250428_075958',3017,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',10,'2025-04-28 08:08:18'),(329,310,'SID_198_732_236_20250428_075958',3018,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',11,'2025-04-28 08:09:02'),(330,311,'SID_212_746_236_20250428_102832',3029,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',2,'2025-04-28 10:29:47'),(331,311,'SID_212_746_236_20250428_102832',3030,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',3,'2025-04-28 10:30:53'),(332,312,'SID_212_746_236_20250428_104315',3039,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',2,'2025-04-28 10:43:59'),(333,312,'SID_212_746_236_20250428_104315',3040,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',3,'2025-04-28 10:45:19'),(334,312,'SID_212_746_236_20250428_104315',3041,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',4,'2025-04-28 10:46:38'),(335,312,'SID_212_746_236_20250428_104315',3042,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',5,'2025-04-28 10:48:04'),(336,312,'SID_212_746_236_20250428_104315',3043,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',6,'2025-04-28 10:49:15'),(337,312,'SID_212_746_236_20250428_104315',3044,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',7,'2025-04-28 10:50:49'),(338,312,'SID_212_746_236_20250428_104315',3045,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',8,'2025-04-28 10:52:41'),(339,312,'SID_212_746_236_20250428_104315',3046,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',9,'2025-04-28 10:53:37'),(340,312,'SID_212_746_236_20250428_104315',3047,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',10,'2025-04-28 10:55:16'),(341,312,'SID_212_746_236_20250428_104315',3048,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',11,'2025-04-28 10:56:24'),(342,313,'SID_195_729_236_20250428_105706',3069,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',2,'2025-04-28 10:58:34'),(343,313,'SID_195_729_236_20250428_105706',3070,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',3,'2025-04-28 10:59:05'),(344,313,'SID_195_729_236_20250428_105706',3071,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',4,'2025-04-28 10:59:47'),(345,314,'SID_195_729_236_20250428_110411',3109,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',2,'2025-04-28 11:05:33'),(346,314,'SID_195_729_236_20250428_110411',3110,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',3,'2025-04-28 11:06:09'),(347,314,'SID_195_729_236_20250428_110411',3111,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',4,'2025-04-28 11:09:30'),(348,315,'SID_195_729_236_20250428_111826',3149,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',2,'2025-04-28 11:19:14'),(349,315,'SID_195_729_236_20250428_111826',3150,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',3,'2025-04-28 11:20:00'),(350,315,'SID_195_729_236_20250428_111826',3151,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',4,'2025-04-28 11:26:51'),(351,316,'SID_196_730_236_20250428_185905',3159,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',2,'2025-04-28 19:00:33'),(352,316,'SID_196_730_236_20250428_185905',3160,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',3,'2025-04-28 19:02:04'),(353,316,'SID_196_730_236_20250428_185905',3161,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',4,'2025-04-28 19:03:47'),(354,316,'SID_196_730_236_20250428_185905',3162,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',5,'2025-04-28 19:05:14'),(355,316,'SID_196_730_236_20250428_185905',3163,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',6,'2025-04-28 19:06:56'),(356,316,'SID_196_730_236_20250428_185905',3164,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',7,'2025-04-28 19:08:49'),(357,316,'SID_196_730_236_20250428_185905',3165,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',8,'2025-04-28 19:11:26'),(358,316,'SID_196_730_236_20250428_185905',3166,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',9,'2025-04-28 19:13:31'),(359,316,'SID_196_730_236_20250428_185905',3167,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',10,'2025-04-28 19:15:46'),(360,316,'SID_196_730_236_20250428_185905',3168,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',11,'2025-04-28 19:17:36'),(361,317,'SID_4_745_236_20250429_042150',3169,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',2,'2025-04-29 04:22:20'),(362,317,'SID_4_745_236_20250429_042150',3170,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',3,'2025-04-29 04:23:02'),(363,317,'SID_4_745_236_20250429_042150',3171,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',4,'2025-04-29 04:23:35'),(364,317,'SID_4_745_236_20250429_042150',3172,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',5,'2025-04-29 04:24:07'),(365,317,'SID_4_745_236_20250429_042150',3173,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',6,'2025-04-29 04:24:28'),(366,317,'SID_4_745_236_20250429_042150',3174,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',7,'2025-04-29 04:24:44'),(367,317,'SID_4_745_236_20250429_042150',3175,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',8,'2025-04-29 04:25:11'),(368,317,'SID_4_745_236_20250429_042150',3176,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',9,'2025-04-29 04:25:30'),(369,317,'SID_4_745_236_20250429_042150',3177,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',10,'2025-04-29 04:26:01'),(370,317,'SID_4_745_236_20250429_042150',3178,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',11,'2025-04-29 04:26:14'),(371,318,'SID_4_748_237_20250429_052911',3179,'ONLY_CUSTOM',2,'2025-04-29 05:29:30'),(372,320,'SID_196_747_237_20250429_132542',3190,'ONLY_CUSTOM',2,'2025-04-29 13:26:07'),(373,320,'SID_196_747_237_20250429_132542',3191,'ONLY_CUSTOM',3,'2025-04-29 13:26:58'),(374,320,'SID_196_747_237_20250429_132542',3192,'ONLY_CUSTOM',4,'2025-04-29 13:28:54'),(375,321,'SID_195_729_236_20250429_133032',3221,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',2,'2025-04-29 13:31:20'),(376,320,'SID_196_747_237_20250429_132542',3193,'ONLY_CUSTOM',5,'2025-04-29 13:31:47'),(377,321,'SID_195_729_236_20250429_133032',3222,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',3,'2025-04-29 13:32:03'),(378,321,'SID_195_729_236_20250429_133032',3223,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',4,'2025-04-29 13:33:14'),(379,320,'SID_196_747_237_20250429_132542',3194,'ONLY_CUSTOM',6,'2025-04-29 13:34:06'),(380,321,'SID_195_729_236_20250429_133032',3224,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',5,'2025-04-29 13:34:11'),(381,321,'SID_195_729_236_20250429_133032',3225,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',6,'2025-04-29 13:35:12'),(382,321,'SID_195_729_236_20250429_133032',3226,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',7,'2025-04-29 13:35:59'),(383,321,'SID_195_729_236_20250429_133032',3227,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',8,'2025-04-29 13:36:40'),(384,320,'SID_196_747_237_20250429_132542',3195,'ONLY_CUSTOM',7,'2025-04-29 13:37:05'),(385,321,'SID_195_729_236_20250429_133032',3228,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',9,'2025-04-29 13:37:20'),(386,321,'SID_195_729_236_20250429_133032',3229,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',10,'2025-04-29 13:37:52'),(387,321,'SID_195_729_236_20250429_133032',3230,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',11,'2025-04-29 13:38:38'),(388,320,'SID_196_747_237_20250429_132542',3196,'ONLY_CUSTOM',8,'2025-04-29 13:40:08'),(389,320,'SID_196_747_237_20250429_132542',3197,'ONLY_CUSTOM',9,'2025-04-29 13:42:15'),(390,320,'SID_196_747_237_20250429_132542',3198,'ONLY_CUSTOM',10,'2025-04-29 13:44:13'),(391,320,'SID_196_747_237_20250429_132542',3199,'ONLY_CUSTOM',11,'2025-04-29 13:46:52'),(392,320,'SID_196_747_237_20250429_132542',3200,'ONLY_CUSTOM',2,'2025-04-29 13:53:51'),(393,322,'SID_206_740_236_20250430_170149',3241,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',2,'2025-04-30 17:04:15'),(394,322,'SID_206_740_236_20250430_170149',3242,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',3,'2025-04-30 17:04:36'),(395,322,'SID_206_740_236_20250430_170149',3243,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',4,'2025-04-30 17:05:04'),(396,322,'SID_206_740_236_20250430_170149',3244,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',5,'2025-04-30 17:05:28'),(397,322,'SID_206_740_236_20250430_170149',3245,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',6,'2025-04-30 17:05:46'),(398,322,'SID_206_740_236_20250430_170149',3246,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',7,'2025-04-30 17:06:08'),(399,322,'SID_206_740_236_20250430_170149',3247,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',8,'2025-04-30 17:06:29'),(400,322,'SID_206_740_236_20250430_170149',3248,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',9,'2025-04-30 17:06:44'),(401,322,'SID_206_740_236_20250430_170149',3249,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',10,'2025-04-30 17:07:10'),(402,322,'SID_206_740_236_20250430_170149',3250,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',11,'2025-04-30 17:07:28'),(403,323,'SID_206_750_237_20250430_172153',3190,'ONLY_CUSTOM',2,'2025-04-30 17:23:23'),(404,323,'SID_206_750_237_20250430_172153',3191,'ONLY_CUSTOM',3,'2025-04-30 17:24:02'),(405,323,'SID_206_750_237_20250430_172153',3192,'ONLY_CUSTOM',4,'2025-04-30 17:24:49'),(406,323,'SID_206_750_237_20250430_172153',3193,'ONLY_CUSTOM',5,'2025-04-30 17:25:18'),(407,323,'SID_206_750_237_20250430_172153',3194,'ONLY_CUSTOM',6,'2025-04-30 17:25:46'),(408,323,'SID_206_750_237_20250430_172153',3195,'ONLY_CUSTOM',7,'2025-04-30 17:26:15'),(409,323,'SID_206_750_237_20250430_172153',3196,'ONLY_CUSTOM',8,'2025-04-30 17:27:04'),(410,323,'SID_206_750_237_20250430_172153',3197,'ONLY_CUSTOM',9,'2025-04-30 17:27:34'),(411,323,'SID_206_750_237_20250430_172153',3198,'ONLY_CUSTOM',10,'2025-04-30 17:28:07'),(412,323,'SID_206_750_237_20250430_172153',3199,'ONLY_CUSTOM',11,'2025-04-30 17:28:33'),(413,323,'SID_206_750_237_20250430_172153',3200,'ONLY_CUSTOM',12,'2025-04-30 17:29:03'),(414,324,'SID_225_767_246_20250508_064158',3289,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',2,'2025-05-08 06:43:29'),(415,325,'SID_225_767_246_20250508_065530',3299,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',2,'2025-05-08 06:56:58'),(416,325,'SID_225_767_246_20250508_065530',3300,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',2,'2025-05-08 06:58:19'),(417,326,'SID_225_767_246_20250508_065921',3309,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',2,'2025-05-08 07:00:02'),(418,326,'SID_225_767_246_20250508_065921',3310,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',3,'2025-05-08 07:01:10'),(419,326,'SID_225_767_246_20250508_065921',3311,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',4,'2025-05-08 07:02:06'),(420,326,'SID_225_767_246_20250508_065921',3312,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',2,'2025-05-08 07:04:40'),(421,326,'SID_225_767_246_20250508_065921',3313,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',3,'2025-05-08 07:05:14'),(422,326,'SID_225_767_246_20250508_065921',3314,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',4,'2025-05-08 07:05:30'),(423,326,'SID_225_767_246_20250508_065921',3315,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',5,'2025-05-08 07:05:48'),(424,326,'SID_225_767_246_20250508_065921',3316,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',6,'2025-05-08 07:06:07'),(425,328,'SID_4_782_251_20250522_105230',3349,'ONLY_CUSTOM',2,'2025-05-22 10:53:56'),(426,328,'SID_4_782_251_20250522_105230',3350,'ONLY_CUSTOM',3,'2025-05-22 10:53:57'),(427,328,'SID_4_782_251_20250522_105230',3351,'ONLY_CUSTOM',4,'2025-05-22 10:53:59'),(428,328,'SID_4_782_251_20250522_105230',3352,'ONLY_CUSTOM',2,'2025-05-22 11:00:56'),(429,328,'SID_4_782_251_20250522_105230',3353,'ONLY_CUSTOM',3,'2025-05-22 11:02:29'),(430,328,'SID_4_782_251_20250522_105230',3354,'ONLY_CUSTOM',4,'2025-05-22 11:02:49'),(431,329,'SID_4_782_251_20250522_110422',3349,'ONLY_CUSTOM',2,'2025-05-22 11:04:59'),(432,329,'SID_4_782_251_20250522_110422',3350,'ONLY_CUSTOM',3,'2025-05-22 11:05:25'),(433,329,'SID_4_782_251_20250522_110422',3351,'ONLY_CUSTOM',2,'2025-05-22 11:07:17'),(434,329,'SID_4_782_251_20250522_110422',3352,'ONLY_CUSTOM',3,'2025-05-22 11:07:33'),(435,329,'SID_4_782_251_20250522_110422',3353,'ONLY_CUSTOM',4,'2025-05-22 11:07:46'),(436,329,'SID_4_782_251_20250522_110422',3354,'ONLY_CUSTOM',5,'2025-05-22 11:08:03'),(437,329,'SID_4_782_251_20250522_110422',3355,'ONLY_CUSTOM',6,'2025-05-22 11:08:17'),(438,329,'SID_4_782_251_20250522_110422',3356,'ONLY_CUSTOM',7,'2025-05-22 11:08:35'),(439,329,'SID_4_782_251_20250522_110422',3357,'ONLY_CUSTOM',2,'2025-05-22 11:10:27'),(440,329,'SID_4_782_251_20250522_110422',3358,'ONLY_CUSTOM',3,'2025-05-22 11:10:44'),(441,329,'SID_4_782_251_20250522_110422',3359,'ONLY_CUSTOM',4,'2025-05-22 11:11:05'),(442,329,'SID_4_782_251_20250522_110422',3360,'ONLY_CUSTOM',5,'2025-05-22 11:11:21'),(443,329,'SID_4_782_251_20250522_110422',3361,'ONLY_CUSTOM',6,'2025-05-22 11:11:51'),(444,330,'SID_229_776_251_20250522_140504',3349,'ONLY_CUSTOM',2,'2025-05-22 14:06:09'),(445,330,'SID_229_776_251_20250522_140504',3350,'ONLY_CUSTOM',3,'2025-05-22 14:06:49'),(446,331,'SID_228_775_251_20250523_083107',3349,'ONLY_CUSTOM',2,'2025-05-23 08:34:00'),(447,332,'SID_226_773_251_20250523_115855',3349,'ONLY_CUSTOM',2,'2025-05-23 12:00:33'),(448,332,'SID_226_773_251_20250523_115855',3350,'ONLY_CUSTOM',3,'2025-05-23 12:01:24'),(449,332,'SID_226_773_251_20250523_115855',3351,'ONLY_CUSTOM',4,'2025-05-23 12:03:09'),(450,332,'SID_226_773_251_20250523_115855',3352,'ONLY_CUSTOM',5,'2025-05-23 12:04:42'),(451,332,'SID_226_773_251_20250523_115855',3353,'ONLY_CUSTOM',6,'2025-05-23 12:07:06'),(452,332,'SID_226_773_251_20250523_115855',3354,'ONLY_CUSTOM',7,'2025-05-23 12:08:38'),(453,332,'SID_226_773_251_20250523_115855',3355,'ONLY_CUSTOM',8,'2025-05-23 12:10:38'),(454,332,'SID_226_773_251_20250523_115855',3356,'ONLY_CUSTOM',9,'2025-05-23 12:11:50'),(455,332,'SID_226_773_251_20250523_115855',3357,'ONLY_CUSTOM',10,'2025-05-23 12:13:19'),(456,332,'SID_226_773_251_20250523_115855',3358,'ONLY_CUSTOM',11,'2025-05-23 12:14:36'),(457,332,'SID_226_773_251_20250523_115855',3359,'ONLY_CUSTOM',12,'2025-05-23 12:15:34'),(458,332,'SID_226_773_251_20250523_115855',3360,'ONLY_CUSTOM',13,'2025-05-23 12:16:58'),(459,332,'SID_226_773_251_20250523_115855',3361,'ONLY_CUSTOM',14,'2025-05-23 12:18:09'),(460,334,'SID_233_780_251_20250527_120018',3349,'ONLY_CUSTOM',2,'2025-05-27 12:01:58'),(461,334,'SID_233_780_251_20250527_120018',3350,'ONLY_CUSTOM',3,'2025-05-27 12:02:54'),(462,335,'SID_233_780_251_20250527_121630',3349,'ONLY_CUSTOM',2,'2025-05-27 12:17:28'),(463,335,'SID_233_780_251_20250527_121630',3350,'ONLY_CUSTOM',3,'2025-05-27 12:18:03'),(464,335,'SID_233_780_251_20250527_121630',3351,'ONLY_CUSTOM',4,'2025-05-27 12:19:12'),(465,335,'SID_233_780_251_20250527_121630',3352,'ONLY_CUSTOM',5,'2025-05-27 12:19:47'),(466,335,'SID_233_780_251_20250527_121630',3353,'ONLY_CUSTOM',6,'2025-05-27 12:21:30'),(467,335,'SID_233_780_251_20250527_121630',3354,'ONLY_CUSTOM',7,'2025-05-27 12:23:26'),(468,335,'SID_233_780_251_20250527_121630',3355,'ONLY_CUSTOM',8,'2025-05-27 12:24:54'),(469,335,'SID_233_780_251_20250527_121630',3356,'ONLY_CUSTOM',9,'2025-05-27 12:26:15'),(470,335,'SID_233_780_251_20250527_121630',3357,'ONLY_CUSTOM',10,'2025-05-27 12:27:35'),(471,335,'SID_233_780_251_20250527_121630',3358,'ONLY_CUSTOM',11,'2025-05-27 12:28:15'),(472,335,'SID_233_780_251_20250527_121630',3359,'ONLY_CUSTOM',12,'2025-05-27 12:28:52'),(473,335,'SID_233_780_251_20250527_121630',3360,'ONLY_CUSTOM',13,'2025-05-27 12:29:40'),(474,335,'SID_233_780_251_20250527_121630',3361,'ONLY_CUSTOM',14,'2025-05-27 12:30:20'),(475,336,'SID_228_775_251_20250527_150125',3349,'ONLY_CUSTOM',2,'2025-05-27 15:02:36'),(476,336,'SID_228_775_251_20250527_150125',3350,'ONLY_CUSTOM',3,'2025-05-27 15:03:09'),(477,336,'SID_228_775_251_20250527_150125',3351,'ONLY_CUSTOM',4,'2025-05-27 15:04:33'),(478,336,'SID_228_775_251_20250527_150125',3352,'ONLY_CUSTOM',5,'2025-05-27 15:05:10'),(479,336,'SID_228_775_251_20250527_150125',3353,'ONLY_CUSTOM',6,'2025-05-27 15:05:53'),(480,336,'SID_228_775_251_20250527_150125',3354,'ONLY_CUSTOM',7,'2025-05-27 15:07:17'),(481,336,'SID_228_775_251_20250527_150125',3355,'ONLY_CUSTOM',8,'2025-05-27 15:08:28'),(482,336,'SID_228_775_251_20250527_150125',3356,'ONLY_CUSTOM',9,'2025-05-27 15:09:24'),(483,336,'SID_228_775_251_20250527_150125',3357,'ONLY_CUSTOM',10,'2025-05-27 15:10:36'),(484,336,'SID_228_775_251_20250527_150125',3358,'ONLY_CUSTOM',11,'2025-05-27 15:11:16'),(485,336,'SID_228_775_251_20250527_150125',3359,'ONLY_CUSTOM',12,'2025-05-27 15:12:02'),(486,336,'SID_228_775_251_20250527_150125',3360,'ONLY_CUSTOM',13,'2025-05-27 15:12:58'),(487,336,'SID_228_775_251_20250527_150125',3361,'ONLY_CUSTOM',14,'2025-05-27 15:13:21'),(488,337,'SID_4_624_181_20250527_160148',2106,'ONLY_CUSTOM',2,'2025-05-27 16:03:17'),(489,337,'SID_4_624_181_20250527_160148',2107,'ONLY_CUSTOM',3,'2025-05-27 16:04:10'),(490,338,'SID_4_627_181_20250527_174706',2106,'ONLY_CUSTOM',2,'2025-05-27 17:47:36'),(491,341,'SID_4_788_256_20250708_070343',3398,'ONLY_CUSTOM',2,'2025-07-08 07:04:16'),(492,341,'SID_4_788_256_20250708_070343',3399,'ONLY_CUSTOM',3,'2025-07-08 07:04:35'),(493,341,'SID_4_788_256_20250708_070343',3400,'ONLY_CUSTOM',4,'2025-07-08 07:05:03'),(494,341,'SID_4_788_256_20250708_070343',3401,'ONLY_CUSTOM',5,'2025-07-08 07:05:19'),(495,341,'SID_4_788_256_20250708_070343',3402,'ONLY_CUSTOM',6,'2025-07-08 07:05:41'),(496,341,'SID_4_788_256_20250708_070343',3403,'ONLY_CUSTOM',7,'2025-07-08 07:06:23'),(497,341,'SID_4_788_256_20250708_070343',3404,'ONLY_CUSTOM',8,'2025-07-08 07:07:01'),(498,341,'SID_4_788_256_20250708_070343',3405,'ONLY_CUSTOM',9,'2025-07-08 07:07:59'),(499,341,'SID_4_788_256_20250708_070343',3406,'ONLY_CUSTOM',10,'2025-07-08 07:08:12'),(500,344,'SID_4_789_256_20250708_092648',3398,'ONLY_CUSTOM',2,'2025-07-08 09:27:49'),(501,348,'SID_4_789_256_20250708_100650',3398,'ONLY_CUSTOM',2,'2025-07-08 10:07:09'),(502,348,'SID_4_789_256_20250708_100650',3399,'ONLY_CUSTOM',3,'2025-07-08 10:07:31'),(503,351,'SID_4_790_257_20250709_085447',3428,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',2,'2025-07-09 08:55:38'),(504,351,'SID_4_790_257_20250709_085447',3429,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',3,'2025-07-09 08:55:56'),(505,353,'SID_4_790_257_20250715_012448',3448,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',2,'2025-07-15 01:25:38'),(506,353,'SID_4_790_257_20250715_012448',3449,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',3,'2025-07-15 01:26:10'),(507,353,'SID_4_790_257_20250715_012448',3450,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',4,'2025-07-15 01:26:54'),(508,353,'SID_4_790_257_20250715_012448',3451,'AI_PRE_DEFINED',5,'2025-07-15 01:27:20'),(509,354,'SID_4_791_258_20250715_101150',3458,'ONLY_CUSTOM',2,'2025-07-15 10:12:17'),(510,354,'SID_4_791_258_20250715_101150',3459,'ONLY_CUSTOM',3,'2025-07-15 10:12:49'),(511,354,'SID_4_791_258_20250715_101150',3460,'ONLY_CUSTOM',4,'2025-07-15 10:13:05'),(512,354,'SID_4_791_258_20250715_101150',3461,'ONLY_CUSTOM',5,'2025-07-15 10:13:20'),(513,354,'SID_4_791_258_20250715_101150',3462,'ONLY_CUSTOM',6,'2025-07-15 10:13:35'),(514,354,'SID_4_791_258_20250715_101150',3463,'ONLY_CUSTOM',7,'2025-07-15 10:13:50');

--
-- Table structure for table `bot_overall_feedback`
--

CREATE TABLE `bot_overall_feedback` (
  `id` int NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT,
  `botInterviewId` int NOT NULL,
  `candidateId` int DEFAULT NULL,
  `resumeId` int DEFAULT NULL,
  `screeningId` int DEFAULT NULL,
  `feedback` text COLLATE utf8mb4_general_ci,
  `strength` text COLLATE utf8mb4_general_ci,
  `weakness` text COLLATE utf8mb4_general_ci,
  `primarySkills` text COLLATE utf8mb4_general_ci,
  `secondarySkills` text COLLATE utf8mb4_general_ci,
  `created` datetime DEFAULT NULL,
  PRIMARY KEY (`id`)
) ENGINE=InnoDB AUTO_INCREMENT=225 DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8mb4 COLLATE=utf8mb4_general_ci;

--
-- Dumping data for table `bot_overall_feedback`
--

INSERT INTO `bot_overall_feedback` VALUES (1,5,4,228,51,'Sanjay demonstrated a lack of confidence and self-awareness during the interview, which led to an early termination of the process. His inability to provide detailed responses about his experience and skills in relation to the job description suggests a misalignment with the Front-end Engineer role at Freshworks.','- Sanjay initially expressed enthusiasm for the interview.','- Sanjay was unable to articulate his experience with UI technologies.\n- He showed a lack of confidence in his abilities for the role.\n- Sanjay terminated the interview prematurely, indicating a potential misfit for the position.','11. HTML: 2/10\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Sanjay did not discuss his HTML skills or provide relevant examples.\n\n12. CSS: 2/10\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Sanjay was unable to elaborate on his CSS experience.\n\n13. JavaScript: 2/10\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Sanjay did not provide any insight into his JavaScript expertise.\n\n14. MVC architecture: 2/10\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Sanjay did not mention any experience with MVC architecture.\n\n15. OOP programming style: 2/10\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Sanjay did not discuss his knowledge of OOP programming style.','16. SASS: 2/10\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: There was no mention of SASS experience in Sanjay\'s responses.\n\n17. JQuery: 2/10\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Sanjay did not provide examples of his work with JQuery.\n\n18. Javascript Frameworks: 2/10\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Sanjay failed to discuss his experience with any JavaScript frameworks.\n\n19. GIT: 2/10\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Sanjay did not talk about his proficiency with GIT.\n\n20. Communication skills: 2/10\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Sanjay\'s communication skills were not up to the mark for the interview process.','2024-02-19 06:08:14'),(2,6,11,256,57,'Eric demonstrated a foundational understanding of Laravel and its ecosystem, including experience with PHP, Laravel framework, and integration of third-party libraries like PayPal. However, his responses lacked depth and specificity in some areas, which are crucial for the PHP Laravel Developer Lead role.','- Eric has experience with Laravel and other PHP frameworks, indicating adaptability to different technologies.\n- He has worked on various projects, including e-commerce and betting applications, showcasing his versatility.\n- Eric is familiar with using Composer and handling deprecated libraries, which is important for maintaining a codebase.','- Responses lacked detail and did not fully convey the depth of his experience or the impact of his work on projects.\n- He could have provided more specific examples of problem-solving and innovation in his past roles.\n- Communication could be more engaging and enthusiastic to better demonstrate his leadership potential.','11. PHP: 6/10\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Eric has experience with PHP but did not convey a mastery level.\n\n12. CSS: N/A\nScore: N/A\nQualitative Assessment: N/A\nDescription: CSS skills were not directly assessed in the interview.\n\n13. Laravel framework: 6/10\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Eric has worked with Laravel but did not demonstrate advanced proficiency.\n\n14. MySQL: N/A\nScore: N/A\nQualitative Assessment: N/A\nDescription: MySQL skills were not directly assessed in the interview.\n\n15. Software Development: 6/10\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Eric has experience in software development but did not discuss his strategic or innovative contributions.','16. Node.js: N/A\nScore: N/A\nQualitative Assessment: N/A\nDescription: Node.js skills were not directly assessed in the interview.\n\n17. React.js: N/A\nScore: N/A\nQualitative Assessment: N/A\nDescription: React.js skills were not directly assessed in the interview.\n\n18. Ajax: N/A\nScore: N/A\nQualitative Assessment: N/A\nDescription: Ajax skills were not directly assessed in the interview.\n\n19. Jenkins: N/A\nScore: N/A\nQualitative Assessment: N/A\nDescription: Jenkins skills were not directly assessed in the interview.\n\n20. GitLab: N/A\nScore: N/A\nQualitative Assessment: N/A\nDescription: GitLab skills were not directly assessed in the interview.','2024-03-19 12:25:11'),(3,8,7,265,59,'Shalu\'s performance in the interview was significantly below expectations. The responses lacked depth, relevance, and engagement with the role\'s requirements. Shalu was unable to demonstrate knowledge or experience in key areas critical for the UX/UI Designer position at Google.','- Shalu expressed comfort with HTML, indicating some familiarity with front-end development technologies.','- Lack of experience and knowledge in JavaScript and other required technical skills.\n- Inability to articulate a process for conducting user research.\n- Did not demonstrate an understanding of user-centered design processes.\n- Failed to engage with the questions related to design principles, tools, and competitive analysis.\n- Requested to reschedule the interview, indicating a lack of preparedness or engagement.','11. UX/UI design principles:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Shalu did not demonstrate knowledge or experience in UX/UI design principles.\n\n12. user-centered design processes:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Shalu did not articulate any understanding of user-centered design processes.\n\n13. design tools (Sketch, Adobe XD, Figma):\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Shalu did not mention any experience with design tools like Sketch, Adobe XD, or Figma.\n\n14. front-end development technologies (HTML, CSS, JavaScript):\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Shalu expressed comfort with HTML but did not demonstrate knowledge or experience with CSS and JavaScript.\n\n15. user research:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Shalu did not describe a process for conducting user research or how findings are incorporated into design.','16. Wireframing:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: There was no mention of wireframing experience or knowledge.\n\n17. prototyping:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Shalu did not discuss any experience with prototyping.\n\n18. visual design:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Shalu did not demonstrate knowledge or experience in visual design.\n\n19. usability testing:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: There was no indication of experience with usability testing.\n\n20. industry trends:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Shalu did not show awareness of industry trends or best practices in UX/UI design.','2024-03-28 03:47:44'),(4,9,4,259,60,'Varun\'s interview performance was subpar, with responses that lacked depth and relevance to the questions asked. His communication was unclear and his engagement in the interview process was minimal, indicating a need for significant improvement in interview preparedness and professional communication.','- Varun expressed a willingness to engage in the interview process.\n- He acknowledged his experience with HTML, which is relevant to the job description.','- Varun\'s responses were brief and lacked detail, failing to demonstrate a strong understanding of UX/UI design principles and user-centered design processes.\n- He did not provide examples of his work or elaborate on his experience, which was necessary to assess his fit for the role.\n- Varun seemed unprepared for the interview, questioning the interview duration and not engaging with the questions meaningfully.','11. UX/UI design principles:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not demonstrate knowledge or experience in UX/UI design principles.\n\n12. user-centered design processes:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not provide evidence of experience or knowledge in user-centered design processes.\n\n13. design tools (Sketch, Adobe XD, Figma):\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not mention any proficiency in design tools.\n\n14. front-end development technologies (HTML, CSS, JavaScript):\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun acknowledged experience with HTML but did not demonstrate proficiency in CSS or JavaScript.\n\n15. user research:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not discuss any experience with user research.','16. Wireframing:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not mention any experience with wireframing.\n\n17. prototyping:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not provide any information on his experience with prototyping.\n\n18. visual design:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not showcase any knowledge or experience in visual design.\n\n19. usability testing:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not discuss any experience with usability testing.\n\n20. mentoring:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not provide any evidence of mentoring experience.','2024-03-28 03:53:03'),(5,10,15,266,61,'Ruby\'s responses were concise but lacked the enthusiasm and detail expected for a senior-level position. The responses were repetitive and did not convey a strong interest or preparedness for the interview.','- Ruby responded affirmatively to the readiness for the interview, indicating a willingness to engage in the conversation.','- Lack of detail and enthusiasm in responses.\n- Repetitive and informal communication style.\n- Missed opportunity to showcase preparation and interest in the role.','11. SQL: 8/10:\nScore: N/A\nQualitative Assessment: N/A\nDescription: SQL knowledge was not assessed in the provided responses.\n\n12. SQL Server: 8/10:\nScore: N/A\nQualitative Assessment: N/A\nDescription: SQL Server knowledge was not assessed in the provided responses.\n\n13. Database Design and Development: 6/10:\nScore: N/A\nQualitative Assessment: N/A\nDescription: Database design and development knowledge was not assessed in the provided responses.\n\n14. Database Management Systems: 6/10:\nScore: N/A\nQualitative Assessment: N/A\nDescription: Database management systems knowledge was not assessed in the provided responses.\n\n15. Familiarity with database management systems and tools: 6/10:\nScore: N/A\nQualitative Assessment: N/A\nDescription: Familiarity with database management systems and tools was not assessed in the provided responses.','16. Performance Tuning and Optimization: 4/10:\nScore: N/A\nQualitative Assessment: N/A\nDescription: Performance tuning and optimization knowledge was not assessed in the provided responses.\n\n17. ETL (Extract: 2/10:\nScore: N/A\nQualitative Assessment: N/A\nDescription: ETL knowledge was not assessed in the provided responses.\n\n18. Transform: 2/10:\nScore: N/A\nQualitative Assessment: N/A\nDescription: Transform knowledge was not assessed in the provided responses.\n\n19. Load) processes: 2/10:\nScore: N/A\nQualitative Assessment: N/A\nDescription: Load processes knowledge was not assessed in the provided responses.\n\n20. Stored Procedures: 8/10:\nScore: N/A\nQualitative Assessment: N/A\nDescription: Stored procedures knowledge was not assessed in the provided responses.','2024-04-03 12:11:56'),(6,21,4,228,51,'Varun\'s responses throughout the interview demonstrated a strong technical background and relevant experience in front-end development. However, there were areas where his responses could have been more aligned with the job description\'s requirements, particularly in showcasing his expertise in specific skills and frameworks mentioned.','- Varun has a solid foundation in front-end technologies such as HTML, CSS, and JavaScript.\n- His extensive experience in web development is evident from his resume and the confidence in his responses.','- Varun\'s responses lacked depth in certain areas such as MVC architecture, SASS, and JavaScript frameworks.\n- He could have provided more specific examples of his work related to the job description to demonstrate his expertise.','11. HTML: 8/10:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Varun demonstrated a strong understanding of HTML.\n\n12. CSS: 8/10:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Varun showed a good grasp of CSS.\n\n13. JavaScript: 8/10:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Varun\'s knowledge of JavaScript was clear and aligned with his experience.\n\n14. MVC architecture: 6/10:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun\'s understanding of MVC architecture was not thoroughly explored.\n\n15. OOP programming style: 6/10:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun\'s responses did not fully reflect his proficiency in OOP.','16. SASS: 4/10:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun\'s experience with SASS was not well articulated.\n\n17. JQuery: 6/10:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun\'s knowledge of JQuery was adequate but lacked depth.\n\n18. Javascript Frameworks (Backbone/Angular/EmberJs/NodeJs): 4/10:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not demonstrate strong expertise in the mentioned JavaScript frameworks.\n\n19. GIT: 6/10:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun\'s experience with GIT could have been highlighted more effectively.\n\n20. Communication skills: 8/10:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Varun communicated effectively but could improve by providing more detailed responses.','2024-04-12 04:52:06'),(7,23,4,258,60,'Varun\'s responses were minimal and lacked the depth and engagement expected for a UX/UI Designer role at Google. He failed to demonstrate the necessary knowledge and experience in key areas relevant to the job description.','- Varun expressed a positive demeanor at the beginning of the interview.','- Varun\'s responses were extremely brief and did not showcase his expertise or experience.\n- He did not provide any evidence of his skills or past work relevant to the UX/UI Designer role.\n- There was no mention of his proficiency in design tools or user-centered design processes.\n- Varun did not engage in the conversation beyond the most basic response.','11. UX/UI design principles:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not mention any UX/UI design principles.\n\n12. user-centered design processes:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not discuss any user-centered design processes.\n\n13. design tools (Sketch, Adobe XD, Figma):\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not reference his proficiency with any design tools.\n\n14. front-end development technologies (HTML, CSS, JavaScript):\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not mention any front-end development technologies.\n\n15. user research:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not provide any information on his experience with user research.','16. Wireframing:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not discuss his skills in wireframing.\n\n17. prototyping:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not mention any experience with prototyping.\n\n18. visual design:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not showcase any visual design skills.\n\n19. usability testing:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not discuss usability testing.\n\n20. mentoring:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not mention any mentoring experience.','2024-04-12 07:36:53'),(8,28,31,339,77,'Yashaswee demonstrated a good understanding of BI tools and technologies, with a particular strength in Power BI and data migration projects. He provided detailed responses about his experiences with BI architecture, tool deployment, and report customization. However, Yashaswee\'s responses lacked depth in certain areas such as building universes and self-service reporting. His communication was clear but could have been more structured and focused on the specific questions asked.','- Yashaswee has strong experience in BI architecture and Power BI.\n- He has practical experience with data migration projects and tool deployment.\n- Yashaswee showed a good understanding of performance optimization and problem-solving in BI contexts.','- Yashaswee\'s responses could be more detailed in areas like building universes and self-service reporting.\n- He could improve on aligning his responses more closely with the questions asked.\n- Yashaswee could benefit from providing more examples of his work with Spotfire to better demonstrate his expertise in that area.','11. - BI Architect: 8/10:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Yashaswee demonstrated strong knowledge and experience as a BI Architect.\n\n12. - Spotfire: 6/10:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Yashaswee could have provided more specific examples of his work with Spotfire to demonstrate his expertise.\n\n13. - PowerBI: 8/10:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Yashaswee showed strong proficiency with PowerBI through his detailed project examples.\n\n14. - Data Modelling: 8/10:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Yashaswee\'s experience with data modeling was evident in his discussion of migration projects and architecture design.\n\n15. - Building Universe: 4/10:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Yashaswee did not provide sufficient detail on his experience with building universes.','16. - Creating Metrics: 6/10:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Yashaswee mentioned creating metrics but did not delve into specifics or examples.\n\n17. - Build Reports and Dashboard: 8/10:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Yashaswee\'s experience with building reports and dashboards was clear from his project descriptions.\n\n18. - Report Authorization and Access Control: 6/10:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Yashaswee discussed report authorization but could have provided more detail on access control mechanisms.\n\n19. - Self-Service Reporting: 6/10:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Yashaswee\'s response on self-service reporting lacked depth and specific examples.\n\n20. - BI Tool Deployment: 6/10:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Yashaswee mentioned BI tool deployment but did not fully explain his approach or experience in this area.','2024-04-26 07:44:27'),(9,29,4,341,79,'Varun demonstrated a good understanding of Agile and Scrum methodologies, relevant experience in business analysis, and strong communication skills. However, there were gaps in his familiarity with certain tools and methodologies, and his responses lacked depth in some areas.','- Varun showed confidence in his technical skills and experience with Agile and Scrum methodologies.\n- He effectively communicated his role in requirement gathering and collaboration with stakeholders.\n- Varun provided clear examples of managing backlogs and facilitating stakeholder sign-offs using Jira.','- Varun\'s responses lacked depth in his experience with data analysis and visualization tools.\n- He did not provide detailed examples of problem-solving or process improvement methodologies.\n- Varun could improve his familiarity with the Atlassian Suite beyond Jira and demonstrate a broader understanding of industry trends and their application to his role.','11. Agile and Scrum methodologies: 8/10:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Varun demonstrated applied experience with Agile and Scrum methodologies.\n\n12. Requirements gathering and documentation: 8/10:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Varun\'s experience with requirements gathering was evident, aligning with the job description.\n\n13. Analytical and problem-solving skills: 8/10:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun could have provided more detailed examples to showcase his analytical and problem-solving skills.\n\n14. Communication and interpersonal skills: 10/10:\nScore: 9\nQualitative Assessment: Excellent\nDescription: Varun\'s communication and interpersonal skills were a strong point throughout the interview.\n\n15. Cross-functional teamwork: 8/10:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Varun showed good experience in working with cross-functional teams.','16. Familiarity with Atlassian Suite (Jira): 6/10:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Varun was familiar with Jira but could have discussed other Atlassian Suite tools.\n\n17. Confluence: 4/10:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not mention his experience with Confluence, indicating a need for improvement.\n\n18. Bitbucket: 2/10:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not demonstrate familiarity with Bitbucket, which is a gap in his skill set.\n\n19. Data analysis and visualization tools: 4/10:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun\'s use of visualization tools was basic, and he could have provided more examples.\n\n20. Process improvement methodologies: 4/10:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun\'s response did not show a strong understanding of process improvement methodologies.','2024-05-08 04:27:27'),(10,31,4,357,81,'Varun demonstrated a good understanding of Agile and Scrum methodologies and his past experience as a Business Analyst aligns with the job description. However, his responses lacked depth in some areas and he did not complete the interview, which affects the overall assessment of his fit for the role.','- Varun has a strong background in Agile and Scrum methodologies, as evidenced by his detailed description of his experience with these practices.\n- He has extensive experience in requirement gathering, documentation, and stakeholder management.\n- Varun\'s communication style is clear and he expresses his ideas effectively.','- Varun\'s responses lacked specific examples and depth in certain areas, such as data analysis and visualization tools, and familiarity with Atlassian Suite.\n- He did not complete the interview, which raises concerns about his ability to handle stress and adaptability.\n- Varun could improve on providing more detailed examples of problem-solving and process improvement methodologies.','11. Agile and Scrum methodologies: 8/10:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Varun demonstrated a good understanding of Agile and Scrum methodologies.\n\n12. Requirements gathering and documentation: 8/10:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Varun has strong experience in requirements gathering and documentation.\n\n13. Analytical and problem-solving skills: 8/10:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun needs to provide more examples of how he has applied his analytical and problem-solving skills.\n\n14. Communication and interpersonal skills: 10/10:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Varun communicates well but could improve on maintaining engagement throughout the interview.\n\n15. Cross-functional teamwork: 8/10:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Varun has experience working with cross-functional teams.','16. Familiarity with Atlassian Suite (Jira): 6/10:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not provide enough detail about his experience with Jira.\n\n17. Confluence: 4/10:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not mention any specific experience with Confluence.\n\n18. Bitbucket: 2/10:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not demonstrate any experience with Bitbucket.\n\n19. Data analysis and visualization tools: 4/10:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun\'s experience with data analysis and visualization tools was not evident in his responses.\n\n20. Process improvement methodologies: 6/10:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun mentioned process improvements but did not provide specific examples or methodologies used.','2024-05-26 06:33:24'),(11,32,4,344,80,'Varun\'s responses during the interview were non-existent or irrelevant, showing a lack of engagement and understanding of the interview process. His inability to provide coherent answers to the questions asked indicates a significant gap in communication skills and job role comprehension.','- No strengths were demonstrated based on the interview responses provided.','- Inability to understand and respond to questions in a relevant manner.\n- Lack of clarity in communication.\n- Did not demonstrate knowledge or experience relevant to the job role.\n- Failed to engage in the interview process.','11. Functional knowledge: 0/10\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not exhibit any functional knowledge relevant to the job description.\n\n12. Technical knowledge: 0/10\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun failed to demonstrate any technical knowledge during the interview.\n\n13. Consulting experience: 0/10\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: There was no evidence of consulting experience in Varun\'s responses.\n\n14. Analytical ability: 0/10\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not display any analytical abilities in his responses.\n\n15. Business understanding: 0/10\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun\'s responses did not reflect an understanding of business related to the role.','16. Interpersonal skills: 0/10\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not demonstrate the interpersonal skills necessary for the role.\n\n17. Industry experience: 0/10\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not show any industry experience relevant to the job description.\n\n18. Presentation skills: 0/10\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not exhibit any presentation skills during the interview.\n\n19. Requirement analysis: 0/10\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: There was no indication of requirement analysis skills in Varun\'s responses.\n\n20. Agile methodology: 0/10\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not demonstrate any knowledge or experience with agile methodology.','2024-05-26 08:36:12'),(12,33,4,342,80,'Varun\'s responses in the interview were generally brief and lacked depth, failing to showcase his skills and experience relevant to the Techno-Functional Business Analyst position. His answers did not provide enough evidence of his expertise in the e-commerce domain or his ability to fulfill the roles and responsibilities outlined in the job description.','- Varun maintained a polite and positive demeanor throughout the interview.','- Varun\'s responses were not detailed and did not demonstrate a clear understanding of the job requirements.\n- He did not provide specific examples of his work experience related to the e-commerce domain or business analysis.\n- Varun failed to highlight his consulting experience, analytical ability, or business understanding, which are critical for the role.\n- His communication style was too brief and lacked engagement.','11. Functional knowledge: 0/10\nScore: 0/10\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not demonstrate functional knowledge relevant to the role.\n\n12. Technical knowledge: 4/10\nScore: 4/10\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun mentioned working with Laravel but did not connect his technical knowledge to the job requirements.\n\n13. Consulting experience: 0/10\nScore: 0/10\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not provide evidence of consulting experience.\n\n14. Analytical ability: 0/10\nScore: 0/10\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not showcase his analytical abilities during the interview.\n\n15. Business understanding: 0/10\nScore: 0/10\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not demonstrate an understanding of business challenges faced by customers.','16. Interpersonal skills: 0/10\nScore: 0/10\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not exhibit strong interpersonal skills required for the role.\n\n17. Industry experience: 0/10\nScore: 0/10\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not mention any specific industry experience related to e-commerce.\n\n18. Presentation skills: 0/10\nScore: 0/10\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not display the presentation skills necessary for the role.\n\n19. Requirement analysis: 0/10\nScore: 0/10\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not discuss his experience with requirement analysis.\n\n20. Agile methodology: 0/10\nScore: 0/10\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not mention any experience with Agile methodology.','2024-06-06 16:41:31'),(13,34,4,371,87,'Asmiya\'s responses during the interview were consistently brief and lacked the depth and detail expected for a candidate with her experience. While she confirmed her readiness and comfort with the interview process, her answers did not provide insight into her skills, experiences, or problem-solving abilities, which are crucial for evaluating her fit for the Developer-Connected Vehicle role.','- Asmiya confirmed her readiness and comfort with the interview process, indicating a positive attitude towards the opportunity.\n- She consistently responded affirmatively to the questions, showing a willingness to engage.','- Asmiya\'s responses lacked detail and did not showcase her experience or knowledge in relation to the job description.\n- She did not provide examples or elaborate on her skills and experiences, which is necessary to assess her fit for the role.\n- Her communication style was too concise, missing the opportunity to demonstrate her problem-solving skills and depth of knowledge.','11. Android Development:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Asmiya did not provide any specific details about her Android development experience.\n\n12. Java/Kotlin:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Asmiya did not elaborate on her experience with Java or Kotlin, which is crucial for the role.\n\n13. Android Studio:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Asmiya did not describe her use of Android Studio or its features in her projects.\n\n14. RESTful APIs/Websocket:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Asmiya did not explain how she implemented RESTful APIs or Websocket in her applications.\n\n15. Agile Practices/JIRA/Rally:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Asmiya did not provide examples of how she applied Agile practices or used JIRA or Rally.','16. Android Architecture/AAOS/BSP:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Asmiya did not elaborate on her knowledge or experience with Android Architecture, AAOS, or BSP.\n\n17. CAN bus/OBD-II Protocols:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Asmiya did not discuss her experience with CAN bus or OBD-II protocols in the context of Android development.\n\n18. GraphQL APIs/Apollo Client:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Asmiya did not explain her use of GraphQL APIs and the Apollo Client in her Android applications.\n\n19. Software Documentation/Technical Support:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Asmiya did not share how she ensured clear and useful software documentation for her team and technical support purposes.\n\n20. Cross-Functional Collaboration:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Asmiya did not provide an example of her collaboration with cross-functional teams to deliver a project successfully.','2024-07-17 03:26:51'),(14,35,4,372,88,'Asmiya\'s performance in the interview was significantly below expectations. She struggled to provide substantive answers to most questions, often responding with brief or irrelevant statements. Her inability to discuss her experience and skills in depth suggests a lack of preparedness or a mismatch with the job requirements.','- Asmiya confirmed her availability and willingness to proceed with the interview.\n- She provided a brief overview of her professional experience, mentioning her specialization and eagerness to collaborate on technology.','- Asmiya failed to provide detailed responses to questions about her specific experiences and skills.\n- She was unable to discuss instances of problem-solving, performance optimization, or collaboration with cross-functional teams.\n- Asmiya did not demonstrate knowledge of security best practices, CI/CD pipelines, or cloud platforms in the context of Android development.\n- She did not engage with questions about leadership, adaptability, or customer advocacy.\n- Asmiya did not ask any questions about the role or the company, showing a lack of engagement with the interview process.','11. Android Platform Development/Customization/Maintenance:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Asmiya mentioned working on Android-based systems but did not elaborate on her experience in development, customization, or maintenance.\n\n12. Android System Services/Frameworks:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Asmiya\'s response did not provide evidence of her expertise in Android System Services or Frameworks.\n\n13. Java/Kotlin Programming:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Asmiya mentioned using Java and Kotlin but did not discuss her programming skills in detail.\n\n14. User Interface (UI) Design/Development for Android:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Asmiya did not provide any information on her experience with UI design or development for Android.\n\n15. Performance Optimization/Profiling/Debugging:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Asmiya was unable to discuss any instances of performance optimization, profiling, or debugging.','16. Collaboration/Communication with Cross-Functional Teams:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Asmiya briefly mentioned working with cross-functional teams but did not detail how she ensured effective collaboration.\n\n17. Security Best Practices/Compliance for Android:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Asmiya\'s mention of two-factor authentication was too vague to demonstrate a comprehensive understanding of security best practices.\n\n18. Continuous Improvement/Keeping Updated with AOSP/AAOS:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Asmiya stated she keeps herself updated but did not provide examples of how this knowledge benefited a project.\n\n19. CI/CD Pipelines/Automated Testing/Build Automation:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Asmiya did not provide any examples of implementing CI/CD pipelines, automated testing, or build automation.\n\n20. Cloud Platforms/Containerization (Docker/Kubernetes):\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Asmiya admitted to not having used Docker or Kubernetes, showing a gap in her experience with cloud platforms and containerization.','2024-07-17 05:57:40'),(15,36,4,342,80,'Varun\'s responses were not in line with professional standards expected for the Techno-Functional Business Analyst position. His use of non-English languages and lack of clear communication indicate a need for improvement in professional interaction and language skills.','- Expressed enthusiasm for the interview process.','- Responses were not in English, which is the medium of communication for the interview.\n- Did not demonstrate a professional level of communication.\n- Lack of clarity and relevance in responses.','11. Functional knowledge:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not provide responses to assess his functional knowledge.\n\n12. Technical knowledge:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun\'s technical knowledge could not be evaluated due to irrelevant responses.\n\n13. Consulting experience:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: There was no evidence of consulting experience in Varun\'s responses.\n\n14. Analytical ability:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not demonstrate analytical ability in his responses.\n\n15. Business understanding:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not show any business understanding relevant to the role.','16. Interpersonal skills:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun\'s interpersonal skills were not evident due to the lack of professional communication.\n\n17. Industry experience:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not mention any relevant industry experience.\n\n18. Presentation skills:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not exhibit the presentation skills expected for the role.\n\n19. Requirement analysis:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: There was no discussion of requirement analysis skills.\n\n20. Agile methodology:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not provide any insight into his experience with agile methodology.','2024-07-17 11:23:49'),(16,37,33,378,91,'Shailendra demonstrated a solid understanding of Android development, with a focus on platform development and customization. However, his responses lacked depth in certain areas, and there were instances of unclear communication.','- Shailendra has a strong background in Android application development, as evidenced by his experience with Scania truck navigation applications.\n- He is familiar with the Android build system and has experience customizing AOSP for specific hardware requirements.\n- Shailendra has worked with cross-functional teams, which is crucial for the role in question.','- Shailendra\'s responses were sometimes vague and lacked the technical depth expected for someone with his experience.\n- Communication clarity was an issue, with some responses being incomplete or not directly addressing the question.\n- There was a lack of specific examples and details in his responses, which made it difficult to assess his problem-solving skills and depth of knowledge in certain areas.','11. Android Platform Development/Customization/Integration:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Shailendra has experience in this area but did not provide detailed examples of his work, making it difficult to assess his proficiency.\n\n12. User Interface Development for Android:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Shailendra mentioned UI development but did not elaborate on his approach or the challenges he faced.\n\n13. Performance Optimization for Android Systems:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Shailendra discussed performance optimization but did not detail the tools or methodologies he used.\n\n14. Android Security Best Practices/Compliance:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Shailendra mentioned security practices but did not provide specific examples of how he implemented them in projects.\n\n15. Cross-Functional Collaboration/Communication:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: While Shailendra has experience collaborating with teams, his communication skills need improvement to effectively work in a cross-functional environment.','16. Java/Kotlin Programming:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Shailendra mentioned using Java and Kotlin but did not discuss complex coding problems he solved with these languages.\n\n17. CI/CD Pipelines/Automated Testing/Build Automation:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Shailendra has experience with CI/CD pipelines but did not clearly explain how he set up a pipeline or the benefits it brought.\n\n18. AOSP/AAOS Experience:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Shailendra has worked with AOSP/AAOS but did not provide in-depth examples of his contributions to development or maintenance.\n\n19. Cloud Platforms/Containerization Knowledge:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Shailendra mentioned cloud and containerization but did not discuss how these technologies impacted his Android development workflow.\n\n20. Android Development Tools Proficiency (Android Studio/ADB/Gradle):\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Shailendra is proficient with development tools but did not share how this proficiency enhanced his development process.','2024-07-17 15:47:57'),(17,39,4,228,51,'Varun\'s responses were brief and lacked engagement. He did not directly address the questions posed by the interviewer, which suggests a need for improvement in communication and interview etiquette.','- Varun was polite in his initial greeting.','- Varun\'s responses did not address the interviewer\'s questions directly.\n- He did not confirm his readiness for the interview or express enthusiasm for the discussion.\n- His answers were not substantive and did not provide any insight into his qualifications or interest in the role.','11. HTML:\nScore: Not Applicable\nQualitative Assessment: Not Applicable\nDescription: Varun did not discuss his HTML skills.\n\n12. CSS:\nScore: Not Applicable\nQualitative Assessment: Not Applicable\nDescription: Varun did not discuss his CSS skills.\n\n13. JavaScript:\nScore: Not Applicable\nQualitative Assessment: Not Applicable\nDescription: Varun did not discuss his JavaScript skills.\n\n14. MVC architecture:\nScore: Not Applicable\nQualitative Assessment: Not Applicable\nDescription: Varun did not discuss his experience with MVC architecture.\n\n15. OOP programming style:\nScore: Not Applicable\nQualitative Assessment: Not Applicable\nDescription: Varun did not discuss his experience with OOP programming style.','16. SASS:\nScore: Not Applicable\nQualitative Assessment: Not Applicable\nDescription: Varun did not discuss his experience with SASS.\n\n17. JQuery:\nScore: Not Applicable\nQualitative Assessment: Not Applicable\nDescription: Varun did not discuss his experience with JQuery.\n\n18. Javascript Frameworks (Backbone/Angular/EmberJs/NodeJs):\nScore: Not Applicable\nQualitative Assessment: Not Applicable\nDescription: Varun did not discuss his experience with JavaScript frameworks.\n\n19. GIT:\nScore: Not Applicable\nQualitative Assessment: Not Applicable\nDescription: Varun did not discuss his experience with GIT.\n\n20. Communication skills:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun\'s communication skills need improvement as he did not effectively communicate during the interview.','2024-07-18 04:16:51'),(18,45,40,377,91,'Gowtham\'s interview responses were inconsistent and at times incoherent, which made it challenging to accurately assess his fit for the HMI Developer role at Royal Enfield. While he mentioned some relevant experience, his answers lacked depth and clarity, making it difficult to gauge his true expertise in Android Platform Development.','- Mentioned having four plus years of experience in Android development.\n- Discussed working with Java and Kotlin, which are relevant to the job description.\n- Briefly touched on experience with AOSP and adapting Android software for specific hardware requirements.','- Responses were often unclear, lacking in detail, and at times incoherent (e.g., response to Q4).\n- Failed to provide concrete examples of past projects or challenges faced, which is crucial for demonstrating applied experience.\n- Did not effectively communicate his approach to ensuring compatibility with AOSP or AAOS specifications.\n- Did not showcase a strong understanding of Android Platform Development in the context of the job description.','11. Android Platform Development/Customization/Integration:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Gowtham mentioned some experience with Android development but did not provide sufficient details to demonstrate proficiency.\n\n12. User Interface Development for Android:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: There was no specific mention of experience in User Interface Development for Android, which is a key component of the job description.\n\n13. Performance Optimization for Android Systems:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Gowtham did not discuss any experience with performance optimization for Android systems, which is essential for the role.\n\n14. Android Security Best Practices/Compliance:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: There was no evidence of knowledge or experience with Android security best practices or compliance.\n\n15. Cross-Functional Collaboration/Communication:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: While Gowtham mentioned teamwork, he did not elaborate on his experience with cross-functional collaboration or communication.','16. Java/Kotlin Programming:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Gowtham mentioned working with Java and Kotlin, but did not provide enough detail to assess his proficiency.\n\n17. CI/CD Pipelines/Automated Testing/Build Automation:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: There was no mention of experience with CI/CD pipelines, automated testing, or build automation.\n\n18. AOSP/AAOS Experience:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Gowtham briefly touched on experience with AOSP but did not demonstrate a comprehensive understanding or provide examples of work with AAOS.\n\n19. Cloud Platforms/Containerization Knowledge:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Gowtham did not mention any experience with cloud platforms or containerization knowledge.\n\n20. Android Development Tools Proficiency (Android Studio/ADB/Gradle):\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: There was no specific mention of proficiency with Android development tools such as Android Studio, ADB, or Gradle.','2024-07-18 14:28:47'),(19,47,35,374,90,'Bhushan demonstrated a good understanding of data engineering concepts and practical experience with data pipelines, cloud platforms, and real-time data processing. His responses indicated hands-on experience with AWS services and a clear direction towards modernizing data pipelines using Kafka and Kubernetes.','- Bhushan has practical experience with AWS services, particularly Lambda and Kinesis, which he mentioned using for data processing.\n- He is aware of the cost and scalability benefits of Kafka over AWS Kinesis and has plans to transition to Kafka and Apache Beam.\n- Bhushan has experience with Elasticsearch, indicating his involvement with data transformation and storage.\n- He mentioned using Kubernetes for scalability, showing an understanding of modern deployment and scaling techniques.','- Bhushan\'s responses lacked specific examples and details that would demonstrate a deeper understanding of the technologies mentioned.\n- He could improve the structure of his responses to make them more concise and focused on the question asked.\n- Bhushan could provide more insights into the challenges faced and how he overcame them in his projects to showcase problem-solving skills.','11. [Data Pipeline Development/Kafka/MQTT/HTTP]:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Bhushan has experience with AWS services and plans to use Kafka, indicating knowledge in data pipeline development.\n\n12. [Real-Time Data Processing/Kafka Streams/Kafka Connect]:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Bhushan mentioned real-time data processing with AWS Lambda and plans for Kafka, showing relevant experience.\n\n13. [Data Ingestion and Integration/IoT/Database/APIs]:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Bhushan discussed data ingestion from APIs and plans for IoT device integration, demonstrating relevant experience.\n\n14. [Data Transformation and Storage/SQL/NoSQL/Data Lakes]:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Bhushan\'s experience with Elasticsearch indicates knowledge in data transformation and storage.\n\n15. [Cloud Platforms/Azure/GCP/AWS]:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Excellent\nDescription: Bhushan\'s extensive use of AWS services for data engineering tasks demonstrates strong experience with cloud platforms.','16. [Software Development Lifecycle/Agile Methodologies]:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Bhushan\'s professional experience implies familiarity with the software development lifecycle, but he could discuss specific Agile practices he has used.\n\n17. [Data Engineering/Data Life Cycle Management]:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Bhushan has practical data engineering experience but could provide more insights into data life cycle management.\n\n18. [Collaboration and Communication Skills]:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Bhushan mentioned collaborating with teams, but he could discuss more about his communication practices within a team setting.\n\n19. [Continuous Improvement/Technology Upgradation]:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Bhushan\'s intention to modernize data pipelines shows a commitment to continuous improvement and technology upgradation.\n\n20. [Problem-Solving/Analytical Skills]:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Bhushan\'s responses indicate problem-solving skills, but he could provide more examples of analytical approaches to complex issues.','2024-07-18 16:39:15'),(20,46,33,378,91,'Shailendra demonstrated a strong technical background in Android platform development with a focus on customization and integration, which aligns with the job description. However, his responses often lacked structure and clarity, leading to some repetition and vagueness in his explanations.','- Extensive experience in Android platform development, particularly in customization and integration for automotive applications.\n- Familiarity with AOSP/AAOS and ensuring compatibility with these specifications.\n- Experience with hardware integration and performance optimization.\n- Demonstrated ability to work with cross-functional teams and third-party libraries.','- Communication lacked clarity and conciseness, with some repetition and lack of focus on the questions asked.\n- Responses sometimes veered off-topic or did not directly address the interviewer\'s questions.\n- Could improve on providing structured and specific examples to showcase his expertise more effectively.','11. Android Platform Development/Customization/Integration:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Shailendra has applied experience in this area, though he could provide more specific examples of his work.\n\n12. User Interface Development for Android:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Shailendra mentioned UI/UX customization, but more details on his experience would strengthen his response.\n\n13. Performance Optimization for Android Systems:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Shailendra discussed performance optimization, but could elaborate on specific techniques and results.\n\n14. Android Security Best Practices/Compliance:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Shailendra mentioned security concerns, but could provide more insight into how he ensures compliance with best practices.\n\n15. Cross-Functional Collaboration/Communication:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Shailendra\'s experience with cross-functional teams is evident, but he could discuss his communication strategies more.','16. Java/Kotlin Programming:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Shailendra has applied experience with Java and Kotlin, which is essential for the role.\n\n17. CI/CD Pipelines/Automated Testing/Build Automation:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Shailendra mentioned CI/CD and automated testing, but could provide more details on his experience with build automation.\n\n18. AOSP/AAOS Experience:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Shailendra has applied experience with AOSP/AAOS, which is highly relevant to the role.\n\n19. Cloud Platforms/Containerization Knowledge:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Shailendra touched on cloud services, but could expand on his knowledge of containerization.\n\n20. Android Development Tools Proficiency (Android Studio/ADB/Gradle):\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Shailendra demonstrated proficiency with Android development tools, which is crucial for the role.','2024-07-18 16:53:43'),(21,48,4,398,93,'Varun\'s responses were non-existent or irrelevant throughout the interview, providing no substantive information or insight into his qualifications or thought processes. This indicates a lack of engagement and preparedness for the interview.','- There are no discernible strengths in Varun\'s interview responses as they are either monosyllabic affirmatives or unrelated to the questions asked.','- Varun failed to provide any relevant or meaningful answers to the interview questions.\n- There was a complete lack of engagement with the interview process.\n- Varun did not demonstrate any knowledge or experience related to the job description.','11. Android Platform Development/Customization/Integration:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not discuss any relevant experience or knowledge in this area.\n\n12. User Interface Development/Android UI/UX:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not provide any insights into his experience with UI/UX development.\n\n13. Performance Optimization/Profiling/Debugging:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not describe any situations where he optimized performance or engaged in profiling/debugging.\n\n14. Security Standards/Compliance/Best Practices:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not discuss how he has implemented security standards or best practices.\n\n15. Cross-Functional Collaboration/Communication:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not provide examples of effective cross-functional collaboration or communication.','16. Java/Kotlin Programming:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not describe any complex problems he solved using Java or Kotlin.\n\n17. CI/CD Pipelines/Automated Testing/Build Automation:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not explain how he utilized CI/CD pipelines in his previous role.\n\n18. AOSP/AAOS Development/Customization:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not talk about his experience with AOSP or AAOS development and customization.\n\n19. Cloud Platforms/Containerization/Docker/Kubernetes:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not describe any projects where he used Docker or Kubernetes in the context of Android development.\n\n20. Android Studio/ADB/Gradle Tools:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not give any examples of how he used these tools to solve development problems.','2024-07-18 17:44:52'),(22,49,4,401,94,'Varun\'s responses during the interview were limited and, in many cases, non-existent. This made it challenging to evaluate his fit for the HMI Developer role at Adzip Technologies. The lack of engagement and detailed answers to the questions posed by the interviewer indicates a need for significant improvement in interview preparedness and communication.','- Varun expressed willingness to continue with the interview despite having a tough day, which shows a level of commitment.','- Varun did not provide substantive responses to the majority of the questions.\n- There was a lack of engagement and detail in his answers, which did not allow for a proper assessment of his skills and experience.\n- Varun\'s responses did not demonstrate a clear understanding of the role or how his background aligns with the job requirements.','11. Android Platform Development/Customization/Integration:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not discuss his experience with Android platform development, which is critical for the role.\n\n12. User Interface Development:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not provide information on his experience with user interface development, a key skill for the position.\n\n13. Performance Optimization:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not describe any scenarios where he optimized Android applications, which is necessary for the role.\n\n14. Security/Compliance:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not discuss his experience with implementing security best practices within an Android environment.\n\n15. Collaboration/Communication:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not provide examples of effective collaboration or communication with cross-functional teams.','16. Java/Kotlin Programming:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not talk about his programming skills in Java or Kotlin, which are essential for the role.\n\n17. CI/CD Pipelines/Automated Testing/Build Automation:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not describe his experience with CI/CD pipelines, which is important for the role\'s responsibilities.\n\n18. AOSP/AAOS Experience:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not explain any complex problems he solved while working with AOSP, a requirement for the position.\n\n19. Cloud Platforms/Containerization:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not share his experience with integrating cloud platforms or containerization into his workflow.\n\n20. Android Development Tools Proficiency:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not demonstrate proficiency with Android development tools, which is necessary for the job.\n\nOverall, Varun\'s interview performance requires significant improvement across all parameters. He should aim to provide detailed and relevant responses that showcase his skills, experience, and alignment with the job requirements.','2024-07-18 18:08:48'),(23,51,4,404,94,'Varun\'s responses during the interview were generally brief and lacked depth. He did not provide detailed examples or insights into his experience and skills, which made it difficult to assess his fit for the role. Varun\'s lack of engagement and inability to answer several questions related to the job description indicates a need for improvement in preparation and communication.','- Varun confirmed his availability and willingness to proceed with the interview.\n- He expressed his experience in leading teams and working on multimedia application connectivity features.','- Varun\'s responses were often too brief and lacked the necessary detail to demonstrate his expertise and experience.\n- He did not provide concrete examples of his work or how he addressed challenges, which is crucial for evaluating his problem-solving skills and technical knowledge.\n- Varun did not engage with the interviewer\'s questions about his experiences with CI/CD pipelines, AOSP, cloud platforms, containerization, and Android development tools, which are critical for the role.\n- He did not ask any questions at the end of the interview, missing an opportunity to show interest in the role and the company.','11. Android Platform Development/Customization/Integration:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not provide specific examples of his experience with Android platform development, customization, or integration.\n\n12. User Interface Development:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun stated he had no experience with User Interface Development, which is a key requirement for the role.\n\n13. Performance Optimization:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun\'s response to performance optimization was vague and did not demonstrate applied experience.\n\n14. Security/Compliance:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun mentioned general security practices but did not provide concrete examples of implementation in his work.\n\n15. Collaboration/Communication:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun\'s response about collaboration was unclear and did not provide insight into his ability to work with cross-functional teams.','16. Java/Kotlin Programming:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not discuss his experience with Java or Kotlin programming during the interview.\n\n17. CI/CD Pipelines/Automated Testing/Build Automation:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not provide any response regarding his experience with CI/CD pipelines, automated testing, or build automation.\n\n18. AOSP/AAOS Experience:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not provide any response regarding his experience with AOSP or AAOS.\n\n19. Cloud Platforms/Containerization:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not provide any response regarding his experience with cloud platforms or containerization.\n\n20. Android Development Tools Proficiency:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not provide any response regarding his proficiency with Android development tools.','2024-07-18 18:35:11'),(24,52,33,388,92,'Shailendra demonstrated a good understanding of Android development and related technologies throughout the interview. He provided detailed responses, showcasing his experience with Android platform development, UI/UX design, and system performance optimization. However, his responses sometimes lacked structure and clarity, which could be improved for better communication.','- Extensive experience in Android application development and customization.\n- Familiarity with AOSP and AAOS development.\n- Knowledgeable in performance optimization and debugging.\n- Demonstrated understanding of CI/CD pipelines and automated testing.','- Responses were sometimes unstructured and lacked clarity.\n- Did not always directly address the interviewer\'s questions.\n- Could improve on providing concise and focused answers.','11. Android Platform Development/Customization/Maintenance:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Shailendra demonstrated applied experience in Android platform development and customization.\n\n12. Java/Kotlin Programming:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Shailendra showed good knowledge and experience in Java and Kotlin programming.\n\n13. Android System Architecture/Frameworks/Services:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Shailendra\'s experience with Android system architecture and frameworks was evident in his responses.\n\n14. UI/UX Design for Android:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Shailendra has experience in UI/UX design, although he could improve on aligning design with user needs.\n\n15. Performance Optimization/Profiling/Debugging:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Shailendra provided strong insights into performance optimization and debugging practices.','16. CI/CD Pipelines/Automated Testing/Build Automation:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Shailendra\'s experience with CI/CD pipelines and automated testing was clear and relevant.\n\n17. AOSP/AAOS Development:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Shailendra showed good knowledge of AOSP/AAOS development, with room for more detailed examples.\n\n18. Security Best Practices/Compliance:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Shailendra understands security best practices, as demonstrated in his discussion of SELinux and code obfuscation.\n\n19. Cross-Functional Collaboration/Communication:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Shailendra\'s responses indicated experience with cross-functional collaboration, though he could improve communication clarity.\n\n20. Cloud Platforms/Containerization (Docker/Kubernetes):\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Shailendra did not provide specific examples of experience with cloud platforms or containerization, which could be an area for improvement.','2024-07-19 04:28:39'),(25,54,33,388,92,'Shailendra demonstrated a strong technical foundation and relevant experience in Android development. However, his responses lacked structure and clarity, often veering off-topic or providing excessive detail without addressing the core of the questions. His communication style could benefit from more focus and conciseness to better align with the expectations of the role.','- Extensive experience in Android application development and customization.\n- Familiarity with AOSP and AAOS development processes.\n- Knowledge of performance optimization techniques for Android applications.\n- Experience with CI/CD pipelines and automated testing.','- Responses were often verbose and lacked clarity, making it difficult to extract relevant information.\n- Some answers did not directly address the questions, indicating a need for better listening skills and understanding of the interviewer\'s intent.\n- Limited engagement with the interviewer\'s questions, missing opportunities to showcase problem-solving skills and creativity.','11. Android Platform Development/Customization/Maintenance:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Shailendra has experience in Android platform development but needs to articulate his expertise more clearly.\n\n12. Java/Kotlin Programming:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Shailendra\'s experience with Java and Kotlin is evident, though his responses could be more concise.\n\n13. Android System Architecture/Frameworks/Services:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Shailendra demonstrated knowledge in this area but could improve by providing more structured examples.\n\n14. UI/UX Design for Android:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Shailendra has relevant experience in UI/UX design, as seen in his work with Scania\'s navigation app.\n\n15. Performance Optimization/Profiling/Debugging:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Shailendra understands performance optimization but needs to communicate his approach more effectively.','16. CI/CD Pipelines/Automated Testing/Build Automation:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Shailendra has experience with CI/CD and automated testing, though his explanation of the implementation process was not clear.\n\n17. AOSP/AAOS Development:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Shailendra\'s familiarity with AOSP/AAOS development is apparent, but his responses lacked specificity.\n\n18. Security Best Practices/Compliance:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Shailendra mentioned security practices but did not delve deeply into his experience with them.\n\n19. Cross-Functional Collaboration/Communication:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Shailendra has experience collaborating with teams but could improve his communication of these experiences.\n\n20. Cloud Platforms/Containerization (Docker/Kubernetes):\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Shailendra did not provide sufficient detail on his experience with cloud platforms and containerization.','2024-07-19 05:17:45'),(26,53,35,410,97,'Bhushan demonstrated a strong technical background with significant experience in data pipeline development and cloud services, particularly AWS. He articulated his role and responsibilities well, showing a clear understanding of real-time data processing and streaming with Kafka, as well as data ingestion and storage using Elasticsearch. Bhushan\'s responses indicated a practical approach to problem-solving and an eagerness to learn new technologies.','- Extensive experience with AWS services and data pipeline development.\n- Practical knowledge of Kafka and its application in real-time data processing.\n- Demonstrated ability to optimize performance and solve complex technical challenges.\n- Good understanding of HTTPS protocol implementation and its use in securing data communication.\n- Expressed willingness to learn and adapt to new technologies, such as Azure.','- Limited experience with Azure and GCP compared to AWS.\n- Some responses lacked specific examples or details that could have demonstrated a deeper understanding of certain technologies.\n- Could benefit from more structured responses to convey information more effectively.','11. Kafka:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Bhushan displayed applied experience with Kafka, detailing its use in his projects.\n\n12. MQTT/HTTP protocols:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Bhushan explained his implementation of HTTPS, but did not provide examples of MQTT usage.\n\n13. Real-time data processing:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Bhushan\'s experience with real-time data processing was evident, particularly with Kafka and AWS services.\n\n14. Data pipeline development:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Bhushan provided a comprehensive overview of his data pipeline development experience.\n\n15. Azure/GCP cloud services:\nScore: 5\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Bhushan admitted limited experience with Azure and GCP, indicating a need for further development in these areas.','16. JIRA/Rally:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Bhushan mentioned using JIRA and Rally but did not elaborate on specific experiences.\n\n17. SQL/NoSQL databases:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Bhushan\'s use of Elasticsearch suggests a good understanding of NoSQL databases.\n\n18. Data ingestion/integration:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Bhushan\'s experience with data ingestion and integration was well articulated, especially with AWS Kinesis and Lambda.\n\n19. IoT device integration:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Bhushan did not specifically mention IoT device integration, but his knowledge of related technologies suggests competence.\n\n20. Data transformation/storage:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Bhushan\'s responses indicated a strong grasp of data transformation and storage, particularly with Elasticsearch.','2024-07-19 05:22:11'),(27,56,4,411,98,'Varun\'s responses during the interview were extremely limited, providing only a \"Yes\" to each question. This indicates a lack of engagement and failure to communicate effectively, which is critical for the role in question. Varun did not demonstrate the required knowledge, experience, or communication skills expected for the Developer - Connected Platform position.','- Unfortunately, based on Varun\'s responses, no strengths can be identified as he did not provide any substantive answers to the interview questions.','- Varun\'s responses lacked detail and did not address the questions asked.\n- There was no evidence of Varun\'s knowledge or experience related to the job description.\n- Varun failed to communicate effectively, which is crucial for the role.\n- Varun did not showcase any problem-solving skills or adaptability.','11. Kafka:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not provide any information on his experience with Kafka.\n\n12. MQTT/HTTP protocols:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not discuss his experience with MQTT/HTTP protocols.\n\n13. Real-time data processing:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not share any insights into his real-time data processing experience.\n\n14. Data pipeline development:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not describe any data pipeline development experience.\n\n15. Microsoft Azure/GCP:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not mention any experience with Microsoft Azure or GCP.','16. SQL/NoSQL databases:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not provide details on his experience with SQL/NoSQL databases.\n\n17. Data ingestion/integration:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not discuss his experience with data ingestion or integration.\n\n18. Kafka Streams/Kafka Connect:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not provide information on his use of Kafka Streams or Kafka Connect.\n\n19. Data transformation/storage:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not elaborate on his experience with data transformation or storage.\n\n20. Jira/Rally:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not discuss how he has used Jira or Rally in managing projects.','2024-07-19 06:03:06'),(28,55,34,373,89,'Asmiya Begum demonstrated a good understanding of Android development, with practical experience in Java and Kotlin, as well as familiarity with various tools and libraries. She has a strong background in application development, particularly in retail and logistics. However, there is room for improvement in her responses regarding advanced topics and leadership experience.','- Asmiya has solid experience in Android application development, particularly with Java and Kotlin.\n- She is proficient in using Android Studio and related tools, which aligns with the job requirements.\n- Asmiya has practical experience with RESTful APIs and has used Agile methodologies effectively in her past projects.','- Asmiya lacks experience with automotive-specific protocols like CAN bus and OBD-II, which are relevant to the job description.\n- Her responses lacked depth in areas such as Android Architecture, AAOS, BSP, and ISO 26262 Functional Safety.\n- Asmiya could improve her communication of complex technical solutions, as seen in her explanation of MSAL implementation.','11. Java/Kotlin:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Asmiya has applied experience with Java and Kotlin, which is evident in her work history and responses.\n\n12. Android Studio:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Asmiya demonstrated applied experience with Android Studio and its tools, aligning with her professional background.\n\n13. RESTful APIs/Websocket:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Asmiya has experience with RESTful APIs and Websocket, but her explanation could have been more detailed.\n\n14. Agile Practice/JIRA/Rally:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Asmiya has applied experience with Agile practices and JIRA, which she effectively used in her projects.\n\n15. Android Architecture/AAOS/BSP:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Asmiya has basic knowledge of Android Architecture but lacks experience with AAOS and BSP, which are relevant to the role.','16. GraphQL APIs/Apollo Client:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Asmiya mentioned using GraphQL in personal projects but did not demonstrate applied experience in a professional context.\n\n17. Software Development:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Asmiya has a strong background in software development, with experience in various aspects of Android app development.\n\n18. CAN bus/OBD-II Protocols:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Asmiya lacks experience with CAN bus and OBD-II protocols, which are important for the role.\n\n19. ISO 26262 Functional Safety:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Asmiya has limited knowledge of ISO 26262 Functional Safety and did not provide examples of ensuring compliance.\n\n20. Performance Optimization/Resource Management:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Asmiya discussed performance optimization and resource management but could provide more in-depth examples of her approach.','2024-07-19 06:15:15'),(29,57,4,411,98,'Varun\'s responses throughout the interview were generally on topic, but they lacked the depth and specificity expected for the role. While he demonstrated some understanding of the technologies and processes involved, his answers were often vague and did not convey a strong grasp of the subject matter or the ability to articulate complex technical concepts clearly.','- Varun expressed confidence in his abilities and a willingness to engage with the interview process.\n- He mentioned experience with Kafka, Python, AWS Lambda, and Jira, which are relevant to the job description.\n- Varun showed an understanding of the importance of scalability and customer-centric approaches in software development.','- Varun\'s responses lacked detail and specificity, often failing to provide concrete examples or in-depth explanations of his experience.\n- He did not demonstrate a strong understanding of data pipeline development, real-time data processing, or the use of specific technologies like MQTT, HTTP, or SQL/NoSQL databases.\n- Varun\'s communication was not always clear or well-structured, which could lead to misunderstandings in a professional setting.','11. Kafka:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun mentioned Kafka but did not provide detailed experiences or knowledge of implementing Kafka in projects.\n\n12. MQTT/HTTP protocols:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun\'s understanding of MQTT and HTTP protocols in device-to-cloud communication was basic and lacked specific examples.\n\n13. Real-time data processing:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun\'s response did not demonstrate a strong grasp of real-time data processing techniques or optimization strategies.\n\n14. Data pipeline development:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun\'s description of data pipeline development was vague and did not reflect a deep understanding of the process.\n\n15. Microsoft Azure/GCP:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun\'s experience with Azure or GCP was not clearly articulated, and he did not provide examples of overcoming challenges with these platforms.','16. SQL/NoSQL databases:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun\'s response on optimizing databases for high-velocity data was insufficient and did not reflect applied experience.\n\n17. Data ingestion/integration:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not provide a clear explanation of his experience with data ingestion or integration processes.\n\n18. Kafka Streams/Kafka Connect:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun\'s knowledge of Kafka Streams or Kafka Connect was not evident from his responses.\n\n19. Data transformation/storage:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not demonstrate a comprehensive understanding of data transformation or storage solutions.\n\n20. Jira/Rally:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun mentioned using Jira for project management but did not elaborate on how it helped maintain project timelines and deliverables effectively.','2024-07-19 07:25:34'),(30,61,40,387,92,'Gowtham\'s responses throughout the interview were generally brief and lacked depth. While he demonstrated some familiarity with the technical aspects of the role, his answers often fell short in providing comprehensive insights into his experiences and approaches to problem-solving. There was a notable gap between the benchmark responses and his actual responses, indicating areas where Gowtham could improve to align more closely with the expectations for the HMI Developer role at Royal Enfield.','- Gowtham has experience in Android development and has worked on various projects, which is relevant to the job description.\n- He mentioned working on customization for specific hardware configurations, which is a key aspect of the role.\n- Gowtham is aware of the importance of security best practices in Android development.','- Responses lacked detail and specific examples that demonstrate his depth of knowledge and problem-solving skills.\n- He did not effectively communicate his experience with cross-functional collaboration, which is critical for the role.\n- Gowtham\'s answers did not showcase his ability to think creatively or adapt to new technologies and changes, as expected for the position.\n- He did not ask questions at the end of the interview, missing an opportunity to learn more about the role and company.','11. Android Platform Development/Customization/Maintenance:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Gowtham mentioned his experience with Android customization but did not provide detailed examples. He could improve by discussing specific projects and their impact.\n\n12. Java/Kotlin Programming:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Gowtham has experience with Java and Kotlin but did not elaborate on his proficiency. He could improve by sharing more about his programming projects and challenges.\n\n13. Android System Architecture/Frameworks/Services:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Gowtham\'s knowledge in this area was implied but not well articulated. He could improve by providing examples of how he has worked with Android system architecture.\n\n14. UI/UX Design for Android:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Gowtham\'s responses did not demonstrate a strong understanding of UI/UX design principles. He could improve by discussing his involvement in designing user interface components.\n\n15. Performance Optimization/Profiling/Debugging:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Gowtham briefly mentioned optimization but did not provide a clear example of how he improved system performance. He could improve by detailing his approach to profiling and debugging.','16. CI/CD Pipelines/Automated Testing/Build Automation:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Gowtham acknowledged the use of CI/CD pipelines but did not describe how he implemented them. He could improve by providing a specific example of how CI/CD improved a project\'s lifecycle.\n\n17. AOSP/AAOS Development:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Gowtham stated he was not directly involved in AOSP or AAOS development. He could improve by discussing any related experience or knowledge he has in this area.\n\n18. Security Best Practices/Compliance:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Gowtham mentioned security practices but did not provide a comprehensive view of how he implements them. He could improve by discussing specific security measures he has taken in his projects.\n\n19. Cross-Functional Collaboration/Communication:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Gowtham did not provide a strong example of cross-functional collaboration. He could improve by sharing experiences where he worked with different teams to achieve project goals.\n\n20. Cloud Platforms/Containerization (Docker/Kubernetes):\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Gowtham mentioned using Docker but not Kubernetes. He could improve by discussing how containerization has enhanced system scalability and reliability in his projects.','2024-07-19 09:42:47'),(31,63,45,412,99,'John\'s responses throughout the interview were generally aligned with the benchmark responses but lacked depth and specificity in certain areas. He demonstrated a solid understanding of Android development and shared relevant experiences from his previous roles. However, his answers could have been more detailed and structured to better showcase his expertise and problem-solving abilities.','- John has a strong background in Android development, with specific experiences in security and performance optimization.\n- He showed awareness of the importance of collaboration with cross-functional teams and the need to prioritize user needs.\n- John\'s experience with leading a team and mentoring junior developers is evident and aligns with the job description\'s emphasis on cross-functional collaboration.','- John\'s responses were sometimes vague and lacked the detail expected from a candidate with his experience. He could have provided more concrete examples and outcomes from his past projects.\n- His communication style could be more engaging and structured to convey his ideas more effectively.\n- John did not ask any questions at the end of the interview, missing an opportunity to learn more about the role and company.','11. Android Platform Development/Customization/Integration:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: John discussed his experience with Android platform development but could have provided more details on customization and integration aspects.\n\n12. User Interface Development for Android:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: John mentioned his transition from XML to Jetpack Compose, indicating his experience with UI development.\n\n13. Performance Optimization for Android Systems:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: John provided an example of performance optimization but could have elaborated on the specific techniques and tools he used.\n\n14. Android Security Best Practices/Compliance:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: John\'s experience with security in banking apps demonstrates his knowledge in this area, although he could have mentioned compliance aspects.\n\n15. Cross-functional Collaboration/Communication:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: John\'s response indicated experience with cross-functional collaboration, aligning with the job description.','16. Java/Kotlin Programming:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: John discussed his experience with Java and Kotlin, showing a solid foundation in these programming languages.\n\n17. CI/CD Pipelines/Automated Testing/Build Automation:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: John mentioned the implementation of CI/CD pipelines at TCS, which improved the development process.\n\n18. AOSP/AAOS Development Experience:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: John did not specifically mention AOSP/AAOS development experience, which is an area he could have highlighted.\n\n19. Cloud Platforms/Containerization Knowledge:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: John did not provide information on his experience with cloud platforms or containerization.\n\n20. Android Development Tools Proficiency (Android Studio/ADB/Gradle):\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: John provided examples of using Android development tools, demonstrating proficiency in this area.','2024-07-19 12:43:38'),(32,65,44,409,96,'Avinash\'s performance in the interview was mixed. While he demonstrated a solid understanding of Android development and experience in the automotive domain, his responses lacked depth in certain areas and were sometimes off-topic or unclear. His communication style was straightforward, but there were instances where he could have been more articulate and relevant to the questions asked.','- Avinash has substantial experience in Android framework development and automotive software, aligning with the job requirements.\n- He has worked on performance optimization, which is critical for the role.\n- His experience with Agile practices and JIRA is evident and aligns with the collaborative nature of the role.','- Avinash\'s responses sometimes lacked relevance and clarity, particularly when discussing Kotlin and GraphQL APIs, which he has limited experience with.\n- He did not demonstrate a strong understanding of Android Architecture, AAOS, or BSP, which are important for the role.\n- His communication style could be more engaging and structured to effectively convey his thoughts.','11. Java/Kotlin:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Avinash has experience with Java but limited experience with Kotlin, which is relevant to the role.\n\n12. Android Studio:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Avinash demonstrated applied experience with Android Studio, which is crucial for the role.\n\n13. RESTful APIs/Websocket:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Avinash has experience with RESTful APIs at the app level but did not provide in-depth examples relevant to the automotive domain.\n\n14. Agile Practice/JIRA/Rally:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Avinash has good experience with Agile practices and JIRA, aligning with the job requirements.\n\n15. Android Architecture/AAOS/BSP:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Avinash\'s understanding of Android Architecture, AAOS, and BSP was not clearly conveyed and requires improvement.','16. GraphQL APIs/Apollo Client:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Avinash has very limited experience with GraphQL APIs and Apollo Client, which are relevant to the role.\n\n17. Software Development Lifecycle:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Avinash demonstrated a good understanding of the Software Development Lifecycle and its application in the automotive industry.\n\n18. CAN bus/OBD-II Protocols:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Avinash has practical experience with CAN bus and OBD-II protocols, which is beneficial for the role.\n\n19. ISO 26262 Functional Safety:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Avinash mentioned ISO 26262 but did not provide a strong example of how he incorporated functional safety into his development process.\n\n20. Performance Optimization:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Avinash has experience with performance optimization, which is crucial for the role.','2024-07-19 17:51:29'),(33,68,42,375,91,'Ajay demonstrated a strong technical background and relevant experience in Android-based Automotive Infotainment systems. His responses indicated a good understanding of the technical aspects of the role, including platform development, integration of third-party libraries, and user interface design. However, there were instances where his responses lacked depth and clarity, particularly when discussing non-technical stakeholder communication and balancing innovation with established processes.','- Relevant experience in Android-based Automotive Infotainment systems.\n- Familiarity with Android platform development, customization, and integration.\n- Experience with third-party library integration and problem-solving skills.\n- Understanding of performance optimization in Android systems.','- Communication could be clearer and more structured.\n- Responses sometimes lacked the depth expected for someone with his experience.\n- Could improve on explaining technical concepts to non-technical stakeholders.\n- Approach to balancing established processes with innovation could be more strategic.','11. Android Platform Development/Customization/Integration:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Ajay provided solid examples of his experience in this area, aligning well with the job requirements.\n\n12. User Interface Development for Android:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Ajay discussed his approach to UI development, but more detail on his creative process would enhance his response.\n\n13. Performance Optimization for Android Systems:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Ajay\'s experience with performance optimization was evident, showcasing his applied experience.\n\n14. Android Security Best Practices/Compliance:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Ajay understands the importance of security and compliance but could articulate his experience with best practices more clearly.\n\n15. Cross-Functional Collaboration/Communication:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Ajay has experience with cross-functional teams but could improve how he communicates technical concepts to various stakeholders.','16. Java/Kotlin Programming:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Ajay provided examples of solving complex problems using Java and Kotlin, demonstrating good proficiency.\n\n17. CI/CD Pipelines/Automated Testing/Build Automation:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Ajay\'s response showed his contribution to CI/CD practices, though more detail on his role in process improvement would be beneficial.\n\n18. AOSP/AAOS Experience:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Ajay shared a relevant experience with AOSP, indicating a good level of applied experience.\n\n19. Cloud Platforms/Containerization Knowledge:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Ajay is familiar with cloud platforms and containerization but could provide more concrete examples of leveraging these technologies.\n\n20. Android Development Tools Proficiency (Android Studio/ADB/Gradle):\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Ajay demonstrated proficiency with essential Android development tools, aligning with the job requirements.','2024-07-20 05:12:02'),(34,70,38,379,91,'Swapnil demonstrated a good understanding of Android development and relevant experience. However, his responses lacked depth in certain areas and were sometimes unclear or incomplete, which suggests a need for improvement in communication and elaboration on technical expertise.','- Swapnil has relevant experience in Android development and has worked on multiple projects, which aligns with the job description.\n- He mentioned experience with performance optimization, security practices, and cross-functional collaboration, which are key aspects of the role.\n- Swapnil\'s experience with AOSP and leading a team of developers indicates his capability to handle responsibilities that the job entails.','- Swapnil\'s responses were sometimes vague and lacked specific examples or detailed explanations.\n- He did not fully articulate his thought process or the impact of his work on the projects he mentioned.\n- There were instances where Swapnil\'s communication was not clear, and he did not address the questions directly, which could be improved with more structured responses.','11. Android Platform Development/Customization/Integration:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Swapnil mentioned relevant experience but did not provide compelling examples of his work in Android platform development.\n\n12. User Interface Development for Android:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Not relevant\nDescription: Swapnil did not provide a response to the question about his experience with User Interface Development on the Android platform.\n\n13. Performance Optimization for Android Systems:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Swapnil discussed performance optimization strategies but could have provided more concrete examples and results.\n\n14. Android Security Best Practices/Compliance:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Swapnil mentioned several security measures but did not detail specific instances where he ensured compliance with best practices.\n\n15. Cross-Functional Collaboration/Communication:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Swapnil\'s response indicated experience with cross-functional collaboration, but he could have provided clearer examples of successful outcomes.','16. Java/Kotlin Programming:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Swapnil\'s resume suggests proficiency in Java and Kotlin, but his interview responses did not fully demonstrate his programming skills.\n\n17. CI/CD Pipelines/Automated Testing/Build Automation:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Swapnil did not mention his experience with CI/CD pipelines, automated testing, or build automation during the interview.\n\n18. AOSP/AAOS Experience:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Swapnil mentioned working on an AOSP project, but he could have elaborated on his specific contributions and the impact of his work.\n\n19. Cloud Platforms/Containerization Knowledge:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Swapnil did not discuss his experience with cloud platforms or containerization, which are mentioned in the job description.\n\n20. Android Development Tools Proficiency (Android Studio/ADB/Gradle):\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Swapnil\'s resume indicates proficiency with Android development tools, but he did not elaborate on this during the interview.','2024-07-20 11:20:28'),(35,69,35,413,100,'Bhushan demonstrated a solid understanding of data engineering concepts and his experience with various technologies relevant to the job description. He provided detailed explanations of his work with Kafka, real-time data processing, and data pipeline development, showcasing his technical expertise. However, there were instances where his responses could have been more structured and aligned with the benchmark responses, which emphasized clarity and relevance to the role at Royal Enfield.','- Bhushan has hands-on experience with Kafka, real-time data processing, and data pipeline development, which are critical for the role.\n- He has worked on modernizing data pipelines, improving performance, and reducing costs, showing his ability to drive efficiency.\n- Bhushan\'s experience with AWS services, Elasticsearch, and Kubernetes indicates a strong background in cloud technologies and data storage solutions.','- Bhushan\'s responses occasionally lacked the structured communication and clear articulation seen in the benchmark responses.\n- While he demonstrated technical knowledge, there were opportunities to better tailor his responses to the specific context of the role at Royal Enfield.\n- Bhushan could improve his ability to communicate complex technical concepts to non-technical stakeholders, ensuring complete understanding.','11. Kafka:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Bhushan\'s experience with Kafka was evident, and he provided detailed explanations of its use in data streaming and processing.\n\n12. MQTT/HTTP protocols:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Bhushan discussed using HTTP protocols for secure data communication but did not elaborate on MQTT, indicating room for improvement.\n\n13. Real-time data processing:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Bhushan provided strong examples of real-time data processing, demonstrating his capability in this area.\n\n14. Data pipeline development:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Bhushan\'s experience with developing and modernizing data pipelines aligns well with the role\'s requirements.\n\n15. Microsoft Azure/GCP:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Bhushan expressed a preference for GCP over Azure based on his experience, showing an understanding of cloud platforms.','16. SQL/NoSQL databases:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Bhushan shared challenges he faced with NoSQL databases and his solutions, indicating his proficiency with these technologies.\n\n17. Data ingestion/integration:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Bhushan\'s use of Kafka Connect for data ingestion and integration showcases his relevant experience.\n\n18. Kafka Streams/Kafka Connect:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Bhushan has practical experience with Kafka Streams and Kafka Connect, which he discussed in the context of enhancing data ingestion.\n\n19. Data transformation/storage:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Bhushan described tackling data transformation and storage challenges, particularly with Elasticsearch and Kubernetes.\n\n20. Jira/Rally:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Bhushan\'s use of Jira to manage complex projects and ensure task completion was well-articulated.\n\nOverall, Bhushan\'s technical expertise and experience are strong, but he could benefit from refining his communication skills and providing more contextually relevant responses.','2024-07-20 11:21:28'),(36,71,38,414,101,'Swapnil demonstrated a good understanding of Android development and relevant experience in his responses. He provided detailed examples of his work, particularly in Android platform development, integration of third-party libraries, and user interface design. However, his responses lacked structure and clarity at times, which made it difficult to follow his thought process. Swapnil\'s experience with AOSP and security practices was evident, but he could improve on articulating his approach to problem-solving and optimization.','- Swapnil has substantial experience in Android development, as evidenced by his work on multiple applications.\n- He has practical knowledge of integrating third-party libraries and customizing Android for specific hardware configurations.\n- Swapnil has experience with AOSP and has tackled challenges related to system services and inter-process communication.\n- His work on user interface components for automotive and consumer applications shows an understanding of usability and accessibility considerations.','- Swapnil\'s responses could be more structured and concise to effectively communicate his ideas.\n- He could provide clearer examples of problem-solving, particularly in performance optimization and security best practices.\n- Swapnil did not answer question 8, which leaves a gap in understanding his approach to performance optimization.\n- While he mentioned automated testing and CI/CD pipelines, he could elaborate more on the impact these practices had on his projects.','11. Android Platform Development/Customization/Integration:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Swapnil has solid experience in Android platform development and customization, as seen in his work with AOSP and third-party libraries.\n\n12. User Interface Development/Design:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Swapnil\'s experience with designing and implementing user interface components for different applications shows his competency in this area.\n\n13. Performance Optimization/Profiling/Debugging:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Swapnil did not answer question 8, which was directly related to performance optimization, leaving an incomplete assessment of his skills in this area.\n\n14. Security Best Practices/Compliance:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Swapnil has a good understanding of security best practices, as evidenced by his response to implementing SSL pinning and data encryption.\n\n15. Cross-Functional Collaboration/Communication:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Swapnil mentioned working with cross-functional teams and helping others with challenges, indicating his ability to collaborate effectively.','16. Java/Kotlin Programming:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Swapnil\'s extensive experience with Java and Kotlin programming is evident in his work on various Android applications.\n\n17. CI/CD Pipelines/Automated Testing/Build Automation:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Swapnil has experience with CI/CD pipelines and automated testing, but could provide more detail on how these practices impacted his projects.\n\n18. AOSP/AAOS Experience:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Swapnil\'s work with AOSP demonstrates his knowledge and experience in this area, although he could improve on explaining his approach to challenges.\n\n19. Cloud Platforms/Containerization Knowledge:\nScore: Not Evaluated\nQualitative Assessment: Not Evaluated\nDescription: There was no specific mention of cloud platforms or containerization knowledge in Swapnil\'s responses.\n\n20. Android Development Tools Proficiency:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Swapnil\'s proficiency with Android development tools is clear from his discussion of using profiling tools, Android Studio, and other relevant software.','2024-07-20 11:50:16'),(37,72,37,380,91,'Muhammed\'s interview responses indicate a candidate with practical experience in Android development, particularly at the application layer. He shows a willingness to learn and adapt to new challenges, such as platform development, but lacks direct experience in some areas like CI/CD and containerization.','- Experience with Java and Kotlin in Android development.\n- Practical knowledge of user interface development and system UI customization.\n- Understanding of performance optimization techniques and security best practices.\n- Ability to communicate technical concepts to non-technical stakeholders.','- Limited experience with Android platform development and customization.\n- Lack of direct involvement in setting up CI/CD pipelines and containerization.\n- Responses sometimes lack depth and specific examples of complex problem-solving.','11. Android Platform Development/Customization/Integration:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Muhammed has limited experience in this area and could benefit from more direct involvement and learning.\n\n12. User Interface Development for Android:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Muhammed has applied experience in UI development, which aligns well with the job requirements.\n\n13. Performance Optimization for Android Systems:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Muhammed understands performance optimization but could provide more detailed strategies and results.\n\n14. Android Security Best Practices/Compliance:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Muhammed is aware of security best practices but could discuss more comprehensive security strategies.\n\n15. Cross-Functional Collaboration/Communication:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Muhammed has experience collaborating with cross-functional teams and effectively communicates technical concepts.','16. Java/Kotlin Programming:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Muhammed has strong experience with Java and Kotlin, which is crucial for the role.\n\n17. CI/CD Pipelines/Automated Testing/Build Automation:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Muhammed lacks direct experience in CI/CD and could benefit from hands-on involvement.\n\n18. AOSP/AAOS Experience:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Muhammed has some exposure to AOSP/AAOS but needs more significant contributions and experience.\n\n19. Cloud Platforms/Containerization Knowledge:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Muhammed has not used containerization in his work and has limited knowledge of cloud platforms.\n\n20. Android Development Tools Proficiency (Android Studio/ADB/Gradle):\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Muhammed demonstrates proficiency with essential Android development tools, which is a key requirement for the role.','2024-07-20 17:41:43'),(38,75,46,383,91,'Tabassum\'s responses were concise but lacked the depth and enthusiasm expected for a candidate with her experience. She confirmed her availability and readiness but did not engage in a manner that showcased her expertise or interest in the role.','- Tabassum confirmed her availability and readiness to proceed with the interview.\n- She acknowledged the questions posed by the interviewer without hesitation.','- Tabassum\'s responses were brief and lacked detail, failing to demonstrate her experience or enthusiasm for the role.\n- She did not take the opportunity to align her experience with the job requirements or express interest in the company.','11. Android Platform Development/Customization/Integration:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Tabassum did not discuss her experience in Android platform development, customization, or integration.\n\n12. User Interface Development for Android:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: There was no mention of her experience in user interface development for Android.\n\n13. Performance Optimization for Android Systems:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Tabassum did not provide any insights into her experience with performance optimization for Android systems.\n\n14. Android Security Best Practices/Compliance:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Tabassum did not discuss her knowledge or experience with Android security best practices or compliance.\n\n15. Cross-Functional Collaboration/Communication:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: There was no indication of her experience with cross-functional collaboration or communication.','16. Java/Kotlin Programming:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Tabassum did not elaborate on her programming skills in Java or Kotlin.\n\n17. CI/CD Pipelines/Automated Testing/Build Automation:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Tabassum did not mention any experience with CI/CD pipelines, automated testing, or build automation.\n\n18. AOSP/AAOS Experience:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Despite mentioning work on AOSP in her resume, Tabassum did not discuss this experience during the interview.\n\n19. Cloud Platforms/Containerization Knowledge:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: There was no discussion of her knowledge or experience with cloud platforms or containerization.\n\n20. Android Development Tools Proficiency (Android Studio/ADB/Gradle):\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Tabassum did not demonstrate her proficiency with Android development tools such as Android Studio, ADB, or Gradle.','2024-07-22 18:23:35'),(39,78,54,462,113,'Abhi demonstrated a good understanding of technical concepts and practical experience through his internships. He was able to articulate his experiences with Python, web development frameworks, and the software development lifecycle. However, his responses lacked depth in some areas and could benefit from more detailed examples and explanations.','- Abhi has practical experience with Python and has applied it in automation and web development tasks.\n- He has experience with Object-Oriented Programming in Python, as evidenced by his work on a VGG-19 model.\n- Abhi has worked with web development frameworks and has experience with the full software development lifecycle.\n- He has demonstrated adaptability by learning new technologies quickly, as shown in his hackathon experience.','- Abhi\'s responses were sometimes brief and lacked the depth and detail that would demonstrate a mastery of the topics discussed.\n- He could improve his communication of complex technical problems to non-technical stakeholders by using more relatable analogies and focusing on the impact.\n- Abhi\'s approach to learning new technologies could be more structured, with a focus on practical application and incremental integration.','11. Python programming:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Abhi has applied Python in his projects, showing applied experience, but he could have provided more detailed examples.\n\n12. Object-Oriented Programming/OOP:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Abhi has experience with OOP in Python, but he could have given a more thorough explanation of how he has implemented OOP concepts.\n\n13. Web development frameworks (Flask/Django):\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Abhi mentioned using FastAPI, which shows good knowledge, but he could have provided more details about his experience with Flask or Django.\n\n14. Software Development Life Cycle/SDLC:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Abhi described his approach to the SDLC phases, demonstrating applied experience, but his response could have been more structured.\n\n15. Code review and optimization:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Abhi discussed optimizing a React website, but he could have provided more insight into his code review process.','16. JavaScript:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Abhi has experience with JavaScript in React, but he could have discussed challenges and solutions in more depth.\n\n17. DOM manipulation and event handling:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Abhi\'s response indicated familiarity with DOM manipulation and event handling in React, but more detail on specific challenges would have been beneficial.\n\n18. HTML5:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Abhi\'s response suggested a misunderstanding of HTML5\'s role in web development, and he could have provided examples of using HTML5 for responsive design.\n\n19. Responsive design principles:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Abhi did not provide a clear example of how he has implemented responsive design principles, which is an area for improvement.\n\n20. Version control systems (Git):\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Abhi shared an experience where Git was useful, showing applied experience, but he could have elaborated on how he uses Git in his workflow.','2024-07-29 06:06:07'),(40,79,53,465,113,'Jyoti demonstrated a basic understanding of the required skills and showed a willingness to learn. However, her responses lacked depth and specificity, and she missed opportunities to showcase her experience in a way that aligns with the job description.','- Expressed comfort with discussing her experience and skills.\n- Mentioned specific projects and technologies she has worked with, such as React.js and Node.js.\n- Demonstrated a proactive attitude by learning new technologies from scratch.','- Responses lacked detail and did not fully address the questions.\n- Missed opportunities to connect her past experiences with the job requirements.\n- Limited demonstration of knowledge in key areas such as Python, Flask/Django, and Git.','11. Python programming:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Jyoti mentioned a project using Python but did not demonstrate a strong understanding of the language.\n\n12. Object-Oriented Programming/OOP:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Jyoti provided a basic explanation of OOP but did not show advanced knowledge or application.\n\n13. Web development frameworks (Flask/Django):\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Jyoti mentioned using Flask briefly but did not demonstrate significant experience with web development frameworks.\n\n14. Software Development Life Cycle/SDLC:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Jyoti\'s description of her role in the SDLC was vague and lacked specifics.\n\n15. Code review and optimization:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Jyoti discussed code optimization but did not provide a clear example of how she has improved code performance.','16. JavaScript:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Jyoti mentioned using JavaScript but did not provide detailed examples of her work with the language.\n\n17. DOM manipulation and event handling:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Jyoti\'s response on DOM manipulation and event handling was not detailed and did not showcase her skills effectively.\n\n18. HTML5:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Jyoti\'s response indicated some familiarity with HTML5 but did not demonstrate a strong understanding of web standards and accessibility.\n\n19. Responsive design principles:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Jyoti mentioned responsive design but did not explain her approach in a way that aligns with best practices.\n\n20. Version control systems (Git):\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Jyoti acknowledged learning Git recently but did not demonstrate applied experience with version control systems.','2024-07-29 06:17:48'),(41,86,58,459,111,'Syed Mohammad Moiez demonstrated a good understanding of technical concepts and the ability to communicate effectively. His responses indicated experience with various tools and technologies relevant to the role, but there were areas where more depth or specific examples could have strengthened his answers.','- Demonstrated familiarity with data analysis tools like Excel and Python libraries such as pandas.\n- Provided examples of machine learning projects using scikit-learn and Flask for backend development.\n- Showed an understanding of version control with Git and the importance of code quality.\n- Expressed a proactive attitude in improving processes and learning new technologies.','- Some responses lacked specific details or depth that would showcase a mastery of the subject matter.\n- Could improve on providing more structured and concise answers to demonstrate problem-solving skills.\n- Missed opportunities to discuss experiences with statistical modeling and data visualization in greater detail.','11. Data Analysis/Excel/Tableau:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Mentioned using Excel for data consistency but did not provide specific examples of analysis or use of Tableau.\n\n12. Statistical Modeling/R/SAS:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Discussed using SAS for classification but did not provide a detailed example of statistical modeling.\n\n13. Machine Learning Algorithms/scikit-learn:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Provided an example of using scikit-learn but could have discussed the implementation in more detail.\n\n14. Data Wrangling/pandas/Python:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Mentioned using pandas for data wrangling but lacked a detailed example of overcoming a specific challenge.\n\n15. Data Visualization/Matplotlib/Seaborn:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Syed mentioned using Matplotlib for visualization but did not elaborate on the insights derived from it.','16. Python/OOP:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Discussed using OOP principles in a project but could have provided a more comprehensive example.\n\n17. Libraries/Frameworks/Flask/NumPy:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Shared experience with Flask in a project but did not mention using NumPy or other libraries.\n\n18. Version Control Systems/Git:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Syed discussed using Git for version control but could have described his workflow in more detail.\n\n19. Virtual Environments/venv/conda:\nScore: 5\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Admitted limited experience with Conda and venv, lacking a detailed explanation of setting up virtual environments.\n\n20. Communication Skills/Problem-Solving Skills:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Communicated effectively but could have provided more examples showcasing problem-solving skills.','2024-07-29 07:04:47'),(42,87,59,469,115,'Mohit demonstrated a strong foundation in full-stack development and a proactive attitude towards learning. His responses indicated a willingness to adapt and a collaborative spirit, which aligns with the job description\'s emphasis on teamwork and adaptability. However, there were gaps in his knowledge of certain technologies and frameworks mentioned in the job description, such as Python libraries and Flask/Django, which he would need to address to fully meet the role\'s requirements.','- Demonstrated experience in full-stack development, particularly with Node.js, Express, and MongoDB.\n- Showed a proactive attitude towards learning and adapting to new technologies.\n- Expressed a collaborative approach to problem-solving and teamwork.\n- Exhibited a strong understanding of web development principles, including responsive design and cross-browser compatibility.','- Limited experience with Python and related libraries (NumPy, pandas), which are essential for the role.\n- Lack of hands-on experience with Flask/Django, despite the job description\'s emphasis on Python frameworks.\n- Responses lacked depth in certain areas, such as SEO principles and web accessibility standards.\n- Could improve communication clarity, particularly when discussing technical challenges and solutions.','11. Python/NumPy/pandas:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Mohit\'s response indicated limited experience with Python and its libraries, which are essential for the role.\n\n12. Full Stack Development/HTML/CSS/JavaScript/React/Angular:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Mohit demonstrated applied experience in full-stack development, particularly with JavaScript and React.\n\n13. Back-end Development/Python Frameworks/Flask/Django:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Mohit lacks experience with Flask/Django, which is a gap in his skill set for the role.\n\n14. Database Systems/ORM Tools:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Mohit has experience with MongoDB and ORM concepts but could benefit from deeper knowledge in this area.\n\n15. Version Control/Git:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Mohit understands the importance of version control and has practical experience with Git.','16. HTML5/CSS3:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Mohit has a strong grasp of HTML5 and CSS3, essential for front-end development.\n\n17. Responsive Design/Bootstrap:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Mohit has applied experience with responsive design and Bootstrap, though he acknowledges its limitations.\n\n18. SEO Principles:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Mohit\'s understanding of SEO principles is basic and requires further development.\n\n19. Web Accessibility Standards/WCAG:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Mohit\'s response indicated a basic awareness of web accessibility but lacked depth.\n\n20. Cross-Browser Compatibility Issues:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Mohit is aware of cross-browser compatibility issues but could improve his understanding of how to address them effectively.','2024-07-29 07:05:02'),(43,84,56,460,112,'Abhinav demonstrated a good understanding of full-stack development, particularly with JavaScript technologies, and showed a proactive attitude towards learning and problem-solving. However, there is room for improvement in his knowledge of Python, Flask, Django, and data manipulation with NumPy and pandas, as these were not as strong in his responses.','- Strong knowledge and experience in full-stack development with JavaScript technologies.\n- Demonstrated problem-solving skills and adaptability in project work.\n- Good understanding of responsive design and front-end challenges.\n- Experience with version control using Git and addressing merge conflicts.','- Limited experience with Python and related frameworks like Flask and Django.\n- Less familiarity with data manipulation using NumPy and pandas.\n- Could benefit from deeper knowledge of SEO principles and web accessibility standards.','11. Python/NumPy/pandas:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Abhinav\'s knowledge in this area was limited and requires further development.\n\n12. Full Stack Development/HTML/CSS/JavaScript/React/Angular:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Abhinav demonstrated strong skills and experience in full-stack development with JavaScript technologies.\n\n13. Backend Development/Python Frameworks/Flask/Django:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Abhinav lacked experience with Flask and Django, which are important for the role.\n\n14. Database Systems/ORM Tools:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Abhinav has good experience with MongoDB and Mongoose but could benefit from more experience with ORM tools like Prisma.\n\n15. Version Control/Git:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Abhinav showed a good understanding of Git for version control and resolving merge conflicts.','16. HTML5/CSS3:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Abhinav demonstrated proficiency in HTML5 and CSS3, particularly in responsive design.\n\n17. Responsive Design/Bootstrap:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Abhinav has experience with responsive design using Tailwind but could expand his knowledge of Bootstrap.\n\n18. SEO Principles:\nScore: 5\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Abhinav\'s understanding of SEO principles was basic and could be improved.\n\n19. Web Accessibility Standards/WCAG:\nScore: 5\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Abhinav showed some awareness of accessibility but needs to deepen his knowledge of WCAG standards.\n\n20. Cross-Browser Compatibility Issues:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Abhinav is aware of cross-browser compatibility issues but has limited experience addressing them.','2024-07-29 07:12:12'),(44,90,39,382,91,'Suresh Redddy demonstrated a good level of technical knowledge and experience in Android development, particularly with AOSP and HMI development. His responses indicated hands-on experience with platform customization and UI development. However, there was a lack of depth in his responses regarding security practices, automated testing, and cloud technologies. His communication was straightforward but lacked engagement and enthusiasm.','- Experience with Android platform development and customization.\n- Hands-on experience with user interface development, particularly with third-party UI tools.\n- Understanding of performance optimization in Android systems.\n- Practical experience with AOSP and creating custom services.','- Limited depth in responses on security best practices and compliance.\n- Lack of experience with automated testing and CI/CD pipelines.\n- Could improve on communication style to be more engaging and articulate.\n- Did not demonstrate a strong understanding of cloud platforms and containerization.','11. Android Platform Development/Customization/Integration:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Demonstrated applied experience with Android platform development and customization.\n\n12. User Interface Development for Android:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Showed applied experience with UI development, especially with third-party tools.\n\n13. Performance Optimization for Android Systems:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Provided practical examples of performance optimization in Android systems.\n\n14. Android Security Best Practices/Compliance:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Lacked depth in discussing security best practices and compliance.\n\n15. Cross-Functional Collaboration/Communication:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Suresh mentioned collaboration but did not demonstrate effective cross-functional communication skills.','16. Java/Kotlin Programming:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Showed applied experience with Java and is currently improving his Kotlin skills.\n\n17. CI/CD Pipelines/Automated Testing/Build Automation:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Limited experience with CI/CD and automated testing.\n\n18. AOSP/AAOS Experience:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Demonstrated good experience with AOSP, including creating custom services.\n\n19. Cloud Platforms/Containerization Knowledge:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Provided a basic understanding of cloud platforms but lacked depth.\n\n20. Android Development Tools Proficiency (Android Studio/ADB/Gradle):\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Showed proficiency with essential Android development tools.','2024-07-29 13:54:48'),(45,89,57,458,111,'Kritika demonstrated a foundational understanding of the technical skills required for the Software Developer/Engineer position. However, her responses lacked depth and specificity, which could be improved to better align with the job requirements.','- Kritika showed a basic understanding of machine learning algorithms and the decision-making process behind choosing specific models.\n- She mentioned the use of pandas for data wrangling and Matplotlib/Seaborn for data visualization, indicating familiarity with these tools.','- Kritika\'s responses were often vague and lacked the detail expected for the technical questions posed.\n- She did not provide concrete examples or outcomes from her experiences, which would have demonstrated a deeper understanding of the skills and knowledge required.\n- Her communication style could be more structured and focused to convey her thoughts effectively.','11. Data Analysis/Excel/Tableau:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Kritika mentioned using Excel but did not provide a detailed application of her skills.\n\n12. Statistical Modeling/R/SAS:\nScore: N/A\nQualitative Assessment: N/A\nDescription: Kritika did not discuss her experience with R or SAS.\n\n13. Machine Learning Algorithms/scikit-learn:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Kritika mentioned machine learning models but did not discuss her experience with scikit-learn specifically.\n\n14. Data Wrangling/pandas/Python:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Kritika mentioned using pandas but did not provide a clear example of how she overcame data wrangling challenges.\n\n15. Data Visualization/Matplotlib/Seaborn:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Kritika mentioned using Matplotlib/Seaborn but did not provide a detailed explanation of how she used these tools to convey insights.','16. Python/OOP:\nScore: N/A\nQualitative Assessment: N/A\nDescription: Kritika did not discuss her experience with Python OOP concepts.\n\n17. Libraries/Frameworks/Flask/NumPy:\nScore: N/A\nQualitative Assessment: N/A\nDescription: Kritika did not mention her experience with Flask or NumPy.\n\n18. Version Control Systems/Git:\nScore: N/A\nQualitative Assessment: N/A\nDescription: Kritika did not discuss her experience with version control systems like Git.\n\n19. Virtual Environments/venv/conda:\nScore: N/A\nQualitative Assessment: N/A\nDescription: Kritika did not mention her experience with virtual environments.\n\n20. Communication Skills/Problem-Solving Skills:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Kritika\'s communication and problem-solving skills were not clearly demonstrated. She could improve by providing specific examples of how she has used these skills effectively.','2024-07-30 07:14:28'),(46,91,46,456,109,'Tabassum demonstrated a good understanding of Android development and relevant technologies, with a focus on practical experience. However, her responses lacked depth in explaining complex technical processes and problem-solving approaches. She could improve by providing more detailed examples and aligning her responses more closely with the job description.','- Tabassum has practical experience in Android development, particularly in the automotive domain.\n- She is familiar with various technologies and tools such as Kotlin, Java, Retrofit, Room database, and WorkManager.\n- Tabassum has experience with performance optimization and user interface design, which are relevant to the HMI Developer role.','- Responses were often brief and lacked detailed explanations of her thought process and solutions.\n- She could have provided more specific examples of how she addressed challenges and implemented features.\n- Tabassum\'s communication style could be more engaging and informative to better demonstrate her expertise.','11. Android Platform Development/Customization:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Tabassum has experience but did not provide in-depth examples of how she customized the Android platform for specific hardware configurations.\n\n12. Java/Kotlin Programming:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Tabassum mentioned using Java and Kotlin but did not elaborate on complex projects or challenges she overcame using these languages.\n\n13. Android System Architecture/Frameworks:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Tabassum\'s response indicated familiarity with Android architecture but lacked details on her contributions to system stability and compatibility.\n\n14. User Interface Design/Development:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Tabassum discussed UI design principles but could have provided more specific examples of her design process and outcomes.\n\n15. Performance Optimization/Debugging:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Tabassum addressed performance optimization but did not give a strong example of a specific optimization she implemented.','16. CI/CD Pipelines/Automated Testing:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Tabassum has experience with CI/CD pipelines and automated testing but could have detailed her strategy and its impact on the development process.\n\n17. AOSP/AAOS Experience:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Not relevant\nDescription: Tabassum did not provide a response to this question, so her experience with AOSP/AAOS could not be assessed.\n\n18. Security Standards/Compliance:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Tabassum mentioned security practices but did not convincingly explain how she ensures compliance with security standards.\n\n19. Cross-functional Collaboration/Communication:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Tabassum spoke about collaboration but did not provide a compelling example of how she communicated technical concepts effectively with cross-functional teams.\n\n20. Cloud Platforms/Containerization (Docker/Kubernetes):\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Tabassum mentioned containerization tools but did not elaborate on how she leveraged them to enhance development workflows.','2024-07-30 19:26:36'),(47,105,41,470,116,'VISHWAS demonstrated a solid understanding of Android development and the necessary skills for the HMI Developer role. His responses indicated hands-on experience with platform customization, UI development, and problem-solving. However, there is room for improvement in communication clarity and depth of knowledge in certain areas.','- Experience with Android platform development and customization for specific hardware.\n- Practical knowledge of Java/Kotlin programming and Android system architecture.\n- Demonstrated problem-solving skills and adaptability in addressing technical challenges.\n- Experience with CI/CD pipelines and automated testing to improve development processes.','- Some responses lacked the depth and technical detail expected for a candidate with his experience.\n- Communication could be clearer and more structured to effectively convey complex ideas.\n- Could benefit from providing more concrete examples of innovation and creativity in his work.','11. Android Platform Development/Customization:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: VISHWAS has experience in platform development and customization, but could provide more specific examples of his work.\n\n12. Java/Kotlin Programming:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Demonstrated practical knowledge of Java/Kotlin programming, though deeper insights into complex project work would enhance his response.\n\n13. Android System Architecture/Frameworks:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Good understanding of Android system architecture, with examples of applying this knowledge in projects.\n\n14. Performance Optimization/Resource Management:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: VISHWAS discussed strategies for performance optimization and resource management, showing applied experience.\n\n15. Security Standards/Best Practices Implementation:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Provided examples of implementing security standards, indicating a good grasp of best practices.','16. User Interface (UI) Development:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Shared experiences in UI development, reflecting a good understanding of user interface design principles.\n\n17. CI/CD Pipelines/Automated Testing/Build Automation:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: VISHWAS has experience with CI/CD and automated testing, but could discuss more about the impact on development efficiency.\n\n18. AOSP/AAOS Development Experience:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Showed experience with AOSP/AAOS development, but could benefit from sharing more detailed contributions.\n\n19. Cloud Platforms/Containerization Knowledge:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: VISHWAS has worked with cloud platforms like Firebase, but could expand on how this knowledge has impacted his Android development work.\n\n20. Cross-Functional Collaboration/Communication:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Demonstrated ability to collaborate with cross-functional teams, though could improve in communicating technical concepts to non-technical stakeholders.','2024-08-04 05:35:41'),(48,117,60,381,91,'Rajat demonstrated a solid understanding of Android development, particularly in the automotive domain. His responses indicated hands-on experience with Android IVI applications, UI development, and performance optimization. However, there were areas where his responses lacked depth, especially regarding CI/CD pipelines, AOSP/AAOS, and cloud technologies. Rajat\'s communication was clear, but he could improve by providing more structured and detailed answers.','- Rajat has hands-on experience with Android IVI applications and has worked on significant projects like FOTA updates.\n- He has demonstrated problem-solving skills, particularly in UI development and performance optimization.\n- Rajat is familiar with using Android development tools such as Android Studio, ADB, and Gradle to solve complex problems.','- Rajat\'s knowledge of CI/CD pipelines, AOSP/AAOS, and cloud technologies seems limited based on his responses.\n- He could improve the structure and detail of his responses to showcase a deeper understanding of the topics discussed.\n- Rajat\'s approach to unconventional industry practices appears to be cautious and reliant on client approval, which may limit innovation.','11. Android Platform Development/Customization/Integration:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Rajat has experience with Android platform development, particularly IVI applications, but his knowledge of platform customization could be deeper.\n\n12. User Interface Development for Android:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Rajat provided strong examples of his experience with UI development, showcasing his ability to solve related challenges.\n\n13. Performance Optimization for Android Systems:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Rajat\'s response indicated applied experience in optimizing Android applications for performance.\n\n14. Android Security Best Practices/Compliance:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Rajat understands the importance of security but could provide more examples of implementing best practices and compliance standards.\n\n15. Cross-Functional Collaboration/Communication:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Rajat has experience collaborating with cross-functional teams but could improve by sharing more about how he navigates diverse perspectives.','16. Java/Kotlin Programming:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Rajat has a good grasp of Java/Kotlin programming for Android, as evidenced by his experience and the coding guidelines he follows.\n\n17. CI/CD Pipelines/Automated Testing/Build Automation:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Rajat\'s knowledge of CI/CD pipelines is basic, and he could benefit from more hands-on experience in this area.\n\n18. AOSP/AAOS Experience:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Rajat has limited experience with AOSP/AAOS, and his response indicated a need for further development in this skill.\n\n19. Cloud Platforms/Containerization Knowledge:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Rajat lacks experience with cloud platforms and containerization, which is an area for improvement given the role\'s requirements.\n\n20. Android Development Tools Proficiency (Android Studio/ADB/Gradle):\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Rajat demonstrated proficiency with essential Android development tools and provided examples of solving complex issues using them.','2024-08-09 14:11:52'),(49,80,52,463,113,'Ishan demonstrated a good understanding of front-end development, particularly with React and Next.js, and showed a proactive attitude towards learning new technologies. However, his experience with Python, Flask/Django, and OOP principles in Python was limited to academic exposure, and he lacked practical application in these areas.','- Proficiency in front-end development with React and Next.js.\n- Experience with code migration and performance optimization.\n- Willingness to learn and quickly adapt to new technologies.\n- Good understanding of code review processes and file structure organization.','- Limited practical experience with Python, Flask/Django, and OOP in Python.\n- Responses lacked depth in certain technical areas relevant to the job description.\n- Could benefit from more examples and details in responses to demonstrate applied knowledge.','11. Python programming:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Ishan lacked practical experience with Python, which is a key requirement for the role.\n\n12. Object-Oriented Programming/OOP:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Ishan\'s understanding of OOP in Python was theoretical and lacked practical examples.\n\n13. Web development frameworks (Flask/Django):\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Ishan had no experience with Flask or Django, which are important for the role.\n\n14. Software Development Life Cycle/SDLC:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Ishan was involved in the SDLC but could have provided more details on his specific contributions.\n\n15. Code review and optimization:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Ishan had experience with code review and provided examples of optimization, which is a strength.','16. JavaScript:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Ishan demonstrated strong knowledge and practical experience with JavaScript.\n\n17. DOM manipulation and event handling:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Ishan likely has experience with DOM manipulation and event handling through his work with React and Next.js.\n\n18. HTML5:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Ishan\'s front-end development experience suggests a good understanding of HTML5.\n\n19. Responsive design principles:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Ishan\'s experience with front-end frameworks implies knowledge of responsive design principles.\n\n20. Version control systems (Git):\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Ishan mentioned using Git, indicating he has experience with version control systems.','2024-08-11 17:52:16'),(50,81,55,466,113,'Kritika demonstrated a strong understanding of the technical skills required for the Software Developer/Engineer role. She provided detailed examples of her experience with Python, Flask, and Git, showcasing her ability to apply these skills in practical scenarios. However, her responses could benefit from more structured communication and deeper insights into problem-solving and software development methodologies.','- Kritika has hands-on experience with Python, Flask, and Git, which she discussed in the context of her internships and projects.\n- She has a good understanding of Object-Oriented Programming and its application in Python.\n- Kritika\'s experience with front-end development and responsive design principles is evident from her discussion about using React and CSS techniques.','- While Kritika\'s responses were relevant, they lacked the structured communication and depth that would demonstrate a mastery level of understanding.\n- Her problem-solving approach could be more systematic, with a clearer explanation of how she identifies and resolves issues.\n- Kritika could improve her explanation of software development methodologies and how she applies them in her work.','11. Python programming:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Kritika has applied experience with Python, as evidenced by her project examples.\n\n12. Object-Oriented Programming/OOP:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Kritika understands OOP concepts in Python but could provide more complex examples.\n\n13. Web development frameworks (Flask/Django):\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Kritika has good experience with Flask but could discuss more advanced features.\n\n14. Software Development Life Cycle/SDLC:\nScore: 5\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Kritika\'s understanding of SDLC could be deeper, with more emphasis on each phase.\n\n15. Code review and optimization:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Kritika follows best practices but could discuss more about optimization techniques.','16. JavaScript:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Kritika has experience with JavaScript but could discuss more complex DOM manipulation.\n\n17. DOM manipulation and event handling:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Kritika\'s response indicates experience but lacks detail on advanced DOM manipulation techniques.\n\n18. HTML5:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Kritika has a good understanding of HTML5 and its semantic elements.\n\n19. Responsive design principles:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Kritika demonstrated knowledge of responsive design but could provide more examples of her work.\n\n20. Version control systems (Git):\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Kritika has practical experience with Git but could improve her explanation of branching and merging strategies.','2024-08-11 17:54:45'),(51,123,4,517,122,'Varun\'s performance in the interview was significantly below expectations. His responses were often unrelated or too brief, lacking depth and relevance to the questions posed. This pattern persisted throughout the interview, indicating a lack of preparation or understanding of the role he applied for. Despite his extensive experience as outlined in his resume, Varun failed to effectively communicate his qualifications and fit for the IT Director position at Adzip Technologies.','It is challenging to highlight specific strengths from Varun\'s interview responses due to the general lack of relevance and detail in his communication. However, his resume suggests a strong background in managing complex IT projects and a deep understanding of Agile methodologies, which are critical for the role.','Varun\'s main weakness in the interview was his inability to provide coherent and relevant answers to the questions asked. This could be due to nervousness, lack of preparation, or misunderstanding the interview format. His responses were often one-word or completely unrelated, which prevented any meaningful assessment of his skills and fit for the role. Varun needs to focus on improving his communication skills, specifically his ability to understand and respond to interview questions effectively. Practicing mock interviews and receiving feedback could be beneficial.','16. Business analysis:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not demonstrate his business analysis skills during the interview, failing to relate his experiences to the questions asked.\n\n17. Requirement gathering:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: There was no detailed discussion on requirement gathering, which is crucial for the role he applied for.\n\n18. Requirement management:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun failed to discuss how he manages requirements effectively, which is a key skill for the position.\n\n19. User stories:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not provide any insight into his ability to develop or manage user stories.\n\n20. Project management:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: There was a lack of evidence regarding Varun\'s project management skills, as he did not discuss any relevant experiences or methodologies.','21. Data analysis:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not showcase his data analysis skills, which are important for the IT Director role.\n\n22. Process mapping:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: No discussion on process mapping was evident, missing an opportunity to display a critical skill.\n\n23. Risk management:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not discuss how he handles risk management, which is essential for the role.\n\n24. Agile methodologies:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Despite mentioning Agile methodologies in his resume, Varun did not effectively discuss his experience or skills in this area during the interview.\n\nRecommendation:\nBased on the interview evaluation, it is recommended not to proceed with Varun\'s application for the IT Director position. His performance in the interview suggests a significant gap between his documented experiences and his ability to articulate and apply those experiences effectively. Further development in communication and interview skills is advised before reapplying for similar roles.','2024-09-07 10:39:25'),(52,124,4,516,121,'Varun\'s responses during the interview were notably brief and lacked the depth and engagement expected for a candidate applying for the IT Director position at Adzip Technologies. His answers did not demonstrate the required understanding or enthusiasm for the role, which involves leading strategic IT initiatives and managing a team in the Retail domain. Varun\'s inability to elaborate on his experiences and skills, particularly in areas critical to the role such as business analysis and digital transformation, raises concerns about his suitability for the position.','Varun\'s resume suggests a strong background in IT and product management, with extensive experience in agile environments and digital transformation. However, these strengths were not effectively communicated in his interview responses, which were minimal and uninformative.','Varun\'s main weakness in the interview was his lack of detailed responses. For a role that requires significant interaction, leadership, and strategic thinking, his one-word answers and failure to engage in the conversation are major red flags. He needs to improve on articulating his experiences, achievements, and understanding of the job role. Practicing detailed responses and engaging more actively in discussions about his qualifications and vision for the role would be beneficial.','16. Business analysis:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not provide any insights into his business analysis skills, which are crucial for the IT Director role.\n\n17. Requirement gathering:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: No evidence was provided of Varun\'s skills in requirement gathering, an essential part of the job description.\n\n18. Requirement management:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun failed to discuss any aspect of requirement management during the interview.\n\n19. User stories:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: There was no mention or demonstration of Varun\'s ability to develop user stories, a key skill for the role.\n\n20. Project management:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not elaborate on his project management skills, which are essential for leading IT initiatives.','Overall, Varun\'s performance in the interview was underwhelming. He needs to significantly improve his engagement and ability to articulate his skills and experiences relevant to the IT Director position. Based on this interview, it is recommended to consider other candidates who demonstrate a stronger understanding and enthusiasm for the role.','2024-09-07 10:43:14'),(53,127,4,523,129,'Varun\'s responses during the interview were brief and lacked depth, particularly when compared to the benchmark responses which were detailed and aligned with the expectations for a Product Manager role in the Retail domain. His inability to engage in a more detailed discussion about his qualifications and experiences, especially in relation to the specific responsibilities and skills required for the role, suggests a need for improvement in interview preparedness and communication.','Varun\'s strengths were not fully demonstrated in the interview due to the brevity and lack of detail in his responses. However, his resume suggests a strong background in digital commerce and product management, which are relevant to the job role.','Varun\'s main weakness in the interview was his lack of detailed responses and failure to effectively communicate his alignment with the job role\'s requirements. His responses were significantly shorter and less informative compared to the benchmark responses, which could indicate a lack of preparedness or inability to effectively articulate his experiences and skills.','16. Product owner:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not discuss his experience as a product owner, missing the opportunity to highlight relevant skills and experiences.\n\n17. User stories:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: There was no mention of his experience with user stories, which are critical in product management.\n\n18. Backlog management:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun failed to mention any specific experiences with backlog management, a key skill for the role.\n\n19. Requirement management:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: The lack of discussion about requirement management suggests a gap in demonstrating this essential skill.\n\n20. Agile methodologies:\nScore: 5\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: While his resume suggests familiarity with agile methodologies, Varun did not effectively communicate this during the interview.','21. Market research:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not provide examples of conducting market research, which is important for understanding customer needs and market trends.\n\n22. Budget management:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: There was no indication that Varun has experience with budget management, an important aspect of the Product Manager role.\n\n23. Risk management:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not discuss any experiences related to risk management, missing the chance to show his capability in this area.\n\n24. User experience design:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: The lack of mention of user experience design in his responses was a missed opportunity to connect his background with the role\'s requirements.\n\n25. Data-driven decision making:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not mention his experience with data-driven decision making, a crucial skill for making informed product decisions.\n\nRecommendation:\nBased on the evaluation, it is recommended that Varun may not be the best fit for the Product Manager position at this time without further development in interview skills and clearer communication of his relevant experiences and skills. Additional interviews or a more detailed discussion may be required to fully assess his suitability for the role.','2024-09-11 12:28:52'),(54,128,4,521,125,'Varun\'s responses during the interview were concise but lacked depth and engagement, which are crucial for the role of a Senior Software Engineer specializing in Java at Adzip Technologies. His responses did not fully address the questions posed, missing opportunities to showcase his expertise and alignment with the job requirements. This raises concerns about his suitability for the role that demands strong technical skills and effective communication.','Varun\'s resume indicates a strong background in digital commerce and program management, suggesting he might have the technical expertise required for the role. However, his strengths were not adequately reflected in his interview responses, which were brief and lacked specific details.','Varun\'s main weakness in the interview was his inability to provide detailed and relevant responses. He did not use the opportunity to highlight his experience or how it relates to the job role, which is essential in demonstrating candidate fit. His responses were shorter than expected and lacked the enthusiasm and detail that might be expected from a candidate with his background. He could improve by elaborating on his experiences, providing examples, and showing more enthusiasm for the role.','16. - Java:\nScore: 5\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: Varun did not provide sufficient details to assess his expertise in Java, which is critical for the role. He should discuss specific projects and contributions.\n\n17. - Core Java:\nScore: 5\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: Similar to Java, Varun\'s expertise in Core Java was not adequately showcased. More detailed examples are needed.\n\n18. - REST API design:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not mention any specific experiences with REST API design, which is a key requirement for the role.\n\n19. - Microservice Architecture:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: There was no mention of Varun\'s experience with microservice architecture, despite its relevance to the job description.\n\n20. - Unit Testing / Test Coverage:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not provide information on his experience with unit testing or test coverage, areas important for the role.','21. - Amazon Cloud:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not discuss his experience with Amazon Cloud, which could be relevant given the job\'s technical requirements.\n\n22. - Database:\nScore: 5\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: There was limited discussion of Varun\'s database skills, which are necessary for the role.\n\n23. - MongoDB:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not mention any specific knowledge or projects involving MongoDB.\n\n24. - Spring Boot:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: There was no evidence of Varun\'s experience with Spring Boot, despite its relevance to the position.\n\n25. - Docker:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not provide details on his experience with Docker, which is important for the role.\n\nRecommendation: Based on the evaluation, it is recommended that Varun may not be the best fit for the Senior Software Engineer role at Adzip Technologies without further demonstration of his technical skills and a more engaging communication style. Additional interviews or a technical assessment may be necessary to fully evaluate his suitability for the position.','2024-09-11 12:34:09'),(55,129,4,512,120,'Varun\'s responses during the interview were notably brief and lacked the depth and engagement expected for a Business Analyst role at Wipro. His answers did not provide the necessary insights into his experience or skills relevant to the job description, which emphasizes Agile and Scrum methodologies, stakeholder collaboration, and detailed business process analysis. This raises concerns about his suitability for the role, as the responses did not demonstrate the required communication and analytical skills.','Varun\'s main strength appears to be his extensive experience in the IT and digital commerce sectors, as indicated in his resume. However, this strength was not effectively communicated in the interview, as his responses were minimal and did not showcase his expertise or align with the job requirements.','Varun\'s major weakness in this interview was his lack of detailed responses and failure to engage with the questions meaningfully. His answers were too brief and did not include examples or explanations that would demonstrate his knowledge and skills. This is particularly concerning for a role that requires strong communication skills and the ability to articulate complex information clearly and effectively. Varun could improve by providing more comprehensive answers, using specific examples from his past experiences, and demonstrating how his skills align with the job requirements.','16. Agile/Scrum methodologies:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not mention any specific experiences with Agile/Scrum, which are critical for the role. He should detail his experience with these methodologies to align with the job requirements.\n\n17. Requirements gathering/documentation:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: There was no discussion of Varun\'s skills in requirements gathering or documentation. He should provide examples of how he has effectively performed these tasks in past projects.\n\n18. Analytical/problem-solving skills:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not provide any examples that demonstrate his analytical or problem-solving skills. He should describe specific instances where he used these skills to address business challenges.\n\n19. Communication/interpersonal skills:\nScore: 3\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Although Varun\'s responses were polite, they lacked depth and did not effectively showcase his interpersonal skills. He should aim to be more engaging and responsive in his communication.\n\n20. Cross-functional team collaboration:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not mention any experiences related to cross-functional team collaboration. He should discuss how he has successfully worked with diverse teams to achieve business objectives.','21. Atlassian Suite (Jira/Confluence/Bitbucket):\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: There was no mention of Varun\'s experience with the Atlassian Suite, which is important for the role. He should detail his proficiency with these tools and how he has used them in his work.\n\n22. Data analysis/visualization tools:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not discuss his skills in data analysis or the use of visualization tools. He should provide examples of how he has applied these tools to derive business insights.\n\n23. Process improvement methodologies:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: There was no indication of Varun\'s experience with process improvement methodologies. He should explain how he has implemented these methodologies to enhance business processes.\n\n24. User acceptance testing:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not provide information on his experience with user acceptance testing. He should describe his role in this area and how he has contributed to successful project outcomes.\n\n25. Training/end-user support:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: There was no mention of Varun\'s experience in providing training or end-user support. He should illustrate how he has effectively supported users in adopting new systems or processes.\n\nRecommendation: Based on the evaluation, it is recommended that Varun may not be the best fit for the Business Analyst role at Wipro without further interviews or a more detailed discussion to better understand his capabilities and experiences. He should be given an opportunity to provide more comprehensive responses in a follow-up interview to fully assess his suitability for the position.','2024-09-11 12:44:33'),(56,130,4,526,130,'Varun\'s responses in the interview were concise but lacked depth in some areas, particularly in demonstrating his understanding of the role\'s responsibilities and his alignment with them. While he confirmed his comfort with the responsibilities, his answers were not expansive enough to showcase his expertise or how his past experiences directly align with the job requirements. This could be due to nervousness or lack of preparation for the interview.','Varun\'s strengths lie in his willingness to proceed with the interview despite not feeling energetically optimal, which shows a level of commitment. His brief affirmations to continue the interview and his comfort with the job responsibilities indicate a positive attitude towards taking on challenges.','Varun needs to improve on providing detailed responses that align with the job role\'s requirements. His answers were too brief and did not fully leverage his background to demonstrate how his experience makes him a suitable candidate for the role. He could benefit from elaborating on his experiences with specific examples, especially how he has bridged IT solutions with business objectives in the past.','Based on the overall assessment, Varun shows potential but would benefit from further development in articulating his experiences and knowledge more effectively related to the job role. It is recommended to consider a second, more detailed interview or a role with training opportunities to better align his skills with the company’s needs.','','2024-09-16 12:33:17'),(57,133,74,528,131,'Manoj\'s interview responses reveal a candidate with foundational experience in business analysis and project management, particularly in Agile environments. While he demonstrates a basic understanding of Agile methodologies and tools like Jira, his responses often lack depth and specificity, especially when detailing technical skills or complex project scenarios. His communication style is somewhat unclear and could benefit from more structured and precise language. Manoj shows potential in areas like stakeholder management and event planning, but his technical and strategic articulations need significant enhancement to meet the demands of a Business Analyst role at SS&C Technologies, especially considering the job\'s focus on mutual funds and financial services.','Manoj\'s strengths lie in his practical experience with Agile methodologies and his exposure to business analysis through event planning and stakeholder management. His involvement with IIBA and his role in organizing conferences and webinars highlight his capability in managing and executing large-scale projects. His proactive approach to starting an NGO during the COVID-19 pandemic showcases his initiative and ability to lead in crisis situations.','Manoj\'s interview responses often lack the depth and technical detail expected for a Business Analyst role in a specialized financial services context. His understanding of SQL and customizing tools like Jira appears limited, which could hinder his ability to perform data-intensive analysis or optimize project management processes. Additionally, his communication skills need improvement for clearer and more effective stakeholder engagement. Manoj would benefit from further training in specific business analysis tools and techniques, particularly those related to financial services, and enhancing his communication clarity and project detailing.','16. Agile Business Analysis:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Manoj mentioned using Agile tools and methodologies but did not convincingly articulate how he applied Agile business analysis techniques to deliver tangible business improvements.\n\n17. User Stories:\nScore: 5\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: Manoj understands the concept of user stories but needs to improve how he crafts these to ensure they are clear, detailed, and aligned with technical and business requirements.\n\n18. Backlog Creation:\nScore: 5\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: Manoj has experience with backlog management but did not demonstrate advanced skills in prioritizing and refining backlogs to drive project efficiency and effectiveness.\n\n19. Sprint Management:\nScore: 5\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: While Manoj has managed sprints, his understanding of optimizing sprint activities to enhance team performance and project outcomes could be improved.\n\n20. Product Owner:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Manoj\'s experience as a product owner is limited, and his strategic impact in this role was not clearly demonstrated during the interview.','21. SQL Database:\nScore: 3\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Manoj admitted to only basic knowledge of SQL, which is below the proficiency expected for a Business Analyst role involving data-intensive activities.\n\n22. Sprint Planning:\nScore: 5\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: Manoj\'s sprint planning experience is basic, and he could benefit from deeper strategic planning skills to align sprints more closely with business goals.\n\n23. Sprint Demo:\nScore: 5\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: Manoj has conducted sprint demos but needs to enhance his ability to use these sessions to effectively communicate project progress and stakeholder alignment.\n\n24. Agile Jira:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Manoj has used Jira but has not customized or optimized it to meet specific project needs, which is a critical skill for a Business Analyst.\n\n25. Backlog Creation:\nScore: 5\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: Manoj\'s approach to backlog creation is adequate but lacks the strategic depth to ensure it drives project priorities and outcomes effectively.\n\nRecommendation:\nBased on the evaluation, Manoj shows potential but would require additional training and development, particularly in technical skills and strategic project management, to fully meet the demands of the Business Analyst role at SS&C Technologies. It is recommended to consider other candidates who demonstrate a stronger alignment with the job\'s technical and strategic requirements or to offer Manoj a role with a tailored development plan to address these gaps.','2024-09-18 20:21:38'),(58,140,4,511,119,'Varun\'s interview responses show a mix of strengths and areas for improvement. His initial greeting was friendly and appropriate, but his responses to subsequent questions were either missing or not in English, which raises concerns about his communication skills and readiness for the interview. This inconsistency makes it challenging to fully assess his fit for the Business Analyst role at Adzip Technologies, especially given the importance of clear and effective communication in this position.','Varun\'s initial response to the greeting was polite and professional, indicating good interpersonal skills. He expressed a positive disposition and engaged with the interviewer initially, which is crucial for building rapport.','Varun\'s major weakness in this interview is his communication, particularly his inability to respond to simple questions in English, which is critical for the role he is applying for. His response to the second question was in a different language, and he failed to provide any response to the third question, which suggests a lack of preparation or understanding of the interview\'s language requirements. This is a significant concern as the job requires excellent communication skills.','Based on the overall evaluation, it is recommended that Varun\'s application not be progressed without further assessment, particularly in areas of communication and language proficiency, which are critical for the Business Analyst role at Adzip Technologies.','','2024-11-07 11:02:04'),(59,148,4,541,136,'Varun\'s interview responses generally align with the expectations for the Business Analyst role at Adzip Technologies, focusing on mutual funds. He demonstrates a solid understanding of business analysis, stakeholder communication, and strategic planning. However, there are areas where Varun could improve, particularly in demonstrating deeper industry-specific knowledge and technical skills related to mutual funds management and regulatory compliance.','Varun\'s strengths lie in his clear communication and strategic thinking, as evidenced by his responses that align well with his resume experiences in business development and strategy. He articulates his thoughts clearly and demonstrates a good grasp of general business analysis concepts.','Varun\'s responses lack depth in specialized knowledge areas critical for the role, such as mutual funds management, SEC and FINRA compliance, and advanced data analysis specific to financial markets. To improve, Varun could benefit from further education or training in these specific areas to better align with the job requirements.','16. - mutual funds:\nScore: 5\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: Varun needs to demonstrate more in-depth knowledge and experience in mutual funds to fully meet the job requirements.\n\n17. - user stories:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Varun understands the concept of user stories but could discuss more about how he has specifically used them to drive mutual funds projects.\n\n18. - product owner:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: Varun mentions working with product owners but does not detail his direct experience in this role, which is crucial for the job.\n\n19. - us retirement solution:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun does not mention any specific experience or knowledge related to U.S. retirement solutions, which could be integral to the role.\n\n20. - business analysis:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Varun shows strong capabilities in business analysis, aligning well with the job\'s requirements, though more specific examples related to mutual funds would enhance his fit.','21. - agile scrum:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Varun mentions Agile Scrum methodologies but could benefit from discussing more detailed applications in his past projects, especially in mutual funds.\n\n22. - sprint management:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: While Varun understands sprint management, more detailed examples of his leadership in this area would strengthen his application.\n\n23. - agile scrum methodologies:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Varun has a good grasp of Agile methodologies but needs to connect this more explicitly to how it can be applied in the mutual funds context.\n\n24. - stakeholder communication:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Varun demonstrates strong stakeholder communication skills, which are essential for the role. He could, however, provide more examples of handling complex communications.\n\n25. - risk management:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: Varun mentions risk management but does not provide enough detail on how he has implemented these strategies specifically in the mutual funds industry.\n\nRecommendation: Consider for a second interview with a focus on technical skills and industry-specific knowledge to better assess suitability for the role.','2024-11-08 06:43:03'),(60,149,4,541,136,'Varun\'s responses in the interview were generally brief and lacked the depth and detail expected for a Business Analyst role in the mutual funds domain. His answers did not fully demonstrate the required expertise or enthusiasm for the responsibilities and skills outlined in the job description. This suggests a need for improvement in communication and domain-specific knowledge.','Varun\'s main strength lies in his willingness to engage in the interview process, as indicated by his affirmative responses to continue the interview and his comfort with the role\'s responsibilities. This shows a basic level of preparedness and openness to the position\'s requirements.','Varun\'s responses were significantly lacking in detail and relevance, particularly when discussing his professional experience and alignment with the job\'s demands. He failed to expand on his skills or experiences related to business analysis, mutual funds, or regulatory compliance, which are critical for the role. To improve, Varun could focus on articulating his experiences more clearly, linking them directly to the job requirements, and demonstrating a deeper understanding of the mutual funds industry.','16. - mutual funds:\nScore: 3\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not display adequate knowledge or experience in mutual funds, which is critical for the role. He should detail his direct experiences with fund management and compliance to align better with the job expectations.\n\n17. - user stories:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: While Varun mentioned handling user stories in his previous roles, he did not elaborate on how this experience could be applied in the new role. Providing specific examples of how he has used user stories to meet business goals would be beneficial.\n\n18. - product owner:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun\'s experience as a product owner was not evident from his responses. He should discuss specific instances where he has led product development or enhancements, particularly in a financial context.\n\n19. - us retirement solution:\nScore: 3\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: There was no mention of experience with U.S. retirement solutions, which could be relevant to the mutual funds domain. Varun should highlight any relevant experience, even if indirectly related, to improve his suitability for the role.\n\n20. - business analysis:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun\'s responses lacked depth in demonstrating his business analysis skills. He should provide detailed examples of his analytical projects, particularly those that had significant business impacts.','21. - agile scrum:\nScore: 5\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: Varun mentioned Agile methodologies but did not discuss his practical experience with Scrum practices. Detailing his role in Scrum projects and his contributions to their success would strengthen his response.\n\n22. - sprint management:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: There was limited evidence of Varun\'s expertise in sprint management. He should describe his approach to planning, monitoring, and leading sprints, especially in complex project environments.\n\n23. - agile scrum methodologies:\nScore: 5\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: While Varun alluded to knowledge of Agile Scrum methodologies, he did not provide concrete examples of how he has implemented or benefited from these methodologies in his projects. More detailed responses would demonstrate his proficiency.\n\n24. - stakeholder communication:\nScore: 5\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: Varun needs to better illustrate his stakeholder communication skills. Discussing specific strategies he has used to manage and satisfy stakeholder expectations would be advantageous.\n\n25. - risk management:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not adequately address his skills in risk management, an essential area for the role. He should outline his experience in identifying, assessing, and mitigating risks, particularly in financial settings.','2024-11-08 07:13:11'),(61,148,4,541,136,'Varun demonstrated a good level of engagement and communication during the interview. His responses, while generally relevant, lacked depth in certain technical areas crucial for the Business Analyst role at Adzip Technologies, particularly in mutual funds and regulatory compliance. His strengths lie in business development and client management, as evidenced by his previous roles. However, for the specific requirements of this job, Varun needs to enhance his knowledge and experience in the mutual funds sector and related regulatory frameworks.','Varun\'s strengths include strong communication skills and a proactive approach to business analysis, as seen in his previous job roles where he led teams and exceeded revenue targets. His experience in client relationship management and strategic sales initiatives are commendable and were evident in his responses about past roles and achievements.','Varun\'s main weakness in the context of the job role is his limited exposure to the mutual funds industry and the specific regulatory standards such as SEC and FINRA, which are critical for the Business Analyst position at Adzip Technologies. His responses lacked depth in discussing technical strategies and compliance issues related to mutual funds, which are central to the job description.','16. - mutual funds:\n    Score: 3\n    Qualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\n    Description: Varun needs to significantly enhance his knowledge and practical experience in mutual funds to meet the job\'s requirements.\n\n17. - user stories:\n    Score: 6\n    Qualitative Assessment: Average\n    Description: Varun has some experience with user stories, but he needs to demonstrate how these align specifically with mutual fund projects.\n\n18. - product owner:\n    Score: 5\n    Qualitative Assessment: Average\n    Description: Varun\'s understanding of the product owner role is basic and needs deeper integration with technical and regulatory knowledge in mutual funds.\n\n19. - us retirement solution:\n    Score: 4\n    Qualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\n    Description: Varun did not demonstrate sufficient knowledge or experience in U.S. retirement solutions, which are relevant to the mutual funds sector.\n\n20. - business analysis:\n    Score: 7\n    Qualitative Assessment: Good\n    Description: Varun has a good foundation in business analysis, but applying this specifically to the mutual funds industry requires further development.','21. - agile scrum:\n    Score: 6\n    Qualitative Assessment: Average\n    Description: While Varun is familiar with Agile Scrum, he needs to better demonstrate how he has applied this methodology in contexts relevant to the financial sector.\n\n22. - sprint management:\n    Score: 5\n    Qualitative Assessment: Average\n    Description: Varun\'s experience with sprint management is adequate but lacks depth in how it can be effectively utilized in mutual fund projects.\n\n23. - agile scrum methodologies:\n    Score: 6\n    Qualitative Assessment: Average\n    Description: Varun understands Agile Scrum methodologies; however, more detailed examples of application in his past projects would strengthen his profile.\n\n24. - stakeholder communication:\n    Score: 8\n    Qualitative Assessment: Good\n    Description: Varun demonstrated strong skills in stakeholder communication, an essential attribute for the business analyst role.\n\n25. - risk management:\n    Score: 4\n    Qualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\n    Description: Varun\'s understanding of risk management in the context of mutual funds is limited and requires significant improvement to meet the demands of the role.','2024-11-08 07:25:28'),(62,150,4,541,136,'Varun\'s performance in the interview was generally satisfactory, but there were areas where he could have demonstrated stronger alignment with the job requirements. His responses were concise and to the point, which is a positive trait. However, his answers lacked the depth and specificity needed to fully convince of his suitability for the Business Analyst role in the mutual funds domain, particularly in demonstrating knowledge of regulatory compliance and strategic initiative management.','Varun\'s strengths include clear communication and a good foundational understanding of business development and client relationship management. His response to the initial greeting was polite and set a positive tone for the interview. His readiness to proceed with the interview also showed good professionalism.','Varun\'s responses lacked depth in areas critical to the role, such as regulatory compliance, financial analysis, and strategic planning specific to mutual funds. His answers were somewhat generic and did not fully address the complexities of the role as described in the job description. To improve, Varun could focus on tailoring his responses more closely to the specifics of the job, perhaps by citing more detailed examples of past experiences that align with the responsibilities of the role.','16. - mutual funds:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not demonstrate a deep understanding of mutual funds, which is critical for the role. He should include specific examples of his experience in this area.\n\n17. - user stories:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: Varun mentioned his experience with user stories, but did not connect this effectively to how it could be applied in the mutual funds context.\n\n18. - product owner:\nScore: 5\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: Varun\'s experience as a product owner was not clearly articulated in terms of leading strategic initiatives in mutual funds.\n\n19. - us retirement solution:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not mention any specific knowledge or experience with US retirement solutions, which could be relevant to the role.\n\n20. - business analysis:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: While Varun has a background in business analysis, he did not sufficiently detail how his skills could be applied specifically in the mutual funds domain.','21. - agile scrum:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Varun has good knowledge of Agile Scrum methodologies, which is beneficial for the role. However, he could discuss more about how he has applied these in complex financial projects.\n\n22. - sprint management:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: Varun mentioned his experience with sprint management but did not elaborate on how this skill could benefit the mutual funds projects at Adzip Technologies.\n\n23. - agile scrum methodologies:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Varun understands Agile Scrum methodologies well. He could enhance his response by detailing specific projects where he successfully applied these methodologies.\n\n24. - stakeholder communication:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: While Varun mentioned stakeholder communication, he did not provide examples of how he has effectively managed this in a complex regulatory environment like that of mutual funds.\n\n25. - risk management:\nScore: 5\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: Varun\'s knowledge of risk management was not specifically tailored to the mutual funds industry, which is essential for the role. He could improve by discussing specific risk management strategies he has implemented in financial settings.\n\nRecommendation:\nBased on the evaluation, Varun shows potential but would benefit from further development in areas critical to the Business Analyst role at Adzip Technologies, particularly in mutual funds-specific knowledge and strategic planning. It is recommended to consider Varun for roles that align more closely with his current expertise while offering him opportunities to grow into the desired role with additional training and exposure.','2024-11-08 07:29:01'),(63,151,4,541,136,'Varun demonstrated a basic level of competence during the interview, but there were notable areas where improvement is needed to fully align with the expectations for a Business Analyst role in the mutual funds domain. His responses lacked depth in specific required skills such as mutual funds knowledge and regulatory compliance. However, he showed good communication skills and a positive attitude towards the interview process.','Varun\'s main strengths lie in his communication style and general engagement during the interview. He was polite and expressed his ideas clearly enough, which are crucial traits for any role involving stakeholder communication. His background in business development and strategy also suggests he has a solid foundation in handling client relationships and strategic planning.','Varun\'s responses lacked depth in several critical areas required for the Business Analyst role, particularly in mutual funds, regulatory compliance, and advanced data analysis. His experience seems more aligned with sales and marketing rather than the technical and analytical demands of the mutual funds industry. To improve, Varun could benefit from specific training in financial regulations, mutual fund operations, and technical platforms mentioned in the job description like Charles River Development.','16. - mutual funds:\nScore: 3\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun\'s knowledge of mutual funds was insufficient for the role\'s demands. He should focus on gaining specific industry knowledge and understanding the technical aspects of fund management.\n\n17. - user stories:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: Varun mentioned experience with user stories but did not provide detailed examples of how he has effectively integrated them into business analysis processes.\n\n18. - product owner:\nScore: 5\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: Varun\'s understanding of the product owner role was basic. He needs to demonstrate how he can translate product owner insights into actionable business analysis.\n\n19. - us retirement solution:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not demonstrate knowledge specific to US retirement solutions, which could be crucial depending on the projects at Adzip Technologies.\n\n20. - business analysis:\nScore: 5\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: While Varun has a background in business analysis, his experience seems more aligned with sales strategies rather than the analytical depth required for this role.','21. - agile scrum:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: Varun mentioned familiarity with Agile Scrum methodologies, but more detailed knowledge and examples of practical application are needed.\n\n22. - sprint management:\nScore: 5\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: Varun\'s experience with sprint management was not detailed during the interview, suggesting a need for further development in this area.\n\n23. - agile scrum methodologies:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: Varun needs to deepen his understanding and application of Agile Scrum methodologies to align with the job requirements.\n\n24. - stakeholder communication:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Varun demonstrated good stakeholder communication skills, which are essential for the Business Analyst role.\n\n25. - risk management:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun\'s knowledge of risk management, especially in the context of mutual funds, needs significant enhancement to meet the role\'s demands.','2024-11-08 07:32:41'),(64,157,4,540,135,'Varun demonstrated a strong foundational understanding of business analysis principles, particularly in areas related to agile methodologies and stakeholder management. His responses were generally clear and relevant, showcasing his experience in business development and strategy. However, there were gaps in technical depth and specific domain knowledge which are critical for the role at Adzip Technologies, especially concerning mutual funds and financial services.','Varun\'s strengths lie in his clear communication and practical experience in business analysis. He effectively articulated his past roles and responsibilities, demonstrating a good grasp of agile practices and user story creation. His experience with CRM tools and client management suggests strong interpersonal and stakeholder management skills, which are crucial for the business analyst role.','Varun\'s main areas for improvement include a deeper technical understanding of the financial services domain, specifically mutual funds, which is essential for the job role. Additionally, his responses could benefit from more detailed examples and less generic descriptions. Enhancing his technical skills, particularly in SQL databases and advanced agile methodologies, would make him a stronger candidate.','16. - agile business analysis:\n    Score: 7\n    Qualitative Assessment: Good\n    Description: Varun understands agile business analysis but needs to apply this knowledge more effectively in the context of financial services.\n\n17. - user stories:\n    Score: 8\n    Qualitative Assessment: Good\n    Description: Varun is proficient in creating user stories. He could enhance his skill by integrating more specific acceptance criteria tailored to financial services.\n\n18. - backlog creation:\n    Score: 6\n    Qualitative Assessment: Average\n    Description: Varun has basic knowledge of backlog creation. He should focus on learning more about prioritizing backlogs in line with strategic business objectives.\n\n19. - sprint creation:\n    Score: 6\n    Qualitative Assessment: Average\n    Description: Varun\'s understanding of sprint creation is fundamental. He could benefit from deeper practical experience in managing sprints within agile frameworks.\n\n20. - product owner:\n    Score: 5\n    Qualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\n    Description: Varun needs to develop a stronger understanding of the product owner\'s role, particularly in defining vision and aligning product goals with business objectives.','21. - sql database:\n    Score: 4\n    Qualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\n    Description: Varun\'s knowledge of SQL databases is limited. Enhancing his skills in SQL query writing and database management would be beneficial.\n\n22. - sprint planning:\n    Score: 6\n    Qualitative Assessment: Average\n    Description: Varun has a basic grasp of sprint planning. He should focus on advanced techniques for effective sprint goal setting and resource allocation.\n\n23. - sprint demo:\n    Score: 6\n    Qualitative Assessment: Average\n    Description: Varun can conduct sprint demos but needs to improve in collecting and integrating feedback into future sprints.\n\n24. - agile jira:\n    Score: 7\n    Qualitative Assessment: Good\n    Description: Varun is competent in using JIRA for agile projects. He could improve by exploring more advanced features and customization options.\n\n25. - requirement gathering:\n    Score: 7\n    Qualitative Assessment: Good\n    Description: Varun is adept at gathering requirements. He could enhance his techniques to ensure more precise and comprehensive requirement documentation.\n\nRecommendation:\nBased on the evaluation, Varun shows potential but would benefit from targeted training in financial services and advanced technical skills. If the role allows for on-the-job training, he could be considered for the position with a recommendation for further development in specific areas.','2024-11-20 09:11:15'),(65,158,134,564,144,'Swami\'s responses throughout the interview were generally concise and to the point, but they lacked depth and specific examples that would demonstrate a thorough understanding of the role and its requirements. While he showed some familiarity with the concepts discussed, his answers were often generic and did not fully align with the benchmark responses, which were more detailed and tied directly to practical experiences and specific methodologies.','Swami\'s strengths lie in his general knowledge of business analysis concepts such as requirement gathering, functional specification, and user acceptance testing. He was able to articulate the basic responsibilities of a business analyst and showed some understanding of Agile methodologies and stakeholder engagement.','Swami\'s main weakness is the lack of depth in his responses and the absence of detailed examples that demonstrate his expertise and experience. His answers were often superficial and did not convey a strong grasp of how to apply business analysis techniques effectively in real-world scenarios. Additionally, his communication was sometimes unclear and could benefit from more structured and polished delivery. To improve, Swami could focus on providing more specific examples from his past experiences that relate directly to the tasks and responsibilities of the role he is applying for. He should also work on enhancing his communication skills to convey his thoughts more clearly and professionally.','16. User Acceptance Testing:\nScore: 5\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: Swami mentioned his involvement in UAT but did not delve into specifics about how he conducts tests or handles feedback. More detailed examples would improve his score.\n\n17. Requirements Gathering:\nScore: 5\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: While Swami understands the basics of requirements gathering, his approach lacks the thoroughness and detail needed to excel in this area.\n\n18. Functional Specification:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Swami needs to provide clearer examples of how he translates business requirements into functional specifications. More detail on his process and the tools he uses would be beneficial.\n\n19. Product Owner Analysis:\nScore: 5\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: Swami has some understanding of the product owner role but needs to demonstrate a deeper knowledge of managing product backlogs and aligning product features with business goals.\n\n20. Agile Analysis:\nScore: 5\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: Swami\'s familiarity with Agile is apparent, but he could improve by sharing more about his direct experiences using Agile methodologies in project management.','21. Business Requirement Document:\nScore: 5\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: Swami knows what a BRD should contain but did not convincingly explain how he ensures these documents meet project needs comprehensively.\n\n22. Functional Specification Document:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: More information on his specific contributions to creating functional specifications would help clarify Swami\'s expertise in this area.\n\n23. User Stories:\nScore: 5\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: Swami mentions user stories but does not detail his approach to writing or validating them, which is crucial for understanding user needs.\n\n24. Backlog Management:\nScore: 5\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: Swami\'s approach to backlog management is basic. He could improve by discussing how he prioritizes and refines backlog items to meet strategic goals.\n\n25. Problem Definition:\nScore: 5\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: While Swami identifies problems, he needs to strengthen his ability to define them clearly and propose effective solutions.\n\nRecommendation:\nBased on the evaluation, Swami shows potential but would benefit from further development in several key areas of business analysis. If the role can accommodate on-the-job training or if a junior position is available, Swami might be considered with the understanding that he would need support to reach his full potential. Otherwise, we might look for a candidate with more demonstrated expertise and a proven track record in similar roles.','2024-11-20 17:43:42'),(66,159,134,566,144,'Swami\'s responses during the interview demonstrated a basic understanding of the responsibilities and skills required for the Catalyst Business Analyst position. However, there were noticeable gaps in the depth and relevance of his answers compared to the benchmark responses. Swami showed some familiarity with the tools and processes mentioned in the job description but often lacked detailed examples and clarity in his explanations. His communication was generally clear, though there were instances of repetition and lack of engagement with the questions posed.','Swami\'s strengths lie in his familiarity with various digital tools and platforms, as evidenced by his mention of using Figma, Google Analytics, and MailChimp. He also demonstrated a basic understanding of Agile methodologies and business analysis through his brief mentions of user stories and business analytics courses. His experience as a social media manager shows he has some practical experience managing tasks and priorities, which are relevant to the role of a business analyst.','Swami\'s main weakness is the lack of depth in his responses. He often failed to provide detailed examples that align with the job responsibilities, such as in user acceptance testing and backlog management. His answers were sometimes vague and did not fully address the interviewer\'s questions, indicating a need for improvement in communication and interview preparedness. To improve, Swami could benefit from more hands-on experience in specific business analyst tasks and enhancing his ability to articulate his experiences and knowledge clearly and relevantly during interviews.','16. User Acceptance Testing:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Swami mentioned his involvement in projects that required testing but did not provide detailed insights into his role in user acceptance testing or the development of test cases. He needs to gain more practical experience in this area and be able to discuss it more competently.\n\n17. Requirements Gathering:\nScore: 5\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: Swami described some activities related to requirements gathering, such as conducting interviews and surveys. However, his explanation lacked depth and did not fully convey his ability to capture and document comprehensive requirements effectively.\n\n18. Functional Specification:\nScore: 5\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: Swami mentioned using Figma for wireframing but did not elaborate on how he translated project requirements into detailed functional specifications. He should focus on gaining more experience in this area and being able to discuss it more thoroughly.\n\n19. Product Owner Analysis:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Swami did not provide any specific examples of his experience with product owner analysis. He needs to develop a better understanding of this role and its responsibilities, particularly in managing product backlogs and roadmap planning.\n\n20. Agile Analysis:\nScore: 5\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: Swami briefly mentioned his exposure to Agile methodologies, but his understanding appears to be superficial. He could benefit from more practical experience in Agile environments and a deeper understanding of Agile analysis techniques.','21. Business Requirement Document:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Swami did not discuss his experience with creating or maintaining business requirement documents. This is a crucial skill for a business analyst, and Swami should focus on developing his abilities in this area.\n\n22. Functional Specification Document:\nScore: 5\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: While Swami mentioned using tools like Figma for wireframing, he did not provide detailed insights into how he develops or maintains functional specification documents. More experience and knowledge in this area would be beneficial.\n\n23. User Stories:\nScore: 5\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: Swami mentioned his recent learning about user stories, but he did not provide examples of how he has effectively written or utilized user stories in projects. He should work on applying this knowledge practically to improve his proficiency.\n\n24. Backlog Management:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Swami\'s experience with backlog management was not evident from his responses. He needs to gain practical experience in this area and be able to articulate how he manages and prioritizes a product backlog effectively.\n\n25. Problem Definition:\nScore: 5\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: Swami mentioned using business analytics techniques, which likely involve some level of problem definition. However, he did not provide specific examples of how he defines and addresses problems in his projects. More detailed explanations and examples would help demonstrate his capability in this area.\n\nIn conclusion, while Swami has some foundational skills and knowledge relevant to the Catalyst Business Analyst role, there are significant areas for improvement, particularly in depth of knowledge, problem-solving, and specific business analysis tasks. His communication skills are adequate but could be enhanced with more focus on clarity and engagement. Swami should seek additional practical experience and training in business analysis to better meet the demands of the role and improve his performance in future interviews.','2024-11-22 06:47:04'),(67,160,4,541,136,'Varun\'s responses during the interview were concise but lacked depth and engagement, which are crucial for the Business Analyst role he applied for. His answers did not fully address the questions posed, particularly in terms of aligning his experience with the job requirements. This suggests a need for improvement in communication and articulation of his skills and experiences relative to the role.','Varun demonstrated basic communication skills and was able to maintain a polite and professional demeanor throughout the interview. His brief responses indicate a level of comfort with the interview process.','Varun\'s responses were often too brief and lacked the necessary detail to fully convey his suitability for the role. He missed opportunities to align his past experiences with the job requirements, particularly in areas like strategic initiative management and regulatory compliance. Varun could benefit from more thoroughly preparing for interviews by mapping his experiences to the job description and practicing more detailed and targeted responses.','16. - mutual funds:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not demonstrate a strong understanding of mutual funds, which is critical for the role. He should provide specific examples of his experience in this area.\n\n17. - user stories:\nScore: 5\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: Varun mentioned user stories in his resume but did not effectively connect this experience to the job requirements during the interview.\n\n18. - product owner:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: There was little to no mention of experience relevant to acting as a product owner, an important aspect of the Business Analyst role.\n\n19. - us retirement solution:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not discuss any relevant experience with US retirement solutions, missing an opportunity to align with the job\'s focus.\n\n20. - business analysis:\nScore: 5\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: While Varun has a background in business analysis, he did not provide strong examples of his expertise in this area during the interview.','21. - agile scrum:\nScore: 5\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: Varun\'s responses lacked depth in discussing his proficiency in Agile Scrum methodologies, which are important for the role.\n\n22. - sprint management:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not provide evidence of experience in sprint management, which is crucial for the Business Analyst role in an IT setting.\n\n23. - agile scrum methodologies:\nScore: 5\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: More detailed examples of applying Agile Scrum methodologies in his past roles would help Varun demonstrate his qualifications for this job.\n\n24. - stakeholder communication:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: Varun mentioned stakeholder communication but did not effectively showcase his skills in this area during the interview.\n\n25. - risk management:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun needs to better articulate his experience with risk management strategies and their application in business settings, especially related to mutual funds.\n\nRecommendation:\nBased on the evaluation, it is recommended that Varun may not currently be the best fit for the Business Analyst position at GCS, primarily due to the lack of depth in his responses and the limited demonstration of required skills and knowledge. However, with additional preparation and a more detailed presentation of his experiences and skills, he could potentially be reconsidered for future opportunities.','2024-12-02 19:37:34'),(68,162,4,577,151,'Varun\'s responses lacked depth and specificity, which is crucial for the Business Analyst role in the retail domain. His answers were often brief and did not demonstrate the necessary experience or knowledge in key areas such as requirements gathering, process mapping, and retail domain expertise. Varun needs to better articulate his experiences and align them with the job requirements. Based on the interview, Varun may not be the best fit for this position.','Varun demonstrated a willingness to engage in the interview process and was open to questions. He responded promptly and showed basic communication skills, which indicates a readiness to participate in discussions.','Varun\'s responses were often too brief and lacked the necessary detail, particularly in areas like process mapping and retail domain knowledge. He should focus on providing specific examples from his experience that align with the job requirements. Additionally, Varun needs to improve his ability to articulate his thoughts clearly and demonstrate a deeper understanding of the subject matter.','16. - **requirements gathering**:\nScore: 3\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not provide specific examples of requirements gathering. He should focus on describing his approach and experiences in this area.\n\n17. - **process mapping**:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not demonstrate knowledge of process mapping. He should provide examples of his experience with As-Is and To-Be mapping.\n\n18. - **product owner**:\nScore: 3\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not demonstrate experience as a product owner. He should focus on describing his relevant skills and experiences.\n\n19. - **product owner skills**:\nScore: 3\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not demonstrate product owner skills. He should focus on describing his relevant skills and experiences.\n\n20. - **retail domain knowledge**:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not demonstrate retail domain knowledge. He should provide examples of his experience and understanding of retail processes.','21. - **use case**:\nScore: 3\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not demonstrate knowledge of use cases. He should provide examples of his experience with use case development.\n\n22. - **use case development**:\nScore: 3\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not demonstrate experience with use case development. He should focus on describing his relevant skills and experiences.\n\n23. - **prototyping and wireframing**:\nScore: 3\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not demonstrate experience with prototyping and wireframing. He should provide examples of his experience with tools like Figma and Balsamiq.\n\n24. - **continuous improvement frameworks**:\nScore: 3\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not demonstrate knowledge of continuous improvement frameworks. He should focus on describing his relevant skills and experiences.\n\n25. - **customer journey mapping**:\nScore: 3\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not demonstrate experience with customer journey mapping. He should provide examples of his experience and understanding of this area.','2024-12-30 11:02:15'),(69,163,4,577,151,'Varun\'s responses in the interview lacked depth and relevance to the job description. His communication was unclear, and he struggled to articulate his thoughts effectively. His responses did not demonstrate the required knowledge or skills for the Business Analyst role in the retail domain. Overall, Varun needs significant improvement in aligning his experience and skills with the job requirements. Based on this evaluation, I would not recommend Varun for selection.','Varun displayed a willingness to engage, as seen in his initial response. He was polite and expressed readiness to participate in the interview, indicating a positive attitude.','Varun\'s responses were often incomplete or irrelevant, failing to address the questions adequately. He needs to improve his clarity of communication and ensure his responses are aligned with the job requirements. For example, in response to scheduling confirmation, he asked for repetition instead of confirming availability. He should focus on understanding and articulating his skills in relation to the job description.','16. - **requirements gathering**:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not demonstrate experience in requirements gathering. He should provide examples of his experience in this area.\n\n17. - **process mapping**:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not demonstrate knowledge of process mapping. He should focus on showcasing his experience in this area.\n\n18. - **product owner**:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not demonstrate experience as a product owner. He should provide examples of his experience in this role.\n\n19. - **product owner skills**:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not demonstrate product owner skills. He should focus on showcasing his experience in this area.\n\n20. - **retail domain knowledge**:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not demonstrate knowledge of the retail domain. He should focus on showcasing his experience in this area.','21. - **use case**:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not demonstrate knowledge of use cases. He should focus on showcasing his experience in this area.\n\n22. - **use case development**:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not demonstrate experience in use case development. He should provide examples of his experience in this area.\n\n23. - **prototyping and wireframing**:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not demonstrate experience in prototyping and wireframing. He should provide examples of his experience in this area.\n\n24. - **continuous improvement frameworks**:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not demonstrate knowledge of continuous improvement frameworks. He should focus on showcasing his experience in this area.\n\n25. - **customer journey mapping**:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not demonstrate experience in customer journey mapping. He should provide examples of his experience in this area.','2024-12-30 11:11:52'),(70,173,138,594,164,'Gagan\'s interview performance was inconsistent, with notable gaps in communication and domain-specific knowledge. While he has a strong technical background, his responses lacked relevance and depth concerning the mutual funds domain, which is crucial for the Business Analyst role at Adzip Technologies. His communication was unclear, with frequent use of irrelevant or incomprehensible responses. Improvement is needed in aligning his experience with the job requirements. Overall, Gagan\'s suitability for the role is questionable, and I would not recommend selection without further assessment.','Gagan possesses a robust technical background in software development and data analysis, which could be beneficial for IT-related tasks. His experience with generative AI and data engineering demonstrates his capability in handling complex technical projects. Gagan\'s proficiency in Agile methodologies and project management tools indicates his ability to work in dynamic environments.','Gagan\'s responses lacked clarity and relevance, particularly regarding mutual funds and regulatory compliance. His inability to articulate his experience in fund performance analysis and stakeholder communication is concerning. To improve, Gagan should focus on aligning his technical expertise with the specific requirements of the mutual funds domain, enhancing his understanding of regulatory standards, and improving his communication skills to convey his ideas more effectively.','16. - **mutual funds**:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Gagan did not demonstrate knowledge or experience in mutual funds, failing to discuss relevant topics such as fund performance analysis or regulatory compliance.\n\n17. - **user stories**:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Gagan did not discuss user stories or their relevance to the job role, indicating a lack of understanding in this area.\n\n18. - **product owner**:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Gagan did not demonstrate knowledge or experience related to product ownership, failing to discuss relevant responsibilities or skills.\n\n19. - **us retirement solution**:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Gagan did not discuss US retirement solutions or their relevance to the job role, indicating a lack of understanding in this area.\n\n20. - **business analysis**:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Gagan did not demonstrate knowledge or experience in business analysis, failing to discuss relevant responsibilities or skills.','21. - **agile scrum**:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Gagan did not discuss Agile Scrum methodologies or their relevance to the job role, indicating a lack of understanding in this area.\n\n22. - **sprint management**:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Gagan did not demonstrate knowledge or experience in sprint management, failing to discuss relevant responsibilities or skills.\n\n23. - **agile scrum methodologies**:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Gagan did not discuss Agile Scrum methodologies or their relevance to the job role, indicating a lack of understanding in this area.\n\n24. - **stakeholder communication**:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Gagan did not demonstrate effective stakeholder communication skills, failing to discuss relevant responsibilities or skills.\n\n25. - **market trend analysis**:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Gagan did not demonstrate knowledge or experience in market trend analysis, failing to discuss relevant responsibilities or skills.','2025-01-04 12:38:21'),(71,174,138,594,164,'Gagan\'s responses in the interview were largely off-topic and did not align with the job description or the benchmark responses. There was a significant lack of clarity and relevance in his answers, which made it challenging to assess his suitability for the Business Analyst role in the mutual funds domain. His responses were often in a different language or unrelated to the questions asked, indicating a possible misunderstanding of the interview context. Based on the evaluation, Gagan does not meet the requirements for the position.','Gagan\'s resume indicates strong technical skills in IT and software development, particularly in generative AI and data engineering. His experience with Agile methodologies and data analysis could be beneficial in a technical role.','Gagan\'s interview responses lacked clarity and relevance, with frequent deviations from the topic. He needs to improve his communication skills, particularly in articulating his experience and aligning it with the job role. Additionally, he should focus on understanding the job requirements and preparing responses that demonstrate his suitability for the role.','16. - **mutual funds**:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Gagan did not demonstrate knowledge or experience in mutual funds. He should discuss his expertise in fund management and analysis.\n\n17. - **user stories**:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Gagan did not discuss user stories or related experience. He should highlight his experience in creating and managing user stories.\n\n18. - **product owner**:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Gagan did not demonstrate experience as a product owner. He should discuss his role in product management and ownership.\n\n19. - **us retirement solution**:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Gagan did not discuss US retirement solutions. He should highlight any relevant experience in this area.\n\n20. - **business analysis**:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Gagan did not demonstrate business analysis skills. He should discuss his experience in analyzing business processes and strategies.','21. - **agile scrum**:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Gagan did not discuss Agile Scrum methodologies. He should highlight his experience in Agile project management.\n\n22. - **sprint management**:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Gagan did not demonstrate experience in sprint management. He should discuss his role in managing sprints and Agile projects.\n\n23. - **agile scrum methodologies**:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Gagan did not discuss Agile Scrum methodologies. He should highlight his experience in Agile project management.\n\n24. - **stakeholder communication**:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Gagan did not demonstrate stakeholder communication skills. He should discuss his experience in effectively communicating with stakeholders.\n\n25. - **market trend analysis**:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Gagan did not demonstrate knowledge of market trend analysis. He should discuss his experience in analyzing market trends and their impact on business strategies.','2025-01-05 03:58:31'),(72,175,138,580,151,'Gagan\'s responses in the interview lacked clarity and relevance, often deviating from the expected benchmark responses. His communication style and depth of knowledge did not align with the job requirements for a Business Analyst in the Retail domain. There was a noticeable absence of domain-specific skills and competencies crucial for the role. Overall, Gagan\'s responses suggest a need for significant improvement to meet the expectations of the position.','Gagan demonstrated a polite demeanor and willingness to engage, as seen in his initial greeting. His eagerness to participate in the interview process was evident, which is a positive trait for any candidate.','Gagan\'s responses were often unclear and lacked depth, particularly in areas critical to the role, such as requirements gathering and retail domain knowledge. He should focus on enhancing his communication skills and gaining more relevant experience in business analysis within the retail sector. Improving his ability to articulate thoughts clearly and provide detailed responses would benefit his future interviews.','16. - requirements gathering:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Gagan did not demonstrate experience or knowledge in requirements gathering. He should focus on providing examples of his experience in this area.\n\n17. - process mapping:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Gagan\'s responses did not indicate experience in process mapping. He should aim to discuss his experience with process mapping techniques.\n\n18. - product owner:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Gagan did not showcase any product owner experience or skills. He should work on highlighting relevant experience in this area.\n\n19. - product owner skills:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Gagan\'s responses lacked evidence of product owner skills. He should focus on discussing his skills and experience related to product ownership.\n\n20. - retail domain knowledge:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Gagan did not demonstrate knowledge of the retail domain. He should work on gaining and discussing relevant experience in this field.','21. - use case:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Gagan did not provide any information on use case development. He should aim to discuss his experience with use cases.\n\n22. - use case development:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Gagan\'s responses did not indicate experience in use case development. He should focus on providing examples of his work in this area.\n\n23. - prototyping and wireframing:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Gagan did not demonstrate experience in prototyping and wireframing. He should work on discussing his skills and experience with these tools.\n\n24. - continuous improvement frameworks:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Gagan\'s responses lacked evidence of experience with continuous improvement frameworks. He should aim to discuss his experience in this area.\n\n25. - customer journey mapping:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Gagan did not demonstrate knowledge of customer journey mapping. He should work on gaining and discussing relevant experience in this field.','2025-01-05 07:24:50'),(73,176,138,579,151,'Gagan\'s interview performance was challenging to assess due to the lack of substantive responses. The responses provided were minimal and did not offer sufficient information to evaluate Gagan\'s fit for the Business Analyst role at Adzip Technologies. The absence of detailed answers limits the ability to gauge his skills and experience against the job requirements. Recommendation for selection cannot be made based on the available responses.','Gagan\'s resume indicates a strong technical background in data engineering and AI, which could be beneficial for the Business Analyst role, especially in a tech-driven environment. His experience with Agile methodology and tools like JIRA aligns with the job requirements.','Gagan\'s responses during the interview were insufficient for a comprehensive evaluation. He should focus on providing detailed answers that highlight his relevant experience and skills. Improving communication clarity and engagement during interviews would enhance his candidacy.','16. - **requirements gathering**:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Gagan did not discuss requirements gathering. He should provide examples of his experience in this area.\n\n17. - **process mapping**:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Process mapping skills were not addressed. Gagan should elaborate on his experience with process mapping.\n\n18. - **product owner**:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Gagan did not mention product owner experience. He should discuss any relevant experience in this role.\n\n19. - **product owner skills**:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Product owner skills were not demonstrated. Gagan should highlight his skills related to product ownership.\n\n20. - **retail domain knowledge**:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Gagan did not showcase retail domain knowledge. He should discuss his understanding and experience in this domain.','21. - **use case**:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Use case experience was not discussed. Gagan should provide examples of his work with use cases.\n\n22. - **use case development**:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Gagan did not mention use case development. He should elaborate on his experience in developing use cases.\n\n23. - **prototyping and wireframing**:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Prototyping and wireframing skills were not addressed. Gagan should discuss his experience with these tools.\n\n24. - **continuous improvement frameworks**:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Continuous improvement frameworks were not mentioned. Gagan should highlight his knowledge and experience in this area.\n\n25. - **customer journey mapping**:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Customer journey mapping was not discussed. Gagan should provide examples of his experience with journey mapping.','2025-01-05 07:31:20'),(74,178,138,594,164,'Gagan\'s responses in the interview lacked clarity and relevance to the job description. His communication was minimal, and he did not effectively convey his experience or skills in relation to the Business Analyst role. The responses did not demonstrate a strong understanding of mutual funds or the specific requirements of the position. Overall, Gagan\'s performance in the interview suggests he may not be the best fit for the role at this time.','Gagan has a strong background in open-source software development and generative AI, as evidenced by his resume. His technical skills in data engineering and analytics are notable, which could be beneficial in roles that require these competencies.','Gagan\'s interview responses were not aligned with the job requirements, particularly in the mutual funds domain. He needs to improve his communication skills to clearly articulate his experience and relevance to the role. Additionally, he should focus on understanding the specific industry requirements and how his skills can be applied to meet those needs.','16. - **mutual funds**:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Gagan did not demonstrate knowledge or experience in the mutual funds domain. He should research the industry and provide relevant examples from his experience.\n\n17. - **user stories**:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Gagan did not discuss his experience with user stories. He should highlight any relevant experience in gathering and analyzing user requirements.\n\n18. - **product owner**:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Gagan did not mention any experience as a product owner. He should discuss any relevant experience in managing product development and stakeholder communication.\n\n19. - **us retirement solution**:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Gagan did not demonstrate knowledge or experience in US retirement solutions. He should research this area and discuss any relevant experience.\n\n20. - **business analysis**:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Gagan did not demonstrate business analysis skills relevant to the role. He should discuss his experience in analyzing business processes and requirements.','21. - **agile scrum**:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Gagan did not discuss his experience with Agile Scrum methodologies. He should highlight any relevant experience in managing Agile projects.\n\n22. - **sprint management**:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Gagan did not mention any experience in sprint management. He should discuss his experience in planning and managing sprints in Agile environments.\n\n23. - **agile scrum methodologies**:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Gagan did not demonstrate knowledge of Agile Scrum methodologies. He should discuss his experience in facilitating Scrum ceremonies and managing Scrum artifacts.\n\n24. - **stakeholder communication**:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Gagan did not demonstrate effective stakeholder communication skills. He should discuss his experience in presenting complex information to stakeholders.\n\n25. - **market trend analysis**:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Gagan did not demonstrate experience in market trend analysis. He should discuss his experience in analyzing market trends and informing strategic decisions.','2025-01-05 07:53:04'),(75,179,138,580,151,'Gagan\'s responses indicate a strong technical background, particularly in AI and data engineering, but lack alignment with the specific requirements of the Business Analyst role in the retail domain. His communication is clear, but responses often lack depth in business analysis and retail-specific knowledge. While he shows potential in technical problem-solving, his responses suggest limited experience in key areas like requirements gathering and process mapping, which are critical for the role.','Gagan exhibits strong technical expertise, particularly in AI and data engineering. His experience with generative AI and data management is evident and suggests a strong analytical mindset. He communicates clearly and confidently, which is a valuable asset in stakeholder interactions.','Gagan\'s responses lack depth in business analysis, particularly in requirements gathering and process mapping. His experience seems more aligned with technical roles than the strategic business analysis required in the retail domain. To improve, Gagan should focus on gaining experience in business process analysis and retail-specific challenges.','16. - **requirements gathering**:\nScore: 3\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Gagan\'s responses lack depth in requirements gathering. He could improve by discussing specific techniques and experiences in gathering business requirements.\n\n17. - **process mapping**:\nScore: 3\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Gagan shows limited experience in process mapping. He could enhance his responses by discussing specific process mapping projects and methodologies.\n\n18. - **product owner**:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Gagan\'s experience as a product owner is not evident in his responses. He should focus on discussing his involvement in product development and management.\n\n19. - **product owner skills**:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Gagan\'s responses lack evidence of product owner skills. He could improve by discussing his experience in managing product backlogs and stakeholder communication.\n\n20. - **retail domain knowledge**:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Gagan\'s responses lack retail domain knowledge. He should focus on gaining experience in retail-specific challenges and processes.','21. - **use case**:\nScore: 3\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Gagan\'s responses lack depth in use case development. He could improve by discussing specific use cases he has developed and their impact on business processes.\n\n22. - **use case development**:\nScore: 3\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Gagan shows limited experience in use case development. He should focus on discussing specific projects where he has developed use cases.\n\n23. - **prototyping and wireframing**:\nScore: 3\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Gagan\'s responses lack evidence of prototyping and wireframing experience. He could improve by discussing specific tools and projects he has worked on.\n\n24. - **continuous improvement frameworks**:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Gagan shows limited experience in continuous improvement frameworks. He should focus on discussing specific methodologies and their impact on business processes.\n\n25. - **customer journey mapping**:\nScore: 3\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Gagan\'s responses lack depth in customer journey mapping. He could improve by discussing specific projects and methodologies he has used in this area.','2025-01-05 07:59:50'),(76,189,4,582,159,'Varun\'s performance in the interview was below expectations for the business analyst role in the retail domain. While he demonstrated some basic understanding of the position, his responses lacked depth and specificity, particularly in areas critical to the job description. His communication was clear but lacked engagement and relevance to the questions asked. Varun needs to improve his domain knowledge and problem-solving skills to be considered a strong candidate for this role.','Varun\'s communication was clear, and he showed a willingness to engage in the conversation. He was polite and concise in his responses, which is a positive trait for a business analyst role where clear communication is essential.','Varun\'s responses lacked relevance and depth, particularly in addressing industry-specific questions. He needs to improve his knowledge of the retail domain and demonstrate a better understanding of business analysis processes. Varun should focus on providing more detailed and relevant examples from his experience to align with the job requirements.','16. - requirements gathering:\nScore: 3\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not demonstrate strong requirements gathering skills. He should provide examples of how he has gathered and analyzed requirements in past roles.\n\n17. - process mapping:\nScore: 3\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun\'s knowledge of process mapping was not evident. He should discuss his experience with As-Is and To-Be process mapping.\n\n18. - product owner:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not showcase product owner skills. He should highlight any relevant experience in backlog management or user story creation.\n\n19. - product owner skills:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Similar to the previous parameter, Varun needs to demonstrate his skills in product ownership more effectively.\n\n20. - retail domain knowledge:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun\'s knowledge of the retail domain was lacking. He should research and discuss industry-specific requirements and trends.','21. - use case:\nScore: 3\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not provide examples of use case development. He should discuss his experience in creating and analyzing use cases.\n\n22. - use case development:\nScore: 3\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun needs to demonstrate his ability to develop use cases effectively. He should provide examples from his past experience.\n\n23. - prototyping and wireframing:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not discuss his experience with prototyping tools. He should highlight any familiarity with tools like Figma or Balsamiq.\n\n24. - continuous improvement frameworks:\nScore: 3\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun\'s knowledge of continuous improvement frameworks was not evident. He should discuss his experience with Lean or Six Sigma.\n\n25. - customer journey mapping:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not demonstrate knowledge of customer journey mapping. He should provide examples of how he has mapped customer journeys in the past.','2025-01-09 06:18:56'),(77,191,144,597,168,'Tanmay\'s interview responses indicate a lack of engagement and insufficient alignment with the job requirements. His responses were either missing or irrelevant, showing a need for improvement in communication and technical skills. Without clear examples or detailed explanations, it is challenging to assess his fit for the role. Based on the responses, I would not recommend selection at this time.','Tanmay\'s resume indicates a solid educational background and relevant internships, suggesting potential in data analysis and visualization. His experience with Power BI and SQL, as highlighted in his resume, aligns with the job requirements, indicating a foundational understanding of data tools.','Tanmay\'s responses lacked clarity and relevance, failing to demonstrate his knowledge and skills effectively. He needs to improve his communication skills, provide specific examples, and articulate his experience better. Practicing common interview questions and preparing detailed responses could enhance his performance.','16. - python:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Tanmay did not demonstrate his Python skills in the interview. He should provide examples of how he has used Python in data analysis or engineering tasks.\n\n17. - mysql:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Tanmay did not discuss his experience with MySQL. He should describe projects where he used MySQL for data management or analysis.\n\n18. - power bi (business intelligence):\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Tanmay did not highlight his Power BI experience. He should provide examples of dashboards or reports he has created using Power BI.\n\n19. - excel:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Tanmay did not mention his Excel skills. He should discuss how he has used Excel for data analysis or reporting.\n\n20. - python programming:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Tanmay did not demonstrate Python programming skills. He should provide examples of scripts or automation tasks he has completed using Python.','21. - excel for data analysis:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Tanmay did not discuss his use of Excel for data analysis. He should highlight specific functions or analyses he has performed using Excel.\n\n22. - communication and collaboration:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Tanmay did not demonstrate communication and collaboration skills. He should provide examples of teamwork or communication in previous roles.\n\n23. - problem-solving:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Tanmay did not showcase problem-solving skills. He should describe challenges he has faced and how he resolved them.\n\n24. - documentation and workflow design:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Tanmay did not discuss documentation or workflow design. He should provide examples of how he has documented processes or designed workflows.\n\n25. null:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Tanmay\'s responses were not relevant to any specific skill or competency. He should focus on providing relevant examples and demonstrating his skills effectively.','2025-01-09 06:44:58'),(78,194,144,598,169,'Tanmay\'s interview responses lacked clarity and relevance to the job description for a Jr Data Engineer. His responses were often off-topic, focusing on marketing rather than data engineering. While he demonstrated some understanding of data analytics, his responses did not align with the technical requirements of the role. Improvement is needed in communication, problem-solving, and technical skills to match the job requirements. Based on this evaluation, Tanmay is not recommended for selection.','Tanmay showed some understanding of data analytics, particularly in optimizing marketing campaigns using data-driven insights. His ability to identify key metrics and adapt strategies based on data is a positive aspect. However, these strengths were not aligned with the data engineering role.','Tanmay\'s responses were often irrelevant to the job role, focusing on marketing rather than data engineering. His communication lacked clarity, and he frequently used filler words. Technical skills in Python, MySQL, and Power BI were not demonstrated. To improve, Tanmay should focus on aligning his responses with the job description and enhancing his technical skills relevant to data engineering.','16. - **python**:\nScore: 3\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Tanmay did not demonstrate his Python skills during the interview. He should discuss specific projects or tasks involving Python.\n\n17. - **mysql**:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Tanmay did not mention MySQL or demonstrate knowledge of database management. He should focus on discussing his experience with SQL.\n\n18. - **power bi (business intelligence)**:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Tanmay did not discuss Power BI or data visualization. He should highlight any experience with creating dashboards or visualizations.\n\n19. - **excel**:\nScore: 3\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Tanmay did not mention Excel skills, which are important for data validation and analysis. He should discuss his proficiency with Excel functions.\n\n20. - **python programming**:\nScore: 3\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Tanmay did not demonstrate Python programming skills. He should provide examples of projects or tasks involving Python coding.','21. - **excel (advanced functions)**:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Tanmay did not discuss advanced Excel functions. He should highlight his experience with data cleaning and analysis using Excel.\n\n22. - **data validation**:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Tanmay did not discuss data validation, which is crucial for ensuring data accuracy. He should focus on his experience with data validation techniques.\n\n23. - **dashboard creation**:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Tanmay did not mention dashboard creation. He should discuss any experience with creating visualizations or dashboards.\n\n24. - **problem-solving**:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: Tanmay mentioned using data analytics for optimization but did not provide specific examples of problem-solving in data engineering.\n\n25. null:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Not relevant\nDescription: No relevant response provided.','2025-01-09 07:10:20'),(79,212,144,601,172,'Tanmay\'s interview performance demonstrated a mix of strengths and areas for improvement. His technical skills and experience in data-related roles are evident, but his responses lacked clarity and depth in some areas. His communication style was polite but could benefit from more precision and engagement. Overall, Tanmay shows potential but needs to refine his communication and problem-solving skills for better alignment with the job role.','Tanmay\'s strengths include his technical background and experience with data analysis and machine learning, as seen in his responses about optimizing marketing campaigns and conducting market research. His familiarity with Python and SQL is evident, aligning well with the job requirements. His polite communication style is also a positive aspect.','Tanmay\'s weaknesses lie in his clarity of communication and depth of knowledge. His responses often lacked detail and specificity, which could be improved by providing more concrete examples and elaborating on his thought process. Additionally, his adaptability and creativity in problem-solving scenarios need enhancement to better meet the job\'s demands.','16. - **python**:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Tanmay\'s knowledge of Python was evident, but he could provide more specific examples of its application in his work.\n\n17. - **mysql**:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: His understanding of MySQL was adequate, but he should elaborate on his experience with database management.\n\n18. - **power bi (business intelligence)**:\nScore: 5\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: Tanmay\'s experience with Power BI was not clearly demonstrated. He should provide examples of his work with data visualization.\n\n19. - **excel**:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: His Excel skills were mentioned but not detailed. He could enhance this by discussing specific functions and tasks he\'s performed.\n\n20. - **python programming**:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Tanmay\'s Python programming skills were evident, but he should provide more detailed examples of projects he\'s worked on.','21. - **excel proficiency**:\nScore: 5\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: His proficiency in Excel was not fully demonstrated. He should discuss specific tasks and functions he\'s used.\n\n22. - **data validation**:\nScore: 5\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: Tanmay\'s experience with data validation was not clearly articulated. He should provide examples of how he\'s ensured data accuracy.\n\n23. - **basic database schema design**:\nScore: 5\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: His understanding of database schema design was not fully demonstrated. He should discuss his experience with designing and managing databases.\n\n24. - **communication skills**:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: Tanmay\'s communication skills were adequate, but he could improve by being more precise and engaging in his responses.\n\n25. null:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Not relevant\nDescription: This parameter is not applicable to the interview conversation provided.','2025-01-09 10:18:09'),(80,213,144,604,173,'Tanmay\'s interview responses lacked clarity and relevance to the questions asked. His responses did not demonstrate the expected level of knowledge or experience for the role of Jr Data Engineer. There was a significant gap between his answers and the benchmark responses, indicating a need for improvement in communication and technical skills. Based on the evaluation, Tanmay is not recommended for selection at this time.','Tanmay\'s resume indicates a strong educational background and relevant coursework in AI and ML, which suggests potential for growth in data engineering roles. His internship experiences demonstrate exposure to machine learning and data analysis projects, which could be valuable if better articulated in interviews.','Tanmay\'s responses were not aligned with the questions, showing a lack of preparation or understanding of the interview context. He needs to improve his communication skills, particularly in articulating his experiences and knowledge relevant to the job role. Practicing common interview questions and aligning responses with job requirements could help address these weaknesses.','16. - **python**:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Tanmay did not demonstrate his Python skills effectively. He should discuss specific projects or tasks where he used Python.\n\n17. - **mysql**:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: There was no mention of MySQL skills. Tanmay should highlight his experience with SQL and database management.\n\n18. - **power bi (business intelligence)**:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Tanmay did not discuss Power BI skills. He should provide examples of creating dashboards or visualizations.\n\n19. - **excel**:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Excel skills were not mentioned. Tanmay should discuss his proficiency in Excel and relevant tasks.\n\n20. - **python programming**:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Python programming skills were not effectively demonstrated. Tanmay should describe projects involving Python.','21. - **excel proficiency**:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Excel proficiency was not evident. Tanmay should discuss tasks involving data cleaning or analysis in Excel.\n\n22. - **data analysis**:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Data analysis skills were not demonstrated. Tanmay should provide examples of data analysis projects.\n\n23. - **communication skills**:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Communication skills were lacking. Tanmay should practice delivering clear and relevant responses.\n\n24. - **problem-solving**:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Problem-solving skills were not demonstrated. Tanmay should discuss specific instances where he solved problems effectively.\n\n25. null:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: The responses did not provide enough content to evaluate this parameter. Tanmay should focus on providing relevant and coherent answers.','2025-01-09 10:32:43'),(81,220,144,605,174,'Tanmay\'s responses lacked clarity and relevance to the job description of a Jr Data Engineer. His answers were either missing or unrelated to the questions asked, indicating a mismatch in understanding the role\'s requirements. The interview demonstrated a need for improvement in communication and technical skills pertinent to data engineering.','Tanmay\'s resume indicates a strong background in software development and proficiency in Python and MySQL, which are relevant to the Jr Data Engineer role. His experience with data integration and analytics tools like Celonis shows potential for data-driven decision-making.','Tanmay\'s responses during the interview were not aligned with the job role, focusing on marketing rather than data engineering. He needs to improve his communication skills and ensure his answers are relevant to the questions asked. Additionally, he should focus on enhancing his understanding of data engineering concepts and tools.','16. - **python**:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: Tanmay\'s resume indicates proficiency in Python, but he did not demonstrate this during the interview. He should discuss specific Python projects and skills relevant to data engineering.\n\n17. - **mysql**:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: Tanmay\'s resume shows experience with MySQL, but he did not highlight this in the interview. He should discuss his SQL skills and experience with database management.\n\n18. - **power bi (business intelligence)**:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Tanmay did not mention Power BI or related skills during the interview. He should focus on discussing his experience with data visualization tools.\n\n19. - **excel**:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Tanmay did not discuss Excel skills during the interview. He should highlight his experience with data analysis and visualization using Excel.\n\n20. - **python programming**:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: Tanmay\'s resume indicates Python programming skills, but he did not demonstrate this in the interview. He should discuss specific programming projects and techniques.','21. - **excel for data analysis**:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Tanmay did not mention Excel for data analysis during the interview. He should focus on discussing his experience with data manipulation and analysis using Excel.\n\n22. - **basic database schema design**:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Tanmay did not discuss database schema design during the interview. He should highlight his understanding of database structures and design principles.\n\n23. - **dax basics**:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Tanmay did not mention DAX or related skills during the interview. He should focus on discussing his experience with data analysis expressions and Power BI.\n\n24. - **problem-solving skills**:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Tanmay did not demonstrate problem-solving skills relevant to data engineering. He should discuss specific challenges and solutions he has implemented in his work.\n\n25. null:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Tanmay did not address any null or unspecified skills during the interview. He should focus on discussing relevant skills and experiences that align with the job description.','2025-01-09 11:39:20'),(82,219,144,606,174,'Tanmay\'s interview responses lacked depth and relevance to the job role of a Jr Data Engineer. His responses were not aligned with the job description, focusing more on marketing strategies rather than data engineering skills. The lack of specific examples related to data engineering tasks, tools, and problem-solving in the field was evident. His communication was clear but lacked engagement and adaptability to the interview context. Overall, Tanmay\'s responses suggest a mismatch with the job requirements, and he may not be the best fit for this role.','Tanmay demonstrated clear communication skills, which is essential for articulating technical concepts to non-technical stakeholders. His ability to convey thoughts succinctly was evident in his responses, even though they were not aligned with the job role.','Tanmay\'s responses were not relevant to the data engineering position. He focused on marketing strategies, which indicates a lack of understanding of the job requirements. He needs to improve his ability to tailor responses to the specific role and demonstrate relevant technical skills and knowledge in data engineering.','16. - **python**:\nScore: 3\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Tanmay did not discuss Python skills relevant to data engineering. He should have mentioned data manipulation libraries like Pandas.\n\n17. - **mysql**:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Tanmay did not demonstrate knowledge of MySQL. He should have discussed SQL queries or database design.\n\n18. - **power bi (business intelligence)**:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Tanmay did not mention Power BI skills. He should have discussed creating dashboards or data visualizations.\n\n19. - **excel**:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Tanmay did not discuss Excel skills relevant to data analysis. He should have mentioned data cleaning or pivot tables.\n\n20. - **python programming**:\nScore: 3\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Tanmay did not highlight Python programming skills. He should have discussed writing reusable code or using Jupyter Notebook.','21. - **excel for data analysis**:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Tanmay did not demonstrate Excel skills for data analysis. He should have discussed using formulas or data validation.\n\n22. - **basic database schema design**:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Tanmay did not discuss database schema design. He should have mentioned designing or optimizing schemas.\n\n23. - **dax basics**:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Tanmay did not mention DAX basics. He should have discussed using DAX for data transformation in Power BI.\n\n24. - **problem-solving skills**:\nScore: 3\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Tanmay did not demonstrate problem-solving skills in data engineering. He should have discussed addressing data-related challenges.\n\n25. null:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Not relevant\nDescription: This parameter is not applicable as there was no response related to it.','2025-01-09 11:42:59'),(83,221,144,608,175,'Tanmay\'s performance in the interview was below expectations. His responses lacked clarity, depth, and relevance to the questions asked. He struggled to articulate his thoughts and often provided incomplete or irrelevant answers. His communication style was not engaging, and he frequently used filler words. There was a noticeable lack of problem-solving skills and creativity in his responses. Overall, Tanmay needs significant improvement in several areas to be considered for the role.','Tanmay demonstrated a basic understanding of the importance of market research and data analytics in marketing campaigns. His response to the question about differentiating a motorcycle brand showed some awareness of the need for unique selling propositions and consistent brand messaging.','Tanmay\'s responses were often incomplete and lacked depth. He struggled with clarity of communication and frequently used filler words. His problem-solving skills and creativity were not evident in his responses. To improve, Tanmay should focus on providing more detailed and relevant answers, enhancing his communication skills, and developing a more structured approach to problem-solving.','16. - **python**:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: Tanmay\'s knowledge of Python was not evident in the interview. He should work on demonstrating his technical skills more effectively.\n\n17. - **mysql**:\nScore: 3\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Tanmay did not demonstrate knowledge of MySQL in the interview. He should work on showcasing his database skills more effectively.\n\n18. - **power bi (business intelligence)**:\nScore: 3\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Tanmay did not demonstrate knowledge of Power BI in the interview. He should work on showcasing his data visualization skills more effectively.\n\n19. - **excel**:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: Tanmay\'s knowledge of Excel was not evident in the interview. He should work on demonstrating his data analysis skills more effectively.\n\n20. - **python programming**:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: Tanmay\'s Python programming skills were not evident in the interview. He should work on showcasing his technical skills more effectively.','21. - **excel for data analysis**:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: Tanmay\'s Excel data analysis skills were not evident in the interview. He should work on demonstrating his data analysis skills more effectively.\n\n22. - **jupyter notebook**:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: Tanmay\'s knowledge of Jupyter Notebook was not evident in the interview. He should work on showcasing his technical skills more effectively.\n\n23. - **dax basics**:\nScore: 3\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Tanmay did not demonstrate knowledge of DAX basics in the interview. He should work on showcasing his data analysis skills more effectively.\n\n24. - **problem-solving skills**:\nScore: 3\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Tanmay\'s problem-solving skills were not evident in the interview. He should work on developing a more structured approach to problem-solving.\n\n25. null:\nScore: 3\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Tanmay\'s responses were often incomplete and lacked depth. He should work on providing more detailed and relevant answers to questions.','2025-01-09 11:53:42'),(84,222,144,610,176,'Tanmay\'s interview performance was below expectations for the role of Jr Data Engineer. His responses lacked clarity, relevance, and depth of knowledge, which are crucial for the position. His communication style and articulation were not up to the mark, and there were significant issues with grammar, filler words, and word repetition. While he showed some understanding of Python and MySQL, his overall engagement and adaptability were lacking. Based on this evaluation, I would not recommend Tanmay for the position.','Tanmay demonstrated some basic understanding of Python and MySQL, which are relevant to the job role. His resume indicates experience with machine learning projects, which could be beneficial if he improves his communication and problem-solving skills.','Tanmay needs significant improvement in communication, particularly in clarity, grammar, and articulation. His responses were often irrelevant or off-topic, indicating a lack of understanding of the questions. He should focus on improving his problem-solving skills and adaptability to better align with the job requirements.','16. - **python**:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: Tanmay showed some basic understanding of Python, but his responses lacked depth and practical application relevant to the job role.\n\n17. - **mysql**:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: Tanmay demonstrated basic knowledge of MySQL, but he did not provide detailed examples of his experience or skills.\n\n18. - **power bi (business intelligence)**:\nScore: 3\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Tanmay did not demonstrate knowledge or experience with Power BI, which is a key skill for the role.\n\n19. - **excel**:\nScore: 3\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Tanmay did not showcase proficiency in Excel, a necessary skill for data manipulation and analysis.\n\n20. - **python programming**:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: While Tanmay has some experience with Python programming, his responses did not reflect a strong understanding of its application in data engineering.','21. - **excel proficiency**:\nScore: 3\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Tanmay did not demonstrate proficiency in Excel, which is important for data cleaning and visualization tasks.\n\n22. - **problem-solving**:\nScore: 3\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Tanmay\'s problem-solving skills were not evident in his responses, which lacked depth and practical solutions.\n\n23. - **communication skills**:\nScore: 3\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Tanmay\'s communication skills were poor, with issues in clarity, grammar, and articulation affecting his ability to convey ideas effectively.\n\n24. - **documentation and workflow design**:\nScore: 3\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Tanmay did not demonstrate experience or understanding of documentation and workflow design, which are important for the role.\n\n25. null:\nScore: 3\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Tanmay\'s overall performance was below expectations, with significant areas for improvement needed to meet the job requirements.','2025-01-09 11:54:35'),(85,223,144,609,176,'Tanmay\'s interview performance was lacking in several areas, particularly in communication and relevance of responses. His responses were not aligned with the job role of Jr Data Engineer, as he seemed to focus on a different role. His technical skills, particularly in Python and MySQL, were not adequately demonstrated. Overall, Tanmay needs significant improvement to be considered for the role.','Tanmay has a strong background in IT with extensive experience in open-source software development and proficiency in Python and MySQL, as indicated in his resume. His experience with various projects and technologies could be beneficial if aligned with the job role.','Tanmay\'s communication was unclear, and his responses were not relevant to the questions asked, indicating a lack of understanding of the job role. He should focus on improving his communication skills and aligning his responses with the job description. Additionally, showcasing his technical skills more effectively during interviews could improve his candidacy.','16. - **python**:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Tanmay did not demonstrate his Python skills during the interview. He should provide examples of his experience with Python in future interviews.\n\n17. - **mysql**:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Tanmay did not demonstrate his MySQL skills during the interview. He should discuss his experience with MySQL and relevant projects.\n\n18. - **power bi (business intelligence)**:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Tanmay did not demonstrate knowledge of Power BI during the interview. He should discuss his experience with data visualization tools.\n\n19. - **excel**:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Tanmay did not demonstrate Excel proficiency during the interview. He should discuss his experience with Excel and relevant skills.\n\n20. - **python programming**:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Tanmay did not demonstrate Python programming skills during the interview. He should provide examples of his programming experience.','21. - **excel proficiency**:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Tanmay did not demonstrate Excel proficiency during the interview. He should discuss his experience with Excel and relevant skills.\n\n22. - **problem-solving**:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Tanmay did not demonstrate problem-solving skills during the interview. He should provide examples of how he addressed challenges in previous roles.\n\n23. - **communication skills**:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Tanmay\'s communication skills were lacking, as he did not engage in meaningful dialogue. He should work on being more articulate and responsive.\n\n24. - **documentation and workflow design**:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Tanmay did not demonstrate documentation and workflow design skills during the interview. He should discuss his experience with these tasks.\n\n25. null:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Tanmay did not demonstrate relevant skills or knowledge related to the job role. He should focus on aligning his responses with the job description.','2025-01-09 11:55:19'),(86,224,144,607,175,'Tanmay\'s responses lacked clarity and relevance to the questions asked, indicating a misalignment with the job role of a Jr Data Engineer. His communication was unclear, and his responses were often missing or irrelevant. There was a significant gap in demonstrating the required technical skills and problem-solving abilities for the role. Overall, Tanmay\'s performance suggests he may not be the best fit for this position at this time.','Tanmay\'s initial greeting was polite, indicating good interpersonal skills. His resume shows extensive experience in IT and open-source software development, which could be beneficial if leveraged correctly.','Tanmay\'s responses were often missing or irrelevant, indicating a lack of preparation or understanding of the role. He needs to improve his clarity of communication and ensure his responses are relevant to the questions asked. Additionally, his technical skills in Python, MySQL, and data visualization tools need to be demonstrated more effectively.','16. - **python**:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Tanmay did not demonstrate proficiency in Python during the interview. He should provide examples of his experience and skills in Python programming.\n\n17. - **mysql**:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Tanmay did not showcase his knowledge of MySQL. He should discuss his experience with SQL queries and database management.\n\n18. - **power bi (business intelligence)**:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Tanmay did not demonstrate experience with Power BI. He should provide examples of his work with data visualization tools.\n\n19. - **excel**:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Tanmay did not mention his Excel skills. He should discuss his experience with data analysis and Excel functions.\n\n20. - **python programming**:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Tanmay did not provide evidence of his Python programming skills. He should discuss projects or tasks where he utilized Python.','21. - **excel for data analysis**:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Tanmay did not demonstrate his Excel skills for data analysis. He should provide examples of how he has used Excel for data-related tasks.\n\n22. - **jupyter notebook**:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Tanmay did not mention his experience with Jupyter Notebook. He should discuss how he has used it for data analysis or visualization.\n\n23. - **dax basics**:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Tanmay did not demonstrate knowledge of DAX basics. He should provide examples of his experience with DAX in Power BI.\n\n24. - **problem-solving skills**:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Tanmay did not showcase problem-solving skills. He should provide examples of how he has addressed challenges in past roles.\n\n25. null:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Tanmay\'s responses were often incomplete or irrelevant, indicating a need for better preparation and understanding of the role.','2025-01-09 14:27:42'),(87,230,4,600,171,'Varun\'s interview performance was below expectations, with several areas needing improvement. His responses lacked clarity and relevance, and he did not demonstrate a strong grasp of the subject matter. Varun\'s communication style was inconsistent, and he frequently used filler words, which detracted from his overall presentation. While he showed some understanding of the retail domain, his responses were not sufficiently aligned with the job requirements. Based on this assessment, Varun is not recommended for selection.','Varun demonstrated some understanding of the retail domain, which is relevant to the Business Analyst role. His response to the question about differentiating a motorcycle brand showed an awareness of the importance of a unique value proposition and consistent brand messaging.','Varun\'s responses lacked clarity and relevance, often deviating from the benchmark. His communication style was inconsistent, with frequent use of filler words and word repetition. Varun needs to improve his articulation and grammar to convey ideas more effectively. Additionally, he should focus on aligning his responses with the job requirements and demonstrating a deeper understanding of the subject matter.','16. - **Requirements Gathering**:\nScore: 3\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun\'s responses did not demonstrate strong requirements gathering skills. He should work on providing more detailed examples of his experience in this area.\n\n17. - **Process Mapping**:\nScore: 3\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun\'s responses lacked detail on process mapping. He should work on showcasing his experience and knowledge in this area more effectively.\n\n18. - **Product Owner**:\nScore: 3\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun\'s responses did not demonstrate strong product owner skills. He should work on providing more detailed examples of his experience in this area.\n\n19. - **Product Owner Skills**:\nScore: 3\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun\'s responses lacked detail on product owner skills. He should work on showcasing his experience and knowledge in this area more effectively.\n\n20. - **Retail Domain Knowledge**:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: Varun demonstrated some understanding of the retail domain, but his responses lacked depth. He should work on providing more detailed insights into his knowledge of the industry.','21. - **Use Case**:\nScore: 3\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun\'s responses did not demonstrate strong use case development skills. He should work on providing more detailed examples of his experience in this area.\n\n22. - **Use Case Development**:\nScore: 3\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun\'s responses lacked detail on use case development. He should work on showcasing his experience and knowledge in this area more effectively.\n\n23. - **Prototyping and Wireframing**:\nScore: 3\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun\'s responses did not demonstrate strong prototyping and wireframing skills. He should work on providing more detailed examples of his experience in this area.\n\n24. - **Continuous Improvement Frameworks**:\nScore: 3\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun\'s responses lacked detail on continuous improvement frameworks. He should work on showcasing his experience and knowledge in this area more effectively.\n\n25. - **Customer Journey Mapping**:\nScore: 3\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun\'s responses did not demonstrate strong customer journey mapping skills. He should work on providing more detailed examples of his experience in this area.','2025-01-10 07:27:44'),(88,231,144,614,179,'Tanmay demonstrated a basic understanding of data analysis tools and programming languages, but his responses lacked depth and specificity. His communication was clear but could benefit from more detailed examples and less reliance on filler words. He showed enthusiasm for learning new technologies but needs to improve his problem-solving skills and adaptability to unexpected questions. Overall, Tanmay has potential but requires further development in technical and soft skills to meet the job requirements effectively.','Tanmay has a solid foundation in Python and SQL, which are crucial for the role. His familiarity with data visualization tools like Matplotlib and Seaborn is a plus. He shows a proactive attitude towards learning new technologies, which aligns with the job\'s requirements for growth and adaptability. His communication is generally clear, and he expresses a willingness to contribute to data-driven decision-making processes.','Tanmay\'s responses often lacked depth and specificity, particularly in problem-solving and adaptability. He struggled to provide concrete examples of past experiences, which could have demonstrated his skills more effectively. His use of filler words and occasional repetition detracted from the clarity of his communication. To improve, Tanmay should focus on providing detailed examples from his experiences and work on reducing filler words to enhance his communication skills.','16. - **python**:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: Tanmay demonstrated a basic understanding of Python but lacked depth in his responses. He should work on providing more detailed examples of his Python skills.\n\n17. - **mysql**:\nScore: 5\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: Tanmay\'s knowledge of MySQL was basic, and he didn\'t provide specific examples. He should work on demonstrating his SQL skills more effectively.\n\n18. - **power bi (business intelligence)**:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Tanmay\'s experience with Power BI was not well demonstrated. He should work on gaining more experience and providing specific examples of using Power BI.\n\n19. - **excel**:\nScore: 5\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: Tanmay\'s Excel skills were mentioned but not demonstrated in detail. He should work on providing specific examples of his Excel proficiency.\n\n20. - **python programming**:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: Tanmay demonstrated basic Python programming skills but lacked depth. He should work on providing more detailed examples of his programming experience.','21. - **excel proficiency**:\nScore: 5\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: Tanmay\'s Excel proficiency was mentioned but not demonstrated in detail. He should work on providing specific examples of his Excel skills.\n\n22. - **data pipeline development**:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Tanmay\'s experience with data pipeline development was not well demonstrated. He should work on gaining more experience and providing specific examples.\n\n23. - **communication and collaboration**:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: Tanmay\'s communication and collaboration skills were generally clear but could benefit from more engagement. He should work on demonstrating these skills more effectively.\n\n24. - **problem-solving**:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Tanmay\'s problem-solving skills were not well demonstrated. He should work on articulating his problem-solving experiences more effectively.\n\n25. null:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Not relevant\nDescription: Not applicable.','2025-01-10 07:28:55'),(89,232,144,617,179,'Tanmay\'s interview performance showed potential but lacked depth and specificity in responses. While he demonstrated some understanding of data-related concepts, his communication was often unclear and lacked the necessary detail to fully convey his skills and experience. His responses were sometimes vague, and he missed opportunities to showcase his knowledge effectively. Overall, Tanmay needs to improve his articulation and provide more concrete examples to strengthen his candidacy.','Tanmay showed a basic understanding of data visualization and the importance of clarity and simplicity in visual communication. His mention of using Python and SQL indicates some familiarity with essential data engineering tools, aligning with job requirements.','Tanmay\'s responses lacked depth and specificity, particularly in discussing his experience with programming languages and big data tools. He failed to provide detailed examples or context, which weakened his responses. Improving articulation and providing concrete examples would enhance his interview performance.','16. - **python**:\nScore: 5\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: Tanmay mentioned using Python but did not provide specific examples of its application. He should discuss projects or tasks where he effectively used Python to demonstrate proficiency.\n\n17. - **mysql**:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Tanmay did not mention MySQL in his responses. He should discuss his experience with SQL queries and database management to align with job requirements.\n\n18. - **power bi (business intelligence)**:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Tanmay did not mention Power BI or provide examples of data visualization. He should discuss his experience with creating dashboards and visualizations to demonstrate this skill.\n\n19. - **excel**:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Tanmay did not mention Excel or provide examples of its use. He should discuss his experience with data cleaning and analysis using Excel to align with job requirements.\n\n20. - **python programming**:\nScore: 5\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: Tanmay mentioned using Python but did not provide specific examples of programming tasks. He should discuss projects or tasks where he effectively used Python programming.','21. - **excel proficiency**:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Tanmay did not mention Excel proficiency. He should discuss his experience with Excel functions and data analysis to demonstrate this skill.\n\n22. - **data pipeline development**:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Tanmay did not mention data pipeline development. He should discuss his experience with designing and maintaining data pipelines to align with job requirements.\n\n23. - **communication and collaboration**:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Tanmay\'s communication and collaboration skills were lacking. He should provide examples of working with cross-functional teams and effectively communicating technical concepts.\n\n24. - **problem-solving**:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Tanmay did not effectively demonstrate problem-solving skills. He should provide examples of addressing data-related challenges and finding solutions.\n\n25. ### Notes:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Tanmay\'s responses were often vague and lacked detail. He should focus on providing specific examples and context to strengthen his interview performance.','2025-01-10 07:32:49'),(90,234,144,614,179,'Tanmay\'s performance in the interview was mixed. He demonstrated a basic understanding of relevant tools and concepts but lacked depth in certain areas. His communication was clear, but responses often lacked detail and specific examples. There is potential for growth, especially with more experience in data engineering tools and problem-solving scenarios. Given the entry-level nature of the role, Tanmay shows promise but would benefit from further development in technical skills and practical application.','Tanmay showed a good foundational understanding of Python and its libraries, which is crucial for the role. His ability to articulate the use of Python for data analysis and automation was clear. He also demonstrated a structured approach to visualization, considering purpose and audience, which aligns well with the job requirements.','Tanmay\'s responses lacked depth, particularly regarding big data tools and handling tight deadlines. He needs to provide more detailed examples and demonstrate a stronger grasp of data engineering concepts. Improving his familiarity with tools like Hadoop and Spark and gaining practical experience would enhance his suitability for the role.','16. - **python**:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Tanmay demonstrated a good understanding of Python, though more detailed examples of its application would strengthen his responses.\n\n17. - **mysql**:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Limited mention of MySQL. Providing examples of query writing or database management would improve his assessment.\n\n18. - **power bi (business intelligence)**:\nScore: 5\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: Basic understanding of Power BI was evident. More examples of dashboard creation or data visualization would be beneficial.\n\n19. - **excel**:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: Tanmay mentioned Excel but lacked detailed examples. Demonstrating specific functions or data analysis tasks would enhance his response.\n\n20. - **python programming**:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: His understanding of Python programming was solid, though more complex examples would showcase advanced proficiency.','21. - **excel proficiency**:\nScore: 5\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: Basic proficiency was indicated. Providing examples of data manipulation or analysis tasks would improve his assessment.\n\n22. - **data pipeline development**:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Limited mention of data pipeline development. Discussing specific projects or tasks would demonstrate relevant experience.\n\n23. - **communication and collaboration**:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: Communication was clear, but collaboration examples were limited. Discussing teamwork experiences would enhance this assessment.\n\n24. - **problem-solving**:\nScore: 5\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: Problem-solving skills were not well demonstrated. Providing examples of challenges faced and solutions implemented would improve his evaluation.\n\n25. null:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Not relevant\nDescription: No relevant information provided for this parameter.','2025-01-10 07:37:34'),(91,236,144,618,180,'Tanmay\'s interview performance was lacking in several key areas, primarily due to incomplete and irrelevant responses. His communication was not clear, and his answers did not align with the job requirements or the benchmark responses. Tanmay showed potential in technical skills based on his resume, but his interview responses did not reflect this adequately. Improvement is needed in communication and providing relevant, complete answers.','Tanmay\'s resume indicates a solid educational background and some relevant project experience, such as his work on biometric voting systems and mobile phone detectors. His internships suggest exposure to practical applications, which could be beneficial if communicated effectively.','Tanmay\'s interview responses were often irrelevant or incomplete, indicating a significant gap in communication skills. He needs to improve his ability to articulate his thoughts clearly and provide relevant examples that align with the job role. Enhancing his understanding of data engineering concepts and tools would also be beneficial.','16. - **python**:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Tanmay did not provide relevant responses to assess his Python skills. He should discuss specific projects or tasks where he used Python effectively.\n\n17. - **mysql**:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Tanmay did not discuss his experience with MySQL. He should provide examples of how he has used MySQL in past projects.\n\n18. - **power bi (business intelligence)**:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Tanmay did not mention Power BI in his responses. He should discuss any experience he has with creating dashboards or visualizations.\n\n19. - **excel**:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Tanmay did not discuss his Excel skills. He should provide examples of how he has used Excel for data analysis or visualization.\n\n20. - **python programming**:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Tanmay did not provide relevant responses to assess his Python programming skills. He should discuss specific projects or tasks where he used Python effectively.','21. - **excel for data analysis**:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Tanmay did not mention using Excel for data analysis. He should provide examples of how he has used Excel for data cleaning or analysis.\n\n22. - **data validation**:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Tanmay did not discuss data validation. He should provide examples of how he has ensured data accuracy and reliability in past projects.\n\n23. - **problem-solving**:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Tanmay did not provide relevant examples of problem-solving. He should discuss challenges he has faced and how he addressed them.\n\n24. - **communication skills**:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Tanmay\'s communication skills were lacking, with responses that were often irrelevant or unclear. He should work on delivering responses in a structured and coherent manner.\n\n25. null:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Tanmay\'s responses were too brief and irrelevant to assess any additional skills or competencies. He should focus on providing complete and relevant answers.','2025-01-10 07:46:33'),(92,237,4,628,181,'Varun\'s interview responses were largely inadequate, failing to meet the expectations for the Business Analyst role. His responses were either irrelevant or missing, indicating a lack of preparation or understanding of the questions asked. There was no demonstration of relevant skills or knowledge required for the position. Varun needs to significantly improve his communication skills and provide more relevant and comprehensive answers.','Varun did not exhibit any notable strengths during the interview. His responses did not align with the job requirements or showcase any specific skills or competencies relevant to the Business Analyst role.','Varun\'s primary weaknesses were his lack of clarity in communication, irrelevance of responses, and failure to demonstrate depth of knowledge. He needs to focus on improving his English communication skills, ensuring relevance in his responses, and showcasing his expertise in business analysis and related areas.','16. - **requirements gathering**:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not demonstrate any experience or knowledge in requirements gathering. He should provide examples of past experiences in this area.\n\n17. - **process mapping**:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: There was no mention of process mapping in Varun\'s responses. He should discuss his experience with process mapping techniques.\n\n18. - **product owner**:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not mention any product owner experience. He should highlight relevant skills and experiences related to product ownership.\n\n19. - **product owner skills**:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not demonstrate any product owner skills. He should discuss his ability to manage product development and stakeholder expectations.\n\n20. - **data analysis**:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not showcase any data analysis skills. He should provide examples of how he has used data analysis in past roles.','21. - **use case**:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not mention use case development. He should discuss his experience with creating and utilizing use cases.\n\n22. - **use case development**:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not demonstrate any knowledge of use case development. He should provide examples of his work in this area.\n\n23. - **prototyping and wireframing**:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not mention prototyping or wireframing. He should discuss his experience with these tools and techniques.\n\n24. - **continuous improvement frameworks**:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not demonstrate knowledge of continuous improvement frameworks. He should highlight his experience with frameworks like Lean or Six Sigma.\n\n25. - **customer journey mapping**:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not mention customer journey mapping. He should discuss his experience with mapping customer journeys to improve user experience.','2025-01-10 07:53:36'),(93,238,144,596,166,'Tanmay\'s interview responses were largely inadequate, failing to align with the benchmark responses provided. His answers lacked clarity, relevance, and depth, making it difficult to assess his suitability for the role of Jr Data Engineer. Tanmay\'s responses did not demonstrate the necessary skills and competencies required for the position, such as problem-solving, technical expertise, and effective communication.','Tanmay\'s resume indicates a solid educational background in data analysis and statistics, with experience in internships that involved using tools like Power BI, SQL, and Python. This suggests potential strengths in technical skills and data-driven decision-making, although these were not reflected in his interview responses.','Tanmay\'s interview responses were unclear and irrelevant, lacking the necessary depth and detail. He failed to effectively communicate his experience and skills, particularly in response to questions about tools and programming languages. To improve, Tanmay should focus on providing structured, relevant answers that highlight his technical expertise and problem-solving abilities.','16. - **python**:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Tanmay did not provide any relevant information about his experience with Python. He should discuss specific projects and tasks where he used Python effectively.\n\n17. - **mysql**:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Tanmay did not mention any experience with MySQL. He should provide examples of how he has used SQL in past projects.\n\n18. - **power bi (business intelligence)**:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Tanmay did not discuss his experience with Power BI. He should highlight projects where he created dashboards or reports using Power BI.\n\n19. - **excel**:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Tanmay did not mention any experience with Excel. He should provide examples of how he has used Excel for data analysis or reporting.\n\n20. - **python programming**:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Tanmay did not provide any information about his Python programming skills. He should discuss specific tasks or projects where he used Python.','21. - **excel for data analysis**:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Tanmay did not mention any experience with Excel for data analysis. He should provide examples of how he has used Excel to analyze data.\n\n22. - **basic database schema design**:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Tanmay did not discuss any experience with database schema design. He should provide examples of how he has designed or worked with databases.\n\n23. - **dax basics**:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Tanmay did not mention any experience with DAX basics. He should provide examples of how he has used DAX in Power BI.\n\n24. - **problem-solving skills**:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Tanmay did not demonstrate any problem-solving skills in his responses. He should provide examples of challenges he has overcome in past projects.\n\n25. null:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Tanmay did not provide any relevant information for this parameter. He should focus on delivering clear and relevant responses to all questions.','2025-01-10 08:50:15'),(94,239,144,611,177,'Tanmay\'s responses lacked depth and relevance to the job role of Jr Data Engineer. His communication was clear but did not align with the technical requirements of the position. There was a noticeable gap in addressing the specific skills and experiences relevant to data engineering. Tanmay needs to focus on aligning his responses with the job description and demonstrating his technical expertise more effectively.','Tanmay demonstrated clear communication and a polite tone throughout the interview. His ability to engage in conversation and maintain a positive demeanor was evident, which is crucial for collaboration and teamwork.','Tanmay\'s responses were not relevant to the job role, particularly in addressing technical skills like Python, MySQL, and data visualization tools. He needs to improve his understanding of the specific requirements of a Jr Data Engineer and tailor his responses to showcase relevant experience and skills.','16. - python:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Tanmay did not demonstrate proficiency in Python relevant to data engineering tasks. He should discuss specific projects or tasks where he used Python effectively.\n\n17. - mysql:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Tanmay did not address his experience with MySQL. He should provide examples of using SQL queries and database management in his past roles.\n\n18. - power bi (business intelligence):\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Tanmay did not discuss his experience with Power BI. He should highlight any projects involving data visualization and dashboard creation.\n\n19. - excel:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Tanmay did not mention his skills in Excel for data analysis. He should discuss his proficiency in using Excel for data cleaning and analysis.\n\n20. - python programming:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Tanmay did not demonstrate Python programming skills relevant to the role. He should provide examples of coding tasks or projects he has completed.','21. - excel for data analysis:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Tanmay did not address his use of Excel for data analysis. He should discuss specific functions or techniques he has used in Excel.\n\n22. - communication and collaboration:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: Tanmay showed good communication skills but did not emphasize collaboration in data projects. He should discuss teamwork experiences in his past roles.\n\n23. - problem-solving:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Tanmay did not demonstrate problem-solving skills relevant to data engineering. He should discuss specific challenges he has overcome using technical skills.\n\n24. - documentation and workflow design:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Tanmay did not address his experience in documentation or workflow design. He should provide examples of documenting processes or designing workflows in past projects.\n\n25. null:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Not relevant\nDescription: Tanmay did not address any additional skills or experiences relevant to the job role. He should focus on highlighting any other relevant competencies.','2025-01-10 08:53:34'),(95,243,144,619,180,'Tanmay\'s responses indicate a foundational understanding of data analysis tools, particularly Python and SQL. However, his responses lack depth in certain areas like big data tools and visualization strategies. His communication is clear but could be more engaging. Overall, Tanmay shows potential but needs to enhance his technical skills and engagement in interviews for a stronger fit for the Jr Data Engineer role.','Tanmay demonstrates a solid grasp of Python and SQL, which are crucial for data engineering roles. His familiarity with data manipulation libraries like Pandas and visualization tools like Matplotlib is evident. His clarity in explaining the use of these tools is commendable.','Tanmay\'s responses lack depth in big data tools and cloud platforms, which are increasingly important in data engineering. He should focus on gaining practical experience with tools like Hadoop and Spark. Additionally, his engagement could be improved by asking insightful questions during interviews.','16. - **python**:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Tanmay\'s knowledge of Python is solid, particularly in data manipulation and visualization. He could improve by discussing more advanced Python applications.\n\n17. - **mysql**:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: Tanmay demonstrates basic proficiency in SQL but could provide more detailed examples of complex queries or database management.\n\n18. - **power bi (business intelligence)**:\nScore: 5\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: Tanmay\'s experience with Power BI is not evident in his responses. He should focus on gaining practical experience with this tool.\n\n19. - **excel**:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: Tanmay\'s Excel skills are basic. He could improve by discussing specific data analysis tasks he\'s performed using Excel.\n\n20. - **python programming**:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Tanmay\'s Python programming skills are solid, but he could enhance his responses by discussing more complex programming tasks.','21. - **excel for data analysis**:\nScore: 5\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: Tanmay\'s use of Excel for data analysis is basic. He should provide examples of advanced Excel functions or data analysis tasks.\n\n22. - **data validation**:\nScore: 5\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: Tanmay\'s responses lack specific examples of data validation. He should discuss techniques he\'s used to ensure data accuracy.\n\n23. - **problem-solving**:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: Tanmay demonstrates basic problem-solving skills but could enhance his responses by discussing specific challenges and solutions.\n\n24. - **communication skills**:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Tanmay\'s communication skills are clear and polite, but he could improve by making his responses more engaging and dynamic.\n\n25. null:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Not relevant\nDescription: This parameter is not applicable based on the provided responses.','2025-01-10 14:20:33'),(96,252,4,632,183,'Gagan\'s interview responses reveal a solid foundation in digital commerce and consulting, but there is a noticeable lack of specific examples and depth in retail-specific IT projects. While Gagan demonstrates strong leadership and strategic planning skills, the responses often lack the detail and specificity expected for a Business Analyst role focused on the retail domain. Gagan\'s experience in eCommerce and digital transformation is evident, but the interview responses could benefit from more targeted examples and deeper insights into retail-specific challenges and solutions. Recommendation','Gagan has demonstrated strong leadership and strategic planning skills, particularly in digital commerce and consulting. His experience in managing large teams and projects is evident, as seen in his response about leading a consulting practice and developing frameworks for eCommerce landscape maturity assessment. Gagan\'s ability to drive strategic initiatives and optimize processes is a notable strength.','Gagan\'s responses lack depth and specificity in retail-specific IT projects, which is crucial for the Business Analyst role. For example, his response to process mapping was vague and lacked a clear methodology. Additionally, his response to the question about acting as a Product Owner in an Agile environment was not provided, indicating a potential gap in experience or understanding. Gagan could improve by providing more detailed examples and insights into retail-specific challenges and solutions.','16. - requirements gathering:  \nScore: 3  \n\n17. - process mapping:  \nScore: 3  \n\n18. - product owner:  \nScore: 3  \n\n19. - product owner skills:  \nScore: 3  \n\n20. - retail domain knowledge:  \nScore: 3  ','21. - use case:  \nScore: 3  \n\n22. - use case development:  \nScore: 3  \n\n23. - prototyping and wireframing:  \nScore: 3  \n\n24. - continuous improvement frameworks:  \nScore: 3  \n\n25. - customer journey mapping:  \nScore: 3','2025-01-22 11:50:29'),(97,253,4,633,184,'Gagan\'s responses lacked depth and clarity, often failing to align with the benchmark responses. His communication was often brief and lacked the necessary detail expected for a Business Analyst role in the retail domain. While he has extensive experience in digital commerce, his responses did not effectively showcase his knowledge or adaptability to the specific requirements of the role. Overall, Gagan\'s performance in the interview suggests he may not be the best fit for this position.','Gagan demonstrated a willingness to engage in the interview process, as seen in his initial response expressing excitement about the opportunity. This eagerness is a positive trait for any candidate.','Gagan\'s responses frequently lacked depth and relevance, such as his brief answer to the question about comfort with the role\'s responsibilities. He often failed to elaborate on his experience or skills, which is crucial for demonstrating fit for the role. For instance, his response to the question about bridging business needs with technical solutions was inadequate and did not reflect his extensive experience.','16. - requirements gathering:\nScore: 2\n\n17. - process mapping:\nScore: 2\n\n18. - product owner:\nScore: 2\n\n19. - retail domain knowledge:\nScore: 2\n\n20. - product owner skills:\nScore: 2','21. - use case:\nScore: 2\n\n22. - use case development:\nScore: 2\n\n23. - prototyping and wireframing:\nScore: 2\n\n24. - continuous improvement frameworks:\nScore: 2\n\n25. - customer journey mapping:\nScore: 2','2025-01-22 11:53:39'),(98,254,4,634,185,'Gagan\'s responses lacked clarity, relevance, and depth, failing to demonstrate the necessary knowledge and skills for the Business Analyst role. Responses were often incomplete or irrelevant, indicating a lack of understanding of the questions. The candidate did not effectively communicate or showcase problem-solving abilities, adaptability, or creativity. Based on the evaluation, Gagan is not recommended for selection.','Gagan did not exhibit notable strengths in the interview. The responses were generally incomplete and did not demonstrate the required knowledge or skills for the Business Analyst role.','Gagan\'s responses were often irrelevant or incomplete, failing to address the questions adequately. For example, the response to Q0 was inappropriate and lacked professionalism. Gagan did not demonstrate an understanding of the role\'s requirements, such as requirements gathering, process mapping, or retail domain knowledge.','16. - **requirements gathering**:\nScore: 0\n\n17. - **process mapping**:\nScore: 0\n\n18. - **product owner**:\nScore: 0\n\n19. - **product owner skills**:\nScore: 0\n\n20. - **retail domain knowledge**:\nScore: 0','21. - **use case**:\nScore: 0\n\n22. - **use case development**:\nScore: 0\n\n23. - **prototyping and wireframing**:\nScore: 0\n\n24. - **continuous improvement frameworks**:\nScore: 0\n\n25. - **customer journey mapping**:\nScore: 0','2025-01-22 11:56:05'),(99,255,144,621,180,'Tanmay\'s responses demonstrate a basic understanding of data analysis tools and some experience with data engineering tasks. However, there is a lack of depth in his responses, particularly in areas requiring detailed explanations or examples. His communication style is clear but could benefit from more structured articulation and less reliance on filler words. Tanmay\'s technical skills in Python and SQL are evident, but his responses lack the depth expected for a data engineering role. Overall, Tanmay shows potential but needs to provide more detailed and insightful responses to demonstrate his full capabilities.','Tanmay shows familiarity with essential data analysis tools like Python, SQL, and Power BI. His ability to list these tools and briefly describe their use in data analytics indicates a foundational understanding. For instance, his mention of using Python libraries like Pandas and Matplotlib for data manipulation and visualization is a strength, as it aligns with the job requirements.','Tanmay\'s responses often lack depth and specificity, particularly in questions requiring detailed examples or explanations. For example, his response to the question about visualization lacked specific examples of how he applied these principles in real-world scenarios. Additionally, his response to the question about programming languages was incomplete, indicating a need for improvement in providing comprehensive answers.','16. - **python**:\nScore: 5\n\n17. - **mysql**:\nScore: 4\n\n18. - **power bi (business intelligence)**:\nScore: 4\n\n19. - **excel**:\nScore: 5\n\n20. - **python programming**:\nScore: 5','21. - **excel for data analysis**:\nScore: 5\n\n22. - **data validation**:\nScore: 4\n\n23. - **problem-solving**:\nScore: 4\n\n24. - **communication skills**:\nScore: 5\n\n25. **Reasoning**:\nScore: 4','2025-01-22 12:06:47'),(100,260,144,651,194,'Tanmay\'s responses lacked depth and specificity, which is crucial for the Jr Data Engineer role. While he has a basic understanding of some relevant tools and concepts, his communication and problem-solving skills need improvement. His responses were often too brief, lacking the detail necessary to demonstrate a strong grasp of the subject matter. For a role that requires effective communication and technical proficiency, Tanmay\'s performance was below expectations. I would not recommend him for selection at this time.','Tanmay has a basic understanding of Python and SQL, as indicated by his mention of using these tools during his internship. His educational background in engineering provides a foundation for technical skills development. However, specific examples from the interview conversation were not provided to substantiate these strengths.','Tanmay\'s responses were often too brief and lacked depth, such as not providing detailed examples of projects or explaining his problem-solving approach. His communication style was not engaging, and he failed to articulate his thoughts clearly. He needs to work on providing more detailed and structured responses, showcasing his technical skills and problem-solving abilities.','16. - python:\nScore: 4\n\n17. - mysql:\nScore: 3\n\n18. - power bi (business intelligence):\nScore: 2\n\n19. - excel:\nScore: 3\n\n20. - python programming:\nScore: 4','21. - excel for data analysis:\nScore: 3\n\n22. - jupyter notebook:\nScore: 2\n\n23. - dax basics:\nScore: 2\n\n24. - problem-solving:\nScore: 2\n\n25. null:\nScore: 2','2025-02-07 12:47:59'),(101,261,157,652,195,'Nirmesh\'s responses lacked depth and engagement, which are crucial for the role of a Graduate Engineer Trainee in Software Development. While he confirmed availability and seemed open to discussing the role, his responses did not demonstrate the required technical knowledge or enthusiasm for the position. His communication was often minimal, lacking the clarity and detail expected for this role. Based on this evaluation, I would not recommend Nirmesh for selection.','Nirmesh demonstrated punctuality and willingness to engage in the interview process, as seen in his prompt confirmation of the interview schedule. His initial response indicated that he was ready to discuss the opportunity.','Nirmesh\'s responses were often too brief, lacking the necessary depth and detail. For example, he did not articulate his comfort with the job responsibilities or his skills in Python and data science. His request for repetition of the question also indicated a lack of attentiveness. He needs to improve on providing comprehensive answers that showcase his technical skills and enthusiasm.','16. - python:\nScore: 2\n\n17. - data scientist:\nScore: 2\n\n18. - python programming:\nScore: 2\n\n19. - data science:\nScore: 2\n\n20. - sql:\nScore: 2','21. - html:\nScore: 2\n\n22. - data visualization:\nScore: 2\n\n23. - object-oriented programming (oop):\nScore: 2\n\n24. - debugging and troubleshooting:\nScore: 2\n\n25. - software development lifecycle (sdlc):\nScore: 2','2025-02-09 12:28:29'),(102,264,164,671,208,'Shivangi\'s responses lacked depth and clarity, often failing to meet the benchmark expectations. While she demonstrated some basic understanding of sales, her answers were often vague and did not showcase a comprehensive knowledge of the insurance industry or the role\'s requirements. Her communication skills need improvement, particularly in articulating her thoughts and providing detailed responses. Based on the interview, Shivangi may not be the best fit for the telesales executive position at Star Health Insurance.','Shivangi showed a basic understanding of the sales profession and expressed a desire to improve her confidence and skills. Her response to why she wants to work in sales indicates a willingness to grow and seek opportunities, which is a positive trait for a sales role.','Shivangi\'s responses were often brief and lacked depth, such as her answer to why she should be hired, which was vague and did not highlight her skills or experience effectively. Her knowledge of the insurance industry and specific role responsibilities was not demonstrated, as seen in her incomplete response about the company. She needs to improve her communication skills to convey her thoughts clearly and effectively.','16. Telesales:\nScore: 4\n\n17. Insurance Product Knowledge:\nScore: 2\n\n18. Communication Skills:\nScore: 3\n\n19. Customer Relationship Management (CRM):\nScore: 3\n\n20. Sales Closing Techniques:\nScore: 3','21. Negotiation Skills:\nScore: 3\n\n22. Compliance Knowledge (IRDAI):\nScore: 2\n\n23. Documentation Management:\nScore: 3\n\n24. Interpersonal Skills:\nScore: 3\n\n25. Sales Reporting:\nScore: 3','2025-04-02 07:42:12'),(103,265,164,672,208,'Shivangi\'s responses lacked depth and specificity, which are crucial for a telesales role in the insurance sector. While she expressed a desire to develop her skills, her answers did not demonstrate a comprehensive understanding of the responsibilities and skills required for the position. Her communication was often unclear, and she missed opportunities to showcase her knowledge and experience. Based on the interview, she needs significant improvement to be considered a strong candidate for the role.','Shivangi\'s willingness to develop her skills and communication abilities is a positive aspect. Her brief mention of being able to convince people quickly suggests potential in persuasion, which is valuable in sales. However, her responses were too brief to fully assess her strengths.','Shivangi\'s responses often lacked depth and clarity. For example, her answer to why she wants a sales profile was vague and did not highlight specific skills or motivations. Her knowledge of the company and industry was not demonstrated, and she failed to articulate the key responsibilities of a telecaller effectively. She needs to improve her ability to provide detailed and relevant answers.','16. Telesales:\nScore: 2\n\n17. Insurance Product Knowledge:\nScore: 2\n\n18. Communication Skills:\nScore: 3\n\n19. Customer Relationship Management (CRM):\nScore: 2\n\n20. Sales Closing Techniques:\nScore: 2','21. Negotiation Skills:\nScore: 2\n\n22. Compliance Knowledge (IRDAI):\nScore: 2\n\n23. Documentation Management:\nScore: 2\n\n24. Interpersonal Skills:\nScore: 3\n\n25. Sales Reporting:\nScore: 2','2025-04-02 07:53:45'),(104,270,4,623,181,'Gagan\'s responses lacked depth and specificity, particularly in areas critical to the Business Analyst role in the retail industry. He often provided incomplete or irrelevant answers, failing to demonstrate the necessary knowledge and skills. His communication was unclear, and he did not effectively articulate his thoughts. Overall, Gagan\'s performance suggests he may not be well-suited for the position, and I would not recommend selection based on this interview.','Gagan demonstrated some understanding of marketing strategies, as seen in his response to question 3, where he mentioned using social media platforms like Instagram and Facebook for visual appeal. However, these insights were not sufficiently detailed or tailored to the Business Analyst role.','Gagan\'s responses often lacked depth and relevance, such as in question 2, where he failed to address the trend in the motorcycle industry. His communication style was unclear, and he frequently used filler words, impacting his articulation and engagement. He needs to improve his knowledge of key Business Analyst skills like requirements gathering and process mapping.','16. - **requirements gathering**:\nScore: 2\n\n17. - **process mapping**:\nScore: 2\n\n18. - **product owner**:\nScore: 2\n\n19. - **product owner skills**:\nScore: 2\n\n20. - **data analysis**:\nScore: 2','21. - **use case**:\nScore: 2\n\n22. - **use case development**:\nScore: 2\n\n23. - **prototyping and wireframing**:\nScore: 2\n\n24. - **continuous improvement frameworks**:\nScore: 2\n\n25. - **customer journey mapping**:\nScore: 2','2025-04-15 07:59:50'),(105,276,144,696,223,'Tanmay\'s interview responses indicate a basic understanding of the required skills but lack depth and specificity in key areas. His communication was often unclear, and he frequently provided short or incomplete answers. While he demonstrated some familiarity with Python and SQL, his responses lacked the detail and insight expected for the role. His understanding of data visualization and version control was also not well-articulated. Overall, Tanmay needs to improve his ability to convey his knowledge and experience effectively. Based on this evaluation, I would not recommend selection at this time.','Tanmay demonstrated a basic understanding of Python and SQL, mentioning the use of libraries like Pandas for data cleaning and transformation. He also showed awareness of key metrics in Power BI dashboards, such as efficiency and customer satisfaction, indicating some familiarity with data visualization.','Tanmay\'s responses often lacked depth and clarity, such as his explanation of SQL query optimization and handling JSON/XML data. His communication style was sometimes unclear, and he frequently provided short or incomplete answers. For example, his response to using Git for version control was missing, and his explanation of handling API timeouts lacked detail. He needs to improve his articulation and provide more detailed, structured answers to demonstrate his knowledge effectively.','16. python :\nScore: 3\n\n17. sql :\nScore: 3\n\n18. data visualization :\nScore: 3\n\n19. python programming :\nScore: 3\n\n20. sql querying and optimization :\nScore: 3','21. git/github version control :\nScore: 3\n\n22. unit testing with pytest/unittest :\nScore: 0\n\n23. json/xml data handling :\nScore: 3\n\n24. agile methodologies :\nScore: 0\n\n25. cloud platforms (aws/azure) :\nScore: 0','2025-04-16 15:23:47'),(106,279,144,697,224,'Tanmay\'s responses during the interview were generally lacking in depth and specificity, which is crucial for the role of a Graduate Engineer Trainee in Manufacturing. While he demonstrated a basic understanding of some concepts like Kanban and 5S, his responses often lacked the detailed insights and examples expected for this position. His communication style was often fragmented, and he struggled to provide comprehensive answers to several key questions. Overall, Tanmay\'s performance suggests he may need further development in articulating his knowledge and experiences effectively.','Tanmay showed a basic understanding of Kanban and 5S methodologies, indicating some familiarity with manufacturing principles. His ability to mention the importance of safety standards, such as wearing PPE, demonstrates an awareness of workplace safety, which is crucial for the role.','Tanmay\'s responses often lacked depth and clarity, such as his inability to provide a detailed explanation of lean manufacturing or to effectively articulate his experiences with data analysis. His response to the Kanban scenario was incomplete, and he failed to demonstrate problem-solving skills. Additionally, his communication style was often abrupt and lacked engagement, as seen in his responses to questions about teamwork and process documentation.','16. kanban:\nScore: 4\n\n17. lean manufacturing:\nScore: 3\n\n18. 5s:\nScore: 3\n\n19. safety standards:\nScore: 4\n\n20. 5s methodology:\nScore: 3','21. data analysis:\nScore: 2\n\n22. standard operating procedures (sop) documentation:\nScore: 2\n\n23. cross-functional collaboration:\nScore: 2\n\n24. problem-solving:\nScore: 2\n\n25. communication skills:\nScore: 3','2025-04-17 08:57:30'),(107,280,144,697,224,'Tanmay\'s responses during the interview lacked depth and specificity, which are crucial for the Graduate Engineer Trainee role. While he demonstrated a basic understanding of some concepts like Kanban and 5S, his answers often lacked the detail and clarity expected for a role in manufacturing engineering. His communication style was often abrupt, and he struggled to articulate his thoughts clearly. Overall, Tanmay needs to develop a more comprehensive understanding of the technical and procedural aspects of the role to be considered a strong candidate.','Tanmay showed a basic understanding of Kanban principles and 5S methodology. For instance, he mentioned visualizing workflows and implementing autonomous systems to improve efficiency, which aligns with the job requirements. His mention of safety standards like wearing PPE indicates awareness of workplace safety, a key competency for the role.','Tanmay\'s responses often lacked depth and clarity. For example, his explanation of lean manufacturing was vague and did not demonstrate a thorough understanding of its application in a manufacturing setting. His inability to answer questions on Kanban bottlenecks and data analysis highlights a gap in problem-solving skills and technical knowledge. Improving these areas would enhance his fit for the role.','16. kanban:\nScore: 4\n\n17. lean manufacturing:\nScore: 3\n\n18. 5s:\nScore: 4\n\n19. safety standards:\nScore: 4\n\n20. 5s methodology:\nScore: 4','21. data analysis:\nScore: 2\n\n22. standard operating procedures (sop) documentation:\nScore: 2\n\n23. cross-functional collaboration:\nScore: 3\n\n24. problem-solving:\nScore: 2\n\n25. communication skills:\nScore: 3','2025-04-17 08:57:55'),(108,282,144,678,214,'Tanmay demonstrated a basic understanding of data engineering concepts but lacked depth in his responses. His communication was clear but often lacked the necessary detail to fully convey his knowledge and problem-solving abilities. While he showed some understanding of requirement gathering and explaining technical concepts, his responses were often brief and lacked the depth expected for the role. Improvement is needed in articulating his experiences and technical skills more comprehensively. Recommendation','Tanmay\'s strength lies in his ability to communicate clearly without using technical jargon, as seen in his response to explaining complex technical concepts to non-technical stakeholders. He also showed a basic understanding of requirement gathering, emphasizing the importance of documentation and client verification.','Tanmay\'s responses lacked depth and detail, particularly in problem-solving and technical knowledge areas. For instance, his response to gathering requirements was too simplistic and did not cover the comprehensive steps involved. Additionally, his inability to provide a detailed example of data-driven decision-making indicates a need for improvement in articulating his experiences and showcasing his technical skills.','16. python:\nScore: 4\n\n17. mysql:\nScore: 4\n\n18. power bi (business intelligence):\nScore: 5\n\n19. excel:\nScore: 5\n\n20. sql:\nScore: 5','21. excel:\nScore: 5\n\n22. jupyter notebook:\nScore: 4\n\n23. data pipeline development:\nScore: 3\n\n24. communication skills:\nScore: 6\n\n25. problem solving:\nScore: 3','2025-04-17 10:29:41'),(109,283,4,700,227,'Gagan\'s responses in the interview lacked depth and relevance, failing to demonstrate the necessary knowledge and experience required for the Senior Developer role at Adzip Technologies. His answers were often incomplete or irrelevant, indicating a lack of understanding of key concepts and skills outlined in the job description. Based on this performance, Gagan does not meet the expectations for this position.','Gagan\'s resume indicates experience with PHP and JavaScript, which could be beneficial for web development projects. However, this was not reflected in his interview responses, which lacked depth and specificity.','Gagan\'s responses were often irrelevant or incomplete, such as stating \"I don\'t think so\" or \"I don\'t want,\" which do not address the questions asked. He failed to demonstrate knowledge in key areas like Python, Java, C#, and AI, which are crucial for the role. Improvement is needed in articulating thoughts clearly and providing detailed, relevant answers.','16. python:\nScore: 0\n\n17. java:\nScore: 0\n\n18. c#:\nScore: 0\n\n19. software development life cycle (sdlc):\nScore: 0\n\n20. artificial intelligence:\nScore: 0','21. javascript:\nScore: 0\n\n22. typescript:\nScore: 0\n\n23. tensorflow:\nScore: 0\n\n24. aws:\nScore: 0\n\n25. natural language processing (nlp):\nScore: 0','2025-04-24 10:40:21'),(110,284,4,708,229,'Gagan\'s responses throughout the interview lacked clarity and depth, often deviating from the expected benchmark responses. The responses were frequently incomplete or irrelevant to the questions asked, indicating a lack of preparedness and understanding of the subject matter. Gagan\'s communication skills, including clarity, grammar, and articulation, need significant improvement to meet the job requirements. The candidate\'s technical knowledge and problem-solving skills were not adequately demonstrated, which is crucial for the role of a Software Developer/Engineer. Based on the evaluation, Gagan is not recommended for selection.','Gagan did not exhibit notable strengths in the interview responses. The responses were often off-topic or lacked the necessary detail to demonstrate a strong understanding of the subject matter.','Gagan\'s responses were often irrelevant and lacked depth, such as the response to Q2 and Q3, which were not aligned with the questions asked. The communication style was unclear, with frequent use of filler words and poor grammar. For example, the response to Q1 was incomplete and did not address the question properly. Gagan needs to improve on providing detailed and relevant answers, as well as enhancing overall communication skills.','16. python:\nScore: 0\n\n17. javascript:\nScore: 0\n\n18. object-oriented programming (oop):\nScore: 0\n\n19. git:\nScore: 0\n\n20. debugging and troubleshooting:\nScore: 0','21. html:\nScore: 0\n\n22. dom manipulation:\nScore: 0\n\n23. es6+ javascript features:\nScore: 0\n\n24. code review practices:\nScore: 0\n\n25. communication skills:\nScore: 2','2025-04-24 10:57:09'),(111,287,4,710,231,'Gagan\'s interview responses lacked depth and relevance to the questions asked. His responses were often incomplete or off-topic, indicating a lack of preparation and understanding of the subject matter. There was also a noticeable lack of clarity and articulation in his communication, which affected the overall engagement and effectiveness of the conversation. Based on the evaluation, Gagan does not meet the requirements for the role.','Gagan demonstrated a willingness to engage in the conversation, as seen in his initial greeting. However, this was not consistently reflected throughout the interview.','Gagan\'s responses were often incomplete or irrelevant to the questions asked. For example, in Q2, he admitted to not remembering the answer despite preparation. His lack of depth in responses and inability to adapt to the questions posed are significant weaknesses. Improving preparation and communication skills could help address these issues.','16. python:\nScore: 0\n\n17. javascript:\nScore: 0\n\n18. object-oriented programming (oop):\nScore: 0\n\n19. git:\nScore: 0\n\n20. debugging and troubleshooting:\nScore: 0','21. html:\nScore: 0\n\n22. html5:\nScore: 0\n\n23. dom manipulation:\nScore: 0\n\n24. es6+ features:\nScore: 0\n\n25. code review practices:\nScore: 0','2025-04-24 11:08:45'),(112,288,4,720,234,'Gagan\'s responses lacked depth and specificity, which is crucial for the role of a Software Developer. His answers were often vague or incomplete, indicating a need for further development in technical knowledge and communication skills. While he has some foundational understanding, his ability to articulate and demonstrate his skills effectively was limited. Based on the interview, Gagan may not currently meet the requirements for the role.','Gagan showed some understanding of object-oriented programming concepts, as indicated by his willingness to try and explain their application in his projects. His resume suggests experience with web design and database management, which could be beneficial if further developed.','Gagan\'s responses often lacked detail and clarity, such as his inability to provide a structured approach to using Git or debugging. His response to the Python script question was particularly weak, as he did not demonstrate an understanding of exception handling or code structure. Improving his ability to articulate his thought process and technical skills would be beneficial.','16. python:\nScore: 2\n\n17. javascript:\nScore: 3\n\n18. object-oriented programming (oop):\nScore: 3\n\n19. git:\nScore: 2\n\n20. debugging and troubleshooting:\nScore: 3','21. html:\nScore: 4\n\n22. dom manipulation:\nScore: 3\n\n23. es6+ features:\nScore: 3\n\n24. code review participation:\nScore: 2\n\n25. communication skills:\nScore: 3','2025-04-25 04:34:53'),(113,293,4,723,235,'Gagan\'s responses during the interview lacked depth and clarity, which are crucial for the role of a Software Developer. His answers did not demonstrate a strong understanding of the technical skills required, such as Python and JavaScript, nor did they show the ability to apply these skills in practical scenarios. The lack of detailed responses suggests a need for improvement in technical knowledge and communication skills. Based on the responses, it is recommended that Gagan is not fit for the role at this time.','Gagan\'s resume indicates a background in engineering and some exposure to front-end web development through internships. This shows a foundational understanding of the field, which can be built upon with further learning and experience.','Gagan\'s responses were often incomplete or irrelevant, such as the response \"20250425_060859\" to a question about JavaScript usage. This indicates a lack of understanding or preparation. Gagan should focus on gaining a deeper understanding of programming concepts and practice articulating his experiences clearly.','16. python:\nScore: 0\n\n17. javascript:\nScore: 0\n\n18. python programming:\nScore: 0\n\n19. javascript programming:\nScore: 0\n\n20. object-oriented programming (oop):\nScore: 0','21. html:\nScore: 0\n\n22. html5:\nScore: 0\n\n23. dom manipulation:\nScore: 0\n\n24. es6+ javascript features:\nScore: 0\n\n25. data structures and algorithms:\nScore: 0','2025-04-25 06:14:25'),(114,294,4,707,228,'Gagan\'s interview performance was inconsistent with the expectations for the Software Developer/Engineer role. While he has relevant technical skills and experience, his responses lacked depth and clarity, often deviating from the topic. His communication style and articulation need improvement to effectively convey his ideas. Gagan\'s resume indicates strong technical skills, but his interview responses did not adequately reflect this expertise. Based on the interview, Gagan requires improvement in aligning his responses with the job description and demonstrating his technical knowledge effectively.','Gagan has a strong technical background in AI and ML, as evidenced by his resume. He has experience with Python and JavaScript, which are crucial for the role. His involvement in various projects and internships showcases his practical application of skills. His resume indicates a proactive approach to learning and contributing to projects, which is a positive trait for a developer.','Gagan\'s responses during the interview often lacked relevance and clarity. For instance, his introduction in Q3 was not aligned with his resume and the job role, indicating a lack of focus. His inability to provide detailed examples or insights into his software development experience suggests a need for improvement in communication and articulation. Gagan should work on aligning his responses with the job requirements and providing more structured and relevant answers.','16. python:\nScore: 6\n\n17. javascript:\nScore: 5\n\n18. object-oriented programming (oop):\nScore: 5\n\n19. git:\nScore: 4\n\n20. debugging and troubleshooting:\nScore: 5','21. html:\nScore: 5\n\n22. html5:\nScore: 5\n\n23. dom manipulation:\nScore: 4\n\n24. es6+ features:\nScore: 5\n\n25. code review practices:\nScore: 4','2025-04-25 06:27:51'),(115,297,4,726,235,'Gagan\'s responses during the interview lacked depth and relevance to the questions asked. His inability to provide detailed examples or explanations indicates a lack of understanding and experience in the required skills. The responses were often vague or irrelevant, showing minimal engagement with the interview process. Based on the evaluation, Gagan does not demonstrate the necessary competencies for the Software Developer/Engineer role at Adzip Technologies. It is recommended not to proceed with his application.','Gagan\'s communication was clear in terms of pronunciation and basic sentence structure. He was able to respond promptly to questions, indicating a certain level of engagement with the interview process.','Gagan\'s responses were often irrelevant and lacked the necessary depth to demonstrate his knowledge and skills. For instance, his response to the question about using Python in recent projects was vague and did not showcase any specific experience or understanding. Similarly, his answers related to JavaScript and HTML lacked substance and failed to demonstrate practical knowledge. Gagan needs to improve his ability to provide detailed and relevant examples that align with the job requirements.','16. python:\nScore: 2\n\n17. javascript:\nScore: 2\n\n18. python programming:\nScore: 2\n\n19. javascript programming:\nScore: 2\n\n20. object-oriented programming (oop):\nScore: 2','21. html:\nScore: 2\n\n22. html5:\nScore: 2\n\n23. dom manipulation:\nScore: 2\n\n24. es6+ javascript features:\nScore: 2\n\n25. data structures and algorithms:\nScore: 2','2025-04-25 07:02:11'),(116,299,4,728,235,'Gagan\'s responses lacked depth and specificity, which is crucial for the software developer role. The responses were often vague or incomplete, indicating a lack of understanding or experience with the required technologies. The lack of detailed examples and explanations suggests that Gagan may not have the necessary technical skills or problem-solving abilities for the position. Based on the interview, Gagan does not meet the expectations for the role.','Gagan demonstrated a willingness to acknowledge challenges, as seen in the response to Q0. This shows an awareness of the difficulties faced in technical projects, which is a positive trait for continuous learning and improvement.','Gagan\'s responses were often incomplete or lacked depth, such as in Q1 and Q2, where there was little to no explanation of JavaScript usage or understanding of Python classes and objects. Additionally, the response to Q3 was non-informative, indicating a lack of familiarity with object-oriented programming principles. Gagan should focus on gaining a deeper understanding of these concepts and providing more detailed examples in future interviews.','16. python :\nScore: 1\n\n17. javascript :\nScore: 1\n\n18. python programming :\nScore: 1\n\n19. javascript programming :\nScore: 1\n\n20. object-oriented programming (oop) :\nScore: 1','21. html :\nScore: 1\n\n22. html5 :\nScore: 1\n\n23. dom manipulation :\nScore: 1\n\n24. es6+ javascript features :\nScore: 1\n\n25. data structures and algorithms :\nScore: 1','2025-04-25 10:19:54'),(121,301,209,743,236,'Rishabh demonstrated a basic understanding of the tools and responsibilities required for the MIS Analyst role. However, his responses often lacked depth and detail, which is crucial for showcasing expertise in data management and reporting. While he showed familiarity with Google Sheets and Excel, his inability to articulate specific experiences or projects in detail indicates a need for further development in communication and problem-solving skills. Overall, Rishabh\'s performance suggests he may not yet be fully prepared for the demands of the role.','Rishabh showed familiarity with tools like Google Sheets and Excel, which are essential for the role. His response to using pivot tables and charts for data visualization indicates a basic understanding of these tools. For example, he mentioned using pivot tables and VLOOKUP formulas to handle large datasets, which aligns with the job requirements.','Rishabh\'s responses often lacked depth and specificity, particularly in areas like problem-solving and project management. For instance, when asked about using Google Apps Script, he admitted to having no experience, which is a preferred skill for the role. Additionally, his communication style was often repetitive and lacked clarity, as seen in his explanation of handling large datasets. To improve, Rishabh should focus on providing detailed examples and demonstrating a clearer understanding of the tools and processes involved in MIS reporting.','16. Google Sheets:\nScore: 5\n\n17. Data Analysis:\nScore: 5\n\n18. MIS Reporting:\nScore: 4\n\n19. Data Visualization:\nScore: 5\n\n20. Cross-functional Communication:\nScore: 5','21. Google Workspace:\nScore: 5\n\n22. Microsoft Excel:\nScore: 5\n\n23. Google Apps Script:\nScore: 2\n\n24. Time Management:\nScore: 5\n\n25. Process Optimization:\nScore: 4','2025-04-26 08:31:43'),(122,300,210,738,236,'Vishal demonstrated a basic understanding of some technical aspects relevant to the MIS Analyst role but struggled with communication and articulation. His responses often lacked depth and clarity, which are crucial for the position. While he showed some familiarity with tools like Excel and Google Sheets, his explanations were not consistently clear or detailed. Overall, Vishal needs to improve his communication skills and provide more structured and insightful responses to align with the job requirements.','Vishal showed some familiarity with Excel and Google Sheets, mentioning specific tools and functions like pivot tables and VLOOKUP. His experience with Power BI and Google Apps Script indicates a foundational understanding of data visualization and automation, which are relevant to the role.','Vishal\'s communication was often unclear, with responses that lacked depth and coherence. For instance, his explanation of handling large datasets in Google Sheets was fragmented and difficult to follow. He also struggled to articulate his experiences effectively, often deviating from the topic or providing incomplete answers. Improving his communication and providing more structured responses would enhance his fit for the role.','16. Google Sheets:\nScore: 4\n\n17. Data Analysis:\nScore: 4\n\n18. MIS Reporting:\nScore: 4\n\n19. Data Visualization:\nScore: 4\n\n20. Cross-functional Communication:\nScore: 4','21. Google Workspace:\nScore: 4\n\n22. Microsoft Excel:\nScore: 4\n\n23. Google Apps Script:\nScore: 4\n\n24. Time Management:\nScore: 4\n\n25. Process Optimization:\nScore: 4','2025-04-26 08:32:02'),(123,301,209,743,236,'Rishabh demonstrated basic familiarity with tools like Google Sheets and Excel but lacked depth in articulating his experiences and skills. His responses often lacked detail and did not fully align with the benchmark expectations. While he showed some understanding of data handling and reporting, his inability to provide specific examples or elaborate on his skills suggests a need for further development. Based on this evaluation, I would not recommend Rishabh for the role at this time.','Rishabh showed a basic understanding of Google Sheets and Excel, mentioning the use of pivot tables and VLOOKUP. He also demonstrated some awareness of using charts for data visualization, which is relevant to the role.','Rishabh\'s responses were often vague and lacked depth, particularly in areas requiring detailed explanation, such as automating reports or handling large datasets. His lack of experience with Google Apps Script and inability to provide specific examples of past projects were notable weaknesses. To improve, Rishabh should focus on gaining practical experience and articulating his skills and experiences more clearly.','16. Google Sheets:\nScore: 4\n\n17. Data Analysis:\nScore: 4\n\n18. MIS Reporting:\nScore: 3\n\n19. Data Visualization:\nScore: 4\n\n20. Cross-functional Communication:\nScore: 4','21. Google Workspace:\nScore: 4\n\n22. Microsoft Excel:\nScore: 4\n\n23. Google Apps Script:\nScore: 2\n\n24. Time Management:\nScore: 4\n\n25. Process Optimization:\nScore: 3','2025-04-26 08:32:02'),(124,301,209,743,236,'Rishabh demonstrated a basic understanding of the tools and responsibilities required for the MIS Analyst role. However, his responses often lacked depth and specificity, which are crucial for the position. While he showed some familiarity with Google Sheets and Excel, his inability to provide detailed examples or articulate his experience effectively was evident. His communication style was informal and sometimes repetitive, which affected the clarity of his responses. Overall, Rishabh needs to improve his articulation and provide more detailed insights to be considered a strong candidate for the role.','Rishabh has a foundational understanding of tools like Google Sheets and Excel, which are essential for the MIS Analyst role. He mentioned using pivot tables, VLOOKUP, and charts, indicating some familiarity with data analysis and visualization. His willingness to learn and adapt to new tools, as seen in his interest in Google Workspace, is a positive trait.','Rishabh\'s responses often lacked depth and specificity. For instance, when asked about using Google Sheets for automated reports, he provided a vague answer without detailing the processes or techniques used. His communication style was informal, with frequent use of filler words and repetition, which detracted from the clarity and professionalism of his responses. To improve, Rishabh should focus on articulating his experiences more clearly and providing specific examples to demonstrate his skills and knowledge.','16. Google Sheets:\nScore: 5\n\n17. Data Analysis:\nScore: 5\n\n18. MIS Reporting:\nScore: 4\n\n19. Data Visualization:\nScore: 5\n\n20. Cross-functional Communication:\nScore: 5','21. Google Workspace:\nScore: 5\n\n22. Microsoft Excel:\nScore: 5\n\n23. Google Apps Script:\nScore: 2\n\n24. Time Management:\nScore: 5\n\n25. Process Optimization:\nScore: 4','2025-04-26 08:32:36'),(125,301,209,743,236,'Rishabh demonstrated a basic understanding of the tools and responsibilities required for the MIS Analyst role. However, his responses lacked depth and specificity, particularly in areas requiring detailed examples or technical explanations. While he showed familiarity with tools like Google Sheets and Excel, his ability to articulate complex processes and problem-solving approaches was limited. To be a strong fit for the role, Rishabh needs to enhance his communication skills and provide more comprehensive insights into his experiences and technical capabilities.','Rishabh showed familiarity with Google Sheets and Excel, mentioning the use of pivot tables and VLOOKUP for data handling. His response to using Google Workspace tools for collaboration indicates a basic understanding of cross-functional communication. He also expressed a willingness to learn and adapt, which is crucial for growth in a dynamic work environment.','Rishabh\'s responses often lacked depth and specificity, particularly in technical areas like data analysis and MIS reporting. For example, his explanation of handling large datasets and creating automated reports was vague and did not demonstrate a strong grasp of advanced techniques. Additionally, his communication style was repetitive and lacked clarity, impacting his ability to convey complex ideas effectively.','16. Google Sheets:\nScore: 5\n\n17. Data Analysis:\nScore: 4\n\n18. MIS Reporting:\nScore: 3\n\n19. Data Visualization:\nScore: 4\n\n20. Cross-functional Communication:\nScore: 5','21. Google Workspace:\nScore: 5\n\n22. Microsoft Excel:\nScore: 5\n\n23. Google Apps Script:\nScore: 2\n\n24. Time Management:\nScore: 4\n\n25. Process Optimization:\nScore: 4','2025-04-26 08:32:45'),(126,301,209,743,236,'Rishabh demonstrated a basic understanding of the tools and responsibilities associated with the MIS Analyst role. However, his responses often lacked depth and specificity, which are crucial for the role. While he showed familiarity with Google Sheets and Excel, his inability to elaborate on his experience with Google Apps Script and provide detailed examples of past projects was a notable gap. His communication was clear but could benefit from more structured and comprehensive responses. Overall, Rishabh\'s performance suggests he needs further development in articulating his skills and experiences in a more detailed manner.','Rishabh showed a good understanding of using Google Sheets and Excel for data management and reporting. His familiarity with pivot tables, VLOOKUP, and data visualization techniques like charts was evident. For instance, he mentioned using Google Sheets for maintaining databases and creating dashboards, which aligns with the job requirements.','Rishabh\'s responses often lacked depth and specificity, particularly in areas like Google Apps Script and handling large datasets. His inability to provide detailed examples of past projects or articulate a structured approach to problem-solving was a weakness. For instance, his response to using Google Apps Script was non-existent, indicating a gap in his skill set. He could improve by providing more detailed explanations and examples of his work experiences.','16. Google Sheets:\nScore: 5\n\n17. Data Analysis:\nScore: 5\n\n18. MIS Reporting:\nScore: 4\n\n19. Data Visualization:\nScore: 5\n\n20. Cross-functional Communication:\nScore: 4','21. Google Workspace:\nScore: 5\n\n22. Microsoft Excel:\nScore: 5\n\n23. Google Apps Script:\nScore: 2\n\n24. Time Management:\nScore: 4\n\n25. Process Optimization:\nScore: 4','2025-04-26 08:32:45'),(127,301,209,743,236,'Rishabh demonstrated a basic understanding of the tools and responsibilities required for the MIS Analyst role. However, his responses lacked depth and specificity, particularly in areas like Google Apps Script and advanced data handling techniques. While he showed familiarity with tools like Excel and Google Sheets, his explanations were often vague and repetitive. To be a strong fit for the role, Rishabh needs to enhance his technical skills and provide more detailed, structured responses.','Rishabh showed a basic familiarity with tools like Excel and Google Sheets, which are essential for the MIS Analyst role. His experience with data visualization techniques, such as using pivot tables and charts, indicates a foundational understanding of data analysis. His response to Q5 demonstrated some awareness of handling large datasets using formulas and pivot tables.','Rishabh\'s responses often lacked depth and specificity, particularly in areas like Google Apps Script (Q12) and advanced data handling techniques (Q6, Q7). His answers were frequently repetitive and lacked clarity, as seen in Q3 and Q8. To improve, Rishabh should focus on providing detailed examples and structured explanations, showcasing a deeper understanding of the tools and processes involved in MIS reporting.','16. Google Sheets:\nScore: 5\n\n17. Data Analysis:\nScore: 5\n\n18. MIS Reporting:\nScore: 4\n\n19. Data Visualization:\nScore: 5\n\n20. Cross-functional Communication:\nScore: 4','21. Google Workspace:\nScore: 5\n\n22. Microsoft Excel:\nScore: 5\n\n23. Google Apps Script:\nScore: 2\n\n24. Time Management:\nScore: 4\n\n25. Process Optimization:\nScore: 4','2025-04-26 08:33:04'),(128,301,209,743,236,'Rishabh demonstrated a basic understanding of the tools and responsibilities required for the MIS Analyst role. However, his responses often lacked depth and specificity, which are crucial for a position that demands strong analytical and reporting skills. While he showed familiarity with tools like Google Sheets and Excel, his explanations did not consistently convey a comprehensive grasp of advanced functionalities or strategic applications. To be a strong fit for the role, Rishabh needs to enhance his ability to articulate detailed and insightful responses that reflect a deeper understanding of data management and reporting processes.','Rishabh showed familiarity with Google Sheets and Excel, mentioning the use of pivot tables, VLOOKUP, and charts for data analysis. His experience with sales analysis projects and the use of Google Workspace tools for collaboration indicates a foundational understanding of data handling and teamwork. His willingness to learn and adapt to new tools and environments is evident, which is a positive trait for continuous improvement.','Rishabh\'s responses often lacked depth and specificity, particularly in areas requiring detailed explanations, such as handling large datasets and creating automated reports. His limited experience with Google Apps Script and advanced Excel features like Power Query suggests a need for further development in these areas. Additionally, his communication style could benefit from more structured and concise articulation to effectively convey complex ideas and insights.','16. Google Sheets:\nScore: 5\n\n17. Data Analysis:\nScore: 4\n\n18. MIS Reporting:\nScore: 4\n\n19. Data Visualization:\nScore: 4\n\n20. Cross-functional Communication:\nScore: 5','21. Google Workspace:\nScore: 5\n\n22. Microsoft Excel:\nScore: 5\n\n23. Google Apps Script:\nScore: 2\n\n24. Time Management:\nScore: 5\n\n25. Process Optimization:\nScore: 4','2025-04-26 08:33:12'),(129,301,209,743,236,'Rishabh demonstrated a basic understanding of the tools and responsibilities required for the MIS Analyst role. However, his responses often lacked depth and specificity, particularly in areas crucial to the role, such as data analysis and reporting. While he showed familiarity with tools like Google Sheets and Excel, he did not provide detailed examples of his experience or how he applied his skills in past projects. His communication was clear but could benefit from more structured and detailed responses. Overall, Rishabh\'s performance suggests he has potential but needs further development in articulating his experience and skills.','Rishabh displayed a good understanding of basic data management tools like Google Sheets and Excel. His response to using Google Workspace tools for collaboration showed his ability to work in a team environment. For example, he mentioned using Google Docs and Sheets for tracking progress and collaborating on projects, which indicates his familiarity with these tools.','Rishabh\'s responses often lacked depth and specificity, particularly in critical areas like data analysis and MIS reporting. For instance, when asked about handling large datasets, his response was vague and did not provide a clear methodology or examples. Additionally, his lack of experience with Google Apps Script was a notable gap, given its importance in automating tasks for the role. Rishabh could improve by providing more detailed examples and demonstrating a deeper understanding of the tools and processes involved in MIS reporting.','16. Google Sheets:\nScore: 4\n\n17. Data Analysis:\nScore: 4\n\n18. MIS Reporting:\nScore: 3\n\n19. Data Visualization:\nScore: 4\n\n20. Cross-functional Communication:\nScore: 5','21. Google Workspace:\nScore: 5\n\n22. Microsoft Excel:\nScore: 5\n\n23. Google Apps Script:\nScore: 2\n\n24. Time Management:\nScore: 4\n\n25. Process Optimization:\nScore: 4','2025-04-26 08:33:32'),(130,301,209,743,236,'Rishabh demonstrated a basic understanding of the tools and responsibilities required for the MIS Analyst role. However, his responses often lacked depth and specificity, which are crucial for the position. While he showed familiarity with tools like Google Sheets and Excel, his explanations were not sufficiently detailed to showcase advanced proficiency or applied experience. His communication style was casual, which sometimes affected the clarity and professionalism of his responses. Overall, Rishabh needs to improve on providing more structured and detailed answers to effectively convey his knowledge and skills. Recommendation','Rishabh is familiar with tools like Google Sheets and Excel, which are essential for the role. He has experience using pivot tables and VLOOKUP, as evidenced by his responses on handling large datasets and creating dashboards. His willingness to learn and adapt is also evident, as he expressed interest in using Google Apps Script in the future.','Rishabh\'s responses often lacked depth and specificity. For instance, when asked about handling large datasets, he mentioned using filters and formulas but did not provide a detailed explanation of his approach. His communication style was casual, and he frequently used filler words, which affected the clarity of his responses. He also needs to improve on articulating his thoughts more clearly and professionally.','16. Google Sheets:\nScore: 4\n\n17. Data Analysis:\nScore: 4\n\n18. MIS Reporting:\nScore: 3\n\n19. Data Visualization:\nScore: 4\n\n20. Cross-functional Communication:\nScore: 4','21. Google Workspace:\nScore: 4\n\n22. Microsoft Excel:\nScore: 4\n\n23. Google Apps Script:\nScore: 0\n\n24. Time Management:\nScore: 4\n\n25. Process Optimization:\nScore: 4','2025-04-26 08:33:33'),(131,301,209,743,236,'Rishabh demonstrated a basic understanding of the tools and responsibilities required for the MIS Analyst role. However, his responses often lacked depth and specificity, which are crucial for this position. While he showed familiarity with Google Sheets and Excel, his explanations were often vague and did not fully convey his ability to handle complex data analysis tasks. His communication style was informal and sometimes repetitive, which affected the clarity of his responses. Overall, Rishabh needs to improve his articulation and provide more detailed and structured answers to showcase his expertise effectively.','Rishabh has a foundational understanding of Google Sheets and Excel, which he uses for data management and analysis. He mentioned using pivot tables and VLOOKUP, indicating some familiarity with data handling techniques. His experience with Google Workspace tools for collaboration suggests he can work in a team environment.','Rishabh\'s responses often lacked depth and specificity, such as when discussing data visualization and handling large datasets. He did not provide detailed examples of his experience with Google Apps Script or advanced Excel features like Power Query, which are important for the role. His communication style was informal, with frequent use of filler words and repetition, impacting the clarity and professionalism of his responses.','16. Google Sheets:\nScore: 5\n\n17. Data Analysis:\nScore: 4\n\n18. MIS Reporting:\nScore: 4\n\n19. Data Visualization:\nScore: 4\n\n20. Cross-functional Communication:\nScore: 5','21. Google Workspace:\nScore: 5\n\n22. Microsoft Excel:\nScore: 5\n\n23. Google Apps Script:\nScore: 2\n\n24. Time Management:\nScore: 5\n\n25. Process Optimization:\nScore: 4','2025-04-26 08:33:39'),(132,304,201,735,236,'Nandani\'s performance in the interview indicates a basic understanding of Google Sheets and related tools, but lacks depth in critical areas such as data analysis, MIS reporting, and cross-functional communication. Her responses often lacked clarity and detail, which are essential for the role of an MIS Analyst. While she demonstrated some familiarity with the tools, her inability to provide specific examples or elaborate on her experiences suggests limited practical exposure. Overall, her responses did not meet the expectations for the role, and she would benefit from further developing her technical and communication skills.','Nandani demonstrated a basic understanding of Google Sheets, mentioning the use of pivot tables and charts for data visualization. Her response to managing deadlines showed a willingness to collaborate with team members, which is a positive trait for cross-functional communication.','Nandani\'s responses often lacked depth and specificity, such as her inability to provide detailed examples of using Google Sheets or Excel for data analysis and reporting. Her understanding of Google Workspace tools was limited, and she struggled with articulating her thoughts clearly. For instance, her response to the question about collaborating with different teams was vague and lacked concrete examples. She should focus on improving her technical skills and communication abilities to better fit the role\'s requirements.','16. Google Sheets:\nScore: 3\n\n17. Data Analysis:\nScore: 2\n\n18. MIS Reporting:\nScore: 2\n\n19. Data Visualization:\nScore: 3\n\n20. Cross-functional Communication:\nScore: 3','21. Google Workspace:\nScore: 2\n\n22. Microsoft Excel:\nScore: 3\n\n23. Google Apps Script:\nScore: 2\n\n24. Time Management:\nScore: 3\n\n25. Process Optimization:\nScore: 2','2025-04-27 04:49:17'),(133,304,201,735,236,'Nandani\'s responses indicate a basic understanding of Google Sheets and Microsoft Excel but lack depth and specificity, particularly in areas crucial for an MIS Analyst role. Her responses often lack clarity and detail, which are essential for effective communication and problem-solving in this role. While she shows some awareness of the tools, her inability to provide concrete examples or detailed explanations suggests limited practical experience. Her responses also indicate a lack of familiarity with Google Workspace tools and troubleshooting skills. Overall, Nandani would benefit from further development in technical skills and communication.','Nandani demonstrates a basic understanding of data visualization tools like bar and pie charts in Google Sheets, which is a relevant skill for the role. Her response to using Excel for data storage shows some awareness of its capabilities, although it lacks depth. She also shows a willingness to collaborate and prioritize tasks, as seen in her response to managing deadlines.','Nandani\'s responses often lack depth and specificity, particularly in areas like data analysis and MIS reporting. Her inability to provide detailed examples or explanations suggests limited practical experience. For instance, her response to troubleshooting a script error in Google Sheets was insufficient, relying on external help rather than demonstrating problem-solving skills. Additionally, her unfamiliarity with Google Workspace tools and lack of clarity in communication are areas needing improvement.','16. Google Sheets:\nScore: 3\n\n17. Data Analysis:\nScore: 2\n\n18. MIS Reporting:\nScore: 2\n\n19. Data Visualization:\nScore: 3\n\n20. Cross-functional Communication:\nScore: 2','21. Google Workspace:\nScore: 0\n\n22. Microsoft Excel:\nScore: 3\n\n23. Google Apps Script:\nScore: 0\n\n24. Time Management:\nScore: 3\n\n25. Process Optimization:\nScore: 2','2025-04-27 04:49:20'),(134,306,211,731,236,'Gaurav\'s responses lacked depth and specificity, which are crucial for the MIS Analyst role. While he has experience in MIS operations, his interview responses did not adequately demonstrate the required skills and knowledge, particularly in Google Sheets automation and data analysis. His communication style was basic, and he did not effectively convey his problem-solving abilities or adaptability to new challenges. Based on the interview, Gaurav needs to improve his articulation and provide more detailed examples to showcase his expertise. Recommendation','Gaurav has a background in MIS operations, which indicates familiarity with data handling and reporting. His resume suggests proficiency in Excel and other technical skills, which are relevant to the job role.','Gaurav\'s responses were often too brief and lacked the depth needed to demonstrate his expertise. For example, he did not elaborate on how he used Google Sheets for automation in his previous roles. He needs to provide more detailed examples and explanations to better showcase his skills and knowledge.','16. Google Sheets:\nScore: 3\n\n17. Data Analysis:\nScore: 3\n\n18. MIS Reporting:\nScore: 4\n\n19. Data Visualization:\nScore: 3\n\n20. Cross-functional Communication:\nScore: 4','21. Google Workspace:\nScore: 4\n\n22. Microsoft Excel:\nScore: 5\n\n23. Google Apps Script:\nScore: 2\n\n24. Time Management:\nScore: 4\n\n25. Process Optimization:\nScore: 3','2025-04-27 10:38:37'),(135,307,200,734,236,'Ishant\'s interview responses indicate a basic understanding of the role\'s requirements but lack depth in key areas such as Google Sheets and automation. While he has relevant experience in data analysis and visualization, his responses did not sufficiently demonstrate the advanced proficiency needed for the role. His communication style is clear, but his answers often lack the necessary detail and depth, which affects his overall engagement and problem-solving skills. Recommendation','Ishant has a solid foundation in data analysis and visualization, as evidenced by his experience with Power BI and Excel. His ability to create dashboards and generate insights from data is a strength, as seen in his projects involving HR and sales analysis dashboards.','Ishant\'s responses lack depth, particularly in the use of Google Sheets for automation, which is crucial for the role. For example, he did not elaborate on specific automation techniques or how he used Google Apps Script. His responses also lacked creativity and adaptability, as he did not provide examples of innovative solutions or how he handled unexpected challenges.','16. Google Sheets:\nScore: 3\n\n17. Data Analysis:\nScore: 6\n\n18. MIS Reporting:\nScore: 4\n\n19. Data Visualization:\nScore: 6\n\n20. Cross-functional Communication:\nScore: 5','21. Google Workspace:\nScore: 4\n\n22. Microsoft Excel:\nScore: 7\n\n23. Google Apps Script:\nScore: 2\n\n24. Time Management:\nScore: 5\n\n25. Process Optimization:\nScore: 4','2025-04-27 11:05:12'),(136,308,211,731,236,'Gaurav demonstrated a basic understanding of some key areas relevant to the MIS Analyst role, such as using tools like Google Sheets and Excel. However, his responses often lacked depth and specificity, which is crucial for the role. His communication was sometimes unclear, and he struggled to articulate his thoughts effectively. Gaurav needs to improve his ability to provide detailed and structured responses, especially when discussing technical processes and problem-solving strategies. Based on the interview, Gaurav may not be the best fit for the role at this time.','Gaurav showed familiarity with using Excel functions like VBA and Macros to optimize tasks, indicating some technical proficiency. For example, he mentioned using VBA code to automate repetitive tasks in Excel, which is a relevant skill for the role.','Gaurav\'s responses often lacked clarity and depth. For instance, when asked about automating a reporting process using Google Sheets, his explanation was vague and did not demonstrate a comprehensive understanding of the tools and techniques involved. He also struggled with articulating his approach to data analysis and problem-solving, which are critical competencies for the role.','16. Google Sheets:\nScore: 4\n\n17. Data Analysis:\nScore: 3\n\n18. MIS Reporting:\nScore: 4\n\n19. Data Visualization:\nScore: 3\n\n20. Cross-functional Communication:\nScore: 4','21. Google Workspace:\nScore: 4\n\n22. Microsoft Excel:\nScore: 5\n\n23. Google Apps Script:\nScore: 3\n\n24. Time Management:\nScore: 4\n\n25. Process Optimization:\nScore: 4','2025-04-27 11:28:16'),(145,309,200,734,236,'Ishant did not provide any response to the key technical question regarding Google Sheets automation, which is central to the MIS Analyst role at Innovatiview. This lack of response is a significant concern, as it prevents assessment of his technical depth, communication skills, and problem-solving abilities in the context most relevant to the job. While his resume suggests proficiency in data analytics and reporting, the absence of an answer in the interview raises doubts about his practical expertise and engagement. Based strictly on the interview, Ishant does not demonstrate the required fit for the role. Recommendation','Ishant’s resume indicates experience with data analysis, dashboard creation, and reporting using Excel and Power BI, which are relevant to the MIS Analyst position. His background suggests a familiarity with data-driven decision-making and process improvement, as evidenced by his project work on HR and sales dashboards.','The primary weakness is the complete lack of response to a core technical question about Google Sheets automation. This prevents evaluation of his communication clarity, technical proficiency, and ability to articulate problem-solving approaches. For future interviews, Ishant should ensure he provides detailed, example-driven answers that demonstrate both his technical and soft skills, especially for questions directly related to the job requirements.','13. Google Sheets:\nScore: 0\n\n14. Data Analysis:\nScore: 0\n\n15. MIS Reporting:\nScore: 0\n\n16. Data Visualization:\nScore: 0\n\n17. Cross-functional Communication:\nScore: 0','18. Google Workspace:\nScore: 0\n\n19. Microsoft Excel:\nScore: 0\n\n20. Google Apps Script:\nScore: 0\n\n21. Time Management:\nScore: 0\n\n22. Process Optimization:\nScore: 0','2025-04-28 06:10:09'),(146,311,212,746,236,'Nikita Maria\'s interview responses indicate a basic understanding of Google Sheets and related tools, but lack depth and specificity. Her responses are often vague and do not demonstrate a strong command of the skills required for the MIS Analyst role. There is a noticeable absence of detailed examples or insights that align with the job\'s technical demands. To be a strong fit for the role, she would need to provide more comprehensive and detailed responses that showcase her expertise in data analysis and reporting.','Nikita Maria has experience using Google Sheets and Microsoft Excel for data validation and reporting tasks. Her familiarity with pivot tables and basic formulas suggests a foundational understanding of spreadsheet tools. Her mention of cross-validation against different systems indicates an awareness of data accuracy and integrity.','Nikita Maria\'s responses lack depth and specificity, particularly in automating reporting tasks and performing complex data analysis. She does not provide detailed examples or insights into how she has used Google Sheets to derive actionable insights or automate processes. To improve, she should focus on providing specific examples of her work, detailing the tools and techniques used, and the outcomes achieved.','13. Google Sheets:\nScore: 4\n\n14. Data Analysis:\nScore: 0\n\n15. MIS Reporting:\nScore: 4\n\n16. Data Visualization:\nScore: 0\n\n17. Cross-functional Communication:\nScore: 4','18. Google Workspace:\nScore: 0\n\n19. Microsoft Excel:\nScore: 4\n\n20. Google Apps Script:\nScore: 0\n\n21. Time Management:\nScore: 0\n\n22. Process Optimization:\nScore: 0','2025-04-28 10:42:47'),(152,316,196,730,236,'Dileep\'s responses throughout the interview lacked clarity and depth, often deviating from the questions asked. His communication was often unclear, and he struggled to provide detailed examples or articulate his experiences effectively. His technical knowledge, particularly in Google Sheets, data analysis, and MIS reporting, was not demonstrated convincingly. Overall, Dileep\'s performance indicates a need for significant improvement in both soft and hard skills to meet the job requirements.','Dileep demonstrated a basic understanding of using pivot tables in Google Sheets, indicating some familiarity with data summarization. His mention of ensuring data accuracy in reports suggests an awareness of the importance of data integrity.','Dileep\'s responses were often incoherent and lacked structure, making it difficult to assess his true capabilities. His inability to provide specific examples or detailed explanations in response to questions about data analysis, cross-functional communication, and report automation highlighted a lack of depth in his technical skills. His communication style was often unclear, with frequent use of filler words and repetition, which detracted from his overall engagement and effectiveness in the interview.','13. Google Sheets:\nScore: 2\n\n14. Data Analysis:\nScore: 2\n\n15. MIS Reporting:\nScore: 2\n\n16. Data Visualization:\nScore: 2\n\n17. Cross-functional Communication:\nScore: 2','18. Google Workspace:\nScore: 2\n\n19. Microsoft Excel:\nScore: 2\n\n20. Google Apps Script:\nScore: 0\n\n21. Time Management:\nScore: 2\n\n22. Process Optimization:\nScore: 2','2025-04-28 19:20:33'),(153,317,4,745,236,'Gagan\'s responses in the interview lacked depth and specificity, which is crucial for the role of an MIS Analyst. His answers were often short and did not demonstrate the required expertise in key areas such as Google Sheets, data analysis, and MIS reporting. His inability to elaborate on his experiences and provide detailed examples suggests a gap in the necessary skills and experience for the position. Based on the evaluation, Gagan does not meet the expectations for the role, and it is recommended not to proceed with his application.','Gagan demonstrated some familiarity with using Google Workspace tools, as he mentioned using Google Slides and Docs for creating presentations and documents. This indicates a basic understanding of these tools, which can be beneficial for reporting and communication tasks.','Gagan\'s responses were often vague and lacked the necessary detail to showcase his problem-solving skills and technical expertise. For instance, his explanation of using advanced formulas in Google Sheets was superficial, and he was unable to provide examples of data analysis influencing business decisions. Additionally, his inability to discuss cross-functional collaboration and process optimization highlights areas where he needs significant improvement. Gagan should focus on gaining practical experience and developing a deeper understanding of these critical skills.','13. Google Sheets:\nScore: 3\n\n14. Data Analysis:\nScore: 3\n\n15. MIS Reporting:\nScore: 2\n\n16. Data Visualization:\nScore: 2\n\n17. Cross-functional Communication:\nScore: 2','18. Google Workspace:\nScore: 4\n\n19. Microsoft Excel:\nScore: 0\n\n20. Google Apps Script:\nScore: 0\n\n21. Time Management:\nScore: 0\n\n22. Process Optimization:\nScore: 0','2025-04-29 04:27:37'),(172,321,195,729,236,'Vineet Kumar\'s responses in the interview lacked depth and clarity, often failing to align with the benchmark responses. His communication was unclear, and he did not demonstrate sufficient technical knowledge or problem-solving skills required for the role of an MIS Analyst. The responses were often incomplete or irrelevant, indicating a need for improvement in both soft and hard skills. Based on this evaluation, Vineet Kumar does not meet the requirements for the position.','Vineet Kumar showed a basic understanding of Google Sheets and mentioned having three years of experience, which suggests some familiarity with the tool. However, his responses did not provide specific examples or insights into how he applied this knowledge effectively in his previous roles.','Vineet Kumar\'s responses were often vague and lacked the necessary detail to demonstrate his skills and experience. For instance, his explanation of using Google Sheets for data analysis was unclear and did not showcase any specific techniques or outcomes. Additionally, his communication style was not engaging, and he frequently failed to address the questions directly, indicating a need for improvement in articulation and problem-solving skills.','13. Google Sheets:\nScore: 2\n\n14. Data Analysis:\nScore: 1\n\n15. MIS Reporting:\nScore: 1\n\n16. Data Visualization:\nScore: 1\n\n17. Cross-functional Communication:\nScore: 1','18. Google Workspace:\nScore: 1\n\n19. Microsoft Excel:\nScore: 1\n\n20. Google Apps Script:\nScore: 1\n\n21. Time Management:\nScore: 0\n\n22. Process Optimization:\nScore: 1','2025-04-29 18:33:24'),(173,312,212,746,236,'Nikita Maria demonstrated a solid understanding of data management and reporting processes, particularly in healthcare settings. However, her responses often lacked depth in technical skills specific to the job description, such as Google Sheets automation and Google Apps Script. While she showed strong communication and collaboration skills, her technical expertise in tools like Google Sheets and Excel was not fully demonstrated. Her ability to articulate her experiences was good, but she could improve by providing more detailed examples and showcasing her problem-solving skills more effectively. Recommendation','Nikita Maria excelled in communication and collaboration, particularly in cross-functional team settings. Her experience in creating SOPs and using Google Workspace tools like Docs and Drive for documentation and collaboration was well-articulated. She also demonstrated a good understanding of data validation and cleaning processes, which are crucial for maintaining data integrity.','Nikita Maria\'s responses lacked depth in technical skills like Google Sheets automation and Google Apps Script, which are critical for the MIS Analyst role. Her explanation of using pivot tables and macros was basic, and she did not provide detailed examples of using advanced features like Power Query in Excel. To improve, she could focus on gaining hands-on experience with these tools and providing more detailed examples of her problem-solving and analytical skills.','13. Google Sheets:\nScore: 5\n\n14. Data Analysis:\nScore: 6\n\n15. MIS Reporting:\nScore: 5\n\n16. Data Visualization:\nScore: 6\n\n17. Cross-functional Communication:\nScore: 8','18. Google Workspace:\nScore: 7\n\n19. Microsoft Excel:\nScore: 5\n\n20. Google Apps Script:\nScore: 3\n\n21. Time Management:\nScore: 6\n\n22. Process Optimization:\nScore: 5','2025-04-29 18:41:12'),(175,320,196,747,237,'Dileep demonstrates a basic understanding of Google Sheets and data analysis but lacks depth in articulating his experiences and skills. His responses often lack specificity and fail to showcase advanced technical knowledge or problem-solving skills. His communication style is somewhat repetitive and lacks clarity, which affects the overall engagement and effectiveness of his responses. While he shows some familiarity with tools like Google Workspace, his explanations are often vague and could benefit from more detailed examples and insights.','Dileep shows a basic understanding of Google Sheets and its functionalities, such as pivot tables and data summarization. He also demonstrates a willingness to collaborate with other departments to resolve data discrepancies, indicating some level of cross-functional communication skills.','Dileep\'s responses often lack depth and specificity, particularly in areas like data analysis and report automation. His communication style is repetitive, and he struggles to articulate his thoughts clearly, impacting his overall engagement. He could improve by providing more detailed examples and showcasing a deeper understanding of technical skills like Google Apps Script and process optimization.','13. Google Sheets:\nScore: 5\n\n14. Data Analysis:\nScore: 4\n\n15. MIS Reporting:\nScore: 4\n\n16. Data Validation:\nScore: 4\n\n17. Cross-functional Communication:\nScore: 5','18. Google Workspace:\nScore: 5\n\n19. Google Apps Script:\nScore: 3\n\n20. Microsoft Excel:\nScore: 4\n\n21. Process Optimization:\nScore: 4\n\n22. Time Management:\nScore: 4','2025-04-30 12:10:00'),(176,321,195,729,236,'Vineet Kumar\'s responses lacked depth and specificity, which is crucial for the role of an MIS Analyst. His answers were often vague and did not demonstrate a strong command of the required skills, such as Google Sheets, data analysis, and reporting. While he has some experience, his inability to articulate specific examples or processes suggests a need for further development in both soft and hard skills. Based on this evaluation, it is recommended to consider other candidates who can better demonstrate the required expertise and communication skills.','Vineet Kumar showed some familiarity with Google Sheets and mentioned using macros in Excel, indicating a basic understanding of automation in reporting tasks. His experience as an MIS Executive suggests he has been exposed to relevant tasks, even if not articulated well during the interview.','Vineet Kumar\'s responses were often incomplete or lacked the necessary detail to assess his capabilities effectively. For example, his explanation of using Google Sheets for data analysis was insufficient, and he failed to provide specific examples of how he managed or optimized reporting processes. His communication style was unclear, and he struggled to express his thoughts coherently, which is critical for the role.','13. Google Sheets:\nScore: 3\n\n14. Data Analysis:\nScore: 2\n\n15. MIS Reporting:\nScore: 2\n\n16. Data Visualization:\nScore: 2\n\n17. Cross-functional Communication:\nScore: 2','18. Google Workspace:\nScore: 2\n\n19. Microsoft Excel:\nScore: 3\n\n20. Google Apps Script:\nScore: 2\n\n21. Time Management:\nScore: 0\n\n22. Process Optimization:\nScore: 0','2025-04-30 13:03:37'),(177,322,206,740,236,'Ayub\'s interview responses lacked depth and relevance to the job role of an MIS Analyst. His answers were often incomplete or unrelated to the questions, indicating a lack of preparation or understanding of the role\'s requirements. The absence of detailed responses in critical areas such as Google Sheets, data analysis, and MIS reporting suggests a significant gap in the necessary skills and experience. Based on the evaluation, Ayub does not demonstrate the required competencies for the position.','Ayub\'s resume indicates experience with Excel and data management, which aligns with the job requirements. His past roles suggest a familiarity with creating and managing MIS reports, which could be a potential strength if demonstrated effectively in the interview.','Ayub\'s responses were often incomplete or irrelevant, such as providing URLs or unrelated phrases instead of addressing the questions. For example, his response to data analysis and Google Sheets questions lacked any mention of specific tools or techniques he used. To improve, Ayub should focus on providing detailed examples from his experience that directly relate to the job description.','13. Google Sheets:\nScore: 0\n\n14. Data Analysis:\nScore: 0\n\n15. MIS Reporting:\nScore: 0\n\n16. Data Visualization:\nScore: 0\n\n17. Cross-functional Communication:\nScore: 0','18. Google Workspace:\nScore: 0\n\n19. Microsoft Excel:\nScore: 0\n\n20. Google Apps Script:\nScore: 0\n\n21. Time Management:\nScore: 0\n\n22. Process Optimization:\nScore: 0','2025-04-30 17:09:15'),(178,323,206,750,237,'Ayub\'s performance in the interview was below expectations. His responses lacked depth and clarity, often failing to align with the benchmark responses. He struggled to provide detailed examples or demonstrate a comprehensive understanding of the skills required for the role. His communication was often unclear, and he frequently failed to address the questions directly. Overall, Ayub\'s responses did not showcase the necessary expertise or experience for the MIS Analyst position. Recommendation','Ayub demonstrated some familiarity with Google Sheets, mentioning his experience with formulas like VLOOKUP and HLOOKUP. His response to collaborating with the Accounts Department showed some understanding of cross-functional communication, indicating his ability to work with other teams.','Ayub\'s responses were often incomplete or off-topic, such as when he failed to address questions about data analysis and problem-solving. His communication lacked clarity, and he frequently did not provide detailed or relevant examples. For instance, his response to handling inconsistent data was entirely unrelated to the question. Ayub needs to improve his ability to articulate his thoughts and provide comprehensive answers to technical questions.','13. Google Sheets:\nScore: 4\n\n14. Data Analysis:\nScore: 2\n\n15. MIS Reporting:\nScore: 2\n\n16. Data Validation:\nScore: 2\n\n17. Cross-functional Communication:\nScore: 4','18. Google Workspace:\nScore: 2\n\n19. Google Apps Script:\nScore: 2\n\n20. Microsoft Excel:\nScore: 4\n\n21. Process Optimization:\nScore: 2\n\n22. Time Management:\nScore: 2','2025-04-30 17:30:47'),(186,326,225,767,246,'Manjul\'s responses in the interview lacked depth and specificity, particularly in areas critical to the nursing role, such as infection control, documentation, and patient assessment. The responses often did not align with the benchmark expectations, indicating a need for improvement in articulating experiences and knowledge. Manjul\'s communication was not clear or detailed, which is essential for effective patient care and teamwork in a healthcare setting. Based on the evaluation, Manjul may not be the best fit for the role without further development in these areas.','Manjul demonstrated a basic understanding of the importance of infection control and the need to involve seniors in critical situations, as seen in the response to handling an allergic reaction. This indicates a foundational awareness of protocol adherence and seeking guidance when necessary.','Manjul\'s responses often lacked depth and specificity, such as in the infection control scenario and patient assessment. For instance, the response to infection control was vague and did not demonstrate a clear understanding of specific protocols or actions taken. Additionally, the response to documentation was off-topic, indicating a need for improvement in staying focused on the question asked.','13. Clinical Nursing Skills:\nScore: 2\n\n14. Patient Assessment:\nScore: 0\n\n15. Medication Administration:\nScore: 2\n\n16. Infection Control:\nScore: 2\n\n17. Documentation and Record Keeping:\nScore: 0','18. Communication Skills:\nScore: 2\n\n19. Teamwork and Collaboration:\nScore: 2\n\n20. Emergency Response:\nScore: 2\n\n21. Customer Service:\nScore: 2\n\n22. Problem Solving and Decision Making:\nScore: 2','2025-05-08 07:07:12'),(193,325,225,767,246,'Manjul\'s responses during the interview lacked depth and specificity, which is crucial for a nursing role. The responses often did not align with the benchmark expectations, indicating a need for improvement in both soft and hard skills. Manjul\'s ability to articulate detailed experiences and demonstrate comprehensive knowledge in key nursing areas was limited. Based on the evaluation, it is recommended to reconsider the selection, as the responses did not meet the required standards for the role.','Manjul demonstrated a basic understanding of the importance of infection control in emergency scenarios, indicating awareness of critical healthcare protocols. This shows some foundational knowledge of infection control, which is essential in nursing roles.','Manjul\'s responses were often incomplete or lacked the necessary detail, such as in the documentation and patient assessment questions. For example, when asked about documentation, the response was irrelevant, and there was no demonstration of structured record-keeping practices. Additionally, the response to handling allergic reactions was vague and did not outline specific steps or protocols. Improvement is needed in articulating detailed, relevant experiences and showcasing comprehensive knowledge in nursing practices.','13. Clinical Nursing Skills:\nScore: 2\n\n14. Patient Assessment:\nScore: 0\n\n15. Medication Administration:\nScore: 0\n\n16. Infection Control:\nScore: 2\n\n17. Documentation and Record Keeping:\nScore: 0','18. Communication Skills:\nScore: 2\n\n19. Teamwork and Collaboration:\nScore: 0\n\n20. Emergency Response:\nScore: 2\n\n21. Customer Service:\nScore: 0\n\n22. Problem Solving and Decision Making:\nScore: 0','2025-05-08 07:17:54'),(194,325,225,767,246,'Manjul\'s interview responses lacked depth and detail, which is crucial for a nursing role that demands strong communication and problem-solving skills. Her responses were often incomplete or irrelevant, failing to demonstrate the necessary knowledge and experience required for the position. The lack of detailed examples and clarity in her answers suggests a need for improvement in both soft and hard skills. Based on this evaluation, Manjul may not be the best fit for the role at this time.','Manjul\'s response to the allergic reaction scenario showed some understanding of the importance of involving senior staff in critical situations. This indicates a basic awareness of protocol and teamwork in emergency scenarios.','Manjul\'s responses were often incomplete or irrelevant, such as her answer about documentation which did not address the question. Her inability to provide detailed examples or demonstrate knowledge in infection control, patient assessment, and medication administration highlights a significant gap in her skills. Improving her ability to articulate experiences and understanding of nursing protocols would be beneficial.','13. Clinical Nursing Skills:\nScore: 2\n\n14. Patient Assessment:\nScore: 2\n\n15. Medication Administration:\nScore: 2\n\n16. Infection Control:\nScore: 2\n\n17. Documentation and Record Keeping:\nScore: 2','18. Communication Skills:\nScore: 3\n\n19. Teamwork and Collaboration:\nScore: 3\n\n20. Emergency Response:\nScore: 3\n\n21. Customer Service:\nScore: 3\n\n22. Problem Solving and Decision Making:\nScore: 2','2025-05-08 07:18:26'),(195,326,225,767,246,'Manjul demonstrated a basic understanding of nursing practices, but her responses lacked depth and specificity. Her communication was often unclear, and she struggled to articulate her thoughts effectively. While she showed some awareness of procedures, her inability to detail them accurately suggests a need for further training and experience. Her responses were often vague, indicating a lack of confidence and comprehensive knowledge. Based on this evaluation, Manjul may need more experience and training before being considered for the role.','Manjul showed a basic understanding of patient assessment, mentioning the importance of checking vitals and assessing psychological status. Her initial approach to patient interaction by introducing herself and explaining procedures indicates a foundational understanding of patient care.','Manjul\'s responses were often vague and lacked the necessary detail to demonstrate proficiency. For example, her inability to articulate the \"11 rites of medication\" suggests a gap in her medication administration knowledge. Her communication style was often unclear, and she struggled with articulation, which hindered her ability to convey her thoughts effectively.','13. Clinical Nursing Skills:\nScore: 3\n\n14. Patient Assessment:\nScore: 4\n\n15. Medication Administration:\nScore: 2\n\n16. Infection Control:\nScore: 3\n\n17. Documentation and Record Keeping:\nScore: 3','18. Communication Skills:\nScore: 3\n\n19. Teamwork and Collaboration:\nScore: 3\n\n20. Emergency Response:\nScore: 2\n\n21. Customer Service:\nScore: 3\n\n22. Problem Solving and Decision Making:\nScore: 2','2025-05-08 17:05:47'),(196,326,225,767,246,'Manjul demonstrated basic knowledge and understanding of nursing practices but lacked depth in several critical areas. Her responses were often vague and lacked the specificity needed to showcase her expertise. While she showed some understanding of procedures, her inability to articulate steps clearly and provide detailed examples was evident. Her communication skills need improvement to ensure clarity and effectiveness in a healthcare setting. Overall, Manjul needs to enhance her technical knowledge and communication skills to be a better fit for the role.','Manjul showed a basic understanding of the nursing process, such as obtaining verbal consent and acknowledging patients. Her response to infection control, although brief, indicated awareness of emergency scenarios where infection control is critical.','Manjul\'s responses lacked depth and specificity, particularly in medication administration and patient assessment. For instance, she was unable to articulate the 11 rights of medication administration clearly. Her response to handling allergic reactions was insufficient, lacking detailed steps and critical thinking. Improving her ability to provide detailed, structured answers would enhance her competency.','13. Clinical Nursing Skills:\nScore: 4\n\n14. Patient Assessment:\nScore: 3\n\n15. Medication Administration:\nScore: 2\n\n16. Infection Control:\nScore: 4\n\n17. Documentation and Record Keeping:\nScore: 3','18. Communication Skills:\nScore: 4\n\n19. Teamwork and Collaboration:\nScore: 4\n\n20. Emergency Response:\nScore: 3\n\n21. Customer Service:\nScore: 4\n\n22. Problem Solving and Decision Making:\nScore: 3','2025-05-09 08:01:28'),(197,326,225,767,246,'Manjul\'s responses in the interview indicate a basic understanding of nursing practices but lack depth and specificity. Her communication skills need improvement, particularly in articulating her thoughts clearly and confidently. While she demonstrates some awareness of nursing protocols, her responses often lack the detail and structure expected for the role. Her inability to provide specific examples or elaborate on her experiences suggests a need for further development in both soft and hard skills. Based on this assessment, I would not recommend her for the position at this time.','Manjul shows a basic understanding of patient assessment and the importance of initial nursing assessments. Her response about checking vitals and assessing psychological status indicates awareness of comprehensive patient care. She also recognizes the importance of infection control in emergency scenarios, highlighting her awareness of critical nursing responsibilities.','Manjul\'s responses often lack depth and specificity, particularly in areas like medication administration and infection control. For example, her inability to articulate the \"11 rights of medication\" or provide specific steps taken during infection control scenarios indicates a need for further training. Her communication skills also require improvement, as her responses are often fragmented and lack clarity.','13. Clinical Nursing Skills:\nScore: 3\n\n14. Patient Assessment:\nScore: 4\n\n15. Medication Administration:\nScore: 2\n\n16. Infection Control:\nScore: 3\n\n17. Documentation and Record Keeping:\nScore: 0','18. Communication Skills:\nScore: 3\n\n19. Teamwork and Collaboration:\nScore: 0\n\n20. Emergency Response:\nScore: 2\n\n21. Customer Service:\nScore: 0\n\n22. Problem Solving and Decision Making:\nScore: 2','2025-05-09 08:13:32'),(198,329,4,782,251,'Varun\'s responses during the interview lacked depth and specificity, particularly in technical areas crucial for a Desktop Support Engineer role. His answers were often brief and did not demonstrate a comprehensive understanding of the required skills. Varun\'s communication was unclear, and he failed to articulate his thoughts effectively, which is essential for client interactions and troubleshooting tasks. Based on the responses, Varun does not meet the expectations for the role, and I would not recommend him for selection.','Varun\'s resume indicates proficiency in Microsoft Office tools, which could be beneficial for documentation tasks. His experience in data management and reporting might be advantageous for maintaining records and generating reports.','Varun\'s responses lacked technical depth, particularly in areas like Windows updates, troubleshooting, and network security. For example, his response to automating Windows updates was vague and did not mention any specific tools or processes. Additionally, his communication style was unclear, as seen in his response to network security, which was not relevant to the question. Varun could improve by providing detailed, structured answers and demonstrating a better understanding of technical concepts.','13. Desktop Support:\nScore: 2\n\n14. Windows Operating System Administration:\nScore: 2\n\n15. IT Hardware Troubleshooting:\nScore: 2\n\n16. Basic Networking:\nScore: 2\n\n17. Customer Service:\nScore: 2','18. Linux/Mac OS Support:\nScore: 0\n\n19. Office Automation Tools:\nScore: 4\n\n20. Network Security Fundamentals:\nScore: 0\n\n21. Remote Troubleshooting:\nScore: 2\n\n22. Documentation Skills:\nScore: 4','2025-05-22 11:12:55'),(199,330,229,776,251,'Bhagirath Ram\'s interview performance was incomplete due to missing responses, which makes it challenging to fully assess his fit for the role. His initial response was brief and lacked engagement, and he did not provide any information on his desktop support experience. This absence of responses significantly impacts the evaluation of his communication skills and technical expertise. Without detailed answers, it\'s difficult to gauge his problem-solving abilities, adaptability, or technical knowledge. Based on the limited interaction, it is recommended to seek additional information or conduct a follow-up interview to better assess his qualifications.','Bhagirath Ram\'s initial response was polite and acknowledged the interviewer\'s question, indicating a basic level of engagement. However, due to the lack of further responses, no specific strengths related to the job role can be identified.','The primary weakness is the absence of responses to key questions, which prevents an assessment of his technical skills and experience. To improve, Bhagirath Ram should provide detailed examples of his desktop support experience, showcasing his problem-solving skills and technical knowledge. Engaging more actively in the conversation would also enhance his communication evaluation.','13. Desktop Support:\nScore: 0\n\n14. Windows Operating System Administration:\nScore: 0\n\n15. IT Hardware Troubleshooting:\nScore: 0\n\n16. Basic Networking:\nScore: 0\n\n17. Customer Service:\nScore: 0','18. Linux/Mac OS Support:\nScore: 0\n\n19. Office Automation Tools:\nScore: 0\n\n20. Network Security Fundamentals:\nScore: 0\n\n21. Remote Troubleshooting:\nScore: 0\n\n22. Documentation Skills:\nScore: 0','2025-05-22 14:12:08'),(218,332,226,773,251,'Sunil Kumar demonstrated a basic understanding of desktop support tasks, including troubleshooting hardware and software issues. However, his responses often lacked depth and clarity, which is crucial for the role. While he has some relevant experience, his communication skills need improvement to effectively convey technical information. His knowledge of specific processes, such as automating updates and network security, was not thoroughly articulated. Overall, Sunil shows potential but requires further development in both soft and hard skills to meet the job requirements effectively.','Sunil has hands-on experience with various operating systems, including Windows and Linux, which is evident from his responses. He has practical knowledge of hardware troubleshooting, such as replacing hard drives and upgrading RAM, which aligns with the job requirements. His ability to handle common desktop support issues like printer connectivity and system slowness is a positive aspect of his skill set.','Sunil\'s communication lacks clarity and structure, often making it difficult to follow his thought process. For example, his explanation of troubleshooting a non-starting desktop was disorganized and lacked a clear step-by-step approach. His responses to questions about network security and automating updates were vague and did not demonstrate a comprehensive understanding. Improving his articulation and providing more detailed, structured responses would enhance his effectiveness in the role.','13. Desktop Support:\nScore: 5\n\n14. Windows Operating System Administration:\nScore: 5\n\n15. IT Hardware Troubleshooting:\nScore: 5\n\n16. Basic Networking:\nScore: 4\n\n17. Customer Service:\nScore: 4','18. Linux/Mac OS Support:\nScore: 4\n\n19. Office Automation Tools:\nScore: 4\n\n20. Network Security Fundamentals:\nScore: 3\n\n21. Remote Troubleshooting:\nScore: 4\n\n22. Documentation Skills:\nScore: 3','2025-05-26 17:27:25'),(220,338,4,627,181,'Varun did not provide any response to the initial question, which is a missed opportunity to establish rapport and demonstrate communication skills. This lack of engagement is concerning for a role that requires effective communication and interaction with stakeholders. Varun\'s silence does not allow for an assessment of his fit for the Business Analyst position, which demands strong analytical and communication skills. Based on this interaction, it is difficult to recommend Varun for the role without further evidence of his capabilities.','None identified due to lack of response.','Varun\'s lack of response indicates a potential weakness in engagement and communication, which are critical for the Business Analyst role. This could be improved by actively participating in the conversation and providing thoughtful responses to questions.','13. - requirements gathering:\nScore: 0\n\n14. - process mapping:\nScore: 0\n\n15. - product owner:\nScore: 0\n\n16. - product owner skills:\nScore: 0\n\n17. - data analysis:\nScore: 0','18. - use case:\nScore: 0\n\n19. - use case development:\nScore: 0\n\n20. - prototyping and wireframing:\nScore: 0\n\n21. - continuous improvement frameworks:\nScore: 0\n\n22. - customer journey mapping:\nScore: 0','2025-05-27 17:59:38'),(221,335,233,780,251,'Vikash Kumar demonstrated a basic understanding of desktop support and related technical skills. However, his responses often lacked depth and clarity, which are crucial for the role. His communication skills need improvement, especially in articulating his thoughts clearly and concisely. Vikash should focus on providing more detailed and structured responses to showcase his problem-solving abilities and technical knowledge effectively. Based on the interview, Vikash may not be the best fit for the role at this time.','Vikash Kumar has experience in handling a significant number of users and systems, as mentioned in his response to Q1. He also shows some understanding of basic troubleshooting, as seen in Q3, where he mentioned checking power sources and connections.','Vikash Kumar\'s responses often lacked detail and clarity, as seen in Q2 and Q5, where he provided very brief and vague answers. He needs to improve his ability to articulate his thoughts and provide structured, detailed explanations. Additionally, his understanding of network security and Linux/Mac OS support appears limited, as evidenced by his responses to Q10 and Q11.','13. Desktop Support:\nScore: 5\n\n14. Windows Operating System Administration:\nScore: 4\n\n15. IT Hardware Troubleshooting:\nScore: 5\n\n16. Basic Networking:\nScore: 4\n\n17. Customer Service:\nScore: 4','18. Linux/Mac OS Support:\nScore: 2\n\n19. Office Automation Tools:\nScore: 3\n\n20. Network Security Fundamentals:\nScore: 3\n\n21. Remote Troubleshooting:\nScore: 4\n\n22. Documentation Skills:\nScore: 3','2025-05-29 02:17:10'),